[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Saint Nicholas The Real St. Nick Will Atheists in China Starve Due to No Fish to Eat? A Thirteen State Solution for the Holy Land? US Sends new Missle to a Pacific ally, angering China and Russia Moscow and Peoking DeaTh noTice ... Freerepublic --- lasT Monday JR died "‘We Are Not the Crazy Ones’: AOC Protests Too Much" "Rep. Comer to Newsmax: No Evidence Biden Approved Autopen Use" "Donald Trump Has Broken the Progressive Ratchet" "America Must Slash Red Tape to Make Nuclear Power Great Again!!" "Why the DemocRATZ Activist Class Couldn’t Celebrate the Cease-Fire They Demanded" Antifa Calls for CIVIL WAR! British Police Make an Arrest...of a White Child Fishing in the Thames "Sanctuary" Horde ASSAULTS Chicago... ELITE Marines SMASH Illegals Without Mercy Trump hosts roundtable on ANTIFA What's happening in Britain. Is happening in Ireland. The whole of Western Europe. "The One About the Illegal Immigrant School Superintendent" CouldnÂ’t believe he let me pet him at the end (Rhino) Cops Go HANDS ON For Speaking At Meeting! POWERFUL: Charlie Kirk's final speech delivered in South Korea 9/6/25 2026 in Bible Prophecy 2.4 Billion exposed to excessive heat 🔴 LIVE CHICAGO PORTLAND ICE IMMIGRATION DETENTION CENTER 24/7 PROTEST 9/28/2025 Young Conservative Proves Leftist Protesters Wrong England is on the Brink of Civil War! Charlie Kirk Shocks Florida State University With The TRUTH IRL Confronting Protesters Outside UN Trump Meeting The UK Revolution Has Started... Brit's Want Their Country Back Inside Paris Dangerous ANTIFA Riots Rioters STORM Chicago ICE HQ... "Deportation Unit" SCRAPES Invaders Off The Sidewalk She Decoded A Specific Part In The Bible Muslim College Student DUMBFOUNDED as Charlie Kirk Lists The Facts About Hamas Charlie Kirk EVISCERATES Black Students After They OPENLY Support “Anti-White Racism” HEATED DEBATE "Trump Rips U.N. as Useless During General Assembly Address: ‘Empty Words’" Charlie Kirk VS the Wokies at University of Tennessee Charlie Kirk Takes on 3 Professors & a Teacher British leftist student tells Charlie Kirk facts are unfair The 2 Billion View Video: Charlie Kirk's Most Viewed Clips of 2024 Antifa is now officially a terrorist organization. The Greatness of Charlie Kirk: An Eyewitness Account of His Life and Martyrdom Charlie Kirk Takes on Army of Libs at California's UCR DR. ALVEDA KING: REST IN PEACE CHARLIE KIRK Steven Bonnell wants to murder Americans he disagrees with What the fagots LGBTQ really means I watched Charlie Kirk get assassinated. This is my experience. Elon Musk Delivers Stunning Remarks At Historic UK March (Tommy Robinson) "Transcript: Mrs. Erika Kirk Delivers Public Address: ‘His Movement Will Go On’" "Victor Davis Hanson to Newsmax: Kirk Slaying Crosses Rubicon" Rest In Peace Charlie Kirk Charlotte train murder: Graphic video captures random fatal stabbing of young Ukrainian refugee Berlin in July 1945 - Probably the best restored film material you'll watch from that time! Status: Not Logged In; Sign In Video and Audio See other Video and Audio Articles Title: “Not true”: Alito mouths words as Obama hammers Supreme Court Source: Hot Air URL Source: http://hotair.com/archives/2010/01/ ... s-obama-hammers-supreme-court/ Published: Jan 28, 2010 Author: Allahpundit Post Date: 2010-01-28 04:11:32 by borntoweardiamonds Keywords: Alito, Supreme Court, Not True Views: 15662 Comments: 56 He’s on the far left of your screen, seated to the right of Sotomayor. Politico’s calling it his Joe Wilson moment. When you hear the president of the United States demagoging the First Amendment, you sit there and you take it, son. Update: CBS screwed up the embed code initially. If you’re seeing the bit about Afghanistan, try refreshing. You should see the Supreme Court clip then. If not, click here. That should do it. Click for Full Text! Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread   Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 37. #1. To: borntoweardiamonds (#0) Obama: "Blah blah blah..." Alito: "YOU LIE!!" Leastways, that's sorta how I heard it...MUD Mudboy Slim  posted on  2010-01-28   7:23:20 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #2. To: Mudboy Slim (#1) I'm very proud of Judge Alito, I only wish he could have hollered it as loud as hero Joe Wilson did last time. Happy Quanzaa  posted on  2010-01-28   7:33:42 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #3. To: Happy Quanzaa (#2) I'm very proud of Judge Alito You're proud that he ruled that an inanimate object has the same rights as a person? war  posted on  2010-01-28   7:58:28 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #4. To: war (#3) I'm proud that the Imperial Federal Government can no longer silence corporations and individual groups while letting the unions and ACORN say and do anything they want. The playing field is still not level though, unions and other statist organizations can still put their thugs on the streets to physically threaten and harm their opponents. That right needs to be either taken away from the unions or granted to the corporations and other groups not Party Central approved. Happy Quanzaa  posted on  2010-01-28   8:21:40 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #5. To: Happy Quanzaa (#4) I'm proud that the Imperial Federal Government can no longer silence corporations The Congress has the power to regulate corporations when they engage in commercial activity AND the Congress has the power to regulate the airwaves. Corporations are not people and your contortions of logic underscore the typical fascist philosophy that you have long espoused. The law that was struck down limited ACORN and the AFLCIO in the same manner, btw. So that strawman won't think. war  posted on  2010-01-28   8:28:19 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #6. To: war (#5) ACORN & The Black Panthers and the unions have no limits, they've stolen elections and sent their thugs into town halls, polling places, rallies, etc. across this nation. Happy Quanzaa  posted on  2010-01-28   8:39:46 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #7. To: Happy Quanzaa (#6) Blah...blah...blah...boo frickety hoo... Get over yourself...fascism isn't the answer...stop cheering it on... war  posted on  2010-01-28   8:41:41 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #8. To: war (#7) Obamunist thugs are allowed to beat the bejesus out of anyone they want to and you call me the fascist? Happy Quanzaa  posted on  2010-01-28   8:44:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #9. To: