[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
United States News Title: The Rear Wheel Drive Resurgence Two things once defined American cars. They were almost always rear-wheel-drive even the economy cars and they sometimes could be had with V8 engines. Or at least they fit. The Pontiac Tempest was one such. Add a 389 and it became the 1964 GTO. Slide one into a Vega or Pinto . . . even a Chevette. Many did. The economy car became a high-performance car after a weekends knuckle-banging in the garage. One capable of outperforming high-end European cars. Which were defined by one other thing: Their (usually) high prices. Not many Americans could afford an E-Type Jag, Mercedes SL or a Ferrari Daytona. But many could afford a Camaro. Almost anyone could afford a Nova. And either plus many others could give an E-Type or Daytona a run for the money . . . for a lot less money. And then it all went away. Or at least, mostly. Vengeful oil cartels made gas impossibly expensive . Government termagants (of both sexes) made gas mileage expensive via heavy fines for cars that didnt deliver it. This changed the landscape almost overnight and seemingly forever. Those who lived through it will remember and shudder. American cars became like Japanese economy cars. We learned to Drive 55 and speedometers read no higher than 85. Rear drive and V8s gave way to front-drive and small fours maybe a small six, if you paid extra. A big V8 wasnt offered and wouldnt fit anyway not without serious welding because the engine bay was meant for a tiny and sideways-mounted engine. A V8 engine was much too long. Even if you managed to knuckle-bust one in there, there was no room left for the transmission which in a front-drive car is likewise mounted sideways (its called transversely) and combined with the drive axles, packaged together into something called a transaxle. Not, as Seinfeld likes to say, that theres anything wrong with that. The FWD layout takes up less space overall leaving more space inside the car for passengers. It is cheaper to manufacture and it gets the weight of the drivetrain over the driven wheels, which aids traction. Pulling the car rather than pushing it helps on that score as well. Its the reason why Citroen called its first front-drive car, the 1934 Traction Avant, just that. The name means traction forward. But FWD is also the broccoli of car design. It may be good for you and good in snow but a ribeye is better for you. And rear-drive is the ribeye youve been craving. Its the right way to burn rubber, obviously. A FWD burnout is always clumsy because the wheels youre trying to steer the car with are skittering and bouncing all over the road as they try to put the power to the road. Theres also a limit to how much power the wheels that steer the car can take before they fly off the car. It is why there have been very few truly powerful FWD cars. To keep things from breaking, the power must be limited or dialed back electronically or some of it shunted to the rear wheels through an all-wheel-drive system. But now you cant do a burnout at all which is no fun, even if the car is powerful. And besides, you still have most of the weight of the drivetrain over the front wheels which messes up the balance. FWD is nose heavy, tail-light; cars of this type are prone to understeer, which is to driving fun what broccoli is to dinner. It is also why almost all race cars and serious high-performance cars are based on a rear-drive layout. You can steer with the rear wheels using the accelerator. Countersteering with the front wheels via the steering wheel. Its what car people crave. American cars and SUVs, even are returning to the rear-drive layout. The Ford Explorer is one such that was rear-drive in its heyday, transitioned to a FWD layout but is now at last rear-drive again for 2020. Ford plans to expand on this, too. There is a hopeful rumor that Lincoln Fords luxury division is going to go back to the RWD layout as well. Chryslers cars (and their Dodge-badged cousins) are all rear-drive, which probably accounts for their rampant popularity, despite aging designs. The 2020 Chrysler 300 and Charger sedans are ten years old, basically but thjat is why people love them. They are built like they used to make em and you can can still get em. Rear drive also thrives among American trucks which remain the most popular and profitable vehicles on the road. In fact, the only reason there still is an American car industry is because of big trucks. They subsidize the FWD (and electric car) loss leaders which are manufactured mainly to keep the government termagants off the car industrys back. None of these trucks has ever been front-wheel-drive. All of them have always offered V8s. Some of these trucks are quicker than the European exotics of not-so-long ago. The 2019 Chevy Silverado 1500 pick-up has the heart of a Corvette: 6.2 liters and 420 horsepower. It gets to 60 in about 5 seconds enough to scare a Lamborghini Countach back to Bolognese. Speaking of Corvette. The new mid-engined one that just made its debut casts a heavy shadow. Its pushrod, two-valve V8 which still drives the rear wheels makes 490 horsepower in standard trim (more is available) for a base price of $58,900 which is just a bit more than half the price of a new Porsche 911 with a 443 hp six with four valves, overhead cams plus turbos. There are also the survivors, like Fords Mustang which somehow made it intact through the dreary 80s and 90s. Its survival encouraged the revival of Camaro which had been down for the count and the Dodge Challenger, now available in Redeye form with almost 800 supercharged horsepower all of them searing the asphalt via the rear wheels, as the Motor Gods intended. And for a relatively accessible $72,745. The good times the American times are back. Enjoy em while they last . . . . Subscribe to *Cars and Automotive* Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Deckard (#0)
(Edited)
The 6.2 is an OPTION. I THINK the GM V-6 is standard,but I have the 5.3 with 350 HP in mine,along with 3:73 gears. Moves up the road pretty good. I have to admit I am more of a torque freak than a horsepower addict,and would MUCH rather have a turbo diesel.
In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
|
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|