Title: **WATCH CLOSELY** at this terrifying "Deep-Fake" CGI Technology; How the line between "reality" and fakery will now obliterate truth Source:
YouTube URL Source:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bPhUhypV27w Published:May 31, 2019 Author:Bill Hader/CGI Tech Post Date:2019-05-31 11:22:59 by Liberator Keywords:"Deep-Fake" Tech, Video-Sorcery, Blured-Reality Views:5917 Comments:86
It's here. "Deep Fake" face transitioning via video-sorcery CGI and technology will now be used to manipulate truth and "reality."
Prepare to have your mind blown:
Poster Comment:
This advanced video technology now means NO videotaped people or event can now be admitted as "proof" of anything.
AATIP's existence was revealed in 2017, when former Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) claimed to have arranged for the program's $22 million annual funding. Reid told the New York Times that it was "one of the good things I did in my congressional service."
The New York Times published the article after the DoD released a 33-second DoD video released by the AATIP, featuring an airborne object being chased off the coast of San Diego by two navy jets in 2004.
On Sunday we reported on an op-ed written by Christopher Mellon in The Hill, on the fact that since 2015, "dozens of Navy F-18 fighter jets have encountered Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon (UAPs) - once commonly referred to as UFOs - off the East Coast of the United States, some not far from the nation’s capital. Encounters have been reported by other military aircraft and civilian airliners elsewhere in the U.S. and abroad, too, including videos shot by airline passengers."
***
Faked by the PTB or actual evidence of UFOs? I tend to believe that the pilots saw something not of this world or some sort of inter-dimensional craft.
History Channel is showing a special tonight at 10 - might be worth a look-see.
It's getting to the stage where you can't see the difference between real and fake.
Yuge problem for obvious reasons.
I think it's been going on for some time now...
That's an interesting theory. Likely longer than we've been privy to.
IF this technique had been perfected by 2016, there's no doubt that the Deep State would have used Deep-Fake CGI transformations to further frame Trump.
On another note, what say you about this:
Pentagon Finally Admits To UFO Investigations
Firstly, let's concede the notion that the Pentagram has long been nothing but a Deep State disinfo/misinfo/propaganda Agency.
The Hill reported since 2015] "dozens of Navy F-18 fighter jets have encountered Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon (UAPs) - once commonly referred to as UFOs - off the East Coast of the United States, some not far from the nation’s capital. Encounters have been reported by other military aircraft and civilian airliners elsewhere in the U.S. and abroad, too, including videos shot by airline passengers."
Faked by the PTB or actual evidence of UFOs? I tend to believe that the pilots saw something not of this world or some sort of inter-dimensional craft.
Regarding "UFO" activity and any concession that they actually exists, like you, IMO such creatures/phenomena *do* indeed exist; And much like you I agree -- they exist as spiritual/demonic entities (which is why they are able to defy the physics of this realm.)
We are witnessing a Last Days clash of the Spiritual with the Physical. (Some might say it makes for "Interesting Times.")
So...many of us are to witness The Big Game/End Game of this World. It's hard NOT to notice that we have been getting groomed (via media/music videos/movies/TV shows/Junk Science) to accept not only "Alien" life, but Other-Worldly "ghosts" and demons with great powers. This is all setting up these "Aliens" (aka demons) to be feared and worshiped. As well as the appearance of Anti-Christ.
Related: I believe The PTB and Elites already are quite aware of these inter-dimensional creatures/entities; They also already know the actual shape of this earth, the secrets of the Antarctica, the inability to access deep space -- as well as our secret/hidden history, "Giants" and "Nephilim" told in Genesis 6.
Further connected: The CERN Project and purpose is all about tearing our way into (or out of) our realm/dimension and further helping allowing those demonic forces access. All of these is obviously almost impossible to wrap or collect head around any of it.
P.S. -- Like most Feral Agys, The Pentagram can't be trusted to tell ANY truth. I simply assume THE OPPOSITE of their claims, or partial truth at best.
It would be expected that UFO research would be kept as secret as possible. Obtaining an alien spacecraft would be a bonanza of technological information which the gov would not want any international pressure to share with other countries.
So all research that could lead to such a find would also be secret. Of course that makes no statement as to whether interstellar aliens have visited us. The gov would keep it a secret before any such determination would be made.
It would be expected that UFO research would be kept as secret as possible.
Obtaining an alien spacecraft would be a bonanza of technological information which the gov would not want any international pressure to share with other countries.
Well, "Area 51" and "UFO Research" is already the subject of decades of speculation, mystery, and "secrets." (As is so much about certain realms.)
To be honest, I don't know what to make of Area 51 and supposed confiscated "Alien" aircraft, reasearch, AND supposed "Aliens" themselves. What's your belief or speculation on any of this subject?
Obtaining an alien spacecraft would be a bonanza of technological information which the gov would not want any international pressure to share with other countries.
Given the sieve that is the US Gummint and its "officials,", shouldn't we already assume there *are* no secrets that aren't already shared & exchanged with the cabal of international elites? Let's also remember that the US Space program from its infancy was the brainchild and run by non-citizen Americans, aka former Nazis.
