[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Utopian Visionaries Who Won’t Leave People Alone

No - no - no Ain'T going To get away with iT

Pete Buttplug's Butt Plugger Trying to Turn Kids into Faggots

Mark Levin: I'm sick and tired of these attacks

Questioning the Big Bang

James Webb Data Contradicts the Big Bang

Pssst! Don't tell the creationists, but scientists don't have a clue how life began

A fine romance: how humans and chimps just couldn't let go

Early humans had sex with chimps

O’Keefe dons bulletproof vest to extract undercover journalist from NGO camp.

Biblical Contradictions (Alleged)

Catholic Church Praising Lucifer

Raising the Knife

One Of The HARDEST Videos I Had To Make..

Houthi rebels' attack severely damages a Belize-flagged ship in key strait leading to the Red Sea (British Ship)

Chinese Illegal Alien. I'm here for the moneuy

Red Tides Plague Gulf Beaches

Tucker Carlson calls out Nikki Haley, Ben Shapiro, and every other person calling for war:

{Are there 7 Deadly Sins?} I’ve heard people refer to the “7 Deadly Sins,” but I haven’t been able to find that sort of list in Scripture.

Abomination of Desolation | THEORY, BIBLE STUDY

Bible Help

Libertysflame Database Updated

Crush EVERYONE with the Alien Gambit!

Vladimir Putin tells Tucker Carlson US should stop arming Ukraine to end war

Putin hints Moscow and Washington in back-channel talks in revealing Tucker Carlson interview

Trump accuses Fulton County DA Fani Willis of lying in court response to Roman's motion

Mandatory anti-white racism at Disney.

Iceland Volcano Erupts For Third Time In 2 Months, State Of Emergency Declared

Tucker Carlson Interview with Vladamir Putin

How will Ar Mageddon / WW III End?

What on EARTH is going on in Acts 16:11? New Discovery!

2023 Hottest in over 120 Million Years

2024 and beyond in prophecy

Questions

This Speech Just Broke the Internet

This AMAZING Math Formula Will Teach You About God!

The GOSPEL of the ALIENS | Fallen Angels | Giants | Anunnaki

The IMAGE of the BEAST Revealed (REV 13) - WARNING: Not for Everyone

WEF Calls for AI to Replace Voters: ‘Why Do We Need Elections?’

The OCCULT Burger king EXPOSED

PANERA BREAD Antichrist message EXPOSED

The OCCULT Cheesecake Factory EXPOSED

Satanist And Witches Encounter The Cross

History and Beliefs of the Waldensians

Rome’s Persecution of the Bible

Evolutionists, You’ve Been Caught Lying About Fossils

Raw Streets of NYC Migrant Crisis that they don't show on Tv

Meet DarkBERT - AI Model Trained On DARK WEB

[NEW!] Jaw-dropping 666 Discovery Utterly Proves the King James Bible is God's Preserved Word

ALERT!!! THE MOST IMPORTANT INFORMATION WILL SOON BE POSTED HERE


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Corrupt Government
See other Corrupt Government Articles

Title: If A Picture is Worth a Thousand Words, Then What Do These Memes Say? (Parts VIII & I)
Source: The Potters Clay
URL Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pa6ulv9aQno
Published: Oct 10, 2018
Author: The Potters Clay
Post Date: 2019-10-07 12:02:10 by Liberator
Keywords: Truth, Memes, Hmmm
Views: 45557
Comments: 340

A little Meme action...
If you haven't seen them, checkout the rest!

A Flat Earth Picture is Worth a Thousand Words - Part I
https://youtu.be/ptar5YtS_Sk

A Flat Earth Picture is Worth A Thousand Words - Part II
https://youtu.be/FchgUVA4SxE

A Flat Earth Picture is Worth a Thousand Words - Part III
https://youtu.be/Kth6X1g7bWk

A Flat Earth Picture is Worth a Thousand Words - Part IV
https://youtu.be/eVk3DIwf66c

A Flat Earth Picture is Worth a Thousand Words - Part V
https://youtu.be/qJAsGkP99rg

A Flat Earth Picture is Worth a Thousand Words - Part VI
https://youtu.be/z2a6g-nfQRU

A Flat Earth Picture is Worth a Thousand Words - Part VII
https://youtu.be/9Xsh2LJ1SvY

A Flat Earth Picture is Worth a Thousand Words - Part IX
https://youtu.be/X-D54GbpPjQ


Poster Comment:

Get bored easily? No time to watch long videos? MEMES TO THE RESCUE! Short & Sweet.

