[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
International News Title: France to UK: Hell no, you can’t delay What do you do with a neighbor who doesn’t want to stay but still won’t go away? You give them a push — and France did exactly that yesterday and today to the Brexit-paralyzed UK. As Theresa May goes to the EU to ask for a longer delay without any evidence of parliamentary support for the deal she negotiated, French ministers publicly rejected the idea: “It’s time that this situation ended,” he told reporters on the sidelines of a G7 meeting in Dinard, northern France. “We can’t live constantly with Brexit. At some point, there needs to be a departure. The British authorities and the British parliament need to understand that the European Union is not going to be able to constantly exhaust itself with the ups and downs of domestic British politics.” “The British need to tell us very quickly how they are going to get out of this crisis,” he added. Yesterday, the French secretary of state put it only slightly more gently. In an interview with the Guardian, Amélie de Montchalin declared that May had better come up with an ironclad plan if she wants the EU to give her more time past the April 12th deadline. Either that, or May will have to agree to EU elections in the UK and commit to constructive engagement in Brussels: The council would then have to define the necessary conditions attached to that extension, she said. “In the absence of such a plan, we would have to acknowledge that the UK chose to leave the EU in a disorderly manner.” … De Montchalin said Paris had “read with interest Theresa May’s letter to President Tusk. As the prime minister rightly wrote, the current impasse is not in the best interest of either the UK nor the EU. It cannot be allowed to continue.” Ireland’s taoiseach Leo Varadkar expressed hope today that May could win a short extension to get Parliament on board with the Withdrawal Agreement. A veto, by France or any other EU country, “wouldn’t be forgiven” if it triggered a Brexit crash-out: Any such country he said ‘would know they might find themselves on the other end of that particular veto power in the future’. He said the European Council is working to agree Brexit on the basis of unanimity and it is rare that a veto is used. Mr Varadkar said that it tends to operate by consensus and while that takes time and can be messy, it is why Europe works. However, it might not be the worst outcome either: That concern arose over the last couple of days after Brexiter Jacob Rees-Mogg floated it as a possible strategy if the EU refused to reopen negotiations on the WA. Even if the strategy wasn’t necessarily deliberate, the situation with the UK still functioning as a full-fledged member in Brussels in the middle of an ugly divorce from it would hardly be optimal for the consensus model on which the EU operates. One has to wonder whether Varadkar is engaging in wishful thinking, but France seems particularly clear-eyed about the potential catastrophe. Furthermore, May’s own party isn’t backing the idea of participating in the next round of elections: The education minister Nadhim Zahawi told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme: “I think it’s important that parliament acts quickly now to decide what it is in favour of. We need to do that quickly because I think going into the EU elections for the Conservative party, or indeed for the Labour party, and telling our constituents why we haven’t been able to deliver Brexit I think would be an existential threat. “I would go further and say it would be the suicide note of the Conservative party.” May wants an extension to June 30th, but the EU elections will be held on May 23rd. The EU has already insisted that the UK would have to participate in those elections if they don’t leave by May 22nd. It’s possible that the EU could extend the deadline to that date, but it’s tough to see why they would. Parliament has rejected the WA three times already, none of those on particularly close votes. From the EU perspective, they’d be better off dealing with Brexit this week than on the night before elections across the continent. Time continues to run out on all of these options anyway. May’s attempt to find a consensus with Labour and Jeremy Corbyn has apparently come to nothing except recriminations from all sides. Parliament plans to hold more “indicative votes” to find some terms for Brexit on which they agree, but two rounds of such attempts only came up with a rejection of a no-deal Brexit, and that only by one vote. Without accepting the WA, the deadline for Brexit remains this coming Friday. The EU commission won’t meet until Wednesday, the very earliest time to address May’s request for a delay. If there is no consensus at that point and May can’t get Parliament to bite the bullet and pass the WA, then it looks very much like the UK will crash out of the EU at the end of the week. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Tooconservative (#0)
I think the free market resolves these things much more quickly and easily than people in gov predict. Sure there's a little disruption but it doesn't last long.
Extracae Digitardum
Is that Greek for "pull my finger"? : )
no it's bastardised latin
What a poorly handled affair. Should have been simple; the people voted and their government proved their votes meant nothing.
Liberals are like Slinkys. They're good for nothing, but somehow they bring a smile to your face as you shove them down the stairs.
Sounds like something California does on a regular basis.
|
||||||
|
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|