[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Utopian Visionaries Who Won’t Leave People Alone

No - no - no Ain'T going To get away with iT

Pete Buttplug's Butt Plugger Trying to Turn Kids into Faggots

Mark Levin: I'm sick and tired of these attacks

Questioning the Big Bang

James Webb Data Contradicts the Big Bang

Pssst! Don't tell the creationists, but scientists don't have a clue how life began

A fine romance: how humans and chimps just couldn't let go

Early humans had sex with chimps

O’Keefe dons bulletproof vest to extract undercover journalist from NGO camp.

Biblical Contradictions (Alleged)

Catholic Church Praising Lucifer

Raising the Knife

One Of The HARDEST Videos I Had To Make..

Houthi rebels' attack severely damages a Belize-flagged ship in key strait leading to the Red Sea (British Ship)

Chinese Illegal Alien. I'm here for the moneuy

Red Tides Plague Gulf Beaches

Tucker Carlson calls out Nikki Haley, Ben Shapiro, and every other person calling for war:

{Are there 7 Deadly Sins?} I’ve heard people refer to the “7 Deadly Sins,” but I haven’t been able to find that sort of list in Scripture.

Abomination of Desolation | THEORY, BIBLE STUDY

Bible Help

Libertysflame Database Updated

Crush EVERYONE with the Alien Gambit!

Vladimir Putin tells Tucker Carlson US should stop arming Ukraine to end war

Putin hints Moscow and Washington in back-channel talks in revealing Tucker Carlson interview

Trump accuses Fulton County DA Fani Willis of lying in court response to Roman's motion

Mandatory anti-white racism at Disney.

Iceland Volcano Erupts For Third Time In 2 Months, State Of Emergency Declared

Tucker Carlson Interview with Vladamir Putin

How will Ar Mageddon / WW III End?

What on EARTH is going on in Acts 16:11? New Discovery!

2023 Hottest in over 120 Million Years

2024 and beyond in prophecy

Questions

This Speech Just Broke the Internet

This AMAZING Math Formula Will Teach You About God!

The GOSPEL of the ALIENS | Fallen Angels | Giants | Anunnaki

The IMAGE of the BEAST Revealed (REV 13) - WARNING: Not for Everyone

WEF Calls for AI to Replace Voters: ‘Why Do We Need Elections?’

The OCCULT Burger king EXPOSED

PANERA BREAD Antichrist message EXPOSED

The OCCULT Cheesecake Factory EXPOSED

Satanist And Witches Encounter The Cross

History and Beliefs of the Waldensians

Rome’s Persecution of the Bible

Evolutionists, You’ve Been Caught Lying About Fossils

Raw Streets of NYC Migrant Crisis that they don't show on Tv

Meet DarkBERT - AI Model Trained On DARK WEB

[NEW!] Jaw-dropping 666 Discovery Utterly Proves the King James Bible is God's Preserved Word

ALERT!!! THE MOST IMPORTANT INFORMATION WILL SOON BE POSTED HERE


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

New World Order
See other New World Order Articles

Title: The CIA’s Influence Over the Media: Use of the Conspiracy Theorist Slur
Source: 911Truth.Org
URL Source: https://911truth.org/conspiracy-theorist-slur-cia-propaganda/
Published: Sep 4, 2019
Author: Kevin Ryan
Post Date: 2019-09-14 13:55:02 by Liberator
Keywords: CT, Gatekeeper, Tools
Views: 10069
Comments: 110

The CIA’s Influence Over the Media: Use of the Conspiracy Theorist Slur

“Let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories concerning the attacks of September the 11th.”—George W. Bush, November 10, 2001

In April of 1967, a CIA official sent a memorandum dispatch to agency chiefs and stations. This memo described a strategy for discrediting critics of the Warren Report, the official account for the assassination of President Kennedy released in 1964. At the time of the memo, polls showed that 46% of Americans did not think that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone, in contradiction to the official finding.

To counter such criticisms, the memo proposed labeling critics as “conspiracy theorists” and proposed that the CIA’s “propaganda assets” in media begin to use the slur and other, related techniques to marginalize critics.

Classified as Secret but finally released in 1998, the memo stated, “Conspiracy theories have frequently thrown suspicion on our organization, for example by falsely alleging that Lee Harvey Oswald worked for us. The aim of this dispatch is to provide material for countering and discrediting the claims of the conspiracy theorists, so as to inhibit circulation of such claims.”

The memo instructed media assets to discredit those questioning government reports by saying the critics should be depicted as “wedded to theories adopted before the evidence was in, hasty or inaccurate in their research, or infatuated with their own theories.”

Conspiracy Theorist: One Who Questions the Statements of Known LiarsPosted by Donna Cleveland on Flickr

The approach laid out by the memo was adopted by many in the American media. That’s not a surprise given that Operation Mockingbird, a domestic propaganda campaign aimed at promoting the views of the CIA within the media, was in full swing at the time. And despite official claims that the CIA’s influence of American media was halted in 1976, after the Church Committee findings, the continued use of the terms “conspiracy theory” and “conspiracy theorist” indicates that the practice has continued.

A few years ago, I tested this by checking how many times the phrase “conspiracy theory” had appeared in the Washington Post and the New York Times in the 45 years before and after the CIA memo.

