[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
United States News Title: Newsweek: Time to Rethink Taboo on Cannibalism? Breitbart by Thomas D Williams, PhD Since cannibalism is found throughout the animal kingdom and therefore is something natural, perhaps it is time for humans to rethink the ultimate taboo against eating human flesh, Newsweek proposes in an article Wednesday. There is nothing necessarily unethical or unreasonable about eating human flesh, declare psychologists Jared Piazza and Neil McLatchie of Lancaster University, but careful reasoning over the merits of cannibalism is often overridden by our feelings of repulsion and disgust. While not going so far as to recommend cannibalism, saying there is no need to overcome our repulsion for the foreseeable future, the two authors suggest that humans could master their aversion for human flesh if they needed to. Many people develop disgust for all kinds of meat, while morticians and surgeons quickly adapt to the initially difficult experience of handling dead bodies, they note. Our ongoing research with butchers in England suggests that they easily adapt to working with animal parts that the average consumer finds quite disgusting. Moreover, the psychological revulsion experienced over the prospect of consuming human flesh is not the product of reason and may even contradict reason, they argue in Wednesdays article, which originally appeared last week in The Conversation. Survivors of the famous 1972 Andes plane crash waited until near starvation before succumbing to reason and eating those who had already died, they propose. All sorts of animals eat members of their own species, from spadefoot tadpoles and Australian redback spiders to gulls and pelicans, they state. And cannibalism can even be found among mammals, they add, such as with many rodents as well as bears, lions, and chimpanzees. Yet humans seem entrenched in their conviction that anthropophagy is simply wrong, no matter how many conditions are placed on hypothetical scenarios. Human revulsion toward cannibalism stems from our tendency to associate personhood and flesh, the authors propose, even when the flesh in question is no longer living. Even if we can bring ourselves to deem cannibalism morally acceptable, they contend, we cant silence our thoughts about the person it came from and so our bias against eating human flesh persists. The way we interact with animals shapes the way we categorize them. Research shows that the more we think of animals as having human propertiesthat is, as being like usthe more we tend to think theyre gross to eat, they note. While noting in passing that philosophers have argued that burying the dead could be wasteful in the context of the fight against world hunger, the authors ultimately do not propose breaking this taboo for now, saying that were as happy as you are to continue accepting the wisdom of repugnance. https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/08/22/newsweek-time-to-rethink-taboo-on-cannibalism/
Poster Comment:
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 5.
#3. To: Deckard (#0)
What human meat do Jared Piazza and Neil McLatchie recommend? At last check, Mexican meat was too greasy, Italian meat was too oily, and Irish meat was just too damn expensive.
Cannibal Husband-I dont like your Mother. Cannibal Wife- Try the potatoes. *** Two cannibals were having supper. Your wife makes great soup said one to the other. Yes agreed the first, but I am going to miss her terribly.
There are no replies to Comment # 5. End Trace Mode for Comment # 5.
Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest |
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|