Title: **WATCH CLOSELY** at this terrifying "Deep-Fake" CGI Technology; How the line between "reality" and fakery will now obliterate truth Source:
YouTube URL Source:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bPhUhypV27w Published:May 31, 2019 Author:Bill Hader/CGI Tech Post Date:2019-05-31 11:22:59 by Liberator Keywords:"Deep-Fake" Tech, Video-Sorcery, Blured-Reality Views:5911 Comments:86
It's here. "Deep Fake" face transitioning via video-sorcery CGI and technology will now be used to manipulate truth and "reality."
Prepare to have your mind blown:
Poster Comment:
This advanced video technology now means NO videotaped people or event can now be admitted as "proof" of anything.
AATIP's existence was revealed in 2017, when former Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) claimed to have arranged for the program's $22 million annual funding. Reid told the New York Times that it was "one of the good things I did in my congressional service."
The New York Times published the article after the DoD released a 33-second DoD video released by the AATIP, featuring an airborne object being chased off the coast of San Diego by two navy jets in 2004.
On Sunday we reported on an op-ed written by Christopher Mellon in The Hill, on the fact that since 2015, "dozens of Navy F-18 fighter jets have encountered Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon (UAPs) - once commonly referred to as UFOs - off the East Coast of the United States, some not far from the nation’s capital. Encounters have been reported by other military aircraft and civilian airliners elsewhere in the U.S. and abroad, too, including videos shot by airline passengers."
***
Faked by the PTB or actual evidence of UFOs? I tend to believe that the pilots saw something not of this world or some sort of inter-dimensional craft.
History Channel is showing a special tonight at 10 - might be worth a look-see.
It's getting to the stage where you can't see the difference between real and fake.
Yuge problem for obvious reasons.
I think it's been going on for some time now...
That's an interesting theory. Likely longer than we've been privy to.
IF this technique had been perfected by 2016, there's no doubt that the Deep State would have used Deep-Fake CGI transformations to further frame Trump.
On another note, what say you about this:
Pentagon Finally Admits To UFO Investigations
Firstly, let's concede the notion that the Pentagram has long been nothing but a Deep State disinfo/misinfo/propaganda Agency.
The Hill reported since 2015] "dozens of Navy F-18 fighter jets have encountered Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon (UAPs) - once commonly referred to as UFOs - off the East Coast of the United States, some not far from the nation’s capital. Encounters have been reported by other military aircraft and civilian airliners elsewhere in the U.S. and abroad, too, including videos shot by airline passengers."
Faked by the PTB or actual evidence of UFOs? I tend to believe that the pilots saw something not of this world or some sort of inter-dimensional craft.
Regarding "UFO" activity and any concession that they actually exists, like you, IMO such creatures/phenomena *do* indeed exist; And much like you I agree -- they exist as spiritual/demonic entities (which is why they are able to defy the physics of this realm.)
We are witnessing a Last Days clash of the Spiritual with the Physical. (Some might say it makes for "Interesting Times.")
So...many of us are to witness The Big Game/End Game of this World. It's hard NOT to notice that we have been getting groomed (via media/music videos/movies/TV shows/Junk Science) to accept not only "Alien" life, but Other-Worldly "ghosts" and demons with great powers. This is all setting up these "Aliens" (aka demons) to be feared and worshiped. As well as the appearance of Anti-Christ.
Related: I believe The PTB and Elites already are quite aware of these inter-dimensional creatures/entities; They also already know the actual shape of this earth, the secrets of the Antarctica, the inability to access deep space -- as well as our secret/hidden history, "Giants" and "Nephilim" told in Genesis 6.
Further connected: The CERN Project and purpose is all about tearing our way into (or out of) our realm/dimension and further helping allowing those demonic forces access. All of these is obviously almost impossible to wrap or collect head around any of it.
P.S. -- Like most Feral Agys, The Pentagram can't be trusted to tell ANY truth. I simply assume THE OPPOSITE of their claims, or partial truth at best.
It would be expected that UFO research would be kept as secret as possible. Obtaining an alien spacecraft would be a bonanza of technological information which the gov would not want any international pressure to share with other countries.
So all research that could lead to such a find would also be secret. Of course that makes no statement as to whether interstellar aliens have visited us. The gov would keep it a secret before any such determination would be made.
It would be expected that UFO research would be kept as secret as possible.
Obtaining an alien spacecraft would be a bonanza of technological information which the gov would not want any international pressure to share with other countries.
Well, "Area 51" and "UFO Research" is already the subject of decades of speculation, mystery, and "secrets." (As is so much about certain realms.)
To be honest, I don't know what to make of Area 51 and supposed confiscated "Alien" aircraft, reasearch, AND supposed "Aliens" themselves. What's your belief or speculation on any of this subject?
Obtaining an alien spacecraft would be a bonanza of technological information which the gov would not want any international pressure to share with other countries.
Given the sieve that is the US Gummint and its "officials,", shouldn't we already assume there *are* no secrets that aren't already shared & exchanged with the cabal of international elites? Let's also remember that the US Space program from its infancy was the brainchild and run by non-citizen Americans, aka former Nazis.