Before the memo was issued, “conspiracy theory” was a phrase used 50 times, or about once per year, in the Times or the Post. In the 45 years after the CIA memo, these newspapers used the term 2,630 times, or about once per week.

Before the CIA memo came out, the Washington Post and New York Times had never used the phrase “conspiracy theorist.” After the CIA memo came out, they have used the phrase “conspiracy theorist” 1,118 times.

The continued use of terms such as “conspiracy theorist” suggests that the CIA still controls the mainstream media. With regard to the crimes of 9/11, The New York Times has led the way in terms of support for official propaganda. Moreover, many “alternative” media sources use these slurs as frequently, or more, than mainstream media do.

An example was in August 2011, when I was a guest on National Public Radio’s ‘On Point” talk show to discuss 9/11 skepticism. Interestingly, I was the only 9/11 skeptic invited to appear on this show about 9/11 skeptics. The other two guests were Jim Meigs from Popular Mechanics and dubious “truther expert” Jonathan Kay. During the show, I answered questions from the host for about 5 minutes, until it became clear that my skepticism of 9/11 sounded rational. After I was dismissed—for the remaining 42 minutes of the show—Meigs, Kay, and the substitute host rambled on about the evils of conspiracy theories, using some form of the phrase conspiracy theory a total of 85 times. That’s more than once every 30 seconds.

The use of “conspiracy theory” to deter citizens from investigating historic events is paradoxical, to be sure. It suggests that those who commit criminal conspiracies can only be relatively powerless people who happen to live on the most strategically important lands, (and conspiracies among rich, powerful people are impossible or absurd.) It’s just that kind of doublethink mindset that has led us to where we are today as a nation.

Of course, 9/11 was a conspiracy. The only question is was it a conspiracy of people who could not possibly pull it off and who would only suffer as a result.... OR ... Was it a conspiracy of the people who benefited and had the power to accomplish it? The first option presents many problems. Common sense suggests the latter.

These days, it seems that you can tell who is working for the CIA simply by the way they use “conspiracy theory” and “conspiracy theorist” in attempts to belittle others. An example might be when a lawyer for gold mining companies was presented by the corporate media as a public servant/truth teller based on stolen documents that were never shared with the public. That lawyer and his colleagues at The Intercept use the conspiracy theorist slur as much as any other media source, and often when they are questioned about their dubious rise to fame.

In any case, our entire legal system is based on the idea of conspiracy....

...Yet despite this fact we have been conditioned by the government and the media to blindly accept official reports and to treat anyone questioning those reports as conspiracy theorists; THAT IS, YOU ARE A CONSPIRACY THEORIST IF YOU DON'T BELIEVE THE GOVERNMENT'S CONSPIRACY THEORY.

This technique is easy to see. Next time you read an article that uses these slurs, look more closely at the author (or poster/gatekeeper/troll) and where he or she is trying to lead you.

SOURCE: Published at Digwithin by Kevin Ryan on 7/31/2019


Poster Comment:

Oh, the rich RICH irony. This same Alinsky "Rules For Radicals" technique that is used by Spooks, Gubmint & G00gle against "CT!!" to shut down legit discussion and truth without question WHILE discrediting their opponent:

"Racist!!", "Anti-semite!!", "H0mophobe!!", "Xenophobe!!"(blank]tard!!), "Truther!!" etc!).

This obvious semantic parlor-trick by a panicky unprincipled elite and its army of uninformed/ignorant gatekeepers are no longer able to dam-up 911 lies OR its a plethora of other ongoing accepted Big Lies.

Perhaps it's time to re-examine and re-assess what and whose side you support....and Big Picture Agenda. (1 image)

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Comments (1-28) not displayed.
      .
      .
      .

#29. To: misterwhite, Liberator (#28)

CIA policy to subvert the truth through MSM propaganda

Subvert the "truth" about 9/11? And what "truth" might that be?

Their policy is to subvert the truth about pretty much everything.

(Former) CIA Director William Casey: "We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false".

Government is in the last resort the employment of armed men, of policemen, gendarmes, soldiers, prison guards, and hangmen.
The essential feature of government is the enforcement of its decrees by beating, killing, and imprisoning.
Those who are asking for more government interference are asking ultimately for more compulsion and less freedom.

Deckard  posted on  2019-09-16   19:00:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: Liberator (#26)

Billy was a high-ranking Mason from what I've read.

Graham and Ruth Bell were married on a Friday the 13th, at a night wedding service...bizarre.

Graham's son is also badly tainted...

There is something terribly wrong with that visit to the donut shop. The logo on Franklin's donut box states "Good things come in pink boxes"

watchman  posted on  2019-09-16   19:36:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: watchman (#24)

This is absolutely hilarious. Sorry for being rude, it’s my natural state.

Ever see the episode of South Park with the underwear gnomes? That’s exactly what your thinking reminds me of.

Step one: steal underwear.

Step two: ?

Step three: profit!

What’s hilarious is you are equating one picture of two men, and a accusation, and using just that to put Masons on top of some ridiculous global conspiracy that is void of anything regarding any actual evidence of.

Your step two is so obvious.

Again, you deliberately avoid any discussion of any point I raise and instead serve up same old tired bullshit of, well, this guy was a Mason, and he did this, ergo, profit!

Am I talking to a wall here? Wasting my time? It’s pretty much the reason I only post a couple posts a year for the last 7 years or so.

