Title: **WATCH CLOSELY** at this terrifying "Deep-Fake" CGI Technology; How the line between "reality" and fakery will now obliterate truth Source:
YouTube URL Source:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bPhUhypV27w Published:May 31, 2019 Author:Bill Hader/CGI Tech Post Date:2019-05-31 11:22:59 by Liberator Keywords:"Deep-Fake" Tech, Video-Sorcery, Blured-Reality Views:5924 Comments:86
It's here. "Deep Fake" face transitioning via video-sorcery CGI and technology will now be used to manipulate truth and "reality."
Prepare to have your mind blown:
Poster Comment:
This advanced video technology now means NO videotaped people or event can now be admitted as "proof" of anything.
AATIP's existence was revealed in 2017, when former Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) claimed to have arranged for the program's $22 million annual funding. Reid told the New York Times that it was "one of the good things I did in my congressional service."
The New York Times published the article after the DoD released a 33-second DoD video released by the AATIP, featuring an airborne object being chased off the coast of San Diego by two navy jets in 2004.
On Sunday we reported on an op-ed written by Christopher Mellon in The Hill, on the fact that since 2015, "dozens of Navy F-18 fighter jets have encountered Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon (UAPs) - once commonly referred to as UFOs - off the East Coast of the United States, some not far from the nation’s capital. Encounters have been reported by other military aircraft and civilian airliners elsewhere in the U.S. and abroad, too, including videos shot by airline passengers."
***
Faked by the PTB or actual evidence of UFOs? I tend to believe that the pilots saw something not of this world or some sort of inter-dimensional craft.
History Channel is showing a special tonight at 10 - might be worth a look-see.
It's getting to the stage where you can't see the difference between real and fake.
Yuge problem for obvious reasons.
I think it's been going on for some time now...
That's an interesting theory. Likely longer than we've been privy to.
IF this technique had been perfected by 2016, there's no doubt that the Deep State would have used Deep-Fake CGI transformations to further frame Trump.
On another note, what say you about this:
Pentagon Finally Admits To UFO Investigations
Firstly, let's concede the notion that the Pentagram has long been nothing but a Deep State disinfo/misinfo/propaganda Agency.
The Hill reported since 2015] "dozens of Navy F-18 fighter jets have encountered Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon (UAPs) - once commonly referred to as UFOs - off the East Coast of the United States, some not far from the nation’s capital. Encounters have been reported by other military aircraft and civilian airliners elsewhere in the U.S. and abroad, too, including videos shot by airline passengers."
Faked by the PTB or actual evidence of UFOs? I tend to believe that the pilots saw something not of this world or some sort of inter-dimensional craft.
Regarding "UFO" activity and any concession that they actually exists, like you, IMO such creatures/phenomena *do* indeed exist; And much like you I agree -- they exist as spiritual/demonic entities (which is why they are able to defy the physics of this realm.)
We are witnessing a Last Days clash of the Spiritual with the Physical. (Some might say it makes for "Interesting Times.")
So...many of us are to witness The Big Game/End Game of this World. It's hard NOT to notice that we have been getting groomed (via media/music videos/movies/TV shows/Junk Science) to accept not only "Alien" life, but Other-Worldly "ghosts" and demons with great powers. This is all setting up these "Aliens" (aka demons) to be feared and worshiped. As well as the appearance of Anti-Christ.
Related: I believe The PTB and Elites already are quite aware of these inter-dimensional creatures/entities; They also already know the actual shape of this earth, the secrets of the Antarctica, the inability to access deep space -- as well as our secret/hidden history, "Giants" and "Nephilim" told in Genesis 6.
Further connected: The CERN Project and purpose is all about tearing our way into (or out of) our realm/dimension and further helping allowing those demonic forces access. All of these is obviously almost impossible to wrap or collect head around any of it.
P.S. -- Like most Feral Agys, The Pentagram can't be trusted to tell ANY truth. I simply assume THE OPPOSITE of their claims, or partial truth at best.
