United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: ‘MAGA’ Model Katie Williams Stripped of Miss Nevada 2019 Crown for ‘Being a Conservative’
Source:
Gov't Slaves
URL Source: https://governmentslaves.news/2019/ ... rown-for-being-a-conservative/
Published: Aug 21, 2019
Author: RUSSIAN TROLL
Post Date: 2019-08-23 16:58:52 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 10233
Comments: 92
According to the dethroned beauty queen, the organisers told her to run separate social media accounts – one where she could voice her opinions and an ‘apolitical’ one for the contest. However, despite creating a second Facebook account, she kept getting complaints about her pro-Trump messages and criticism of the group Antifa on her personal page. Miss Nevada State 2019 winner Katie Williams has had her title revoked by the Miss America pageant organisers, and believes she lost her throne due to her conservative political views. Katie Jo Williams, a member of the US Army National Guards and a combat veteran, learned on 18 August that she’d lost the title and been banned from competing in the upcoming Miss America contest. In a statement posted on Instagram, she said the pageant coordinators told her via emails that she was “too political” to be involved, and that the only way to stay in the contest was to delete political posts from her Facebook page. However, she added, the organisers failed to address her requests to clarify what content they found to be in breach of their ‘No Politics’ rules. Williams has created a separate Facebook page for the pageant, devoid of political statements, but she claimed that the organisers continued to voice their disapproval in personal communications of what she was posting on her personal account. These posts, in her words, included a picture of herself wearing a red ‘Trump 2020’ hat as well as expressions of support for the United States and criticism of the leftist political organisation antifa. Williams had regularly received calls from the pageant director, Susan Jeske, but insisted that she would only communicate via email for the sake of her own safety. “I stopped taking your calls because every time you were on the phone with me you told me you agreed with my political opinions and then in writing would softly scold me for them,” she said in a letter to Jeske, according to screenshots she shared on Twitter. Williams has also published alleged screenshots of online exchanges with Jeske, which appear to show that the pageant director encouraged her to take pictures with President Trump and his son, Donald Trump Jr., while wearing the Miss Nevada sash and crown.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-11) not displayed.
.
.
.
#12. To: A K A Stone, Gatlin, Tooconservative (#11)
(Edited)
She used her personal facebook account to make political comments Story and FOX News report HERE "Williams claims that she did create a separate social media account, but alleges an official "continued to screenshot my page, my personal page, and email me about how she was disappointed and she didn’t agree with it and that I needed to speak with her on the phone." According to Ms. America CEO Susan Jeske, Williams continued to make mentions of the Ms. America competition on her personal page. "If you're putting pageant stuff on your personal page, then that's a pageant page," Jeske told NBC. Noah Jennings, Williams' spokesman, told Newsweek that Jeske was allegedly sending "mixed signals” to his client. “Ms. America CEO Susan Jeske, who would encourage Katie over the phone, and then follow that up with emails and screenshots of things she took issue with,” Jennings said. “Katie separated pages, combed through to remove posts, and overall made every effort to comply with the requests of the pageant.” Williams, who did not immediately respond to Yahoo Lifestyle’s requests for comment, told Newsweek: "I was censored for my beliefs. I was excited to compete in this pageant — everything was ready to go for this weekend — and so to have that opportunity taken away from me so quickly feels like a slap in the face. The entire reason I participated in pageants in the first place was to provide young women like my daughter with a strong role model to look up to." Williams was deployed with the Army National Guard to Afghanistan in 2008-09 and is currently a fitness instructor. *** I believe the obfuscation was done deliberately by the pageant director to insure that Miss Williams' title would be revoked when she won.
Government is in the last resort the employment of armed men, of policemen, gendarmes, soldiers, prison guards, and hangmen. I will be off forum for a couple of hours – I will read you reply later.
