[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
The Establishments war on Donald Trump Title: DOJ Refuses to Produce Brady Material Requested by Flynn Attorney Sidney Powell – Seeks to go Immediately to Sentencing DOJ Refuses to Produce Brady Material Requested by Flynn Attorney Sidney Powell – Seeks to go Immediately to Sentencing by Cristina Laila Deep State DOJ lawyers stepped up their prosecutorial misconduct on Tuesday in a court filing in response to a motion filed by Flynn’s lawyer Sidney Powell. General Mike Flynn’s attorney Sidney Powell on Monday filed a supplement status report in response to the conclusion of the case against Flynn’s former business associate Bijan Rafiekian. Last week, in a major blow to the DOJ National Security Division, a federal judge tossed out a conviction against General Flynn’s former lobbying partner, Bijan Rafiekian. A federal jury in July found General Flynn’s associate Bijan Rafiekian guilty of illegally lobbying for Turkey after just 4 hours of deliberation — but Federal Judge Anthony Trenga, a George W. Bush appointee, dismissed the indictment because of ‘insufficient evidence to sustain the conviction.’ “The evidence was insufficient as a matter of law for the jury to convict Rafiekian on either count,” Judge Trenga wrote in a 39-page memorandum last Tuesday. “There is no substantial evidence” that he agreed to cooperate subject to the direction/control of Turkey; no evidence of any implied agreement with Turkey. “There is no evidence of discussions or suggestions, let alone an agreement, express or implied, to either avoid filing under FARA or to cause the filing of a false FARA registration statement,” Judge Trenga wrote. Evidence is mounting that Mueller’s thugs pressured General Flynn to lie, then withheld Brady Material in order to build a case against him and used prosecutorial blackmail by threatening Michael Flynn Jr. More on Sidney Powell’s motion via Margot Cleveland from The Federalist: Additionally, “[t]here [wa]s no evidence of discussion or suggestions, let alone an agreement, express or implied, to either avoid filing under FARA or to cause the filing of a false FARA registration statement,” Judge Trenga explained in dismissing the charges. Then things got really good. Powell posited that prosecutor Brandon “Van Grack was determined that Mr. Flynn would testify in the Rafiekian case that he had knowingly signed a false FARA registration, even though Mr. Van Grack knew that was not true and Mr. Flynn had not agreed to that in the course of his plea agreement.” Yet, in a heated exchange, Powell wrote, Van Grack “claimed Mr. Flynn had agreed to plead to a knowing and intentional false FARA filing.” Then came the boom: “In our endless document review, we now have a draft of the statement of offense that proves the contrary, showing similar language deleted,” Powell told the court. This proves extremely significant. To explain: The Statement of Offense is the document a defendant—Flynn here—signs in pleading guilty to an offense and then later swears to the veracity of in court. The Statement of Offense summarizes the facts for the court to show they are sufficient to establish that the defendant has committed the charged offense. Mueller’s lawyer Brandon Van Grack claimed Flynn had a agreed to plead to a knowing and intentional false FARA filing however, a draft of the Statement of Offense proves to the contrary. The US government on Tuesday filed its response to Sidney Powell’s motion to compel production of Brady Material. The DOJ is refusing to produce any other evidence and requested to go right to sentencing.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 7.
#2. To: nolu chan (#0)
DoJ should produce the Brady material or dismiss the charges. If they don't, the judge should dismiss the entire case against Flynn with prejudice. Surprising that the DoJ is willing to take these chances with a judge who is clearly not impressed with their case or their conduct as prosecutors. I'd prefer the judge dismiss with prejudice. Flynn isn't guilty of anything significant. No one needs to find him guilty or innocent of anything and he doesn't need to get a plea deal or time in a Club Fed. He's already been punished a lot more than people who committed serious national security breaches. Like Hitlery. Like 0bama. Like Brennan and Clapper.
https://www.scribd.com/document/428314056/United-States-v-Flynn-DCDC-17-cr-232-Doc-122-01-Oct-2019-GOVERNMENT-S-RESPONSE-TO-DEFENDANT-S-MOTION-TO-COMPEL-PRODUCTION-OF-BRADY-MATERIAL
Flynn, Doc 122 at 21: The defendant’s motion is not a search for Brady material. It is a fishing expedition in hopes of advancing conspiracy theories related to the U.S. government’s investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election. The government has already provided any evidence that could reasonably be construed as favorable and material for the defendant at sentencing. Accordingly, the motion should be denied.
There are no replies to Comment # 7. End Trace Mode for Comment # 7.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
|
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|