If the damn Freemasons were so friggen evil, why don’t you, yes, you, infiltrate and expose this sinister world domination plan? Just become active, learn your lines, make friends, and make it known you want a larger role in organization. It’s NOT the Manhattan project.

Jeez, they’re even running ads for members since their numbers are cratering. What an evil group!

Seriously! But nah, all it ever is, is one person somewhere who was a Mason did something, or, in your case, was merely accused, and for you? That’s enough to flesh out crazytown.

I need to start a crazy group and expose all those evil Episcopalians. Seriously, am sure there is just as much material to work with.

You do realize there have been millions of Masons in this country, right? You’re bound to find a few things some have done that ain’t cool. But, take a good, solid look where that takes you. Ya, I get it, your brain is pozzed with this, and you will never admit this whole pile of shit is what it is.

Pride is funny like that. Most times, all someone has to do to harden someone’s opinion is disagree with them. If they’ve been spouting this nonsense for years, it’s done. It’s like a terminal case. No coming back.

When you can admit to yourself you have no step 2, we can talk. I’ve already given examples of conspiracies that have real legs to them in Hillary, and Epstein.

Wish this place luck, hope that the improvements considered bring new faces. Would be nice for you guys.

'What kind of man gives cigarettes to trees?'

Dead Culture Watch  posted on  2019-09-16   19:51:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: Liberator (#27)

Dood. You entirely gloss over the “top of the foodchain”.

Those guys? They are ALL ELECTED. By other members, first, within their lodges, and then district, etc.

And don’t spout stuff about higher degrees. If you knew it was just about learning more lines in the LARP they put on once a week, you wouldn’t be saying that. It’s easy as hell to get to 32nd degree.

My brother may one day be in charge of the district, he’s very well liked. Why? Well, he was instrumental in starting the lodges yearly ‘pirate degree’ where, the LARP takes on a pirate theme for one night, and also, getting guest speakers that carry a lot of weight within the community of theirs to discuss going back to tradition in the group.

He also spends a lot of time at other lodges, and does a pilgrimage once a year to BFE in the eastern part of this state to the localized convention.

THAT is how one rises to the ‘top’ and becomes the super nefarious puppet master. It’s THE ONLY WAY. They are ALL voted on to get there. And leadership changes constantly.

It seems many just want to ignore their structure, the type of people in the group, what they try and do (become better men and give scholarships and to charities.) and cling to derp.

They are very good men, on the whole, from top to bottom. Not a breeding ground for evil. That is simply a fact.

'What kind of man gives cigarettes to trees?'

Dead Culture Watch  posted on  2019-09-16   20:08:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: All (#32)

Edit:

I hate coming across as ‘the voice of reason’, because to me, most of ‘those guys’ are full of shit and seek control over others, and dislike others freedom. Why? Probably because they’re miserable, and were not especially familiar or noticed by the fairer sex growing up.

This thread is NOT in my wheelhouse, lol.

'What kind of man gives cigarettes to trees?'

Dead Culture Watch  posted on  2019-09-16   20:29:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: watchman (#24)

However, the final straw for me concerning Billy Graham and his fraudulent ministry...was Franklin Graham's visit to Voodoo Donuts. This was real. Like father, like son. If you are unfamiliar with Voodoo Donuts you can find out more on Barnett's own website.

I'm not sure why Franklin Graham thought it was just fine to promote a donut shop with a witch-y sounding name that sells a lot of donuts with (allegedly humorous) names like Cock And Balls. Or Triple Chocolate Penetration, etc.

Graham and Ruth Bell were married on a Friday the 13th, at a night wedding service...bizarre.

Graham was America's most famous Baptist preacher. His wife was Presbyterian. When the children were born, they were baptized as infants.

I was suspicious of Graham over that, just as I was when he joined the World Council of Churches and wandered around praising the pope as the greatest living evangelist. When Graham was passed leadership of the most conservative fundamentalist group in the country at the beginning of his career, he repudiated the pledges he had made to keep their public profile fundamentalist. This was the beginning of the rise of evangelicalism to eventually crush the fundamentalist churches.

Graham was always a phony. He told quite a few major lies. He promoted himself by palling around with presidents, including the young alcoholic Bush Junior who he "saved" from alcoholism so he could become a good president like his daddy. Graham also planted his own volunteers in the audience of his televised rallies to come forward to be "saved", to make it look like his preaching was effective and that it was worthwhile for donors to continue sending him money to hold more rallies. Graham's preaching was strikingly weak and he had a noteworthy habit of chopping key doctrinal verses in half, leaving off the "bad half" that emphasized human guilt for sin and human responsibility to turn away from their own path of destruction. I called this "verse-chopping" and it characterizes Graham's preaching in my mind.

I do think there is enough evidence and testimony against Graham to believe credibly that he was a 33rd degree Mason. And that he concealed that and lied about it for decades.

I used to consider Graham more respectable than Falwell or Robertson. I've realized think that Falwell, an actual Baptist fundamentalist, was more honest about his positions and politics than Graham ever was. Robertson remains in the tank, another Benny Hinn type.

Tooconservative  posted on  2019-09-17   5:35:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: Dead Culture Watch (#32)

Those guys? They are ALL ELECTED. By other members, first, within their lodges, and then district, etc.

You mean, elected by other Satanic pedophiles?