Regarding technology -- there have been many ongoing theories afoot (stemming partially from The Book of Enoch) that civilization's discoveries and technologies from the very beginning are the result of forbidden Nephilim/Fallen Angel/demonic knowledge that had/has been illicitly given to man. Pretty fascinating, plausible stuff. Given that much of this tech is weaponry with which to kill and maim, it makes sense.
IMO what's been locked up and hidden away in the bowels of the Vatican would yield the greatest bonanza of treasures: Ancient Knowledge and Truths about mankind's history and world.
To be honest, I don't know what to make of Area 51 and supposed confiscated "Alien" aircraft, reasearch, AND supposed "Aliens" themselves. What's your belief or speculation on any of this subject?
Michael Newton's work makes a handful of references to life existing beyond earth and our solar system, including intelligent life. Given the premise that we are unique because we are souls and our humanity is merely an incidental, temporary part of what we as souls acquire, and nothing particularly special about human DNA, it is reasonable to me that life would exist elsewhere in the cosmos.
Earth, and the human race itself is, in spiritual terms, completely expendable. If and when the human race dies out for whatever reason, we as souls will simply move on to a new planet with a new race of intelligent beings, perhaps in bodies we as humans would consider aliens to continue the same mission of spiritual growth. All of human civilized history will be repeated with a new planet in some new galaxy that happens to have all the ingredients for extensive, abundant life as earth does.
The purpose of the universe we live in is to facilitate growth of the soul. It's not important that it be on earth or that we incarnate into human form. Any intelligent life form can serve that purpose.
So might aliens have cracked the speed of light barrier and made it to earth? I don't know. Maybe. But wouldn't impact my spiritual beliefs if they did.
Newton is a kook former scientologist. He has no answers Only Delusion hypnotic trances and a path to hell.
I see no compelling reason to believe more the theological musings of people who lived many thousands of years ago over those who live today, who have far more information resources at their disposal.
Being subject to anger and jealousy is a sign of insecurity and weakness, yet we are to believe the all knowing, all wise Almighty God who knows us completely and everything we will ever do is somehow subject to these weaknesses?
The Bible has many good stories and good morals. But it is not the "Word of God". It is easy to dismissively and myopicly choose to believe it is. Far harder to critically examine something that you were taught as a child and beleived your whole life to decide if it passes such critical examination.
Newton has done nothing more than compile information from his first hand observations.
I should add that while Newton does make references to alien life, that is not to say that he necessarily concludes it exists. Any single hypnotic reference is subject to error or misinterpretation. Newton was a scientist and he apparently did see fit to relay a few observations about alien life in his books, but it should not be inferred that he declared himself the equivalent of a prophet giving infallable messages from a divine source. He is a witness to things he had seen and heard, and like any witness, may have some things wrong.
But that alien life could exist elsewhere in the universe does make more sense to me than the notion that the earth is the only planet with life in the entire universe, or that it is only some 6000 years old. I see no reason why the universe cannot be as old as it is big.
From the "Word of God", I can clearly and systematically define God...His Personality, His Characteristics, Who He is, ect.
Would I take this to mean that divine inspiration for a writing can be determined by how sufficiently it claims to define God?
If I wrote an essay defining God in clear terms, would that be something you'd consider authoritative?
Clearly we need to be more critical than that.
But as I pointed out, the Bible paints God as subject to anger and jealousy. Are not both of these traits signs on weakness when applied to any human? Aren't jealousy and wrath among the "7 deadly sins" under Christianity? How is it that it's okay for God to experience these things but not us humans? Does God hold us humans to a higher standard than God holds himself?
What it sounds like to me is that the authors added these attributes to their perception of God as a means of social control of the masses. A God who never gets angry is a God that can be disregarded with relative safety.
Under the Newton model, a failure to do the right thing is detrimental to the person, not to God. There is no negative reinforcement. At least from God. Doing the wrong thing is detrimental to you, but not God. All we receive is positive reinforcement.
I've yet to meet anyone who has been able to, critically and constructively, point out any structural defect in what I call the Newton model. The most I've seen is name calling.
Would I take this to mean that divine inspiration for a writing can be determined by how sufficiently it claims to define God?
If I wrote an essay defining God in clear terms, would that be something you'd consider authoritative?
Good questions, all of them.
As for divine inspiration, the only writing I know that is divinely inspired is the Bible. And it is not just how sufficiently it defines God but how accurately it defines God (without error/inerrancy).
Christians believe the Bible to be divinely inspired, and therefore without error, based on a simple premise:
1. God cannot lie.
That by two immutable things, in which it was impossible for God to lie... Hebrews 6:18a
2. The Bible is God's Word.
All scripture is given by inspiration of God... 2 Timothy 3:16a
3. Therefore, the Bible is true.
Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word is truth. John 17:17
And yes, if you wrote an essay defining God in clear (and accurate) terms, I'd consider that essay to have authority. Pastors do this every week in the form of a sermon. If it is true, it has authority.
As for Michael Newton, he's selling you things based on beliefs that are in direct conflict with the Bible: "life between lives"(reincarnation?), spirit guides, and so on...