“However, the Ms. Nevada Facebook Page should be devoid of political content” – It was NOT. “All the pageant asked of Ms. Williams, in writing, is to keep separate social media accounts. (ie: Facebook) One is for politics where she can voice her own opinion as Katie Williams and the other is a new Facebook page for the pageant representing Ms. Nevada State 2019,” the statement reads. “She could be a President Trump supporter on her Personal Facebook page all she wants for everyone to read. However, the Ms. Nevada Facebook Page should be devoid of political content,” it adds. The pageant said it gave Williams a deadline to edit her pages, but that she refused — proving she is “no longer capable of representing this pageant as Ms. Nevada.” https://nypost.com/2019/08/22/ms-nevada-i-was- stripped-of-beauty-crown-because-i-support-trump/.
Certainly, she is entitled to her private life. But she put this on her page(s) as a designated competitor who, in some sense, represents the pageant and its rules of decorum and inclusiveness. However, she undertook certain obligations as a Miss Nevada and as a designated competitor for the national beauty pageant. And that is the standard by which it must be judged. If she wants to be in their pageant under contract as an official Miss Nevada and competing for the national title, then she is obligated to fulfill the rules as the pageant dictates. In competing for the state title and for the national title, there are certain requirements to observe. There can't be any lurid scandal associated with the contestant. There has to be a very direct standard for what the eventual winner will do or not do as the title holder. Even if she won the national title, she would have even more obligations to obey the petty dictates of the pageant committee. As she ascended in the beauty pageant contests, her responsibility to obey the committee in all publicity matters only increases until the day she is no longer a state contestant or until the day after she is no longer the national title holder. She has no recourse to legal action because it's ridiculous to think any state contestant can actually sue their way into winning the national title. And if she can't win the national title, then why even compete since she already has the Miss Nevada title? She may as well sell out and pose for a girlie mag to pay off college debts and call it a day. Her only recourse would be if other contestants were using their social media pages as homage to 0bama or Hitlery or one of the current Dem prez candidates. If the pageant took action against only one contestant and not against others doing the same thing, then there might be a (remote) chance of legal action. As long as the rules are applied uniformly, she doesn't have a legal pot to piss in. Even so, the courts are likely to be reluctant to involve themselves in something as subjective as a beauty pageant. Would you be as willing to demand freedom of speech for a contestant who was carrying water for 0bama or Hitlery or Biden or Warren or some political cause like abortion that you really hate? I think not.
I'm not a huge fan of Trump as you may know, nor am I a fan of any of the Dems you mentioned, but this just stinks. None of those contestants would have been stripped of the title had they won. The would have been praised and exalted, by the pageant and the medi.. Double standard. I still contend that she did everything possible to abide by the rules, but the pageant director kept moving the goalposts specifically for her. "Katie separated pages, combed through to remove posts, and overall made every effort to comply with the requests of the pageant.”
Government is in the last resort the employment of armed men, of policemen, gendarmes, soldiers, prison guards, and hangmen. They've stripped others of their titles before. Quite a few times actually. If you are in their pageant and you have signed their contract, you'd better obey their rules. They have all the power and you should know it by the time you have won a state pageant and sign up for the national pageant by signing the contracts. Their pageant, their rules. Just as the contract says pretty plainly. You keep saying this or implying it but I have yet to see you provide any proof that other state title holders are doing the same thing on their pages. If it is true, provide some evidence.
I do believe she followed their rules - it seems clear to me that this was a set-up all along. You keep saying this or implying it but I have yet to see you provide any proof that other state title holders are doing the same thing on their pages. It would be naive to think that they didn't.
Government is in the last resort the employment of armed men, of policemen, gendarmes, soldiers, prison guards, and hangmen. "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." - Hanlon's razor And the pageant may be taking a more anti-politics stance here, given how sick people are of hearing politics in every sphere of life. I know I don't watch hardly anything any more because I'm so sick of all the politics in everything. Sports, music, movies, TV, and now beauty pageants. These hirelings need to keep their fucking opinions to themselves. Not a single person in America craves more politics in their entertainment.
