[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Antifa is now officially a terrorist organization.

The Greatness of Charlie Kirk: An Eyewitness Account of His Life and Martyrdom

Charlie Kirk Takes on Army of Libs at California's UCR

DR. ALVEDA KING: REST IN PEACE CHARLIE KIRK

Steven Bonnell wants to murder Americans he disagrees with

What the fagots LGBTQ really means

I watched Charlie Kirk get assassinated. This is my experience.

Elon Musk Delivers Stunning Remarks At Historic UK March (Tommy Robinson)

"Transcript: Mrs. Erika Kirk Delivers Public Address: ‘His Movement Will Go On’"

"Victor Davis Hanson to Newsmax: Kirk Slaying Crosses Rubicon"

Rest In Peace Charlie Kirk

Charlotte train murder: Graphic video captures random fatal stabbing of young Ukrainian refugee

Berlin in July 1945 - Probably the best restored film material you'll watch from that time!

Ok this is Funny

Walking Through 1980s Los Angeles: The City That Reinvented Cool

THE ZOMBIES OF AMERICA

THE OLDEST PHOTOS OF NEW YORK YOU'VE NEVER SEEN

John Rich – Calling Out P. Diddy, TVA Scandal, and Joel Osteen | SRS #232

Capablanca Teaches Us The ONLY Chess Opening You'll Ever Need

"How Bruce Springsteen Fooled America"

How ancient Rome was excavated in Italy in the 1920s. Unique rare videos and photos.

Reagan JOKE On The Homeless

The Deleted Wisdom (1776 Report)

Sicko Transfaggots video

The Englund Gambit Checkmate

20 Minutes Of Black DC Residents Supporting Trump's Federal Takeover!

"Virginia Public Schools Deserve This Reckoning"

"'Pack the Bags, We're Going on a Guilt Trip'—the Secret to the Democrats' Success"

"Washington, D.C., Is a Disgrace"

"Trump Orders New 'Highly Accurate' Census Excluding Illegals"

what a freakin' insane asylum

Sorry, CNN, We're Not Going to Stop Talking About the Russian Collusion Hoax

"No Autopsy Can Restore the Democratic Party’s Viability"

RIP Ozzy

"Trump floats 'restriction' for Commanders if they fail to ditch nickname in favor of Redskins return"

"Virginia Governor’s Race Heats Up As Republican Winsome Sears Does a Hard Reboot of Her Campaign"

"We Hate Communism!!"

"Mamdani and the Democratic Schism"

"The 2nd Impeachment: Trump’s Popularity Still Scares Them to Death"

"President Badass"

"Jasmine Crockett's Train Wreck Interview Was a Disaster"

"How Israel Used Spies, Smuggled Drones and AI to Stun and Hobble Iran"

There hasn’T been ... a single updaTe To This siTe --- since I joined.

"This Is Not What Authoritarianism Looks Like"

America Erupts… ICE Raids Takeover The Streets

AC/DC- Riff Raff + Go Down [VH1 Uncut, July 5, 1996]

Why is Peter Schiff calling Bitcoin a ‘giant cult’ and how does this impact market sentiment?

Esso Your Butt Buddy Horseshit jacks off to that shit

"The Addled Activist Mind"

"Don’t Stop with Harvard"


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

WORLD WAR III
See other WORLD WAR III Articles

Title: Trump: ‘OK’ With a War Against Iran Now
Source: Anti-War
URL Source: https://news.antiwar.com/2019/07/22 ... k-with-a-war-against-iran-now/
Published: Jul 22, 2019
Author: Trump: ‘OK’ With a War Against Iran Now
Post Date: 2019-07-27 12:11:23 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 2867
Comments: 9

While President Trump’s position on Iran tends to change with little notice, he backed away from his insistence that he doesn’t want war with Iran on Monday, saying now of the war “it could go either way, and I’m OK either way it goes.”

Trump added that it’s “getting harder for me to want to make a deal with Iran” in the first place, because he views them as “behaving very badly,” and are “the number one state of terror in the world.”

Trump followed this up by announcing new sanctions against China, saying they were intended to punish them for “accepting crude oil.” This is likely to be a bigger problem for US-China ties than Iran, as Iran is already heavily sanctioned.