Well, he was instrumental in starting the lodges yearly ‘pirate degree’ where, the LARP takes on a pirate theme for one night, and also, getting guest speakers that carry a lot of weight within the community of theirs to discuss going back to tradition in the group.

Going back to tradition? There is nothing traditional about America and there hasn't been for many years. Tell me, is there anyone under 70 attending these meetings?

He also spends a lot of time at other lodges, and does a pilgrimage once a year to BFE in the eastern part of this state to the localized convention.

I thought the state and national conventions were where the Satanic/Masonic (same thing really) pedophiles worship Satan by sacrificing children to their master, Satan. They lure those children into their hands by offering them Voodoo Donuts™ with sexually suggestive names and shapes. Next thing you know, little Johnny is on an altar with donut crumbs around his mouth with the high priest/33rd degree Mason standing over him with a knife dripping with his blood.

what they try and do (become better men and give scholarships and to charities.

Hush money to silence their surviving victims and pay off local authorities to suppress prosecution of their criminal acts.

Remember, kids, don't accept any donuts from a sleazy old dude with a funny little hat or strange costume.

Tooconservative  posted on  2019-09-17   5:46:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: watchman, Liberator, Dead Culture Watch (#30) (Edited)

I knew the Masons and other men's clubs and orgs like Kiwanis and KoC and such were in decline but hadn't seen any numbers in recent years. So I thought I'd look those up. I'll include a table of members by state so you can better determine how much of a threat these donut-munching Satanic/Masonic pedophiles pose to your children and grandchildren.

Masonic Service Organization of North America: Masonic Membership Stats

Membership Totals since 1924

The Masonic Service Association has compiled the following table of totals of Master Masons in the United Sates Grand Lodges for the fiscal years indicated. These figures are based upon M.S.A. records and do not necessarily correspond exactly with those published by other sources.


YEARU.S. TOTAL YEARU.S. TOTAL YEAR U.S. TOTAL
19243,077,161 19564,053,323 19882,682,537
19253,157,566 19574,085,676 19892,608,935
19263,218,375 19584,099,928 19902,531,643
19273,267,241 1959**4,103,161 19912,452,676
19283,295,872 19604,099,219 19922,371,863
19293,295,125 19614,086,499 19932,293,949
19303,279,778 19624,063,563 19942,225,611
19313,216,307 19634,034,020 19952,153,316
19323,069,645 19644,005,605 19962,089,578
19332,901,758 19653,987,690 19972,021,909
19342,760,451 19663,948,193 19981,967,208
19352,659,218 19673,910,509 19991,902,588
19362,591,309 19683,868,854 20001,841,169
19372,549,772 19693,817,846 20011,774,200
19382,514,595 19703,763,213 20021,727,505
19392,482,291 19713,718,718 20031,671,255
19402,457,263 19723,661,507 20041,617,032
19412,451,301 19733,611,448 20051,569,812
19422,478,892 19743,561,767 20061,525,131
19432,561,844 19753,512,628 20071,483,449
19442,719,607 19763,470,980 20081,444,823
19452,896,343 19773,418,844 20091,404,059
19463,097,713 19783,360,409 2010
1,373,453
19473,281,371 19793,304,334 2011
1,336,503
19483,426,155 19803,251,528 2012
1,306,539
19493,545,757 19813,188,175 2013
1,246,241
19503,644,634 19823121,746 2014
1,211,183
19513,726,744 19833,060,242 2015
1,157,987
19523,808,364 19842,992,389 2016
1,117,554
19533,893,530 19852,914,421 2017*
1,076,626
19543,964,118 19862,839,962   
19554,009,925 19872,763,828   

NOTE: * Indicates lowest point, ** Indicates highest total, ***indicates estimated

U.S. Grand Lodges Membership

STATE2016 MEMBERSHIP2017 MEMBERSHIP GAIN/(LOSS)
ALABAMA23,31723,868551
ALASKA1,7201,635(85)
ARIZONA7,0306,828(202)
ARKANSAS 13,753 13,048(705)
CALIFORNIA50,69448,196(2,498)
COLORADO8,0997,676(423)
CONNECTICUT10,008 9,603(405)
DELAWARE4,291 4,095(196)
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA4,266 4,144(122)
FLORIDA36,777 35,494(1,283)
GEORGIA36,975 33,799(3,176)
HAWAII1,657 1,67013
IDAHO3,067 2,860(207)
ILLINOIS57,197 55,210(1,987)
INDIANA52,470 48,775(3,695)
IOWA16,897 15,978(919)
KANSAS17,304 16,427(877)
KENTUCKY36,21236,24533
LOUISIANA15,867 15,469(398)
MAINE17,250 16,478(772)
MARYLAND13,670 13,196(474)
MASSACHUSETTS28,34626,296(737)
MICHIGAN28,860 27,383(1,477)
MINNESOTA11,642 11,124(518)
MISSISSIPPI15,747 15,257(490)
MISSOURI36,100 34,012(2,088)
MONTANA4,768 4,530***(238)
NEBRASKA10,105 9,644(461)
NEVADA3,695 3,584(111)
NEW HAMPSHIRE5,321 5,088(233)
NEW JERSEY17,935 17,278(657)
NEW MEXICO4,094 3,551(543)
NEW YORK35,394 33,595(1,799)
NORTH CAROLINA39,312 38,173(1,139)
NORTH DAKOTA 2,774 2,752(22)
OHIO82,958 80,602(2,346)
OKLAHOMA20,641 19,594(1,047)
OREGON7,712 7,347(365)
PENNSYLVANIA99,245 97,822(1,423)
RHODE ISLAND3,000 2,943(57)
SOUTH CAROLINA33,694 32,191(1,503)
SOUTH DAKOTA5,327 5,022(305)
TENNESSEE35,930 34,858(1,072)
TEXAS71,665 70,590(1,075)
UTAH1,801 1,8076
VERMONT5,000 4,681(319)
VIRGINIA33,762 32,473(1,289)
WASHINGTON12,671 12,118(553)
WEST VIRGINIA18,67717,953(724)
WISCONSIN11,155 10,796(359)
WYOMING3,015 2,868(147)
TOTALS1,117,554 1,076,626(40,928)