I will continue … I trust the following will address all three of your charges. ALL the pageant asked of Ms. Williams, in writing, is to keep separate social media accounts. (ie: Facebook) One is for politics where she can voice her own opinion as Katie Williams and the other is a new Facebook page for the pageant representing Ms. Nevada State 2019. None of this had to do with her personal political views. They are immaterial. She has her Personal Facebook page to voice her political views. She could be a President Trump supporter on her Personal Facebook page all she wants for everyone to read. However, the Ms. Nevada Facebook Page should be devoid of political content. ________________ The Ms. America Pageant is a No Politics pageant. It is in our Rules & Regulations as posted on the pageant website and therefore available to read before applying to the pageant. It is also included in our contracts and requires handwritten initials and signatures acknowledging that you have read and understood the pageants rules. Ms. Williams acknowledged both verbally and in writing that she understood these rules before she was accepted into the pageant. Nothing on her Facebook Page had any political statements at the time she was accepted into the pageant. The purpose for these Rules and Regulations is that the Ms. America Pageant does not want to be seen as endorsing any political candidate or political cause. Thru many emails starting in July she claimed she could not comprehend keeping pageant and politics separate on her Facebook pages. The pageant made many attempts to speak to her over the phone to try to resolve this issue. Many times we wrote to her to try to set up an appointment to have a telephone conference, all of which she consistently refuse to do. The pageant believes that a telephone conversation is a reasonable request and was willing to speak to her at any time that was convenient for her schedule. The pageant gave her a final deadline to edit the Facebook pages which she refused to do. This leads the pageant to believe that she is no longer capable of representing this pageant as Ms. Nevada State 2019, and she is no longer eligible to participate in the 2019 national pageant. Her title has been revoked. The pageant offered her a full refund on her entry fee and refund on one ticket that she purchased to the pageant after she fulfilled requirements of returning crown and sash and removal of the title Ms. Nevada State 2019 from all social media and the Internet. ________________ PAGEANT WEBSITE OF RULES AND REGULATIONS ________________ AGREEMENT HAND SIGNED BY KATIE WILLIAMS ________________ REVOCATION OF TITLE LETTER ________________ ________________ https://msamericapageant.com/page.php?groupingID=miscellaneous16
Yeah, quit being to so long winded. Moreover, what did you do to yukon?
Nice document inclusion. The key phrase that sticks out is the one which declares MAP as the sole arbiter of acceptable conduct and participation and that there is no venue for appeal or for suing the pageant. I think it would be hard to get into court with a civil suit. No judge wants to wade into that by setting aside contractual obligations expressed in straightforward legalese. If only sports/movies/TV and other venues would embrace the same standard. I'm sick of the politics, especially liberal politics, being injected into everything. If you want to show your tits and ass in a swimsuit, then just do it. Spare us your political lectures and promotional branding nonsense. After all, we only cared about the tits and ass to begin with.
In Post 20 , you will find in a letter from Susan Jeske, CEO Ms. America Pageant, to Katie Jo Williams [dated August 18, 2019] where Susan Jeske enumerated 9 instances in Footnote 2 where Katie Williams violated her signed agreement. Can you dispute Susan Jeske’s findings or show where Katie Williams did not violate the signed agreement in those instances? Again I ask, “what is the basis for you to “believe that Katie Williams followed their rules? You said it “would be naïve” to think that “other state title holders didn’t do the same thing on their pages.” It appears that you are just “thinking” that they are – while you have absolutely no proof that they are. When you're thinking something is happening and there is no proof that it is, then you're imagining it. You need to stop conjuring up these wildly strong justifications to substantiate your weak positions.
jussie swoleTT injury scam arTisTs The liberal gold mine To fund Their queerdom gods - hell - supersTaTe love ps liberTarians have Their overloaded kook cave sasquaTch - deckard buckeroo - toolconservaTive to fund theirs Too
If you ... don't use exclamation points --- you should't be typeing ! Commas - semicolons - question marks are for girlie boys !
liberTarians 2 MuCh ObsErvng PaulTuRd liberTarians dickHead – buckerRoot toolconservaTive - PinhEad Kan cAus devout KristIAnS to almost belV as A theory oriGins of biological Dvsrty. salute
Those clauses are illegitimate and you can sue anyway.
