Education
See other Education Articles
Title: A K A Stone on Thin Ice
Source:
4um
URL Source: http://freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=113785&Disp=All
Published: Jan 25, 2010
Author: Various
Post Date: 2010-01-26 00:00:16 by Fred Mertz
Keywords: Baldwin, Chuck, Stoner
Views: 41193
Comments: 94
That site doesn't ban anyone, or so they say. .. I'm biting my fingertips to keep from typing words expressing my annoyance with you. christine posted on 2010-01-25 23:47:26 ET
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-25) not displayed.
.
.
.
#26. To: war (#2)
I am the first poster on 4um to be banned .... and on FU and on LibertyPost and on FR. When I helped John Deere create LibertyForum, I was banned. Who the fuck are you?
I think I may trump you on this point ...
There is no way ANYONE can trump my personal efforts to be banned on the Internet. Yet, here on Stone's Ohio chittie-chatty channel I am welcome. What is wrong with this guy? I shall kill his efforts and certainly his money to create a channel.
LOL! Try writing it again sometime when you are sober bucky. As it is now, it only makes sense to wet brains such as you wino. I'll wait. LOL!
Quoted by PDS insane assholes every where.
You can't be banned if you're still posting there.
You dumb fucking Alaskan whiner begging Palin to come to you in your dreams. And what do you wake up with ... your pal, yukon?
Not true. I was number one banned; on every chitty-chat channel you ever saw me appear upon. Now, do you want to know why?
Not challenging that point; when were you banned on 4um?
LOL! You really are much more pleasant to be around since you switched your "beverage" of choice from sterno to vanilla extract drunken bucky, your breath smells so much better now.
Quoted by PDS insane assholes every where.
LOL! Btw drunken bucky it's spelled Alaskan "winner". I hope you aren't mixing that vanilla extract with any soda drunken bucky, soda is bad for you.
Quoted by PDS insane assholes every where.
Check it out for yourself. It was not long after creation.
My last post date late 2005 (10-29) ... before being banned ... freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/latestcomments.cgi? Fm=_Jim&To=&SNSearch=+Go+&PNU=
YOUR latest/last post date comes up more like ... 2010-01-31 (today) freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/latestcomments.cgi? Fm=buckeroo&To=&SNSearch=+Go+&PNU=
Correction, you are a fucking Alaskan whiner. You would probably screw a melted glacier just after eating some newly understood wetland tundra that you think is all because of Obama.
Go back in time, my good friend. Go way back.
I see a solid posting history on 4um from 2005-02-18 through today ... WUWT?
#2. To: buckeroo (#1) Welcome to 4.. Zipporah posted on 2005-02-18 13:57:23 ET Reply Trace Private Reply - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - From: http://freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=667&Disp=2#C2
Maybe he means FreedomUnderground...I'm just guessing...
Check that last reply...he's still posting at FU too.
Not true. I am number one poster banned. I taunt while making everyone feel insecure about themselves. Just like here on AKA's channel. I am going to get the BIG_KICK.... he will watch his ratings plummett because I picked on him. It is fun, _Jim, to have debate. Just like I used to pick on you back on FR during 1999 while you believed the federal government was "GOOD" frying the Branch Davidians to death. And you supported Chuck Schumer in the Congressional hearings while he smiled burning innocent women and children.
Fortunately, the facts of the case were never in your favor. Only hyperbole, dissembling, craw-dadding and in some case wholesale fabrication 'for your cause'. Oh yeah, we know you well ...
Either he's (his mind) has skipped a cog or - he's testing us to see if we can spot the inconsistency. I think we spotted the inconsistency.
Yeah. I am alive and kicking, similar to yourself. But your compliant government message swore your faith about America before any honour or pursuit of ethical or moral principles. Would you like me to send a lighter to you in recognition of YOUR awesome talent towards discerning the truth?
Negative; I had a specific message to get out, to wit, the truth, as opposed to the wholesale fabrication of the du jour patriot movement at the time ... You are entitled to your own opinion; you are not entitled to your own 'facts'; get the diff?
Remember to that those kids were burned to death under the watch of Janet Reno. I saw that movie Rules of Engagement. Unbelievable! Those people were fried to death with cns gas by our own feds.
Fiction.
But my opinions were always based upon FACT, unlike your hand-clapping for government to violate the US Constitution taking the lives of about 100 innocent people. So your perspective has always had a certain aloofness or disingenuous spirit for me. And I am certain I am not alone in regard towards your perspective.
I meant the movie: WACO: The Rules of Engagement
Unfortunately, facts existing only by your definition and/or between your ears count for sqat. Physical evidence, tapes, recordings; THAT'S evidence, clean, pure FACTUAL evidence.
