United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: Trump To Address Nation Monday Over Mass Shootings, Says More Gun Control May Be Needed
Source:
Zero Hedge
URL Source: https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019 ... more-gun-control-may-be-needed
Published: Aug 4, 2019
Author: Tyler Durden
Post Date: 2019-08-05 10:44:33 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 5787
Comments: 57
In the wake of multiple mass shootings over the weekend, President Trump told reporters in Morristown Airport before departing for the White House on Sunday that "hate has no place in our country and we're going to take care of it." As The Hill reports, Congressional Democrats, 2020 presidential candidates and others have rushed to draw comparisons between the motives of the El Paso shooter and Trump’s immigration rhetoric and suggested he helped fuel the environment that led to the attack. “Let’s be very clear about what is causing this and who the president is. He is an open avowed racist and encouraging more racism in this country,” former Rep. Beto O’Rourke (D-Texas), whose hometown is El Paso, said Sunday on CNN’s “State of the Union.” Notably, however, even Trump nemesis, former FBI Director, Jim Comey admitted in his latest op-ed (albeit in the 20th paragraph) that: "...according to a 'manifesto' widely attributed to him, the Texas terrorist who killed at least 20 people in El Paso on Saturday wasn’t directly motivated by Donald Trump..." The president ignored shouted questions about whether the El Paso shooter's anti-immigrant manifesto shared similarities with his rhetoric and noted instead that the shootings are part of “a mental illness problem.” The president then added that he had spoken to Attorney General William Barr, FBI Director Christopher Wray, the Ohio and Texas governors as well as members of Congress. “We have to get it stopped,” he said. “This has been going on for years, for years and years in our country.” He added that "perhaps" more needs to be done with respect to gun control. Trump added that he will deliver a formal statement on Monday at 10 a.m. Monday at the White House. On Saturday, a gunman entered an El Paso, Texas Walmart, killing 20 people and wounding 26 others. Less than 24 hours later, at least nine people were killed and 26 more injured when 24-year-old Connor Betts of Bellbrook Ohio used a .223 caliber rifle to open fire at a crowd on East 5th street in the city's popular downtown Oregon district.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 51.
#1. To: Deckard (#0)
Mass shooting deaths are on par with getting killed by lightning. You are not going to legislate away occurrances that are already extremely rare.
As of August 4, 2019, 11 lightning fatalities have occurred in 2019. These numbers certainly do not show that “mass shooting deaths are on par with getting killed by lightning.”
Yes, with two fewer fatalities than "mass shootings". Get a grip Gatlin. (Hey, try saying that 5 times real fast!) It's about time to put you back on bozo.
Go ahead. I have more data to post for others to read ...
Okay. Ooooohh... maybe I should wait!
Good choice ...
there were 38 lightning fatalities in 2016. These numbers certainly do not show that “mass shooting deaths are on par with getting killed by lightning.”
There were 38 lightning fatalities in 2016. In 2016, there were 37,806 deaths in motor vehicle accidents in America. So in 2016, you were 995 times as likely to die in a vehicle accident than by lightning. And in 2016, you were only 532 times as likely to die by a motor vehicle accident than you were to be killed in a mass shooting. Deaths by lightning are only 0.1% of the number who die in vehicle accidents. Deaths by mass shootings are only 0.19% of the number who die in vehicle accidents. We are talking about vanishingly small numbers of deaths from lightning or mass shootings. BTW, you don't have that much less chance of dying while rock climbing in America or Canada than of being struck by lightning or killed in a mass shooting. Quora: How many people die rock climbing each year? ...: I just found these 2013 numbers in a quick search. You could do comparable searches for dying by slipping in a bathtub or shower or dying by electrocution from kitchen or bathroom gadgets and you'd probably get more fatalities than from lightning or from mass shootings.
Yes, we are ... I did not bring up the subject. I only responded to a faulty analogy. Have you even known me to pass up a chance not to?
You and Neil were arguing over very very tiny percentages of annual deaths in America. Vanishingly small. I've never known a person shot in a mass shooting. I've never known 500 vehicle fatalities. And I've never known a person struck by lightning. We all generally have much better things to worry about than lightning or mass shootings. Like car accidents, heart disease, strokes and cancer. It's discouraging we allow the pols to stage these little political pillow fights on these peripheral issues that simply do not affect the vast majority of the population. It's almost like it is a deliberate tactic of the two-party duopoly to keep the peasants busy. Perhaps you recall the old Wizard Of Id comics. Strange how they dragged that one out for years.