Point Q renders the contract null and void. It violate her free speech rights. You cannot be forced to give up a constitutional right in a contract.
Oh so you can talk about politics.
You are expressing your personal opinion here. In reality you will find that when you try to sue after you have signed a “covenant not to sue” – you will quickly learn that the “suit in law" you desire to have heard in a court of law ”will never go before a court of law.” This is true since “covenants not to sue are used to settle specific legal issues "outside of the court system”.
Oh so you [Katie Williams] can talk about politics. You will see in Post 20, a letter from Susan Jeske, CEO Ms. America Pageant, to Katie Jo Williams [dated August 18, 2019] where Susan Jeske enumerated 9 instances in Footnote 2 where Katie Williams violated her signed agreement. You can also read where Katie Williams was given ample opportunities to “edit” those posts and she “refused” to do so. It was never about her not being able to “talk politics” – it was always about her not representing herself as “Ms. Nevada” by wearing the crown and sash while “talking politics” and she violated her sign agreement by doing that on at least 9 occasions. So, Katie, say “goodbye” to your title …
Courts Say Man Can Sue Despite Signing Waiver By Avi Salzman https://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/04/nyregion/courts-say-man-can-sue-despite- signing-waiver.html You can always sue. You may not win but you can sue. Comprende?
Williams has created a separate Facebook page for the pageant, devoid of political statements, but she claimed that the organisers continued to voice their disapproval in personal communications of what she was posting on her personal account. F you would like to post about your political positions then create a new FB profile page for pageants only She can sue for breach of contract. You can have a political page if it is separate.
That's a bald faced lie! Story and FOX News report HERE Noah Jennings, Williams' spokesman, told Newsweek that Jeske was allegedly sending "mixed signals” to his client. “Ms. America CEO Susan Jeske, who would encourage Katie over the phone, and then follow that up with emails and screenshots of things she took issue with,” Jennings said. “Katie separated pages, combed through to remove posts, and overall made every effort to comply with the requests of the pageant.”
Government is in the last resort the employment of armed men, of policemen, gendarmes, soldiers, prison guards, and hangmen. What political statements did she make? Can you even name them? I don't think you can. Canning her is a political statement.
Saying that you hate Antifa and one of their thugs murdered 9 people in Dayton Ohio and you wish they would rot in hell. If she said something like that. That is not political. Did any of them say they were queer on their pages? If so that is political and since they were inconsistent breach of contract. My point is there are tons of ways to sue them. Not that she will or necessarily should. But she sure can.
She can also sue them for slander.
Katie Williams was stripped of her title for representing herself as “Ms. Nevada” by wearing the crown and sash when those political statements were made. Since are apparently are so desirous to see those – then you can look them up yourself. You will find the links in Footnote 2 of the REVOCATION OF TITLE LETTER in Post 20. I trust you will have no difficulty in performing that task.
Exactly where did they slander her?
But MAP stated that she could not wear the crown and sash in pictures posted on a political page and she did as shown in nine occasions. She violated here written agreement and she was stripped of her title.
That's a bald faced lie! Oh wait, - I see now – you used this Story and FOX News report to prove it’s a lie. Please now show your factual documentation to prove that Noah Jennings [Williams' spokesman] was telling the truth and that Susan Jeske [“Ms. America CEO] was lying. Hearsay in news stories will not suffice since they cannot adequately substantiated.
She was stripped of here title for wearing the crown and sash in the links in Footnote 2 of the REVOCATION OF TITLE LETTER in Post 20 for political statements Uh, what was your point again?
They are legal and binding, just like any contract. Certain types of contracts cannot be enforced even if someone is stupid enough to sign them. This isn't one of them.
https://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/04/nyregion/courts-say-man-can-sue-despite- signing-waiver.html I “comprehende” from reading more than enough of the Deckard posted articles that newspapers, other media lie by slanting their headlines – especially shit put out by the NY Times. Since I could not read the story directly, you made me work and it took me a while to get to the bottom of this. Yes, there was an exception in New York State where “if you've been injured due to negligent actions, you can sue – even if you signed a waiver.” Was Katie Williams “injured due to negligent actions” by the MAP? No. You showed me one exception – I will accept that, of course. I ask you to now show factual evidence that can ALWAYS sue after you have signed a covenant not to sue. Can you show me that …
Certain types of contracts cannot be enforced even if someone is stupid enough to sign them. This isn't one of them. Sure you could. You could scour the other contestants pages especially the runner up. Then say something they said is political. Something everyone said is political. Again i'm not saying she should just she could.