Tooconservative  posted on  2019-09-17   6:41:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: Tooconservative (#34)

I've realized think that Falwell, an actual Baptist fundamentalist, was more honest about his positions and politics than Graham ever was.

Falwell's son is in hot water now.

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/sex-and-self-dealing-welcome-to-jerry-falwell-jrs-liberty-university-2019-09-09

The thread has certainly wandered off topic. Just to nudge it back a little, the media did play a big role in Graham's popularity.

From wiki...

...William Randolph Hearst sent a telegram to all his newspaper editors: "Puff Graham." As a result, within five days Graham gained national coverage.With such media attention, the crusade event ran for eight weeks—five weeks longer than planned. Graham became a national figure. Henry Luce also promoted Graham with coverage at this time, and by 1954 featured him on the cover of his magazine TIME.

watchman  posted on  2019-09-17   7:38:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: watchman (#37) (Edited)

The problems with Graham started at the very beginning of his rise. I see you are also focused on that.

The rot with Billy Graham didn't start in the Eighties or Nineties. It was there at the very beginning. A lot of fundamentalist Baptists used to complain about Graham and his antics over the years, his claim to be a Baptist preacher (who had baptized his own children as infants), etc.

The warning signs were there all along. And the endless praise for Graham from the libmedia, certainly enemies of Christendom, wasn't exactly an honor for Graham. He was never hated for being a Christian at all. Instead he was praised as the kind of wishy-washy Christian leader who could Judas Goat the rest of the sheep into being submissive and obedient to the State.

Tooconservative  posted on  2019-09-17   8:34:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: misterwhite, Deckard, A K A Stone, Gatekeepers, ALL (#28)

Subvert the "truth" about 9/11? And what "truth" might that be?

Seriously??

Ok. Glad to be of service.

Here is an extremely thorough overview (in only 5 minutes) of the EXTENDED "truth", sloppy deception, and attempted burial of several truths regarding 911 and its aftermath.

If you or anyone else is still taking a "CT!!" position, please do go right ahead and try and refute ANY of this.

Liberator  posted on  2019-09-17   11:32:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: All (#39)

(1) “Let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories concerning the attacks of September the 11th.”—George W. Bush, November 10, 2001

(2)...Classified as Secret but finally released in 1998, the memo stated, “Conspiracy theories have frequently thrown suspicion on our organization (@FOGGY BOTTOM), ....

(3) The continued use of terms such as “conspiracy theorist” suggests that the CIA still controls the mainstream media [in a desperate attempt to quash all truth -- while continuing to advance the elites' Fake News, Hoaxes, and Paranoia.]

The aim of this dispatch is to provide material for countering and discrediting the claims of the conspiracy theorists, so as to inhibit circulation of such claims [OF TRUTH].”

(3)

Please be reminded of the ORIGINAL genesis of the pejorative terms, "Conspiracy Theorist" OR "Truther." RIGHT FROM THE SOURCE.

Liberator  posted on  2019-09-17   11:44:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#41. To: Dead Culture Watch (#32)

They are very good men, on the whole, from top to bottom. Not a breeding ground for evil. That is simply a fact.

Facts? Based on what? Who?

As acknowledged, yes, outwardly or exotericaly "good deeds" are presented and even done on an individual basis. And maybe at individual lodges....

Your opinion is your opinion. Same of your definition of truth. Same of your definition of both "good" and "evil." And of course, your opinion is based on the extent of your knowledge on the subject and associations.

The fact remains, the Freemasons stamped their own symbol on the Holy Bible and changed it; adhere to secret rules and secret ritual pledges, take loyalty oaths to and worship "A Higher Power," aka the Light/Lucifer and his "Knowledge." (no, nothing to do Jesus Christ or God. Or truth for that matter.)

Since the late 1770s, the Freemasons have leveraged their influence and control over all matters of society ultimately NOT in the interest of benevolent motives.

Their history and subversive goals go way back. I'm not going to belabor the actual history and knowledge on this org (And you certainly won't check out any links I could provide in any case.)

Liberator  posted on  2019-09-17   12:05:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#42. To: Liberator (#39)

I watched half. All it does is snarkily question the report. It offer no alternative explanation.

So I ask again. What is the supposed "truth" you're trying to claim is being suppressed?

misterwhite  posted on  2019-09-17   12:07:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#43. To: Tooconservative, Dead Culture Watch (#35)

DCW: (Those guys? They are ALL ELECTED. By other members, first, within their lodges, and then district, etc.)