That's actually not true. I made an observation comparing the number of deaths in "mass shootings" to those killed by lightning saying they were similar. I've made this observation elsewhere to counter the illusion put forth by gun grabbers about mass shootings being an "epidemic" and how people claim to be afraid to go shopping because there might be a mass shooting at their mall. Gatlin, I guess because he doesn't care about gun rights, decided that this was an opportunity to slam a libertarian because, you know, we libertarians are demon spawn and all, so he got on his high horse and tried to attack me by suggesting that "mass shooting" deaths were in fact far more common than lightning deaths citing some stats and seemingly assuming that a "mass shooting" was any shooting incident in which more than one bullet leaves a gun. When I pointed out the common but non-standard definition of "mass shooting" was a single shooting incident in which at least 4 people die by gunfire, he threw a hissy fit because it didn't fit his attack narrative and it was me, as a libertarian, lying and twisting stats and redefining terms and so on, because that's what we conniving demon spawn libertarians do when we are backed into a corner with no hope of escape. So the entire argument -- not a discussion or debate -- began because Gatlin, rather than addressing and agreeing with my 2rd Amendment point just wanted to score personal points in bashing a libertarian. That is all it was. TC, you are correct about the numbers of deaths due to lightning and "mass shootings" (using the more conservative definition of 4+ deaths in a single incident, or something similar to differentiate them from targeted murders and what not) are both "vanishingly small", and that is, to me, true even if one form of death is 10x more than the other if the larger number is still only a fractional sliver compared to the size of a country of 320 million, though I don't consider the MS/Lightning death ratio to be that far apart. I think I said some where the numbers were "on par" which Gatlin chose to define as "equal to" as part of his personal anti-libertarian bashing effort, but which I have always defined in that context as "on similar scale". If I meant "equal to" I would have said so. And in the "vanishing small" context I would consider even a 10x difference to be "on par" **if** both are highly unlikely to occur with any single person. I.e. I'd consider a drop of gasoline to be "on par" with 1/10th that amount absorbed by a piece of paper, but I would not consider 10 gallons of gas to be "on par" with 1 gallon. But leave it to Gatlin to ignore the pro-gun point coming from a demon-spawn libertarian and instead seize on a perceived opportunity to act out his obsessive-compulsive anti-libertarian fetish, and fall flat on his face in the process. So no, this was not really about arguing over tiny numbers. This was simply Gatlin at his most embarrassing worst. I've known of people via personal links killed by lightning, gunned down with a shotgun and killed in a car accident. None close to me though. Precisely true! Well, us libertarians are demon-spawn and must be stopped somehow. The world hangs in the balance. What good it is to restore justice, eradicate corruption and spread freedom all over the world if there is even one demonic libertarian running around demanding his right to smoke a naturally occurring plant? That was one of my favorites, though Calvin and Hobbs is, for me, the hands-down best comic of all time.
What I like about Libertarians is leave me alone and I will leave you alone. Let me live my life and you live yours. The thing I don't like about libertarian philosophy is it treats moral and immoral as equal it seems to me.
The thing I don't like about libertarian philosophy is it treats moral and immoral as equal it seems to me. The thing I don’t like about libertarians is that they never exercise the fundamental principle of primum non nocere. I find libertarians to be overly impetuous. They consistently act too quickly without thought or care. While they continuously demonstrate that they neither believe in or exercise the thought of first, to do no harm, they definitely should. The guy in the video below has a good explanation of the dangers of libertarianism and why he chose to abandon the philosophy. The unique perspective from his personal involvement in libertarianism is fascinatingly educational. Libertarians should never be in political power where they will cause more harm than good because they will react selfishly in their own personal interest when it would have been better not to do something, or even to do nothing, than to risk causing more harm than good. Think about it …
There are no replies to Comment # 51. End Trace Mode for Comment # 51.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#31. To: Pinguinite (#1)
Mass shooting deaths are on par with getting killed by lightning.
As of July 31, 2019, 248 mass shootings have occurred in 2019 with 246 fatalities.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_mass_shootings_in_the_United_States_ in_2019
https://www.weather.gov/safety/lightning-fatalities
#32. To: Gatlin (#31)
As of July 31, 2019, 248 mass shootings have occurred in 2019 with 246 fatalities.
#34. To: Pinguinite (#32)
It's about time to put you back on bozo.
#35. To: Gatlin (#34)
Go ahead.
I have more data to post for others to read ...
#37. To: Pinguinite (#35)
Ooooohh... maybe I should wait!
#38. To: Pinguinite (#37)
(Edited)
Mass shooting deaths are on par with getting killed by lightning.
There were 71 mass killings in 2016.
https://time.com/4965022/deadliest-mass-shooting-us-history/
https://www.google.com/search? ei=2exNXbm9JMPdtAbcn5jQBQ&q=lightning+deaths+in+2016&oq=lightning+deaths+in+20 16&gs_l=psy- ab.12..0i22i30l4.157498.158756..161534...0.0..0.90.172.2......0....1..gws- wiz.......0i71j0.nPvgH08xoMU&ved=0ahUKEwj5ja3a5PbjAhXDLs0KHdwPBloQ4dUDCAo
#42. To: Gatlin, Pinguinite, nolu chan (#38)
(Edited)
There were 71 mass killings in 2016.
In 2013 there were 143 US and 11 CAN accidents reported, with 283 US and 24 CAN persons involved, 100 US and 5 CAN injuries, and 21 US and 4 CAN fatalities.
#43. To: Tooconservative (#42)
We are talking about vanishingly small numbers of deaths from lightning or mass shootings.
#45. To: Gatlin (#43)
I only responded to a faulty analogy.
#48. To: Tooconservative (#45)
You and Neil were arguing over very very tiny percentages of annual deaths in America. Vanishingly small.
I've never known a person shot in a mass shooting. I've never known 500 vehicle fatalities. And I've never known a person struck by lightning.
We all generally have much better things to worry about than lightning or mass shootings. Like car accidents, heart disease, strokes and cancer.
It's discouraging we allow the pols to stage these little political pillow fights on these peripheral issues that simply do not affect the vast majority of the population. It's almost like it is a deliberate tactic of the two-party duopoly to keep the peasants busy.
Perhaps you recall the old Wizard Of Id comics. Strange how they dragged that one out for years.
#49. To: Pinguinite (#48)
we libertarians are demon spawn and all,
#51. To: A K A Stone, Pinhead (#49)
What I like about Libertarians is leave me alone and I will leave you alone. Let me live my life and you live yours.
Primum non nocere is a Latin phrase that means "first, to do no harm" and is one of the principal precepts of bioethics that all medical students are taught in school and is a fundamental principle throughout the world. Another way to state it is that, "given an existing problem, it may be better not to do something, or even to do nothing, than to risk causing more harm than good." It reminds physicians to consider the possible harm that any intervention might do. It is invoked when debating the use of an intervention that carries an obvious risk of harm but a less certain chance of benefit.
Replies to Comment # 51.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]