So, who's speaking the truth: Michael Newton or the Bible. And what does Newton believe about God? Better yet, what do you believe about God? I'd really like to know.
Christians believe the Bible to be divinely inspired, and therefore without error, based on a simple premise:
1. God cannot lie.
That by two immutable things, in which it was impossible for God to lie... Hebrews 6:18a
2. The Bible is God's Word.
All scripture is given by inspiration of God... 2 Timothy 3:16a
3. Therefore, the Bible is true.
Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word is truth. John 17:17
With all due respect, this reasoning fails a very basic logic test.
It can be summed up as: The Bible is the Word of God because the Bible says it's the Word of God.
And that's it.
This is circular logic. If I wrote my hypothetical essay and included a sentence that the essay was the "Word of God" would that make it so? If not, why is it so when the Bible makes the same claim about itself?
With all due respect, this reasoning fails a very basic logic test.
It can be summed up as: The Bible is the Word of God because the Bible says it's the Word of God.
And that's it...
If I wrote my hypothetical essay and included a sentence that the essay was the "Word of God" would that make it so? If not, why is it so when the Bible makes the same claim about itself?
So one of your question is basically, "What considerations make one a "Prophet of God?" This is a fair, reasonable and valid challenge.
You're also claiming citation of the Bible as the "Word of God" fails at "Logic"; Well, let's agree on the definition of "logic"...
Can we agree that "logic" is the principle or demonstration of reason and knowledge? A series of provable facts?
If we can agree on the above definition...
Perhaps this brief 4 minute that addresses your skepticism:
If Dr. Michael Newton is to be considered a "prophet" of sorts of his namesake "Model", could he and his stand-alone "testimony" of the Newton Model meet the same standard and scrutiny asked of a Bible that testifies and answers to being THE "Word of God"?
Q: What are the odds?:
Biblical prophecies are proven true. Not just some, but ALL in predicting events in advance of hundreds or even thousands of years. What are the odds that several prophets in the Bible have foretold the same exact events? Without a single prophecies proven false or a lie? Remember: "Logic" is the principle or demonstration of reason and knowledge; A series of provable facts.
There comes a points where one must ask: How does one dismiss or discredit phenomena that's demonstrated to be true without accepting the logic of divine inspiration and knowledge?
By any honest standard of criteria of "logic," The Bible can only be the divinely-inspired Word of God.
5 Prophecies that Prove the Bible = Proof for God:
The premise that the Bible is exceptional on the basis that it contains works if several dozens of authors over 1500 years that all agree on a common theology sounds impressive on its face, but is actually based on an argument I consider flawed.
It's one thing to ask 40 random writers to all write a story that involves a deity and have all the works be compatible in theology. But in the case of the Bible, that's not exactly how it came down.
It was more like this, I suspect: You rent out a hotel with 40 rooms, and put an author in each. You go to room #1, and ask the author to write a story of creation. He does it, and you can critique and edit it. Then you go to room #2, and give him a copy of the story and ask for a sequel. But since he first read the creation story, it's no surprise that his sequel is compatible with it.
Repeating the process, with every author already informed about what all authors before him composed, every work is pretty much compatible. And at the end of the process when all 40 authors have contributed their works, you get to sit down with a committee of scholars to read & study them all and have a vote on which one's to keep and which to throw away, which is what happened back in the middle ages when the books of the Apocrypha were thrown out (though retained in the Catholic Bible).
Given the process, and the likelihood of each author being not just informed about the older stories and writings but full blown religious believers in them, in addition to the final "editing" that took place, it's not particularly surprising that all the books in the Bible would agree.
This argument does not say the Bible cannot be the "Word of God", of course. It only argues that the agreement of all authors in the Bible could easily be explained without any divine intervention.
As for prophecies, it's much the same case. Tell an author about older prophecies, and a creative writer could see to it that they are fulfilled in his writings. What's really required is a double blind test where a prophet says something, while a new author writes his story without knowing what the prophecy is, and having his writings validate the prophecy, and do so in clear, unambiguous terms. We simply do not know what advanced information these later writers may have had when they composed their works, but given the volume of prophecies, there's little question many later writers would have been aware of at least many in advance. The volume of prophecies, particularly ones that were perhaps more obtuse, would also make it easier to mix and match later writings with one of the many bucket full of prophecies made in the past. I.e. make enough prophecies and some of them are bound to find some fulfillment somewhere in the works of later authors.
Sorry to rain on the parade, but that is my counter argument to the Bible being special for both theologically compatible and prophetic reasons.
As for the validation of the Bible through archeological findings, that's neither here nor there in terms of divine inspiration. To their credit, it appears the ancient Israelites were methodical record keepers. But of course keeping accurate records does not normally require divine intervention, unless perhaps you work for the FBI and are in charge of Hillary's emails or employee SMS messages!
Re: the second video, I am familiar with what happened with Tyre, and will concede that the construction of the causeway was a pretty good prophecy fulfilliment. However, predicting the fall of any city in ancient times was certainly a safe prediction to make, given the constant rise and fall of empires, particularly when no time frame is provided.
