Title: Assange arrested betrayed by Ecuador Source:
[None] URL Source:[None] Published:Apr 11, 2019 Author:Aka Post Date:2019-04-11 07:10:18 by A K A Stone Keywords:None Views:7711 Comments:59
Just found out that Julian Assange has been arrested in the embassy. Asylum withdrawn.
I don't care about locking Assange up nearly as much as sending Tranny Manning back to prison where he/she belongs for the crime of treason.
Manning?? Meh.
But...but...what about the High Crimes committed in plain sight by Brennan, Clapper, the Feeb/CIA Deep State coup playahs -- not to mention Hitlery and Zero etal and *their* respective TREASON??
But...but...what about the High Crimes committed in plain sight by Brennan, Clapper, the Feeb/CIA Deep State coup playahs -- not to mention Hitlery and Zero etal and *their* respective TREASON??
A point all too obvious. Some people want to be patriotic to the American gov when it comes to prosecuting Manning and Assange, but when it comes to these criminals, it's no longer a patriotic cause but a political one. Those who break the law to expose high crimes by the US gov those in it are given no quarter.
Case in point, Clapper was exposed as lying to Congress by Snowden's releases, and was never prosecuted for it. Not no much as a hearing.
#22. To: Pinguinite, Stoner, IbJensen, hondo68 (#20)
Some people want to be patriotic to the American gov when it comes to prosecuting Manning and Assange, but when it comes to these criminals, it's no longer a patriotic cause but a political one.
Those who break the law to expose high crimes by the US gov those in it are given no quarter.
Exactamundo. Spot on observations.
"Patriotism" or "safe-guarding US security" is not ANY case that can honestly be made against Assange. His is simply a Political Target and Prisoner. Because he is...a Whistle-Blower.
(btw, personally, I'm more inclined to consider the Assange and Snowden cases far more uniquely similar in the expressed category of true "WHISTLE-BLOWER" than Manning, who I'd categorize as a patsy.)
We are now compelled to ask:
If "law" is enacted behind closed doors in the bowels of DC dungeons that indemnifies the fox's presence and dining arrangements in the hen-house, does it make that law legitimate or righteous?
THAT is now the way our PTB have set up the game.
By criminalizing those Whistle Blowers who expose the harm and imminent plans to do harm to We The People, shouldn't they indeed be given quarter?
Moreover, any so-called "law" that ostensibly shields the "untouchables" and their clear criminality should be considered invalid; Such "shielding laws" are clear violations of the US Constitution, Bill of Rights, and oaths of respective Office.
We either serve Man or we serve the Truth. Can't do both.
Don't I need to anoint myself in Paul's spit and do some kind of hexagon ritual before dismissing his insanity?
Btw, Paul exposed NOTHING in the way of GOVT corruption on the floor of Congress, introducing ZIP legislation to clean up Congressional corruption while he served all those decades. ZIP. NADA.
#47. To: Liberator, FED mother lode of corruption, inflation taxes (#41)
The Federal Reserve Transparency Act of 2015 (H.R. 24) was a bill introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives of the 114th United States Congress by Congressman Thomas Massie (KY-4). It included proposals for a reformed audit of the Federal Reserve System (the "Fed"). The Senate version was introduced by Senator Rand Paul (R-KY). (S. 264).
The original version of the bill, (H.R. 1207), was proposed by now retired Congressman Ron Paul in response to the 2008 financial crisis during the 111th United States Congress. The Senate version was introduced by Bernie Sanders (I-VT). (S. 604). Ron Paul was disappointed with the Senate's version of the bill, stating it "guts the spirit of a truly meaningful audit of the most crucial transactions of the Fed".[1]
The bill was subsequently brought up in the 112th United States Congress as (H.R. 459) /S. 202[2][3] and in the 113th United States Congress as (H.R. 24)/S. 209. All three previous attempts passed in United States House of Representatives but died in the US Senate.
The Senate version was introduced by Bernie Sanders (I-VT). (S. 604).
Ron Paul was disappointed with the Senate's version of the bill, stating it "guts the spirit of a truly meaningful audit of the most crucial transactions of the Fed".
Bernie. What a poseur and snake. As was AND STILL IS the rest of the Senate.