These are found at a Christian You Tube called, 'The Potters Clay'...

These are REALLY good. Fun stuff. I promise. Spectacular AND clever. It doesn't matter what your core belief is; you will come upon several memes that will stop you dead in your tracks and challenge you.

(STRONG SUGGESTION: To adjust and slow these memes down, go to your YouTube 'Settings', then adjust 'Playback Speed to .75. It will give you more time to contemplate the meme, since they move along pretty fast.)

When you have the time, please give them all a look; I consider them a crash-course in Earth-Science Truth, Logic, and Reason.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 31.

#12. To: Liberator (#0)

When you have the time, please give them all a look; I consider them a crash-course in Earth-Science Truth, Logic, and Reason.

I watched both. I find them, to varying degrees, flawed.

I'm not willing to rehash the science, at least right now. But setting science aside, I'd just speak to the conspiracy factor. If the earth is flat, then it's an absolutely enormous conspiracy going back some 15 generations to perpetuate this round earth lie. And the number of people that would have to be in on it in this day and age is huge. Not just NASA and astronomers, but meteorologists, navigators, and even satellite TV equipment manufactures.

Every parent knows how it is, and so does everyone who's ever been a kid. If you tell one lie, you later have to tell another lie to cover up for your first lie. And then a 3rd lie to cover for the second. It goes on and on and eventually the whole house of cards collapses under its own weight.

If the earth is flat, then the lie about the earth being round amounts to an absolute huge house of cards. Then again, I guess you would counter that the house has collapsed. For you. Fact is though, it's only collapsed for a tiny fraction of people. If you were right, this would have fallen over a very long time ago.

And that's even ignoring the question of what perpetuating this round earth theory was ever supposed to achieve in the first place. If it was to marginalize the story of Genesis in the Bible, then they could have done that in any number of other ways that would be safe from being disproved, unlike something so basic as the shape of the earth.

Pinguinite  posted on  2019-10-09   0:50:27 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: Pinguinite (#12)

I watched both. I find them, to varying degrees, flawed.

Thanks for checking them out.

Some of the memes aren't going to be A+. But some of them are.

(Which meme or memes did you find "flawed" btw?)

...Setting science aside, I'd just speak to the conspiracy factor. If the earth is flat, then it's an absolutely enormous conspiracy going back some 15 generations to perpetuate this round earth lie.

I think we can both agree that acceptance of Globe Earth was first making headway near the time of Galileo and Copernicus, which would have been @ the 1500s. It was not fully accepted by a consensus until the mid-1800s -- at coincidentally the same time "institutional Science" (controlled by certain Elites with an agenda) was insisting that "Evolution" was fact AND that Dinosaurs were older than Man.

By the late 1800s and early 1900s Globe Earth was still being challenged strongly, believe it or not...

The is is now a Publisher called, 'Dead Authors Society' that enables one to purchase a plethora of re-released old books. I'd read, 'Terra Firma: The Earth Not A Plane, Proved From Scripture, Reason, and Fact' (Author: David Wardlaw Scott). It was published in 1903.

What especially fascinating about the book and perspective as written is the degree of knowledge about our realm -- even in 1903 -- style of writing, ideological and scientific battles at that time being waged over how our world should be perceived.

(I think you and others would find it a great read.)

Regarding any difficulty in catapulting any so-called, "Conspiracies" -- well, it's been quite easy. Institutional Science via schools were co-opted, where they *still* manage to convince the public via these secular humanist schools that 'Evolution' and 'Stone Age Man' is indeed a "Fact" -- even though it's been proven impossible.

Regarding our realm, Institutional Science and its cabal have simply rigged the system and what they insist are "natural laws" like "gravity", formulas like "the theory of relativity" and one that explains earth "curvature" -- ALL of which not only remain 'theories' but are proven false.

The number of people that would have to be in on it in this day and age is huge. Not just NASA and astronomers, but meteorologists, navigators, and even satellite TV equipment manufactures.

Right. And many *would* tell you they already *know* the truth of the matter (or risk ostracization and unemployment. *I* can't believe even how much *I* assumed and denied of my own eyes.)

Many of those memes can't be denied, btw. There are 8 more Meme Vids that provide further food for thought and additional "scientific" and observational contradictions FWIW.