TooCartoonative: "You mean, elected by other Satanic pedophiles?"

What kind of person would leap immediately to that kind of bizarre conclusion?

Oh, that's right -- The Forum Gatekeeper with the comically fake moniker of "Too Conservative." Bwaahaa! Still funny.

TooConservative: "Remember, kids, don't accept any donuts from a sleazy old dude with a funny little hat or strange costume."

Hmmm...You sure you haven't a extra window open?

Liberator  posted on  2019-09-17   12:16:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#44. To: misterwhite (#42) (Edited)

I watched half.

I one-quarter believe you.

All it does is snarkily question the report. It offer no alternative explanation.

It's 5 MINUTES.. It offers bullet point definitive FACTS. You can't watch 5 minutes and you are about to watch 5 HOURS of detailed explanations?

So I ask again. What is the supposed "truth" you're trying to claim is being suppressed?

Try watching the OTHER 2 1/2 minutes and see if a bolt of lightning strikes a synapse.

Liberator  posted on  2019-09-17   12:20:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#45. To: Deckard, misterwhite (#29)

Their policy is to subvert the truth about pretty much everything.

(Former) CIA Director William Casey: ****"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false"****.

Amen, Deckard.

MW -- how did you miss William Casey's own quote?

Liberator  posted on  2019-09-17   12:48:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#46. To: TooConservative, Deckard, A K A Stone (#45)

Well well...

Your President is a "CT!!!"

(Have you your butterfly net out for Trump? Or will simply declaring him a "danger" and "terrorist" suffice?)

Liberator  posted on  2019-09-17   12:53:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#47. To: Liberator (#41)

Sigh......it’s 2019.

Don’t you have anything from the last 40 years at least? With as much evidence there is against a whole shit load of people. I still, see no evidence of the stuff you take on faith. (Talk about a religion, sheesh!)

'What kind of man gives cigarettes to trees?'

Dead Culture Watch  posted on  2019-09-17   13:40:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#48. To: All (#47)

BTW, lemme make this easy.

We all know the evidence against George Soros for what it is that you are EXACTLY accusing the Freemasons of doing.

There are LOTS of money transfers to horrible groups that can be traced directly back to him. Show me one, just friggen one, instance like this with Masons.

Can’t find that? Damn, they’re either piss poor evildoers of George Soros completely overlooked the cunning way they do this.

But honestly, I don’t expect anyone to consider any of the things I’ve posted in this thread. It’s way too easy to tune out any such questions if they don’t comport to a belief hardwired in the brain. We used to call that being an NPC. It’s just programming from a non trad source. (Which is why many believe it.)

I still haven’t had anyone address the structure in any meaningful way, so, I expect this question to be ignored as well. That which doesn’t fit the narrative is to be dismissed or not talked about at all. Instead, bring up with scary music in the background, something, anything from decades ago.

Do powerful people conspire in private to increase power and wealth at the expense of the masses? Certainly. Do they need the structure of the Freemasons to do that? Hell no, in fact, that would be stupid, and that, they are not.

'What kind of man gives cigarettes to trees?'

Dead Culture Watch  posted on  2019-09-17   16:06:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#49. To: Liberator (#45)

MW -- how did you miss William Casey's own quote?

Apparently a lot of people did, huh? Or they don't believe he said it.

misterwhite  posted on  2019-09-17   16:38:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#50. To: Liberator (#46)

Your President is a "CT!!!"

Nah. He's just yanking the chains of people like you, the real CTs.

Tooconservative  posted on  2019-09-17   19:28:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#51. To: Liberator (#44) (Edited)

Try watching the OTHER 2 1/2 minutes and see if a bolt of li lightning strikes a synapse.

Done. And it's exactly the same as the first 2 1/2 minutes -- a snarky summary of the events of 9/11 expecting us all to nod our heads and say, "Yeah, that couldn't have happened".

Problem is, the video presents ZERO evidence of it happening any other way. A complete waste of time.

misterwhite  posted on  2019-09-18   11:40:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#52. To: misterwhite (#51)

....a snarky summary of the events of 9/11 expecting us all to nod our heads and say, "Yeah, that couldn't have happened".

Problem is, the video presents ZERO evidence of it happening any other way. A complete waste of time.

IS it possible your mind hasn't been hard-wired to reject ANY and EVERY notion of doubt? Just saying.

Well... thanks for watching anyway.

Liberator  posted on  2019-09-18   11:50:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#53. To: Tooconservative (#50) (Edited)

He's just yanking the chains of people like you, the real CTs.

Who is yanking WHO'S chain here? lol...

There are none so blind who refuse to see (or hear.)

Trump is OBVIOUSLY not yanking any chain with respect to describing the construction of WTC.

HE KNOWS.

WE KNOW.

Liberator  posted on  2019-09-18   11:53:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#54. To: misterwhite, Liberator (#49)

MW -- how did you miss William Casey's own quote?

Apparently a lot of people did, huh? Or they don't believe he said it.

Barbara Honegger
Barbara Honegger, studied at Stanford University

Originally Answered: Did William Casey (CIA Director) really say, "We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false."?

I am the source for this quote, which was indeed said by CIA Director William Casey at an early February 1981 meeting of the newly elected President Reagan with his new cabinet secretaries to report to him on what they had learned about their agencies in the first couple of weeks of the administration. 

