[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Trump Is Planning to Send Kill Teams to Mexico to Take Out Cartel Leaders

The Great Falling Away in the Church is Here | Tim Dilena

How Ridiculous? Blade-Less Swiss Army Knife Debuts As Weapon Laws Tighten

Jewish students beaten with sticks at University of Amsterdam

Terrorists shut down Park Avenue.

Police begin arresting democrats outside Met Gala.

The minute the total solar eclipse appeared over US

Three Types Of People To Mark And Avoid In The Church Today

Are The 4 Horsemen Of The Apocalypse About To Appear?

France sends combat troops to Ukraine battlefront

Facts you may not have heard about Muslims in England.

George Washington University raises the Hamas flag. American Flag has been removed.

Alabama students chant Take A Shower to the Hamas terrorists on campus.

In Day of the Lord, 24 Church Elders with Crowns Join Jesus in His Throne

In Day of the Lord, 24 Church Elders with Crowns Join Jesus in His Throne

Deadly Saltwater and Deadly Fresh Water to Increase

Deadly Cancers to soon Become Thing of the Past?

Plague of deadly New Diseases Continues

[FULL VIDEO] Police release bodycam footage of Monroe County District Attorney Sandra Doorley traffi

Police clash with pro-Palestine protesters on Ohio State University campus

Joe Rogan Experience #2138 - Tucker Carlson

Police Dispersing Student Protesters at USC - Breaking News Coverage (College Protests)

What Passover Means For The New Testament Believer

Are We Closer Than Ever To The Next Pandemic?

War in Ukraine Turns on Russia

what happened during total solar eclipse

Israel Attacks Iran, Report Says - LIVE Breaking News Coverage

Earth is Scorched with Heat

Antiwar Activists Chant ‘Death to America’ at Event Featuring Chicago Alderman

Vibe Shift

A stream that makes the pleasant Rain sound.

Older Men - Keep One Foot In The Dark Ages

When You Really Want to Meet the Diversity Requirements

CERN to test world's most powerful particle accelerator during April's solar eclipse

Utopian Visionaries Who Won’t Leave People Alone

No - no - no Ain'T going To get away with iT

Pete Buttplug's Butt Plugger Trying to Turn Kids into Faggots

Mark Levin: I'm sick and tired of these attacks

Questioning the Big Bang

James Webb Data Contradicts the Big Bang

Pssst! Don't tell the creationists, but scientists don't have a clue how life began

A fine romance: how humans and chimps just couldn't let go

Early humans had sex with chimps

O’Keefe dons bulletproof vest to extract undercover journalist from NGO camp.

Biblical Contradictions (Alleged)

Catholic Church Praising Lucifer

Raising the Knife

One Of The HARDEST Videos I Had To Make..

Houthi rebels' attack severely damages a Belize-flagged ship in key strait leading to the Red Sea (British Ship)

Chinese Illegal Alien. I'm here for the moneuy


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Video and Audio
See other Video and Audio Articles

Title: “Not true”: Alito mouths words as Obama hammers Supreme Court
Source: Hot Air
URL Source: http://hotair.com/archives/2010/01/ ... s-obama-hammers-supreme-court/
Published: Jan 28, 2010
Author: Allahpundit
Post Date: 2010-01-28 04:11:32 by borntoweardiamonds
Keywords: Alito, Supreme Court, Not True
Views: 12692
Comments: 56

He’s on the far left of your screen, seated to the right of Sotomayor. Politico’s calling it his Joe Wilson moment. When you hear the president of the United States demagoging the First Amendment, you sit there and you take it, son. Update: CBS screwed up the embed code initially. If you’re seeing the bit about Afghanistan, try refreshing. You should see the Supreme Court clip then. If not, click here. That should do it.

Click for Full Text!

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 42.

#1. To: borntoweardiamonds (#0)

Obama: "Blah blah blah..."

Alito: "YOU LIE!!"

Leastways, that's sorta how I heard it...MUD

Mudboy Slim  posted on  2010-01-28   7:23:20 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Mudboy Slim (#1)

I'm very proud of Judge Alito, I only wish he could have hollered it as loud as hero Joe Wilson did last time.

Happy Quanzaa  posted on  2010-01-28   7:33:42 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Happy Quanzaa (#2)

I'm very proud of Judge Alito

You're proud that he ruled that an inanimate object has the same rights as a person?

war  posted on  2010-01-28   7:58:28 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: war (#3)

I'm proud that the Imperial Federal Government can no longer silence corporations and individual groups while letting the unions and ACORN say and do anything they want. The playing field is still not level though, unions and other statist organizations can still put their thugs on the streets to physically threaten and harm their opponents. That right needs to be either taken away from the unions or granted to the corporations and other groups not Party Central approved.

Happy Quanzaa  posted on  2010-01-28   8:21:40 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Happy Quanzaa (#4)

I'm proud that the Imperial Federal Government can no longer silence corporations

The Congress has the power to regulate corporations when they engage in commercial activity AND the Congress has the power to regulate the airwaves. Corporations are not people and your contortions of logic underscore the typical fascist philosophy that you have long espoused.

The law that was struck down limited ACORN and the AFLCIO in the same manner, btw. So that strawman won't think.

war  posted on  2010-01-28   8:28:19 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: war (#5)

ACORN & The Black Panthers and the unions have no limits, they've stolen elections and sent their thugs into town halls, polling places, rallies, etc. across this nation.

Happy Quanzaa  posted on  2010-01-28   8:39:46 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Happy Quanzaa (#6)

Blah...blah...blah...boo frickety hoo...

