[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

For the cash: Ex-NFL player stages hate crime, trashes his businesses

Rep Jim Jordan’s passionate speech against Red Flag laws

Trump administration repeals the Obama era ‘clean water rule’ and that is a good thing

Our Favorite Price

PETITION: Throw out the illegal prosecution of General Michael Flynn. Prosecute the perpetrators.

Concerning Government and Mainstream Media: Believe Nothing, Question Everything

Martial Law Masquerading as Law and Order: The Police StateÂ’s Language of Force

Ric Ocasek, New Wave Rock Visionary and Cars Co-Founder, Is Dead

Saturday Night Live Fires New Cast Member Shane Gillis for Using Offensive Language

New storm rises over Kavanaugh

Vapers seek relief ... by turning to cigarettes

Same Gov’t Who’s Now Banning Flavored E-Cigs, Approved Candy-Flavored Amphetamines for Kids

Remember the Vallejo Cop Who Tackled a Veteran for Filming Him?

Blood, Delusions, and Corruption in the American West

Will Justin Amash Run for President as a Libertarian in 2020?

Ken Burns Delves into the Hardscrabble History of Country Music

"Remain in Mexico" immigration hearings begin in tents at border

Black Race Huslter Deray Accuses White Race Grifter Shaun King of Fleecing Donors, Demand He Stop His "Fundraising" Scams

Are Comedians Finally Fighting Back Against the Far Left’s Cultural Clampdown?

Pete Buttigieg’s Association With the Abortionist Who Stockpiled Baby Corpses in His Home Is Hardly Surprising

Elizabeth Warren’s Social Security Proposal Doesn’t Go Far Enough: It’s Time For A Basic (Retirement) Income

The CIA’s Influence Over the Media: Use of the Conspiracy Theorist Slur

Pete Buttigieg Chides Gun Owners Who Have ‘Sense of Manhood’ Wrapped Up in Guns

Is Vaping Marijuana Safe? Deaths and Lung Disease Linked to E-Cigs Call That Into Question

DOJ Inspector General Has Completed FISA Abuse Probe

Ohio gamer sentenced to 15 months prison in 'swatting' case

Court: FBI Must Destroy Memos Calling Antiwar.com a Threat

Trump administration enters new phase for border wall, sets ambitious timetable after securing land

Eddie Money, ‘Two Tickets to Paradise’ singer, dead at 70

Eighth Illegal Alien Charged with Rape in Same Maryland Sanctuary County

Free (with ads) Movie "The Wrecking Crew"

Judicial Watch Sued To Get Footage of The ‘Plane’ Hitting The Pentagon On 9/11 (Video)

Webb Wilder & The Beatnecks - Baby Please Don't Go

95 Percent of Americans Believe the Media is Full of Shit

Orange County deputy accidentally shoots himself while training

9/11 Solidified the Destruction of Our Freedom

The Orange Car Guy

AGW is “Paid to Find Out Who’s in Town”

Witness: Girls as young as 11 visited Jeffrey EpsteinÂ’s island in 2018

Christine Blasey Ford's Father Privately Supported Brett Kavanaught's Confirmation

'Way Too Far To The Left': Obama’s Homeland Security Secretary Skewers Democrats On Immigration

Biden Tried to Buy Putin’s Support for Iraq War With Promise of Oil Money

Clown World: Canadian Cancer Society Claims Men Without Cervixes Can Get Cervical Cancer

Revealed: You Know How Rush Limbaugh Talks About "Seminar Callers"? Turns Out They're Real -- Employed by a Joint Clinton-DNC Effort

Don’t look now, but there’s more border wall news

Psychedelic Science Just Got a Big Boost

The Bill of Rights Turns 230, and What Do We Have to Show for It? Nothing Good

Trump Replaces Bolton with Fringe Neocon

When Booze Was Banned but Pot Was Not

The 911 Commission Report: A 571-Page Lie


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Weird Stuff/Unexplained
See other Weird Stuff/Unexplained Articles

Title: Why Facts Don’t Change Our Minds
Source: The New Yorket
URL Source: https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/ ... hy-facts-dont-change-our-minds
Published: Feb 19, 2017
Author: Elizabeth Kolbert
Post Date: 2019-08-15 02:14:06 by Gatlin
Keywords: None
Views: 38

The vaunted human capacity for reason may have more to do with winning arguments than with thinking straight.