The meeting was in the Roosevelt Room in the West Wing of the White House, not far from the Cabinet Room.  I was present at the meeting as Assistant to the chief domestic policy adviser to the President.  Casey       first told Reagan that he had been astonished to discover that over  80 percent of the 'intelligence' that the analysis side of the CIA produced was based on open public sources like newspapers and magazines. 

As he did to all the other secretaries of their departments and agencies, Reagan asked what he saw as his goal as director for the CIA, to which he replied with this quote, which I recorded in my notes of the meeting as he said it. 

Shortly thereafter I told Senior White House correspondent Sarah McClendon, who was a close friend and colleague, who in turn made it public.  Barbara Honegger  bshonegg@gmail.com

Government is in the last resort the employment of armed men, of policemen, gendarmes, soldiers, prison guards, and hangmen.
The essential feature of government is the enforcement of its decrees by beating, killing, and imprisoning.
Those who are asking for more government interference are asking ultimately for more compulsion and less freedom.

Deckard  posted on  2019-09-18   11:56:12 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#55. To: Dead Culture Watch (#47)

Sigh......it’s 2019.

Don’t you have anything from the last 40 years at least? With as much evidence there is against a whole shit load of people.

Come on, man. It's a 5-minute overview that does some quick dot-connecting on the history and genesis of Freemasonry and worship of its cult and "god." NOT a documentary.

(and again, those at and near the top of the Masonic priesthood are the ones who YOU should investigate. The grunts at lower levels have NO idea what's going on. All *I* can do is shine a tiny light on it.)

I still, see no evidence of the stuff you take on faith. (Talk about a religion, sheesh!)

Whole different issue. I realize and accept that you're locked into your own faith of non-faith, so I won't go there.

Liberator  posted on  2019-09-18   12:00:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#56. To: Deckard (#54)

So she says. But you would think that if the CIA Director did indeed say this we would have heard more about it over the last 40 years.

I mean it's a pretty significant statement, no? Especially considering the source.

misterwhite  posted on  2019-09-18   12:19:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#57. To: Dead Culture Watch (#48)

BTW, lemme make this easy.

We all know the evidence against George Soros for what it is that you are EXACTLY accusing the Freemasons of doing.

Really??

The Freemasons have officially been driving to the hoop as an organization for control of people and gubmint for abut 250 years. Under the radar (sorta.)

Soros and his orgs are a relative wisp of smoke, acting on behalf of the LARGER cabal of Elites. IN THE OPEN. No comparison.

There are LOTS of money transfers to horrible groups that can be traced directly back to him. Show me one, just friggen one, instance like this with Masons.

Can’t find that?

They run their organizations much differently. Apples and Watermelons. AND to much different long-range & personal goals.

Honestly, I don’t expect anyone to consider any of the things I’ve posted in this thread. It’s way too easy to tune out any such questions if they don’t comport to a belief hardwired in the brain.

Irony right there. *I* believe YOU believe you've figured it all out and laid out your supposed case.

"Money Transfers"?? You believe THAT is a primary factor of comparing Masons vs. Soros agenda? Not even in the same universe. Soros isn't close to the high degree of control of people, politics, courts, business and organizations by Masons in the US.

I still haven’t had anyone address the structure in any meaningful way...

I haven't the time or motivation to post stuff you'll merely dismiss or not watch/read. And admit it; you're not interested in digging deeper than your pre-conceived notion of "Masons" other than at the benevolence achieved at the LOCAL local level -- which again is MUCH different than the agenda at the TOP of the food-chain. And expressly DESIGNED that way. It's actually ingenious.

Do powerful people conspire in private to increase power and wealth at the expense of the masses? Certainly. Do they need the structure of the Freemasons to do that? Hell no, in fact, that would be stupid, and that, they are not.

Not only "power and wealth" -- nearly EVERY org aspires for that.

All I can say is...research it yourself.

Liberator  posted on  2019-09-18   12:22:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#58. To: Liberator (#52)

IS it possible your mind hasn't been hard-wired to reject ANY and EVERY notion of doubt? Just saying.

Big difference between "I doubt it happened that way" and "It didn't happen that way".

Moot point. In either case my response is, "OK. Fine. I can accept your doubt. But WHY do you doubt it and how DID it happen?"

No response. People like you simply slink away and refuse to answer.

misterwhite  posted on  2019-09-18   12:27:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#59. To: misterwhite, Deckard (#56)

You would think that if the CIA Director did indeed say this we would have heard more about it over the last 40 years.

Aren't you forgetting about the unholy marriage between the MSM and CIA?

Liberator  posted on  2019-09-18   12:30:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#60. To: misterwhite (#58)

In either case my response is, "OK. Fine. I can accept your doubt. But WHY do you doubt it and how DID it happen?"

No response.

Come on, MW...

Over the years theories on the WHYS and HOWS have been posted to death.

Liberator  posted on  2019-09-18   12:32:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#61. To: misterwhite, Deckard (#58)

People like you simply slink away and refuse to answer.

You can't be serious.

Ok, I'll bite...

Be specific -- on which questions regarding 911 would you like answered?

Liberator  posted on  2019-09-18   12:35:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#62. To: Liberator (#61)

Be specific -- on which questions regarding 911 would you like answered?

I'll make it easy plus give you your choice.

A) If a fire didn't bring down WTC 7, what did and what is your evidence?