It would be expected that UFO research would be kept as secret as possible. Obtaining an alien spacecraft would be a bonanza of technological information which the gov would not want any international pressure to share with other countries.
So all research that could lead to such a find would also be secret. Of course that makes no statement as to whether interstellar aliens have visited us. The gov would keep it a secret before any such determination would be made.
It would be expected that UFO research would be kept as secret as possible.
Obtaining an alien spacecraft would be a bonanza of technological information which the gov would not want any international pressure to share with other countries.
Well, "Area 51" and "UFO Research" is already the subject of decades of speculation, mystery, and "secrets." (As is so much about certain realms.)
To be honest, I don't know what to make of Area 51 and supposed confiscated "Alien" aircraft, reasearch, AND supposed "Aliens" themselves. What's your belief or speculation on any of this subject?
Obtaining an alien spacecraft would be a bonanza of technological information which the gov would not want any international pressure to share with other countries.
Given the sieve that is the US Gummint and its "officials,", shouldn't we already assume there *are* no secrets that aren't already shared & exchanged with the cabal of international elites? Let's also remember that the US Space program from its infancy was the brainchild and run by non-citizen Americans, aka former Nazis.
Regarding technology -- there have been many ongoing theories afoot (stemming partially from The Book of Enoch) that civilization's discoveries and technologies from the very beginning are the result of forbidden Nephilim/Fallen Angel/demonic knowledge that had/has been illicitly given to man. Pretty fascinating, plausible stuff. Given that much of this tech is weaponry with which to kill and maim, it makes sense.
IMO what's been locked up and hidden away in the bowels of the Vatican would yield the greatest bonanza of treasures: Ancient Knowledge and Truths about mankind's history and world.
To be honest, I don't know what to make of Area 51 and supposed confiscated "Alien" aircraft, reasearch, AND supposed "Aliens" themselves. What's your belief or speculation on any of this subject?
Michael Newton's work makes a handful of references to life existing beyond earth and our solar system, including intelligent life. Given the premise that we are unique because we are souls and our humanity is merely an incidental, temporary part of what we as souls acquire, and nothing particularly special about human DNA, it is reasonable to me that life would exist elsewhere in the cosmos.
Earth, and the human race itself is, in spiritual terms, completely expendable. If and when the human race dies out for whatever reason, we as souls will simply move on to a new planet with a new race of intelligent beings, perhaps in bodies we as humans would consider aliens to continue the same mission of spiritual growth. All of human civilized history will be repeated with a new planet in some new galaxy that happens to have all the ingredients for extensive, abundant life as earth does.
The purpose of the universe we live in is to facilitate growth of the soul. It's not important that it be on earth or that we incarnate into human form. Any intelligent life form can serve that purpose.
So might aliens have cracked the speed of light barrier and made it to earth? I don't know. Maybe. But wouldn't impact my spiritual beliefs if they did.
Newton is a kook former scientologist. He has no answers Only Delusion hypnotic trances and a path to hell.
I see no compelling reason to believe more the theological musings of people who lived many thousands of years ago over those who live today, who have far more information resources at their disposal.
Being subject to anger and jealousy is a sign of insecurity and weakness, yet we are to believe the all knowing, all wise Almighty God who knows us completely and everything we will ever do is somehow subject to these weaknesses?
The Bible has many good stories and good morals. But it is not the "Word of God". It is easy to dismissively and myopicly choose to believe it is. Far harder to critically examine something that you were taught as a child and beleived your whole life to decide if it passes such critical examination.
Newton has done nothing more than compile information from his first hand observations.
I should add that while Newton does make references to alien life, that is not to say that he necessarily concludes it exists. Any single hypnotic reference is subject to error or misinterpretation. Newton was a scientist and he apparently did see fit to relay a few observations about alien life in his books, but it should not be inferred that he declared himself the equivalent of a prophet giving infallable messages from a divine source. He is a witness to things he had seen and heard, and like any witness, may have some things wrong.
