United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: Google Censors Apollo 11 Moon Landing Hoax Videos and Articles
Source:
Google/Duck Duck Go/
URL Source: [None]
Published: Jun 24, 2019
Author: Google/Duck Duck Go
Post Date: 2019-06-24 10:38:17 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 3451
Comments: 27
Compare the search results from Google and Duck Duck Go Google has memory-holed any articles that dispute the official narrative about the Apollo 11 moon landing - no alternative sources come up in a search. Duck Duck Go is a little better - some alternative sources are listed. YouTube has literally no videos that are contrary to the official story. Remember when the internet was a source for ALL information, not just articles and videos that are cherry-picked by the Deep State assets like Google? Not any more. Welcome to 1984.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Deckard (#0)
Independent thinking is no longer permitted. Google will now think for you. We really need a technology boom in decentralized services that cannot be censored. Bitcoin and crypto currency is the first step, but it needs to be expanded into social media and similar net areas.
By that you mean, "any unsupported bullshit articles, presented as fact, that dispute the truth."
By that you mean, "any unsupported bullshit articles, presented as fact, that dispute the truth." But...they ARE supported. By incontrovertible (and inconvenient) FACTS. Which specific articles or claim are referred to are "unsupported BS"? It has been the gummint's "The Official Narrative" for far too long that relies on "unsupported bullshit" -- substantiated only by, "Cuz scientists, our Generals, our State Dept, FBI/CIA and NASA said so". OR, "See these maps and photoshopped and CGI pix? See this "crime scene"? Yup, all dat proves what we be sayin', Jack." MW, by your standard of "official narratives," you must certainly then also believe in AlGore's/UN "Global Warming," right? And...believe 0bama was legally qualified to be President? And...and...believe that Hillary was innocent of High Crimes at Benghazi and with respect to her TWO Senate Hearings?
Btw -- if you've been oblivious and impervious to what's actually going on *other than* by default accepting what you are told is "truth" by the Mainstream Media and the Usual Gummint Liars, you're not exactly doing much if any independent critical thinking, are you?
Btw -- if you've been oblivious and impervious to what's actually going on *other than* by default accepting what you are told is "truth" by the Mainstream Media and the Usual Gummint Liars, you're not exactly doing much if any independent critical thinking, are you? Well, my post was referencing the Apollo moon landing. If you have proof the moon landing was fake, I'd be interested in seeing it. If, however, all you got it "It's fake because I say so", then you're worse than the Mainstream Media and the Usual Gummint Liars.
I'd still appreciate a response to my above questions. If you have proof the moon landing was fake, I'd be interested in seeing it. If, however, all you got it "It's fake because I say so", then you're worse than the Mainstream Media and the Usual Gummint Liars. I've been posting slam-dunk video refutations that the entire NASA problem has been a terrible fake, fraud, theater. If interested, check out my posting history. Btw -- you ARE aware that NASA sez they've lost ALL the telemetry AND knowledge of just how to supposedly "return to the moon," right? 50 year old technology: LOST. MOREOVER, according to NASA, ALL VIDEO OF APOLLO 11 is ALSO GONE. *POOF!!!* (except that which has been saved and archived by YouTubers etal.) Wanna explain any of that?
I'd still appreciate a response to my above questions. —- Liberator You’ll never get an honest answer from misterwrong. — He’s been posting the authoritarian- communitarian line since his first day at FR, (20 years ago?).
Those were back-up tapes, recorded at the same time as the live TV broadcast. Had the live TV broadcast failed, the tapes would have been saved. Since the live TV broadcast was successful, the tapes "were erased and reused by NASA in the early 1980s, following standard procedure at the time." "50 year old technology: LOST." I see. You're saying we should return to the moon using 50-year-old technology?
For starters, that we never landed on the moon.