-- or --

B) If a 757 didn't hit the Pentagon, what did and what is your evidence?

misterwhite  posted on  2019-09-18   15:27:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#63. To: Liberator (#57)

Damn dood. Your fantasy world is built solid, I must say.

The Masons at ‘the top’ are voted there. You fail, repeatedly, to grasp that. It’s truly amazing. There is no super secret squirrel level of masonry. And, you fail to provide a single iota of proof of anything sinister in last 50 years.

Love ya man, but this thread isn’t a good look on you.

'What kind of man gives cigarettes to trees?'

Dead Culture Watch  posted on  2019-09-19   0:50:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#64. To: Liberator (#61)

Oh, and btw, it’s something I know about. Watching goofy videos with scary music talking about people who’ve been dead for hundreds of years doesn’t address a single thing about those questions and facts you just ignore.

These retarded vids/stories have been on the interwebs for as long as it’s been a thing. And, I read, a lot.

'What kind of man gives cigarettes to trees?'

Dead Culture Watch  posted on  2019-09-19   0:54:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#65. To: Dead Culture Watch (#64) (Edited)

Watching goofy videos with scary music talking about people who’ve been dead for hundreds of years doesn’t address a single thing about those questions and facts you just ignore.

Such an astute observation shows a most perceptive insight of your understanding about how – rather watching goofy videos and spouting off what they others say - nice it would be to simply apply “critical thinking” to the thought process. This does not come naturally to some people, but fortunately, it’s something an individual can train himself to do.

Regrettably, there will always remain among us, those who because of the high volume of information that carry so many varied opinions every day – it will always be really easy for them to remain afflicted with their cognitive bias. They are forever destined to continually get lost in the formative details that are being subtly channeled into their minds and taking complete control over their though process.

Sad – so very sad …

Salute,
Gatlin

Gatlin  posted on  2019-09-19   4:46:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#66. To: misterwhite (#62)

A) If a fire didn't bring down WTC 7, what did and what is your evidence?

Too easy. How about Larry Silverstein's own words?

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-jPzAakHPpk

"Fire"?? How can you be sure it wasn't purposely set as cover for...THE CONTROLLED DEMO??

Same pre-controlled demo as both towers. The "planes" were designed as cover as well. But I digress...

Building 7 EVIDENCE (just a few bullet points):

1) Collapsed in its own footprint (yes, oddly, just like the two towers. A building MUST be pre-wired for such precision, taking far more time than a few hours.)

2) Corroborative testimony of people warned to get out of Building 7 (prior to the pulling of the building.)

3) A reporter announced on LIVE AIR that the building had collapsed. BEFORE IT ACTUALLY COLLAPSED. (Yes, even I watched this report in real time, live.)

B) If a 757 didn't hit the Pentagon, what did and what is your evidence?

The evidence from both perspectives of argument of exactly what hit the Pentagram is circumstantial.

Your side cannot possibly cite any "evidence" that a 757 was actually what hit this building; Nor that a noob-pilot from Saudi Arabia expertly guided such an aircraft at near-ground level into the Pentagram (a direct hit into the General Accounting office, coincidently just a day after Rumsfeld public revelation of a missing $2 TRILLION.)

As circumstantial evidence from the other side, there is absolutely ZERO video OR scientific, OR forensic evidence that ANY "plane" hit the Pentagram. Given ZERO video despite countless security cameras.

I'm also going to discount the smattering of so-called "witnesses" (who happen to be gubmint employees) from afar who claim they "saw a plane."

There isn't ONE shred of evidence to support the physics that such a large plane created such a small hole in the Pentagram. (a few lame props strewn around weren't convincing.)

A mountain video and other documentation is out there, but why bother? If yu seek the truth you'll find it. Regarding the truth, this is yet another case of cognitive dissonance and, "We [blindly] accept the reality of the world with which we are presented."

Liberator  posted on  2019-09-19   8:45:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#67. To: Liberator (#66)

A mountain video and other documentation is out there, but why bother?

It amazes me that those who roundly criticize the MSM for lying unquestioningly believe they are telling the truth about paradigm-shifting events like this and others.

Government is in the last resort the employment of armed men, of policemen, gendarmes, soldiers, prison guards, and hangmen.
The essential feature of government is the enforcement of its decrees by beating, killing, and imprisoning.
Those who are asking for more government interference are asking ultimately for more compulsion and less freedom.

Deckard  posted on  2019-09-19   8:57:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#68. To: Dead Culture Watch (#63)

Damn dood. Your fantasy world is built solid, I must say. There is no super secret squirrel level of masonry.

Uh, ok.

Love ya man, but this thread isn’t a good look on you.

Same bro. Love you too. But in your case the adage, "we accept the reality of the world with which we are presented" also applies.

If you seek the truth you'll find it.

Liberator  posted on  2019-09-19   9:01:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#69. To: Deckard (#67)

It amazes me that those who roundly criticize the MSM for lying unquestioningly believe they are telling the truth about paradigm-shifting events like this and others.

Yup. Exactamundo. They want it BOTH ways.

Letting any Goob "official report" and a pathologically lying MSM create their reality and truth makes no sense these days.

That's called, "cognitive dissonance."

Liberator  posted on  2019-09-19   9:04:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  



      .
      .
      .

Comments (70 - 110) not displayed.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com