Happy Quanzaa (#8) Obamunist thugs are allowed to beat the bejesus out of anyone they want to and you call me the fascist? A) No one was allowed to beat the bejesus out of anyone... B) Yea...if you believe that corporations have rights equal to those of actual people then that shoe fits... war  posted on  2010-01-28   8:46:46 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #11. To: war (#9) Yea...if you believe that corporations have rights equal to those of actual people then that shoe fits... corporations are made up of people. Why can't the owner(s) of a corporation speak and say whatever they want? Where is the authority in the constitution to limit a corporations speech or anything else to do with a corporation. A corporation is simply a legal entity created by people. A K A Stone  posted on  2010-01-28   8:55:58 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #14. To: A K A Stone (#11) (Edited) Corporations are made up of people So are school busses. The purpose of a corporation is commerical activity. A corporation cannot vote. A corporation is not subject to the same tax code as a person. You want to put corporations on the same legal plane as people? Fine. Then subject a CEO to arrest for murder when his corporate policy kills someone. Where is the authority in the constitution to limit a corporations speech When has Exxon ever uttered a word? ...or anything else to do with a corporation. Article I... A corporation is simply a legal entity... Yepper...that is ALL it is... and what is CREATED by law can be LIMITED by law...it has no protected political rights war  posted on  2010-01-28   9:03:58 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #19. To: war (#14) Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. Where does it say that speech has to come from an individual? There is the word people to peacefully assemble. A corporation that is peaceably assembled is made up of people. People is plural. They have a right to petition the government. They have the right to speak. Your not a constitutionalist. Why do you hate the constitution? What has it ever done to you. A K A Stone  posted on  2010-01-28   10:42:11 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #21. To: A K A Stone (#19) (Edited) Where does it say that speech has to come from an individual? You're looking at it incorrectly. People have inherent, or "natural" rights at birth. They can exercise those rights individually or through associations. Corporations are a legislative creation. As such, they have privileges granted only by law. What a law has the power to create, another law has the power to destroy. Your [sic] not a constitutionalist. Actually, I am. Read the first three words of it... war  posted on  2010-01-28   10:55:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #23. To: war (#21) You're looking at it incorrectly. People have inherent, or "natural" rights at birth. They can exercise those rights individually or through associations. Corporations are a legislative creation. As such, they have privileges granted only by law. What part of "congress shall make no law....free speech" don't you understand. No law means no law. It doesn't mean corporations are a legislative creation so they can make a law pertaining to it. Be honest with yourself. No law means no law. A K A Stone  posted on  2010-01-28   13:24:16 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #24. To: A K A Stone (#23) Be honest with yourself. (laughing) Thats the funniest thing I've read today.... Badeye  posted on  2010-01-28   13:32:35 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #25. To: Badeye, war (#24) You're looking at it incorrectly. People have inherent, or "natural" rights at birth. They can exercise those rights individually or through associations. Corporations are a legislative creation. As such, they have privileges granted only by law. Well it is true. Be honest. The plain reading of the text says that they can't make any laws limiting free speech. Now if war opposes this decision and thinks it is immoral. That is ok. His position should be the constitution needs amended. The supreme courts job is supposed to be to interpret the constitution truthfully as to what the text actually says and means. They did that job correctly. A K A Stone  posted on  2010-01-28   13:40:32 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #27. To: A K A Stone (#25) His position should be the constitution needs amended. How many times is "corporation" in the constitution? Fred Mertz  posted on  2010-01-28   14:13:21 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #31. To: Fred Mertz, war (#27) How many times is "corporation" in the constitution? What does it matter. The constitution doesn't limit speech to just people. It doesn't say the congress shall make no law respecting free speech except if you form a corporation and da da da da da. It says they can't make any laws restricting free speech period. If they make a law concerning corporatoins and make them jump in this hoop and that hoop whatever the outcome one things is for sure. Because of the constitution they sure can't put any free speech restrictions on anybody anything anyhow period checkmate. If folks have a problem with that then they should amend the constitution and not try to usurp power that isn't given to the govt. According to you and wars view the president doesn't have free speech. He is president of a corporation. A K A Stone  posted on  2010-01-28   15:57:39 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #37. To: A K A Stone (#31) What does it matter. Because what the US knows to be a "corporation" did not exist when the USCON and B/R were ratified. It is a legal creation. I don't understand the point that you are trying to make here in defending this ridiculous decision. What if a corporation declares itself to be, in fact, a religion? Hey, people believe in its products and support and promote them just as any preacher or follower does and, well fuck political speech, our corporation with the trillion dollar market cap is now tax exempt. While we're at it, since a corporation is, in fact, solely a money making enterprise, taxing it is cruel and unusual... Where does it stop? war  posted on  2010-01-28   19:13:29 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   Replies to Comment # 37.         There are no replies to Comment # 37. End Trace Mode for Comment # 37. Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register]  Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com