Was Katie Williams “injured due to negligent actions” by the MAP? It could be argued that she was injured, emotionally and financially. They singled her out because she supports Trump. She didn't tell anyone to vote for Trump that I know of. Everything is political, or you can make that case. She could say they were being political because she just likes our country and the President. Nothing necessarily political about that. Definition of political 1a : of or relating to government, a government, or the conduct of government
Certain types of contracts cannot be enforced even if someone is stupid enough to sign them. This isn't one of them. Sure you could. You could scour the other contestants pages especially the runner up. Then say something they said is political. Something everyone said is political. Again i'm not saying she should just she could. That will NOT matter. Two or more wrongs will never make the first wrong be right. All that would do would cause other contestants to be stripped of their titles if it were shown they violated their signed agreement. Stone, with all due respect – you are grasping at straws on this one.
She was, no doubt. And she agreed to be subject to the pageant's rules and directives. She was, in essence, applying to be the employee of the pageant for one year if she won the national title. And she signed the contract, knowing that other contestants in previous years had been stripped of titles with no legal recourse. If you sign their contract, you have to abide by their rules.
Sidebar Post to Ask a Question of You: Do you consider this a political statement? A photo of two men embracing posted on Instagram, one with an American flag
Gatlin has been hitting the Sterno again and now he's posting his gay Twitter porn. You know what's likely to come next. : )
Please now show your factual documentation to prove that Noah Jennings [Williams' spokesman] was telling the truth and that Susan Jeske [“Ms. America CEO] was lying.
Comments (53 - 92) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestThere is no breach of the contract.
The essential feature of government is the enforcement of its decrees by beating, killing, and imprisoning.
Those who are asking for more government interference are asking ultimately for more compulsion and less freedom.
#13. To: A K A Stone (#11)
There is no breach of the contract.
There is a breach of a written agreement [contract]. Show me the part of the contract she broke.
Read: [The written] AGREEMENT [that is] HAND SIGNED BY KATIE WILLIAMS. You can't it's you speculating what the contract says.
I was not speculating. [To TC earlier] - You're wrong you should be a able to have a personal life too.
I politely and kindly ask you once again: Does “having a personal life” mean having the right to unilaterally breech a written agreement [contract] and break the terms set forth in such agreement?
#14. To: Deckard (#12)
She used her personal facebook account to make political comments
Yes she did. In a statement, the Ms. America Pageant said Williams is “distorting the facts” about her disqualification.
Boy, she damned well showed the pageant she can do what she wants to – didn’t she? [/s].
#15. To: A K A Stone, Deckard, Gatlin, nolu chan (#8)
You're wrong you should be a ableto have a personal life too. Nothing she did was wrong.
#16. To: Tooconservative (#15)
Would you be as willing to demand freedom of speech for a contestant who was carrying water for 0bama or Hitlery or Biden or Warren or some political cause like abortion that you really hate?
The essential feature of government is the enforcement of its decrees by beating, killing, and imprisoning.
Those who are asking for more government interference are asking ultimately for more compulsion and less freedom.
#17. To: Deckard (#16)
(Edited)
None of those contestants would have been stripped of the title had they won.
Double standard.
#18. To: Tooconservative (#17)
If you are in their pageant and you have signed their contract, you'd better obey their rules.
The essential feature of government is the enforcement of its decrees by beating, killing, and imprisoning.
Those who are asking for more government interference are asking ultimately for more compulsion and less freedom.
#19. To: Deckard (#18)
(Edited)
It would be naive to think that they didn't.