I know; I am well aware of that 'movie' containing out-of-time sequence depiction of events. What do you expect from the ex-CNN group that produced it? (news media agitprop/propaganda)
#2. To: Zipporah (#1) Can I post a thread here upon your website? buckeroo posted on 2005-02-18 23:24:58 ET Reply Trace Private Reply - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Note the date
Oh sure. The denial of individual liberties while government black helicopters spin over-head with 50mm automatic rifles upon a church in Waco, Texas. Yep. Yes, indeed, there is a lot of truth there.
I smell a skunk ... a great big 4um buckeroo skunk ...
Hyperbole, wholesale fabrication of events, and I can add chest beating to the list ... Not buying your 'act' Mr. buckeroo. I think you're a 4um plant. No?
You should note the links about my original sign-ups. I am normally in the 100s if you have a chance to click on my nick or perchance view my info. I give everyone the data deserve.
And with that - I gotta go. By all.
Yes, of course; you would. You turned a blind eye to America. BTW, how do you like the way you fabricated America with Obama running the place, now? Not much difference is there?
You will go to your grave clutching onto your government paid pension. I won't. My opinion can't be bought.
No one of consequence... OR did you typo "Who" for "How"? IN that case, fine, perfectly fine...
LOL! Sober up bucky boy, you make zero sense.
Quoted by PDS insane assholes every where.
What do I expect from those CNN producers who interviewed some of those people with Koresh? I thought they did a very good job! Not that I'm a fan of CNN but that I think the people of America have a right to be shown how their government looks upon those who believe in Jesus Christ by referring to them as cults. At least that's what freakazoid Janet Reno referred to those Davidians as. Next the government will be referring to those who view Jesus Christ as their saviors as terrorists. Watch that happen next. Only in America.
Comments (67 - 94) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest4um? They do ban people and if you read the mission statement or whatever on the front page, Christine, IMHO, states that free association will trump free speech on that site.
#27. To: buckeroo (#26)
I am the first poster on 4um to be banned
#28. To: _Jim, AKA Stone (#27)
#29. To: drunken bucky (#22)
#30. To: buckeroo (#26)
I am the first poster on 4um to be banned ....
#31. To: Mad Dog (#29)
LOL!
#32. To: Fred Mertz (#30)
#33. To: buckeroo (#28)
There is no way ANYONE can trump my personal efforts to be banned on the Internet.
#34. To: drunken bucky (#31)
#35. To: drunken bucky (#31)
#36. To: _Jim (#33)
Not challenging that point; when were you banned on 4um?
#37. To: buckeroo (#28)
(Edited)
#38. To: buckeroo (#36)
Check it out for yourself. It was not long after creation.
#39. To: Mad Dog (#35)
Alaskan "winner".
#40. To: _Jim (#38)
#41. To: buckeroo (#40)
#42. To: buckeroo (#40)
#43. To: _Jim (#41)
#44. To: _Jim (#41)
#45. To: _Jim (#41)
#46. To: buckeroo (#45)
It is fun, _Jim, to have debate. Just like I used to pick on ...
#47. To: Fred Mertz (#44)
(Edited)
Check that last reply...he's still posting at FU too.
#48. To: _Jim (#46)
the facts of the case were never in your favor.
#49. To: buckeroo (#48)
But your compliant government message swore your faith about America before any honour or pursuit of ethical or moral principles.
#50. To: buckeroo (#45)
It is fun, _Jim, to have debate. Just like I used to pick on you back on FR during 1999 while you believed the federal government was "GOOD" frying the Branch Davidians to death. And you supported Chuck Schumer in the Congressional hearings while he smiled burning innocent women and children.
#51. To: goldeeluckx (#50)
I saw that movie Rules of Engagement.
#52. To: _Jim (#49)
You are entitled to your own opinion; you are not entitled to your own 'facts';
#53. To: _Jim (#51)
#54. To: buckeroo (#52)
(Edited)
unlike your ...
#55. To: goldeeluckx (#53)
#56. To: buckeroo (#52)
#57. To: _Jim (#54)
Physical eveidence, tapes, recordings; THAT'S evidence, clean, pure FACTUAL evidence.
#58. To: buckeroo (#52)
#59. To: buckeroo (#57)
Oh sure. The denial of individual liberties while government ...
#60. To: _Jim (#56)
#61. To: All (#59)
#62. To: _Jim (#59)
Hyperbole, wholesale fabrication of events, and I can add chest beating to the list ...
#63. To: _Jim (#61)
And with that - I gotta go. By all.
#64. To: buckeroo (#26)
(Edited)
Who the fuck are you?
#65. To: drunken bucky (#39)
#66. To: _Jim (#55)
.
.
.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]