But that alien life could exist elsewhere in the universe does make more sense to me than the notion that the earth is the only planet with life in the entire universe, or that it is only some 6000 years old. I see no reason why the universe cannot be as old as it is big.
From the "Word of God", I can clearly and systematically define God...His Personality, His Characteristics, Who He is, ect.
Would I take this to mean that divine inspiration for a writing can be determined by how sufficiently it claims to define God?
If I wrote an essay defining God in clear terms, would that be something you'd consider authoritative?
Clearly we need to be more critical than that.
But as I pointed out, the Bible paints God as subject to anger and jealousy. Are not both of these traits signs on weakness when applied to any human? Aren't jealousy and wrath among the "7 deadly sins" under Christianity? How is it that it's okay for God to experience these things but not us humans? Does God hold us humans to a higher standard than God holds himself?
What it sounds like to me is that the authors added these attributes to their perception of God as a means of social control of the masses. A God who never gets angry is a God that can be disregarded with relative safety.
Under the Newton model, a failure to do the right thing is detrimental to the person, not to God. There is no negative reinforcement. At least from God. Doing the wrong thing is detrimental to you, but not God. All we receive is positive reinforcement.
I've yet to meet anyone who has been able to, critically and constructively, point out any structural defect in what I call the Newton model. The most I've seen is name calling.
Your honest questions and assertions require honest sensible explanations and rebuttals.
With respect to any LF inability to critique and deconstruct the inherent weaknesses and defects in the Newton Model' as opposed to the inherent strength of the Bible Model, I will be obliging your request. You have deserved sensible, comprehensible answers for too long now -- respectfully, without name-calling or ad hominims.
Thank you for your patience. I am currently re-examining research on Michael Newton, his methodologies, claims, and Model in preparation for doing so.
We'll attempt to examine and compare the respective authority, witness, validity, purpose, truth, spirituality, and especially weight of "God's Word" vs. "Newton's Word" (i.e. Model).
Would I take this to mean that divine inspiration for a writing can be determined by how sufficiently it claims to define God?
If I wrote an essay defining God in clear terms, would that be something you'd consider authoritative?
Good questions, all of them.
As for divine inspiration, the only writing I know that is divinely inspired is the Bible. And it is not just how sufficiently it defines God but how accurately it defines God (without error/inerrancy).
Christians believe the Bible to be divinely inspired, and therefore without error, based on a simple premise:
1. God cannot lie.
That by two immutable things, in which it was impossible for God to lie... Hebrews 6:18a
2. The Bible is God's Word.
All scripture is given by inspiration of God... 2 Timothy 3:16a
3. Therefore, the Bible is true.
Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word is truth. John 17:17
And yes, if you wrote an essay defining God in clear (and accurate) terms, I'd consider that essay to have authority. Pastors do this every week in the form of a sermon. If it is true, it has authority.
As for Michael Newton, he's selling you things based on beliefs that are in direct conflict with the Bible: "life between lives"(reincarnation?), spirit guides, and so on...
So, who's speaking the truth: Michael Newton or the Bible. And what does Newton believe about God? Better yet, what do you believe about God? I'd really like to know.
But as I pointed out, the Bible paints God as subject to anger and jealousy. Are not both of these traits signs on weakness when applied to any human? Aren't jealousy and wrath among the "7 deadly sins" under Christianity? How is it that it's okay for God to experience these things but not us humans? Does God hold us humans to a higher standard than God holds himself?
I believe that God is a Person. Persons have emotions. That's part of what make a person, well, a person. Gotta have emotions to be considered a person. It's simply this: God has all the emotions that any person would have...yet without any imperfection. God can be angry or jealous and not be wrong in any way. For example, Jesus was angry when He drove the money changers from the temple. Did He sin? Not at all.