#20. To: A K A Stone, Deckard (#11)
I’m sorry that it took longer than expected for me to get back to you. There is no breach of the contract.
Show me the part of the contract she broke.
You can't it's you speculating what the contract says.Katie Williams is distorting the facts.
I have attempted here to show you all the things you asked me to show you.
(See below)
(See her hand written signature below)
(See below disqualifying Email and offering her a full refund)
No Politics 
4-17-19
Agreeing to the NO Politics Rule
Offering her a full refund on her money.
8-18-19
I believe I have done that.
Is there anything else you need from me?
#21. To: Gatlin (#20)
Is there anything else you need from me?
#22. To: Gatlin (#20)
#23. To: Deckard (#18)
I do believe she [Katie Williams] followed their rules -
What is the basis for you to believe that? it seems clear to me that this was a set-up all along.
What is it that gives you a clear picture that Katie Williams “was set-up all along?”
#24. To: Gatlin (#23)
boris
#25. To: BorisY (#24)
(Edited)
ps
Gatlin
#26. To: Tooconservative (#22)
The key phrase that sticks out is the one which declares MAP as the sole arbiter of acceptable conduct and participation and that there is no venue for appeal or for suing the pageant.
#27. To: Gatlin (#20)
#28. To: Gatlin (#20)
IF you would like to post about your political positions then create a new FB profile page for pageants only
#29. To: A K A Stone (#26)
(Edited)
Those [covenants not to sue] clauses are illegitimate and you can sue anyway.
Nope, they are not “illegitimate” – and – Nope, you cannot “sue anyway.” “A covenant ‘not to sue’ legally obliges a party that could initiate a lawsuit not to do so."
Perhaps you will better understand the fallacy of your personal opinion after you read: ”Covenant Not to Sue Defined”.
"The covenant is made explicitly between two parties, and any third party that wants to make a claim is legally allowed to do so. Covenants not to sue are used to settle specific legal issues outside of the court system. Parties may enter into this type of agreement to prevent a protracted, expensive lawsuit. In exchange for the covenant, the party that could seek damages may be provided with compensation or may be given assurances that the other party in the agreement will conduct a specific action."
#30. To: A K A Stone (#28)
Katie Williams IF you [Katie Williams] would like to post about your political positions then …
Of course, Katie Williams can talk about politics. She was never forbidden to do so. She, however, signed an agreement where she is expressly forbidden to wear her crown and sash when talking politics.
#31. To: Gatlin (#29)
#32. To: Gatlin (#30)
However, she added, the organisers failed to address her requests to clarify what content they found to be in breach of their ‘No Politics’ rules.
#33. To: Gatlin, A K A Stone (#30)
You can also read where Katie Williams was given ample opportunities to “edit” those posts and she “refused” to do so.
The essential feature of government is the enforcement of its decrees by beating, killing, and imprisoning.
Those who are asking for more government interference are asking ultimately for more compulsion and less freedom.
#34. To: Gatlin (#30)
#35. To: Deckard, Gatlin (#0)
These posts, in her words, included a picture of herself wearing a red ‘Trump 2020’ hat as well as expressions of support for the United States and criticism of the leftist political organisation antifa.
#36. To: Gatlin (#30)
#37. To: A K A Stone (#34)
What political statements did she make?
You obviously have difficulty grasping onto the fact that it was not “what political statements” Katie Williams made – she was not stripped of her title for “making political statements.” Can you even name them [the political statements]?
I have no need, reason, or desire to do so for it would serve absolutely no purpose here since she was not stripped of her title for making political statements. Canning her is a political statement.
There you go again, stating your personal opinion. Which you are of course entitled to do. However, stating your personal opinion changes nothing and will rectify no “alleged wrongs” since Katie Williams was stripped of her title by a “legal action” because she violated – on at least nine stated occasion – an agreement she had signed.
#38. To: A K A Stone (#36)
She can also sue them for slander.
#39. To: A K A Stone (#32)
She can sue for breach of contract.
How did MAP breach the contract? You can have a political page if it is separate.
MAP stated that she could and she had one.