Every parent knows how it is, and so does everyone who's ever been a kid. If you tell one lie, you later have to tell another lie to cover up for your first lie. And then a 3rd lie to cover for the second. It goes on and on and eventually the whole house of cards collapses under its own weight.

True. And Globe Earth remain the biggest, clearest case of adulthood Easter Bunny and Santa Claus (besides, 'Evolution, 'Big Bang', and "We from the Gummint and here to help.")

If the earth is flat, then the lie about the earth being round amounts to an absolute huge house of cards. Then again, I guess you would counter that the house has collapsed. For you. Fact is though, it's only collapsed for a tiny fraction of people. If you were right, this would have fallen over a very long time ago.

Aye-aye on all the above. (Except your last statement; The reason the PTB are freaking out about Flat Earth/NASA is...Knowledge of the truth is growing exponentially...And collapsing like many other things we've been told is "the truth.")

And that's even ignoring the question of what perpetuating this round earth theory was ever supposed to achieve in the first place.

(The Big Picture: please see my Post #17)

If it was to marginalize the story of Genesis in the Bible, then they could have done that in any number of other ways that would be safe from being disproved, unlike something so basic as the shape of the earth.

FWIW, besides Genesis, the shape of the Earth is also discussed in Psalms, Job, and Isaiah.

But to your premise, multiple civilizations for thousands of years had already presumed its shape not only to be Flat, but having a Dome or Firmament over it. I didn't make that up; That's a fact. Again, "Globe/Ball" earth has only been advanced as a theory since the 1500s, and "fact" only since the mid-1800s.

Liberator  posted on  2019-10-11   11:47:08 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: Liberator (#20)

But to your premise, multiple civilizations for thousands of years had already presumed its shape not only to be Flat, but having a Dome or Firmament over it.

This is all I see fit to respond to, with I'll do with a simple "of course". Anyone looking over long distances will have the impression the land is flat, with the exception of ships sailing over the horizon which might be mistaken for disappearing in the distant mist.

There's no reason ancients living thousands of years ago should be considered a scientific authority. If we don't consider them an authority when they said that all matter could be subcategorized into one of: Earth, Air, Fire & Water, and if they didn't understand even basic things air pressure, bacteria, steam engines and the like, then why would or should they be considered an authority on the shape of the earth?

Pinguinite  posted on  2019-10-11   14:01:21 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: Pinguinite, ALL (#21)

There's no reason ancients living thousands of years ago should be considered a scientific authority. If we don't consider them an authority when they said that all matter could be subcategorized into one of: Earth, Air, Fire & Water...

....and if they didn't understand even basic things air pressure, bacteria, steam engines and the like, then why would or should they be considered an authority on the shape of the earth?

Several separate civilizations (or "authorities" of the day) ALL conceptualized similar configurations of our earthly realm as can be seen below. What are the odds?? NONE conceptualized any realm that was remotely a "ball" or globular. These concepts were more accepted even as recently as the 16th century.

The elements of the earth are a whole different category.

Why should the previous 5,000 years of mankind's knowledge of nature and science be invalidated? They weren't scientifically uneducated and ignorant of technology. In many ways it could be said that they were more advanced and regressed after the Fall of the Roman Empire.

What of the Pyramids the world over? All the Chinese and folk herbal remedies and treatment? Roman sewer systems and aqueducts? And so forth.

It really wasn't until the mid-19th century and beyond that man began harnessing "high tech" and discoveries on a macro level. Much of the biological by the mid-20th century.

Why dismiss and invalidate all past civilizations' scientific credibility, discoveries and truth on the basis of realm concepts? Moreover, hasn't "modern science and tech" had to build on past tested scientific evidence, truths and technologies?

"Science" has claimed a "Big Bang" and "Evolution" are "FACT"; Based on what?

At the World's museums "Science" claims a "Prehistoric Man" -- that he indeed evolved from Apes. Based on what? Same of the age of fossils and dinosaur bones. Same of both the age of the Universe and alleged near-infinite size.

By what criteria does "Science" claim "empirical evidence" in any of these cases? (HAVE those theories been supported by any evidence -- as per "Scientific protocols"?

With respect to the actual shape of this earthly realm, I'd mentioned in a prior post that by the turn of the 20th century there was still a big battle raging over the actual shape of the earth.

