4um? They do ban people and if you read the mission statement or whatever on the front page, Christine, IMHO, states that free association will trump free speech on that site. This editorial policy certainly appears to protect the posters there who don't want to be called out for their irrational hatred of Jews. If you point this out, as I have, you get warned or banned. It wouldn't surprise me if posters there believe that I was some sort of Zionista plant sent to disrupt simply because I questioned why a poster used the term "Hebe"...
One of the more bizzarre conversations I had there was over an Irish-American NPR reporter...the person I was speaking with said his name sounded Jewish...
4um? They do ban people and if you read the mission statement or whatever on the front page, Christine, IMHO, states that free association will trump free speech on that site.
I am the first poster on 4um to be banned .... and on FU and on LibertyPost and on FR.
When I helped John Deere create LibertyForum, I was banned.
There is no way ANYONE can trump my personal efforts to be banned on the Internet. Yet, here on Stone's Ohio chittie-chatty channel I am welcome. What is wrong with this guy? I shall kill his efforts and certainly his money to create a channel.
I am number one poster banned. I taunt while making everyone feel insecure about themselves. Just like here on AKA's channel. I am going to get the BIG_KICK.... he will watch his ratings plummett because I picked on him.
It is fun, _Jim, to have debate. Just like I used to pick on you back on FR during 1999 while you believed the federal government was "GOOD" frying the Branch Davidians to death. And you supported Chuck Schumer in the Congressional hearings while he smiled burning innocent women and children.
Yeah. I am alive and kicking, similar to yourself. But your compliant government message swore your faith about America before any honour or pursuit of ethical or moral principles.
Would you like me to send a lighter to you in recognition of YOUR awesome talent towards discerning the truth?
But your compliant government message swore your faith about America before any honour or pursuit of ethical or moral principles.
Negative; I had a specific message to get out, to wit, the truth, as opposed to the wholesale fabrication of the du jour patriot movement at the time ... You are entitled to your own opinion; you are not entitled to your own 'facts'; get the diff?
You are entitled to your own opinion; you are not entitled to your own 'facts';
But my opinions were always based upon FACT, unlike your hand-clapping for government to violate the US Constitution taking the lives of about 100 innocent people. So your perspective has always had a certain aloofness or disingenuous spirit for me. And I am certain I am not alone in regard towards your perspective.