#40. To: Deckard (#33)
You can also read where Katie Williams was given ample opportunities to “edit” those posts and she “refused” to do so.
Is it now? How did you prove it to be? Noah Jennings, Williams' spokesman, told ...
That is no proof.
#41. To: A K A Stone (#35)
These posts, in her words, included a picture of herself wearing a red ‘Trump 2020’ hat as well as expressions of support for the United States and criticism of the leftist political organisation antifa.
That being the case, then she was obviously not stripped of her title for the posts she is referring to here. Saying that you hate Antifa and one of their thugs murdered 9 people in Dayton Ohio and you wish they would rot in hell. If she said something like that. That is not political.
An irrelevant supposition which never took place and there is no valid reason to discuss this hypothetical here. Did any of them say they were queer on their pages? If so that is political and since they were inconsistent breach of contract.
Same answer as stated above. My point is there are tons of ways to sue them.
There is no way she can sue them for stripping her of the title since she signed a “covenant not to sue.” [See Post 29]. Not that she will or necessarily should. But she sure can.
She CANNOT sue them for stripping here of the title since she signed a “covenant not to sue.” [See Post 29].
#42. To: A K A Stone (#26)
Those clauses are illegitimate and you can sue anyway.
#43. To: A K A Stone (#31)
Courts Say Man Can Sue Despite Signing Waiver By Avi Salzman
Upon going to your link, I could not read about the case because this was posted: Keep reading The Times by creating a free account or logging in.
So all that you furnished me was a HEADLINE. You can always sue. You may not win but you can sue. Comprende?
No, I don’t “comprende” – because you cannot ALWAYS sue.
#44. To: Deckard (#2)
Williams has created a separate Facebook page for the pageant, devoid of political statements, but she claimed that the organisers continued to voice their disapproval in personal communications of what she was posting on her personal account.
Katie Williams didn’t “tell the whole truth and nothing but the truth.” Katie Williams neglected to state that the MAP was voicing the disapproval because she was posting pictures [9, at least] of her in the Ms. Nevada crown and sash where political material was presented – which was a flagrant violation of the agreement Katie Williams signed with the MAP.
#45. To: Tooconservative (#42)
They are legal and binding, just like any contract.
#46. To: Gatlin (#43)
Yes, there was an exception in New York State where “if you've been injured due to negligent actions, you can sue – even if you signed a waiver.”
#47. To: A K A Stone (#45)
They are legal and binding, just like any contract.
#48. To: A K A Stone (#46)
It could be argued that she was injured, emotionally and financially.
If she ever could get it filed, then she could be counter sued for “abuse of process.” That is to say for bringing a lawsuit for an “improper purpose.” Based on the evidence presented in Post 20, I really – REALLY – think she would be even more stupid to try that. They singled her out because she supports Trump.
Whom she supported is of no consequence. It has no bearing on the resulting action. She violated the written agreement not for supporting anyone, but for wearing her crown and sash on political statements posted in Facebook. She didn't tell anyone to vote for Trump that I know of.
That makes no difference. She could have shouted to the world by any and all means to vote for Trump. She however could not be involved in political activity while wearing the crown and sash. She was at least 9 times and she was stripped of her title Everything is political, or you can make that case.
But you can’t be a MAP contestant and wear the crown and sash while “making that case.” She could say they were being political because she just likes our country and the President. Nothing necessarily political about that.
The old “could-would-should.” But she dis say that. She wore here crown and sash in at least 9 pictures where political statements were made and she was legally stripped of her title for doing that. Definition of political 1a : of or relating to government, a government, or the conduct of government
What is this supposed to mean?
#49. To: A K A Stone, Gatlin (#46)
It could be argued that she was injured, emotionally and financially.
#50. To: A K A Stone (#48)
skin and the other with a rainbow skin. “Don’t assume my beliefs based on my
political party! Everyone has the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness!
I will fight for Fairness for everyone regardless of where you fall on the political
spectrum.”
#51. To: A K A Stone, Gatlin (#50)
#52. To: Deckard (#40)
.
.
.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]