Serious question to you or anyone else:

By whose authority, by what criteria IS the earth said to definitively be a "globe"? Because IF it's NASA, they and their credibility is already an ongoing problem and challenge. If it's flight, the horizon is proven to rise as flat -- whether the horizon at ocean level, the horizon at cloud-level, "space" at low-altitude balloon level.

Liberator  posted on  2019-10-11   19:34:16 ET  (2 images) Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: Liberator (#22)

By whose authority, by what criteria IS the earth said to definitively be a "globe"? Because IF it's NASA, they and their credibility is already an ongoing problem and challenge. I

You really are big on that "whose authority?" question, and not just on religious topics.

I really don't have the time or inclination to continue on this. Not now. You are wrong on this. I am satisfied that you have chosen to believe the earth is flat, and that the power of that belief overwhelms the physical evidence of a spherical earth that is all around us. So much in this world wouldn't be as it is if the earth was flat, like flying from Chile to New Zealand in 13 hours at commercial jet speeds. That is such a basic piece of evidence that blows flat earth out of the water all by itself. TC posted this vid about the psychological term for describing an inability to accurately understand or comprehend certain subjects. I forget the term. I know I'm terrible at some subjects and good at others. One area I'm good at is math and, as it pertains to the flat earth subject, geometry. If you are not good at spacial comprehension, and it seems you are not, then that's okay. But I can, with full confidence and respect, say to you that you are so very, very wrong in believing the earth is flat. Every single argument for a flat earth falls flat on its face. Every. Single. One.

The power we have to believe things that are not true is one of the most underrated powers known to man. Almost no one appreciates how true that is. And that truism is one reason why I cannot believe that God would judge us on what we believe, rather, what we do with what we believe.

Best to you...

Pinguinite  posted on  2019-10-11   22:56:26 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: Pinguinite (#23) (Edited)

You really are big on that "whose authority?" question, and not just on religious topics.

I am. But aren't you as well? After all, on who or what source shall we base "truth"? (or credibility?)

You are wrong on this...

I could accept your premise -- IF it were based on refutations. But all I ever see is THIS one by you:

...So much in this world wouldn't be as it is if the earth was flat, like flying from Chile to New Zealand in 13 hours at commercial jet speeds. That is such a basic piece of evidence that blows flat earth out of the water all by itself.

It does no such thing. It's been this very same citation of flight times from Chile to New Zealand I keep seeing as THE prima facia "evidence" and a guarantee by you as well as Flat Earth opponents by search engines that our realm is a "Globe." Strange.)

It is on this one basis ALL other evidence to the contrary should be dismissed??

Meanwhile, I've lost count of what must be hundreds of pieces of evidences I've submitted that prove the earth is NOT a "GLOBE," and still you claim, "every single argument for a flat earth falls flat on its face. Every. Single. One."

Why engage in cognitive absolutism without examining the tangible, provable data, science, observations, and facts? Please refute ANY of the memes. Just one.

One area I'm good at is math and, as it pertains to the flat earth subject, geometry.

Alrighty then. Great! Then explain the following geometric out- of-the-way paths this (below).

It is said that Santiago-Sydney flights (close to your examples of Chile to New Zealand, right?) go into the Northern hemisphere making stop-overs at LAX and other North American airports before continuing back down to the Southern hemisphere. Such ridiculously wayward detours make no sense on the globe but make perfect sense and form nearly straight lines when shown on a flat Earth map.

Curious geometry:

(200 Proofs The Earth Is Not A Spinning Ball)

Liberator  posted on  2019-10-12   9:23:27 ET  (1 image) Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: Liberator (#24) (Edited)

After all, on who or what source shall we base "truth"? (or credibility?)

Hasn't God given us logical thinking ability? If he has, we should use it. If he hasn't then nothing we conclude can be held against us.

But all I ever see is THIS one by you:

...So much in this world wouldn't be as it is if the earth was flat, like flying from Chile to New Zealand in 13 hours at commercial jet speeds. That is such a basic piece of evidence that blows flat earth out of the water all by itself.

I've refuted other arguments and even suggested an photo experiment of the moon from our respective geographic locations. The degree of conclusiveness of counterarguments vary. A difference in rotation of the moon is somewhat less than easy understand. A ship disappearing over the horizon depends on a consensus of perception. Navigation discrepancies requiries some knowledge of the art. But the flight mentioned would simply be impossible. It's easy to understand and doesn't depend on exact calculations of time and distance. It doesn't depend on info provided by NASA. It's a flight done directly from South America to NZ &/or Australia. So yes, it's my favorite for all those reasons.