Must Read, Amazing work from the late Dave McGowan - a guy that had 9/11 pretty much nailed on 9/12/01, also author of WEIRD SCENES INSIDE THE CANYON. Whether you think the moon landings were faked or not, this is brilliant writing. And hilarious. http://centerforaninformedamerica.com/moondoggie/ Audio version now available ...Anyway, a whole lot of people are extremely reluctant to give up their belief in the success of the Apollo missions. A lot of people, in fact, pretty much shut down at the mere mention of the Moon landings being faked, refusing to even consider the possibility (Facebook, by the way, is definitely not the best place to promote the notion that the landings were faked, in case anyone was wondering). And yet there are some among the True Believers who will allow that, though they firmly believe that we did indeed land on the Moon, they would have understood if it had been a hoax. Given the climate of the times, with Cold War tensions simmering and anxious Americans looking for some sign that their country was still dominant and not technologically inferior to the Soviets, it could be excused if NASA had duped the world.... SEPTEMBER 11, 2001 REVISITED: PROLOGUE I Welcome to the New and Improved Police State ...While the people of the Palestinian territories may well be dancing in the streets today in celebration of the blow struck against the United States, they certainly won’t emerge as the winners in this national tragedy. When the bombs begin to rain down upon them, as they certainly will, the loss of life, property and hope will be far more profound for them than it will be for the people of New York. Their short-term ‘victory’ will be a hollow one indeed.... http://centerforaninformedamerica.com/september11-prologue-i/ RIP Dave and thanks for the laughs
Ah. So you see something in the blurry, jerky, signal-converted, black-and- white, 1969 live TV footage broadcasted from the moon? Color me surprised.
I was (and still am) a huge fan of Dave's work - he passed way too soon. "Weird Scenes..." was eye-opening to say the least. SEPTEMBER 11, 2001 REVISITED: PROLOGUE I Welcome to the New and Improved Police State ...While the people of the Palestinian territories may well be dancing in the streets today in celebration of the blow struck against the United States, they certainly won’t emerge as the winners in this national tragedy. When the bombs begin to rain down upon them, as they certainly will, the loss of life, property and hope will be far more profound for them than it will be for the people of New York. Their short-term ‘victory’ will be a hollow one indeed.... It appears that Dave was the first to publicly question the "official" government narrative concerning 9/11.
Government is in the last resort the employment of armed men, of policemen, gendarmes, soldiers, prison guards, and hangmen. With both eyes.
Mister white is more right then you on lots of issues.
Replies to Comment # 7. #15. To: tpaine (#7) Mister white is more right then you on lots of issues. Years ago, on FR, his true communitarian self was more evident... Since then, he’s learned to cloak his propaganda, pretending to be conservative... You’re being fooled..
They found it! Apollo 11: Former NASA intern bought original Moon landing recordings for $217, could be worth $2M https://www.foxnews.com/science/apollo-11-original- videotape-recordings-auction
Your link doesn't work. The rather HUMONGOUS point remains: NASA deep-sixed the so-called, alleged evidence of Apollo 11 (that was being shredded and laughed at as total make-believe and complete BS by "Truthers".)
IF a so-called NASA "intern" allegedly "bought" these tapes (now how dumb does NASA and this gummint believe we are??), and identity just found, then the Under/Over on this owner to continue breathing must be about +/-2 weeks.
Take out the space between "original-" and "videotape". It should be original-videotape.
Well, NASA provided evidence that it did happen. Now, where's your evidence of something different?
If you consider flimsy and tainted documentation as "evidence," then to you and other that suffices as "proof." The disturbing fact remains: NASA, the US Government, and the PTB thought so little of their alleged accomplishment called, "Man's Greatest Achievement," that they not only authorized tossing out the video documentation, but also the supposed "Go-To-The Moon!" know-how...IN THE DUMPSTER. Any rational, logical person knows that the ONLY reason for such actions was...IT NEVER REALLY EXISTED TO BEGIN WITH.
Posted repeatedly. I can't force you or anyone else to leave the Crib-to-Present paradigm of fabricated NASA reality. It's understandable to psychologically prefer the reality to which you've grown accustomed to rather than shake everything up.
Look at the ending credits of any CGI-intensive movie -- hundreds of people involved. If that number of people were involved in faking the lunar landings (plural), no one would leak? Puh-leeze.