As for human anger, we CAN experience anger just as God does. Paul said as much when he wrote...
Be ye angry, and sin not: let not the sun go down upon your wrath...
The God I believe in wants a relationship with a fully functioning human being. That means a person with a full range of healthy emotions. But you know as well as I that emotions can get carried away. Healthy anger can soon turn into unhealthy anger (bitterness, depression, even murder).
How about the God you believe in...can you describe your God in any way as clearly as I can? For example, is your God a Person with the attributes (emotions, intellect) of a Person?
("From the "Word of God", I can clearly and systematically define God...His Personality, His Characteristics, Who He is, ect.")
Would I take this to mean that divine inspiration for a writing can be determined by how sufficiently it claims to define God?...
If I wrote an essay defining God in clear terms, would that be something you'd consider authoritative?
Clearly we need to be more critical than that.
Not many have been tasked with speaking Truth on behalf of The Almighty. It's never been any kind of contest, lottery or shot in the dark. The Bible warns of deception of many who would try and claim they've spoken for God, this is nothing new. Mormon Joseph Smith is one more major fraud who tried to usurp divine authority.
The prophets and prophecies of The Bible have been scrutinized like no other human literature and messaging. Again, ALL of it is found to be true. Not a single lie or untruth in the entire book. There is also NO vague promises, NO murky unspecific resolutions. The Bible's citations and claims are specific and precise. (As an aside, some people actually are spoken to by the Lord. But one doesn't just simply submit an essay and claim, "HERE IS GOD'S NEXT MESSAGE...")
If you want to subscribe to the necessity of being "critical" about claims of divinity, let's do so.
The Bible has a undefeated record of historically accuracy and detailed prophecies describing The Beginning and End, Realm of Heaven and Hell, real people, places, events, and claims; And importantly, the Purpose for Living, Wisdom, Truth, Justice...AND JUDGEMENT.
It must be noted that the God of the Bible has never pronounced any "fairness" in and for this life. ONLY Judgement and Justice in the NEXT life.
On the other hand is Michael Newton.
As proof of his "divinity" he has simply submitted and documented records of his patients who under hypnosis anecdotally claim they've lived in the past or can recall certain real places. I guess we've just got to trust his word and that of his subjects, right?
I suspect that the vast majority of reincarnational subjects had a pre-existing belief in it or at least were very open to it's possibility. I also suspect that Dr. Newton steered his subjects as the Power of Suggestion will find many takers for reincarnation, provided one actually permits themselves to yield their own free will to a professional like Newton.
As far as I can see, Michael Newton cobbled a theory, a model, a tale of an ambiguous Afterlife spent in spiritual classroom so to speak; And based partially on the principle of academics(??), testing and "learning your lesson," one's soul is thrust back into this Mortal Life...with NO memory of past lives OR the "Between Lives" lesson. Btw Ping, do YOU recall any past-lives lessons presently??
So this process to to be repeated until the NEXT death..and next death ad infinitum or for however long it takes" in the classroom? All the pesky esoteric "Between-Lives" details, "After-Life" details and "Final Graduation" details -- conveniently omitted by Newton.
Regarding these "Between-Life" lessons -- if we assume the process to be true, why is it so critical to "learn" every conceivable moral "lesson" in every conceivable moral situation on this earth that one missed during their OTHER 50 lives? Why would this "Between Lives" dimension not be as "hard" to learn moral lessons as within the Physical Realm? Again, I'd ask if you or anybody you know can recall any past "Between-Lives" lessons...
The belief that it is (accredited by WHOM??) "Counselors" determine the sufficiency of the moral lessons one learns in Between Lives -- where is the proof of that? Is this a matter of blind faith? Or pure deception?
It seems pretty clear upon any critical examination that anecdotes produced under hypnotic trance, vague theories and assumptions, and same ol' reincarnation has more holes in it than Swiss cheese hit with buck-shot.