It is on this one basis ALL other evidence to the contrary should be dismissed??

Seeing how arguments about how the sun would change its apparent size drastically on a daily basis, the sun would never be seen going below the horizon (according to the model you've subscribed to) doesn't put a dent in things, then yes.

Meanwhile, I've lost count of what must be hundreds of pieces of evidences I've submitted that prove the earth is NOT a "GLOBE," and still you claim, "every single argument for a flat earth falls flat on its face. Every. Single. One."

At least half of the "hundreds" of pieces of evidence is not evidence at all. It's merely arguments in favor of flat earth theory -- a big difference. And evidence is not proof. A footprint of someone's shoe at a crime scene is not proof the shoe owner was there. But it is evidence in support. An apparent straight line of sight for many miles from one end of a canal to the other is evidence of flat earth. But it is not proof, if the flatness of the canal can be attirbuted to one end being at a higher altitude than the other.

Why engage in cognitive absolutism without examining the tangible, provable data, science, observations, and facts? Please refute ANY of the memes. Just one.

You won't listen. Your mind is made up. But flipping the first vid randomly to 3:50, 6 photos are shown of a guy in some kind of vessel with various images visible out a window. Obviously fake, but who made them? A flat earther? It's not proof of flat earth, or proof of earth being any particular shape at all, whether it be shaped like a globe, pyramid, hour glass, a donut, a beer can, a bull horn, a car piston or any other shape you can imagine. Even if NASA made these, it still wouldn't prove anything about the earth's shape There, you have one.

It is said that Santiago-Sydney flights (close to your examples of Chile to New Zealand, right?) go into the Northern hemisphere making stop-overs at LAX and other North American airports before continuing back down to the Southern hemisphere. Such ridiculously wayward detours make no sense on the globe but make perfect sense and form nearly straight lines when shown on a flat Earth map.

Simple. They have little to do with geometry, and everything to do with the fact that a lot of people boarding in Chile are going to both the east and west coast of the USA. And there are people boarding on the East coast going to the west coast and to Australia. And people boarding on the West coast going to Australia. So it has little to do with geometry and everything to do with running an airline business. If the vast majority of people boarding in Chile are not going to Australia, then going straight there would pretty much upset most of the passengers.

Your own map shows a distance of 25,400 km between Chile and Australia. That's 15,783 miles. Flown in 13 hours would be 1214 MPH. Speed of sound, some 700 MPH and change. So not stop flights would have to be near mach 2 in planes not designed to even exceed mach 1, much less sustain it for 13 hours, which I'm guessing no mach 2 aircraft can do due to the increased fuel consumption rate, as drag increases by the square of an aircraft's speed. But.... Doesn't matter, does it?

But you will not accept this, or even if you do, it won't change your mind about the earth being flat. So it's all really a waste of time.

Pinguinite  posted on  2019-10-13   2:42:39 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: Pinguinite, Liberator, tooconservative (#29)

A cruise to the end of the earth by the great ice wall that keeps the wildings out and keeps the sharks from falling off the edge of the earth is taking reservations.

Kook ship of fools.

www.themanual.com/travel/...arth-cruise-2020-details/

A K A Stone  posted on  2019-10-13   11:22:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 31.

#33. To: A K A Stone (#31)

A cruise to the end of the earth by the great ice wall that keeps the wildings out and keeps the sharks from falling off the edge of the earth is taking reservations.

I hate to admit it but I would love to go on this cruise, just to document all the kookeries.

Reminds me a bit of the old Freeper cruises. They organized a couple of them. They had a group back then called Clown Posse that existed mostly just to ridicule the freeper antics. And they never had such a bonanza as the photos and posts about the freeper cruises, especially the second and third freeper cruises. BobJ and Diotima in very unsexy and too-revealing photos. The Clowns actually had people at various ports of call for the cruise, taking photos of the sad-ass freepers. And at least one Clown was undercover, actually on the cruise ship with the freepers. It was wildly funny stuff, really mean-spirited.

I have regretted over the years that I didn't keep an archive of the antifreeper Clown Posse stuff. It seems that RimJob threatened them with lawsuits and they folded up and disappeared entirely.

Tooconservative  posted on  2019-10-13 12:17:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 31.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com