New discoveries about the human mind show the limitations of reason.

In 1975, researchers at Stanford invited a group of undergraduates to take part in a study about suicide. They were presented with pairs of suicide notes. In each pair, one note had been composed by a random individual, the other by a person who had subsequently taken his own life. The students were then asked to distinguish between the genuine notes and the fake ones.

Some students discovered that they had a genius for the task. Out of twenty-five pairs of notes, they correctly identified the real one twenty-four times. Others discovered that they were hopeless. They identified the real note in only ten instances.

As is often the case with psychological studies, the whole setup was a put-on. Though half the notes were indeed genuine—they’d been obtained from the Los Angeles County coroner’s office —the scores were fictitious. The students who’d been told they were almost always right were, on average, no more discerning than those who had been told they were mostly wrong.

In the second phase of the study, the deception was revealed. The students were told that the real point of the experiment was to gauge their responses to thinking they were right or wrong. (This, it turned out, was also a deception.) Finally, the students were asked to estimate how many suicide notes they had actually categorized correctly, and how many they thought an average student would get right. At this point, something curious happened. The students in the high-score group said that they thought they had, in fact, done quite well—significantly better than the average student —even though, as they’d just been told, they had zero grounds for believing this. Conversely, those who’d been assigned to the low-score group said that they thought they had done significantly worse than the average student—a conclusion that was equally unfounded.

“Once formed,” the researchers observed dryly, “impressions are remarkably perseverant.”

A few years later, a new set of Stanford students was recruited for a related study. The students were handed packets of information about a pair of firefighters, Frank K. and George H. Frank’s bio noted that, among other things, he had a baby daughter and he liked to scuba dive. George had a small son and played golf. The packets also included the men’s responses on what the researchers called the Risky-Conservative Choice Test. According to one version of the packet, Frank was a successful firefighter who, on the test, almost always went with the safest option. In the other version, Frank also chose the safest option, but he was a lousy firefighter who’d been put “on report” by his supervisors several times. Once again, midway through the study, the students were informed that they’d been misled, and that the information they’d received was entirely fictitious. The students were then asked to describe their own beliefs. What sort of attitude toward risk did they think a successful firefighter would have? The students who’d received the first packet thought that he would avoid it. The students in the second group thought he’d embrace it.

Even after the evidence “for their beliefs has been totally refuted, people fail to make appropriate revisions in those beliefs,” the researchers noted. In this case, the failure was “particularly impressive,” since two data points would never have been enough information to generalize from.

The Stanford studies became famous. Coming from a group of academics in the nineteen-seventies, the contention that people can’t think straight was shocking. It isn’t any longer. Thousands of subsequent experiments have confirmed (and elaborated on) this finding. As everyone who’s followed the research—or even occasionally picked up a copy of Psychology Today—knows, any graduate student with a clipboard can demonstrate that reasonable-seeming people are often totally irrational. Rarely has this insight seemed more relevant than it does right now. Still, an essential puzzle remains: How did we come to be this way?


Poster Comment:

Poster Comment:

Repeating – Even after the evidence “for their beliefs has been totally refuted, people fail to make appropriate revisions in those beliefs,” the researchers noted. That people can’t think straight was shocking. It isn’t any longer. Thousands of subsequent experiments have confirmed (and elaborated on) this finding. Reasonable-seeming people are often totally irrational. Rarely has this insight seemed more relevant than it does right now. Still, an essential puzzle remains: How did we come to be this way?

The vaunted human capacity for reason may have more to do with winning arguments than with thinking straight.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com