Regarding technology -- there have been many ongoing theories afoot (stemming partially from The Book of Enoch) that civilization's discoveries and technologies from the very beginning are the result of forbidden Nephilim/Fallen Angel/demonic knowledge that had/has been illicitly given to man. Pretty fascinating, plausible stuff. Given that much of this tech is weaponry with which to kill and maim, it makes sense.
IMO what's been locked up and hidden away in the bowels of the Vatican would yield the greatest bonanza of treasures: Ancient Knowledge and Truths about mankind's history and world.
To be honest, I don't know what to make of Area 51 and supposed confiscated "Alien" aircraft, reasearch, AND supposed "Aliens" themselves. What's your belief or speculation on any of this subject?
Michael Newton's work makes a handful of references to life existing beyond earth and our solar system, including intelligent life. Given the premise that we are unique because we are souls and our humanity is merely an incidental, temporary part of what we as souls acquire, and nothing particularly special about human DNA, it is reasonable to me that life would exist elsewhere in the cosmos.
Earth, and the human race itself is, in spiritual terms, completely expendable. If and when the human race dies out for whatever reason, we as souls will simply move on to a new planet with a new race of intelligent beings, perhaps in bodies we as humans would consider aliens to continue the same mission of spiritual growth. All of human civilized history will be repeated with a new planet in some new galaxy that happens to have all the ingredients for extensive, abundant life as earth does.
The purpose of the universe we live in is to facilitate growth of the soul. It's not important that it be on earth or that we incarnate into human form. Any intelligent life form can serve that purpose.
So might aliens have cracked the speed of light barrier and made it to earth? I don't know. Maybe. But wouldn't impact my spiritual beliefs if they did.
Newton is a kook former scientologist. He has no answers Only Delusion hypnotic trances and a path to hell.
I see no compelling reason to believe more the theological musings of people who lived many thousands of years ago over those who live today, who have far more information resources at their disposal.
Being subject to anger and jealousy is a sign of insecurity and weakness, yet we are to believe the all knowing, all wise Almighty God who knows us completely and everything we will ever do is somehow subject to these weaknesses?
The Bible has many good stories and good morals. But it is not the "Word of God". It is easy to dismissively and myopicly choose to believe it is. Far harder to critically examine something that you were taught as a child and beleived your whole life to decide if it passes such critical examination.
Newton has done nothing more than compile information from his first hand observations.
I should add that while Newton does make references to alien life, that is not to say that he necessarily concludes it exists. Any single hypnotic reference is subject to error or misinterpretation. Newton was a scientist and he apparently did see fit to relay a few observations about alien life in his books, but it should not be inferred that he declared himself the equivalent of a prophet giving infallable messages from a divine source. He is a witness to things he had seen and heard, and like any witness, may have some things wrong.
But that alien life could exist elsewhere in the universe does make more sense to me than the notion that the earth is the only planet with life in the entire universe, or that it is only some 6000 years old. I see no reason why the universe cannot be as old as it is big.
From the "Word of God", I can clearly and systematically define God...His Personality, His Characteristics, Who He is, ect.
Would I take this to mean that divine inspiration for a writing can be determined by how sufficiently it claims to define God?
If I wrote an essay defining God in clear terms, would that be something you'd consider authoritative?
Clearly we need to be more critical than that.
But as I pointed out, the Bible paints God as subject to anger and jealousy. Are not both of these traits signs on weakness when applied to any human? Aren't jealousy and wrath among the "7 deadly sins" under Christianity? How is it that it's okay for God to experience these things but not us humans? Does God hold us humans to a higher standard than God holds himself?
What it sounds like to me is that the authors added these attributes to their perception of God as a means of social control of the masses. A God who never gets angry is a God that can be disregarded with relative safety.
Under the Newton model, a failure to do the right thing is detrimental to the person, not to God. There is no negative reinforcement. At least from God. Doing the wrong thing is detrimental to you, but not God. All we receive is positive reinforcement.
I've yet to meet anyone who has been able to, critically and constructively, point out any structural defect in what I call the Newton model. The most I've seen is name calling.
Your honest questions and assertions require honest sensible explanations and rebuttals.
With respect to any LF inability to critique and deconstruct the inherent weaknesses and defects in the Newton Model' as opposed to the inherent strength of the Bible Model, I will be obliging your request. You have deserved sensible, comprehensible answers for too long now -- respectfully, without name-calling or ad hominims.
Thank you for your patience. I am currently re-examining research on Michael Newton, his methodologies, claims, and Model in preparation for doing so.
We'll attempt to examine and compare the respective authority, witness, validity, purpose, truth, spirituality, and especially weight of "God's Word" vs. "Newton's Word" (i.e. Model).
With respect to any LF inability to critique and deconstruct the inherent weaknesses and defects in the Newton Model' as opposed to the inherent strength of the Bible Model, I will be obliging your request. You have deserved sensible, comprehensible answers for too long now -- respectfully, without name-calling or ad hominims.
Reading your reply, I realize my previous assertion is not entirely correct. You have give me meaningful dialog on the subject of the Newton model. I think I have stated that appreciation in a past post at some point, and for that I thank you.
I have tried to reciprocate on your flat earth assertions. I do intend to send a photo of a rising moon from my location as I suggested previously as a latitude experiment, though opportunity for such a photo is rare. You are free to do with that as you will.