FIRST OF ALL as a reminder, I have post several videos that easily expose outright CGI fakery and glitches; Whether it's exposed and compromised the ISS and their personnel, "Moon" pictures from "Space" and NASA's so-called "Moon Landings." Their extremely ridiculous fakery isn't even good. Not they need to care, given the vast majority believe what they are told rather than their own eyes anyway. If you refuse to watch any of it, that's on you, MW. So you actually disbelieve the notion that hundreds of people can not keep a secret? Please. Are you really this naive? Have you not heard of a "Code of Silence"? CONSIDERATION: As at places like NASA, the Military, or Deep State, many agencies are departmentalized so that their tasks are delegated seperately -- they don't necessarily know what others are doing. People in government (as well as out of government to be fair) sell themselves out for very little. There are also such things as "Non-Disclosure Agreements." And when compensation of keeping one's job, extra money, position, power doesn't work, other motivating factors do: Like various threats (that also extend to family members), blackmail, framing, ostracizing...and if all else fails, "accidents." Beyond this... NASA is mere theater. Just like international and national politics. And "Climate Change." And "investigations" on 911, Sandy Hook, the Vegas Slaughter, etc. The Truth = Roadkill. That's the path the PTB attempt re-route all but the discerning.
It's been frustrating...but I believe its possible for everyone to see the light eventually. Btw, nice to see you.
Thanks ——
#2. To: Deckard (#0)
any articles that dispute the official narrative
#3. To: misterwhite, Deckard (#2)
("any articles that dispute the official narrative")
#4. To: misterwhite (#2)
#5. To: Liberator (#4)
#6. To: misterwhite (#5)
Well, my post was referencing the Apollo moon landing.
#7. To: Liberator, yall (#6)
misterwhite (#5) —— Well, my post was referencing the Apollo moon landing.
#8. To: Liberator (#6)
MOREOVER, according to NASA, ALL VIDEO OF APOLLO 11 is ALSO GONE.
#9. To: Liberator (#3)
Which specific articles or claim are referred to are "unsupported BS"?
#10. To: misterwhite, All (#9)
#11. To: Deckard, all (#0)
Wagging the MoonDoggie
...I am very well aware, by the way, that there are many, many people out there – even many of the people who have seen through other tall tales told by our government – who think that Moon hoax theorists are complete kooks. And a whole lot of coordinated effort has gone into casting them as such. That makes wading into the Moon hoax debate a potentially dangerous affair....
BY DAVE MCGOWAN | SEP 12, 2001 ...As for motive, we are being asked to believe that a band of Islamic terrorists are the most likely suspects. But is that really the case? Was it a state-sponsored terrorist group that had the most to gain by launching such an assault? Or was it our own political, corporate and military leaders?
#12. To: randge (#10)
#13. To: Operation 40 (#11)
(Edited)
BY DAVE MCGOWAN | SEP 12, 2001 ...As for motive, we are being asked to believe that a band of Islamic terrorists are the most likely suspects. But is that really the case? Was it a state-sponsored terrorist group that had the most to gain by launching such an assault? Or was it our own political, corporate and military leaders?
The essential feature of government is the enforcement of its decrees by beating, killing, and imprisoning.
Those who are asking for more government interference are asking ultimately for more compulsion and less freedom.
#14. To: misterwhite (#12)
So you see something
#15. To: tpaine (#7)
#16. To: A K A Stone, Yall (#15)
You’ll never get an honest answer from misterwrong. — He’s been posting the authoritarian- communitarian line since his first day at FR, (20 years ago?). tpaine
#17. To: Liberator (#6)
MOREOVER, according to NASA, ALL VIDEO OF APOLLO 11 is ALSO GONE. *POOF!!!* (except that which has been saved and archived by YouTubers etal.)
#18. To: misterwhite (#17)
#19. To: misterwhite (#17)
#20. To: Liberator (#18)
Your link doesn't work.
#21. To: Liberator (#18)
NASA deep-sixed the so-called, alleged evidence of Apollo 11
#22. To: misterwhite (#21)
(Edited)
NASA provided evidence that it did happen.
#23. To: misterwhite (#21)
Now, where's your evidence of something different?
#24. To: Liberator (#23)
#25. To: misterwhite (#24)
#26. To: tpaine, misterwhite (#7)
#27. To: Liberator (#26)
Btw, nice to see you.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]