LF: Judicial Watch Sued To Get Footage of The ‘Plane’ Hitting The Pentagon On 9/11 (Video)

Title: Judicial Watch Sued To Get Footage of The ‘Plane’ Hitting The Pentagon On 9/11 (Video)
Source: Lew Rockwell
URL Source: https://www.lewrockwell.com/2019/09 ... ng-the-pentagon-on-9-11-video/
Published: Sep 13, 2019
Author: Joe Martino
Post Date: 2019-09-13 10:32:48 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 5035
Comments: 22

Finally, we can put to rest the theory that a plane hit the pentagon on 9/11. Tom Fitton from Judicial Watch released a video today on his Twitter showing what looks like a Tomahawk cruise missile going into the side of the Pentagon on 9/11. Although Fitton claims this was actually a plane that hit the Pentagon, the evidence doesn’t appear to support this at all.

The ‘plane hitting the Pentagon’ theory has been a question mark for so many people as the camera footage was instantly seized showing the entire event, and there were no plane parts to be found anywhere. Not to mention the plane would have to be flying completely parallel to the ground, JUST skimming the grass to make it into the side of the Pentagon. And of course the hole made in the Pentagon doesn’t match that of a plane at all. See image below.

I have honestly been trying to figure out what Fitton is really up to with this post, because I almost can’t believe he thinks this is a plane which leads me to think he is doing this on purpose to help people see the truth.

Do you see a plane? Or do you see what looks a lot more like a Tomahawk cruise missile?

Reprinted with permission from Collective Evolution.

But it must have been carrying the Flight 77 flight data recorder, personal effects of the passengers, and the landing gear from a 757.

The problem with that camera is that the frame per second is too slow and that we are lucky to see any plane at all. To those that do not under stand video its no more than a bunch of still shots. Depending on the fps you may not see much at all. Plane flying at 400mph ([400mph*5280feetpermile / 60min*60sec]=586feet per second). At roughly 30fps that's not going to show shit. 586/30=19ft of plane to be seen on video and what do we see? About 19ft of the plane! Go figure?

I would like to see the video from the hotel across from the pentagon. There has to be better video footage.

BTW we have already seen this video. I have already talked about this a long time ago.

I like it when people do some math. Takeoff speed for a 757 is ~143mph. Stall speed is 167mph. So the speed could have been much lower if they chose to adopt a landing profile to hit the Pentagon.

The overall length of the plane is about 155 feet. Supposedly, it was a 757-223, a variant of the 757-200. That's where I'm getting the 155 feet. The 757-300 was a stretch version, about 20' longer.

So if they were approaching the Pentagob at 200mph in their 155-foot 757, it does change the math for your video calculations quite a bit. Since the plane was long since under the local radar ceiling, we don't have any evidence (other than flight recorder) for the speed the plane was traveling at.

I just left the Pentagon one month before the attack and where the plane hit was the newly renovated portion of the Pentagon. If not for the additional force protection and blast construction measures that plane would have gone through to the inner courtyard by some estimates.

Well I digress. Two fellow officers (worked with me in the Pentagon), who had early appointments returning to the Pentagon, saw the plane from I395 hit the pentagon. That's good enough for me.