If we are to be honest and critical, please tell us how Michael Newton of ALL people figured out the Great Mystery of the Universe and got it right? Why should his "divinity" AND "Model" be considered legitimate and himself the recipient of divine truth?
You do understand to main problems with his Model, right? (and there are several obvious ones.)
**Possibilities/probabilities to be considered:
**Corrupted Testimony (subjects freely let their walls down and surrendered their respective will to be possessed by demons)
**False Memory (led on by Michael Newton and/or demonic spirits)
**Michael Newton own nefarious motivation and agenda
**Newton's claim to know THE destination and nature of souls via esoteric means
**Newton and his "Model" claim to usurp the Authority and Knowledge of God; claim there is no Heaven & Hell, no God or Satan, no Final Penalty for sin, no Eternal Reward.
**Newton's own nefarious personal background AND agenda
On the further basis of using critical thinking and logic as a standard for faith in the Newton Model, I could rattle off another 20 reasons it no only merits no consideration for credibility and accountability; it's just a very bad theory or model with which to trust for your Eternity. The biggest mistake one can make, but there are no "do-overs."
Reincarnation. Many have claimed to see it "remember" it in practically everything. Even my brother claims he landed at Iwo Jima. (He ws a big fan of the John Wayne movie.)
I guess this debate is really about Michael Newton's "advanced" twist on Reincarnation vs. Christianity. He believes he has gained secret, esoteric wisdom that HE discovered through several thousand altered state of consciousness of people who not only volunteered to be subjects, but were aware of Newton's "mission." From an observation perspective while watching Newton's speech, tone, and content, the vibe he put out (IMO) was one of a Yoda-sage and technocrat, possessing an unusual sense of certainty and self-esteem but a hollow compassion.
I have a real desire to know the truth. So much so that I'm willing to critically question whether the Bible is the WoG, something I'd venture most Bible believing Christians are afraid to seriously do for fear of offending the Almighty.
I realize you are seeking the truth. But the weight of evidence is extremely lop-sided. The destination of your soul is the single most important decision you make. Please re-consider your position. Michael Newton imo was a thief of souls, possessed and imprisoned by an inner-demon who spoke FOR him during those thousand of sessions.
I would think God would appreciate more an honest skeptic than an insincere "believer". Don't you?
He tells us BOTH will be "spit out." "Lukewarm" Christians will be very disappointed and panicked. Skeptics will merely be shocked and terrified. ALL will realize that it is by their OWN free will and decision from which they are condemned. If we invite the Holy Spirit into our heart, Jesus will enter it and we'll grow in Him. I believe you possess more than a gain of a mustard seed. It is Satan who confuses and is the accuser, the betrayer, the liar. Yes, you're right -- we must pursue Jesus and our Father out of sincere love and desire. And keep on at it. Many believe only because they are broken hearted or desperate -- that is IF one is blessed. Strangely and ironically, to never "need God" is actually a curse in this mortal life.
....Logically, if God had a choice in which model to employ, I think He'd choose the Newton model. In comparing the merits of the two, the Newton model has many attributes that are, I think, objectively superior to Christianity, one of the big ones being that no one burns in hell for all eternity just because no one told them about Jesus.
This isn't only about "Merit" it's about "Truth"; And for what it's worth we are ALL sinners, which technically makes us all unpure, doesn't it? Exactly how have we earned anything, much less "merit" entry into the immaculate, sinless Kingdom of Heaven? We can't wish away or invent an alternative Truth just because the Biblical One seems unfair; Can't run away from The Law, the Truth, The Life, The Way either. Again, God never tells us in scripture, "Life is fair." He does instruct us on how to cope here and prepare for the next life.
As to your concern that the souls of those who have not heard the Name of Jesus are in jeopardy, that's why the Lords states that HE will judge...and also do so according to one's deeds...as well as even in the case of innocent children's deaths. Wouldn't an Omnipotent God *know* any given life's verdict in ALL cases either way??
