[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"Leftists Make Desperate Attempt to Discredit Photo of Abrego Garcia's MS-13 Tattoos. Here Are Receipts"

"Trump Administration Freezes $2 Billion After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands"on After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands

"Doctors Committing Insurance Fraud to Conceal Trans Procedures, Texas Children’s Whistleblower Testifies"

"Left Using '8647' Symbol for Violence Against Trump, Musk"

KawasakiÂ’s new rideable robohorse is straight out of a sci-fi novel

"Trade should work for America, not rule it"

"The Stakes Couldn’t Be Higher in Wisconsin’s Supreme Court Race – What’s at Risk for the GOP"

"How Trump caught big-government fans in their own trap"

‘Are You Prepared for Violence?’

Greek Orthodox Archbishop gives President Trump a Cross, tells him "Make America Invincible"

"Trump signs executive order eliminating the Department of Education!!!"

"If AOC Is the Democratic Future, the Party Is Even Worse Off Than We Think"

"Ending EPA Overreach"

Closest Look Ever at How Pyramids Were Built

Moment the SpaceX crew Meets Stranded ISS Crew

The Exodus Pharaoh EXPLAINED!

Did the Israelites Really Cross the Red Sea? Stunning Evidence of the Location of Red Sea Crossing!

Are we experiencing a Triumph of Orthodoxy?

Judge Napolitano with Konstantin Malofeev (Moscow, Russia)

"Trump Administration Cancels Most USAID Programs, Folds Others into State Department"

Introducing Manus: The General AI Agent

"Chinese Spies in Our Military? Straight to Jail"

Any suggestion that the USA and NATO are "Helping" or have ever helped Ukraine needs to be shot down instantly

"Real problem with the Palestinians: Nobody wants them"

ACDC & The Rolling Stones - Rock Me Baby

Magnus Carlsen gives a London System lesson!

"The Democrats Are Suffering Through a Drought of Generational Talent"

7 Tactics Of The Enemy To Weaken Your Faith

Strange And Biblical Events Are Happening

Every year ... BusiesT casino gambling day -- in Las Vegas

Trump’s DOGE Plan Is Legally Untouchable—Elon Musk Holds the Scalpel

Palestinians: What do you think of the Trump plan for Gaza?

What Happens Inside Gaza’s Secret Tunnels? | Unpacked

Hamas Torture Bodycam Footage: "These Monsters Filmed it All" | IDF Warfighter Doron Keidar, Ep. 225

EXPOSED: The Dark Truth About the Hostages in Gaza

New Task Force Ready To Expose Dark Secrets

Egypt Amasses Forces on Israel’s Southern Border | World War 3 About to Start?

"Trump wants to dismantle the Education Department. Here’s how it would work"

test

"Federal Workers Concerned That Returning To Office Will Interfere With Them Not Working"

"Yes, the Democrats Have a Governing Problem – They Blame America First, Then Govern Accordingly"

"Trump and His New Frenemies, Abroad and at Home"

"The Left’s Sin Is of Omission and Lost Opportunity"

"How Trump’s team will break down the woke bureaucracy"

Pete Hegseth will be confirmed in a few minutes

"Greg Gutfeld Cooks Jessica Tarlov and Liberal Media in Brilliant Take on Trump's First Day"

"They Gave Trump the Center, and He Took It"

French doors

America THEN and NOW in 65 FASCINATING Photos

"CNN pundit Scott Jennings goes absolutely nuclear on Biden’s ‘farce’ of a farewell speech — and he’s not alone"


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Obama Wars
See other Obama Wars Articles

Title: GOP lawmaker introduces bill to ban terror trials from civilian courts and NYC
Source: The Hill
URL Source: http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-brief ... s-from-civilian-courts-and-nyc
Published: Jan 28, 2010
Author: Jordan Fabian
Post Date: 2010-01-28 15:01:20 by Badeye
Keywords: None
Views: 6272
Comments: 38

GOP lawmaker introduces bill to ban terror trials from civilian courts and NYC By Jordan Fabian - 01/28/10 02:03 PM ET The ranking Republican on the House Homeland Security Committee on Thursday introduced legislation that would prevent the 9/11 terror trials from taking place in New York City.

Rep. Pete King (R-N.Y.), who represents New York City suburbs on Long Island, told the Associated Press that his bill would cut off Justice Department funding for moving Guantanamo Bay detainees to civilian courts.

The Obama administration announced last year that it would hold a trial for so-called 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammad and four others in civilian courts in Manhattan.

King and other Republicans have long opposed the trial, saying that it could pose a security threat to New York City and that the suspects do not deserve the legal protections of civilian courts.

While most Democrats believe that the suspected terrorists should be tried in civilian courts, some top Democrats have recently voiced opposition to their New York City location.

Senate Intelligence Committee Chairwoman Diane Feinstein (D-Calif.) said Thursday they should be moved as did New York Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D).

"I am open for the trials to be moved to another appropriate place," Gillibrand said.

Sens. Blanche Lincoln (D-Ark.) and Jim Webb (D-Va.) also signed a letter to Attorney General Eric Holder asking him to move the trials.

The Obama administration has stood behind the trials and their location in lower Manhattan.

It's not clear how much Democratic support King's bill could garner, since it is meant to prevent all civilian terror trials.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 30.