Get over yourself...fascism isn't the answer...stop cheering it on...

war  posted on  2010-01-28   8:41:41 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: war (#7)

Obamunist thugs are allowed to beat the bejesus out of anyone they want to and you call me the fascist?

Happy Quanzaa  posted on  2010-01-28   8:44:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Happy Quanzaa (#8)

Obamunist thugs are allowed to beat the bejesus out of anyone they want to and you call me the fascist?

A) No one was allowed to beat the bejesus out of anyone...

B) Yea...if you believe that corporations have rights equal to those of actual people then that shoe fits...

war  posted on  2010-01-28   8:46:46 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: war (#9)

Yea...if you believe that corporations have rights equal to those of actual people then that shoe fits...

corporations are made up of people. Why can't the owner(s) of a corporation speak and say whatever they want?

Where is the authority in the constitution to limit a corporations speech or anything else to do with a corporation.

A corporation is simply a legal entity created by people.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-01-28   8:55:58 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: A K A Stone (#11) (Edited)

Corporations are made up of people

So are school busses. The purpose of a corporation is commerical activity. A corporation cannot vote. A corporation is not subject to the same tax code as a person. You want to put corporations on the same legal plane as people? Fine. Then subject a CEO to arrest for murder when his corporate policy kills someone.

Where is the authority in the constitution to limit a corporations speech

When has Exxon ever uttered a word?

...or anything else to do with a corporation.

Article I...

A corporation is simply a legal entity...

Yepper...that is ALL it is... and what is CREATED by law can be LIMITED by law...it has no protected political rights

war  posted on  2010-01-28   9:03:58 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: war (#14)

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Where does it say that speech has to come from an individual?

There is the word people to peacefully assemble. A corporation that is peaceably assembled is made up of people. People is plural. They have a right to petition the government. They have the right to speak.

Your not a constitutionalist.

Why do you hate the constitution? What has it ever done to you.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-01-28   10:42:11 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: A K A Stone (#19) (Edited)

Where does it say that speech has to come from an individual?

You're looking at it incorrectly. People have inherent, or "natural" rights at birth. They can exercise those rights individually or through associations.

Corporations are a legislative creation. As such, they have privileges granted only by law. What a law has the power to create, another law has the power to destroy.

Your [sic] not a constitutionalist.

Actually, I am. Read the first three words of it...

war  posted on  2010-01-28   10:55:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: war (#21)

You're looking at it incorrectly. People have inherent, or "natural" rights at birth. They can exercise those rights individually or through associations.

Corporations are a legislative creation. As such, they have privileges granted only by law.

What part of "congress shall make no law....free speech" don't you understand.

No law means no law. It doesn't mean corporations are a legislative creation so they can make a law pertaining to it.

Be honest with yourself. No law means no law.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-01-28   13:24:16 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: A K A Stone (#23)

Be honest with yourself.

(laughing) Thats the funniest thing I've read today....

Badeye  posted on  2010-01-28   13:32:35 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: Badeye, war (#24)

You're looking at it incorrectly. People have inherent, or "natural" rights at birth. They can exercise those rights individually or through associations.

Corporations are a legislative creation. As such, they have privileges granted only by law.

Well it is true. Be honest. The plain reading of the text says that they can't make any laws limiting free speech.

Now if war opposes this decision and thinks it is immoral. That is ok. His position should be the constitution needs amended. The supreme courts job is supposed to be to interpret the constitution truthfully as to what the text actually says and means. They did that job correctly.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-01-28   13:40:32 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: A K A Stone (#25)

His position should be the constitution needs amended.

How many times is "corporation" in the constitution?

Fred Mertz  posted on  2010-01-28   14:13:21 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: Fred Mertz, war (#27)

How many times is "corporation" in the constitution?

What does it matter.

The constitution doesn't limit speech to just people. It doesn't say the congress shall make no law respecting free speech except if you form a corporation and da da da da da. It says they can't make any laws restricting free speech period. If they make a law concerning corporatoins and make them jump in this hoop and that hoop whatever the outcome one things is for sure. Because of the constitution they sure can't put any free speech restrictions on anybody anything anyhow period checkmate.

If folks have a problem with that then they should amend the constitution and not try to usurp power that isn't given to the govt.

According to you and wars view the president doesn't have free speech. He is president of a corporation.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-01-28   15:57:39 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: A K A Stone (#31) (Edited)

First off all, I have no view that is remotely similar to that fucking asshole if only because I'm not insistent on being obstinately stupid . Secondly, the POTUS is NOT the head of a corporation. He's the head of the government.

Thirdly, your argument fails on any number of levels not the least of which is that the Uniform Commercial Code of the United States is the main body of law that creates and governs a good portion of corporate existence [Law of Contracts is another, and in fact, was the FIRST aspect of law to recognize a limited right of citizenship for a corporation so that it could enter into contracts.] Just as members of the military are subject to a different set of laws, restrictive in nature, e.g. you have no right of free association in the military, so, therefore, are corporations because they are wholly created and governed by legislation.

Can the Congress legislate a person out of existence? No. It CAN legislate a business out of existence.

war  posted on  2010-01-28   19:21:37 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#42. To: war (#38)

the Uniform Commercial Code of the United States...

has nothing to do with the free speech issue at hand.

It's amazing how a dumbass with a BS in political science imagines himself smarter than the the members of the SC.

dont eat that  posted on  2010-01-28   20:58:13 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 42.

        There are no replies to Comment # 42.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 42.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com