If Trump’s new bellicose stance sticks, this could be a major shift in US hostility toward Iran. President Trump has been one of the few top officials insisting he didn’t want a war as administration hawks continued to talk of a conflict as all but inevitable. If Trump is indeed “OK either way” on the war, it’s not going to be any secret that his top aides will be pushing him to choose war over peace.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Deckard (#0) (Edited)

At the first indication they're serious about achieving "Death to America!", they turn to glass.

I'm OK with that, too.
We're better than them. We're better than any deathcult Mooslum, as a matter of fact. How has any Moo ever improved my nation?

A peaceful stance in the world must not be allowed to be a suicide pact when facing down evil, defective lunatics.

Hank Rearden  posted on  2019-07-27   15:07:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Hank Rearden (#1)

At the first indication they're serious about achieving "Death to America!", they turn to glass.

How many nukes do you need to turn to glass the mountainous country with the size of Texas, California, Arizona and New Mexico together?

A Pole  posted on  2019-07-27   15:24:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Deckard, A K A Stone (#0)

While President Trump’s position on Iran tends to change with little notice, he backed away from his insistence that he doesn’t want war with Iran on Monday, saying now of the war “it could go either way, and I’m OK either way it goes.”

Pure propaganda.

https://nypost.com/2019/07/22/trump-calls-iran-a-very-mixed-up-country-as-tensions-grow/

“Instead of being respectful, they put their finger up in the air,” Trump said, showing his thumb. “And they disrespected the United States. They shouldn’t have done that. That was a big mistake.”

“If they want to make a deal, it’s frankly getting harder for me to want to make a deal with Iran because they’ve behaved very badly. They’re saying bad things. I’ll tell you, it could go either way, very easily. Very easily. And I’m OK either way it goes.”

Trump was clearly speaking of making, or not making, a deal with Iran. He was not speaking of an as yet non-existent war, nor of a future war.

https://www.apnews.com/e6bd6334ff4148f2985de059f93dc390

Deal critics, including Republican Sens. Ted Cruz of Texas and Tom Cotton of Arkansas, say the waivers should be revoked because they give Iran access to technology that could be used for weapons. In particular, they have targeted a waiver that allows conversion work at the once-secret Fordow site. The other facilities are the Bushehr nuclear power station, the Arak heavy water plant and the Tehran Research Reactor.

Deal supporters say the waivers give international experts a valuable window into Iran’s atomic program that might otherwise not exist. They also say some of the work, particularly on nuclear isotopes that can be used in medicine at the Tehran reactor, is humanitarian in nature.

Trump has been coy about his plans. He said this past week that “it could go either way very easily. Very easily. And I’m OK either way it goes.”

Trump was clearly speaking of making, or not making, a deal with Iran. He was not speaking of an as yet non-existent war, nor of a future war.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-mideast-iran-trump/trump-says-it-is-getting-harder-for-him-to-want-to-negotiate-with-iran-idUSKCN1UH204

World News
July 22, 2019 / 11:52 AM / 5 days ago

Trump says it is getting harder for him to want to negotiate with Iran

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump said on Monday that it is getting harder for him to want to make a deal with Iran and said the situation could go either way very easily.

Trump was clearly speaking of making, or not making, a deal with Iran. He was not speaking of an as yet non-existent war, nor of a future war.

Try bringing a source that is not pure lying propaganda.

nolu chan  posted on  2019-07-27   15:34:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: A Pole (#2)

How many nukes do you need to turn to glass the mountainous country with the size of Texas, California, Arizona and New Mexico together?

Shall we find out?

Vicomte13  posted on  2019-07-27   16:23:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Vicomte13 (#4)

No you don't have enough and noone wants to die in a nuclear winter

paraclete  posted on  2019-07-28   9:31:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: paraclete (#5)

The Iranians don't want to find out either, so in the end, they'll deal.

Vicomte13  posted on  2019-07-29   7:09:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Vicomte13 (#6)

The Iranians don't want to find out either, so in the end, they'll deal.

In the game of chicken, usually the one who has less to lose, wins.

A Pole  posted on  2019-07-30   9:22:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Vicomte13 (#6)

you don't understand the principle of MAD, do you? However threatened time and time again with destruction how do you think Iranians react

paraclete  posted on  2019-08-01   9:41:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: paraclete (#8)

The wonderful thing about this particular dispute is that there is going to be a result, so when it comes one of us will be able to point at what happened and say to the other "Told ya so".

I'm going to enjoy that.

Vicomte13  posted on  2019-08-03   13:13:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com