#1. To: All (#0)

Perfect opportunity for bi partisanship that makes the nation safer, eliminates a propaganda win for al Qaeda, and saves the tax payers 2 BILLION DOLLARS per year related to the upcoming trial in NYC.

Wanna bet Democrats don't jump at this opportunity? Nor the White House?

Badeye  posted on  2010-01-28   15:02:58 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Badeye (#1)

Cowering in fear sends the right message to Al Qaeda?

go65  posted on  2010-01-28   15:03:54 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: go65 (#3)

Cowering in fear? By trying enemy combatants in a military tribunal?

How is that 'cowering in fear'? Its common sense, much better and cheaper security, and highly cost effective in comparision to Obama and Holder's ridiculous 'terrorist rights' insanity.

Badeye  posted on  2010-01-28   15:05:55 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Badeye (#4)

Cowering in fear? By trying enemy combatants in a military tribunal?

How is that 'cowering in fear'? Its common sense, much better and cheaper security, and highly cost effective in comparision to Obama and Holder's ridiculous 'terrorist rights' insanity.

The problem with military tribunals is crafting a system that's fair. However, if you've already decided that folks are guilty and are just looking for a show-trial, then military tribunals could be useful. However, due to supreme court rulings there isn't much of a difference anymore in rules between a military tribunal and a federal courts.

Meanwhile we've tried Ramsey Yusuf, Richard Reid, Jose Padilla, Sheik Abdul-Rahman, and Tim McVeigh in civilian courts without much of a problem.

This strikes me as another case of faux outrage. Nobody complained when Bush tried Reid and Padilla in civilian courts.

go65  posted on  2010-01-28   15:37:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: go65 (#7)

The problem with military tribunals is crafting a system that's fair.

Really? Please explain in specifics what you think is 'unfair' about a military tribunal.

I'm going to love reading your explanation, I just know it!

Badeye  posted on  2010-01-28   15:48:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: Badeye (#9)

Really? Please explain in specifics what you think is 'unfair' about a military tribunal.

Tell me the rules first.

go65  posted on  2010-01-28   16:57:06 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: go65 (#11)

You suggest KSM won't get a fair trial up above.

Now you ask me for the 'rules' for a military tribunal?

(laughing)

This is what happens when you blindly follow talking points, GO65.

As Senator Feinstein, or Mayor Bloomberg.

Badeye  posted on  2010-01-29   9:05:13 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: Badeye (#17)

ou suggest KSM won't get a fair trial up above.

Now you ask me for the 'rules' for a military tribunal?

We need to know the rules for a military tribunal before determining whether or not it's "fair".

See: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/29/AR2006062900928.html

go65  posted on  2010-01-29   11:12:27 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: go65 (#19)

'we' kemosabe? Nope. You, obviously. Again, you say it won't be a fair trail by military tribunal, but you admit you don't have a CLUE as to whats involved.

Its exceedingly fair. Those of us that have knowledge on the topic know this. Those that don't, are leftwingers using talking points, as you did up above.

Tsk, tsk, tsk...(chuckle)

Badeye  posted on  2010-01-29   11:59:19 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: Badeye (#20)

'we' kemosabe? Nope. You, obviously. Again, you say it won't be a fair trail by military tribunal, but you admit you don't have a CLUE as to whats involved.

I said the problem with a tribunal is making it fair.

So what rules do you propose that would make it fair?

go65  posted on  2010-01-29   14:00:39 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: go65 (#21)

Military tribunals are exceedingly 'fair'. The suggestion that 'rules' needed to be made or added to what exists is absurd...if you are familiar with the topic.

Badeye  posted on  2010-01-29   19:57:11 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: Badeye (#26)

Military tribunals are exceedingly 'fair'. The suggestion that 'rules' needed to be made or added to what exists is absurd...if you are familiar with the topic.

Well again, the USSC tossed out Bush's tribunal proposal as being unfair. Did you miss that?

go65  posted on  2010-01-29   21:49:20 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: go65 (#29)

If you don't understand the difference between the circumstances specific to the case you are trying to cite, and this conversation...well, its okay, you've already admitted you don't know what your talking about in relation to military tribunals.

So you oppose Feinstein and Jimmy Webb? Interesting. Smart money says this gets put back into a military tribunal, and that its held at Gitmo.

btw, Gitmo isn't going to be closed. (laughing)

Badeye  posted on  2010-01-30   8:22:15 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 30.

#32. To: Badeye (#30)

btw, Gitmo isn't going to be closed. (laughing)

Why shouldn't it be closed? I mean why do we have to keep prisoners on a foreign countries soil? Here is the answer. Because they want to do things that would be unlawful in this country. They want to be to coverup stuff.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-01-30 09:22:32 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: Badeye (#30)

If you don't understand the difference between the circumstances specific to the case you are trying to cite, and this conversation...well, its okay, you've already admitted you don't know what your talking about in relation to military tribunals.

)

Again, the USSC threw out Bush's proposal for military tribunals.

Again, what treaty do you keep referring to.

So you oppose Feinstein and Jimmy Webb? Interesting. Smart money says this gets put back into a military tribunal, and that its held at Gitmo.

non-sequitur

btw, Gitmo isn't going to be closed. (laughing

Non-sequitur.

After all these years Badeye, some things haven't changed. You STILL throw stuff out without any basis in fact and still try and change the subject when cornered.

go65  posted on  2010-01-30 10:35:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 30.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com