[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Utopian Visionaries Who Won’t Leave People Alone

No - no - no Ain'T going To get away with iT

Pete Buttplug's Butt Plugger Trying to Turn Kids into Faggots

Mark Levin: I'm sick and tired of these attacks

Questioning the Big Bang

James Webb Data Contradicts the Big Bang

Pssst! Don't tell the creationists, but scientists don't have a clue how life began

A fine romance: how humans and chimps just couldn't let go

Early humans had sex with chimps

O’Keefe dons bulletproof vest to extract undercover journalist from NGO camp.

Biblical Contradictions (Alleged)

Catholic Church Praising Lucifer

Raising the Knife

One Of The HARDEST Videos I Had To Make..

Houthi rebels' attack severely damages a Belize-flagged ship in key strait leading to the Red Sea (British Ship)

Chinese Illegal Alien. I'm here for the moneuy

Red Tides Plague Gulf Beaches

Tucker Carlson calls out Nikki Haley, Ben Shapiro, and every other person calling for war:

{Are there 7 Deadly Sins?} I’ve heard people refer to the “7 Deadly Sins,” but I haven’t been able to find that sort of list in Scripture.

Abomination of Desolation | THEORY, BIBLE STUDY

Bible Help

Libertysflame Database Updated

Crush EVERYONE with the Alien Gambit!

Vladimir Putin tells Tucker Carlson US should stop arming Ukraine to end war

Putin hints Moscow and Washington in back-channel talks in revealing Tucker Carlson interview

Trump accuses Fulton County DA Fani Willis of lying in court response to Roman's motion

Mandatory anti-white racism at Disney.

Iceland Volcano Erupts For Third Time In 2 Months, State Of Emergency Declared

Tucker Carlson Interview with Vladamir Putin

How will Ar Mageddon / WW III End?

What on EARTH is going on in Acts 16:11? New Discovery!

2023 Hottest in over 120 Million Years

2024 and beyond in prophecy

Questions

This Speech Just Broke the Internet

This AMAZING Math Formula Will Teach You About God!

The GOSPEL of the ALIENS | Fallen Angels | Giants | Anunnaki

The IMAGE of the BEAST Revealed (REV 13) - WARNING: Not for Everyone

WEF Calls for AI to Replace Voters: ‘Why Do We Need Elections?’

The OCCULT Burger king EXPOSED

PANERA BREAD Antichrist message EXPOSED

The OCCULT Cheesecake Factory EXPOSED

Satanist And Witches Encounter The Cross

History and Beliefs of the Waldensians

Rome’s Persecution of the Bible

Evolutionists, You’ve Been Caught Lying About Fossils

Raw Streets of NYC Migrant Crisis that they don't show on Tv

Meet DarkBERT - AI Model Trained On DARK WEB

[NEW!] Jaw-dropping 666 Discovery Utterly Proves the King James Bible is God's Preserved Word

ALERT!!! THE MOST IMPORTANT INFORMATION WILL SOON BE POSTED HERE


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

U.S. Constitution
See other U.S. Constitution Articles

Title: Donald Trump's Bump Stock Ban Turns Peaceful Gun Owners Into Felons by Fiat
Source: Reason
URL Source: https://reason.com/blog/2019/03/28/ ... n-turns-peace?utm_medium=email
Published: Mar 28, 2019
Author: Jacob Sullum
Post Date: 2019-03-29 06:33:20 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 880
Comments: 11

The ban, which took effect this week, usurps congressional authority by rewriting an inconvenient law.

As of midnight on Tuesday, owners of "bump-stock-type devices" became felons, subject to a maximum penalty of 10 years in federal prison and a $250,000 fine. That's a pretty nasty surprise for anyone who bought these products, which were repeatedly declared legal by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) during the Bush and Obama administrations. It is especially unsettling because the law has not changed since the agency made that determination.

What happened instead is that the ATF, under orders from Donald Trump, reinterpreted the law to reach a diametrically opposed conclusion that is contrary to the plain meaning of the relevant statutes. Critics of presidential power grabs, regardless of how they feel about bump stocks or gun control more generally, should be troubled by this blatant usurpation of congressional authority.

Bump stocks are accessories that facilitate a rifle shooting technique in which recoil energy causes the gun to slide backward after a round is fired, resetting the trigger. By maintaining forward pressure on the rifle, the shooter bumps the trigger against his stationary finger, which fires another round, causing the rifle to slide backward again, and so on. Until October 1, 2017, the technique, which increases the rate of fire but reduces accuracy, was of interest mainly to gun enthusiasts, the companies that sold bump stocks, and the ATF officials who approved their sale. But after a gunman equipped with multiple rifles and bump stocks murdered 58 people in Las Vegas, Trump promised to ban the devices by administrative fiat.

The ATF rule that took effect this week accomplishes that trick by reclassifying bump stocks as illegal machine guns. The problem is that federal law defines a machine gun as "any weapon which shoots, is designed to shoot, or can be readily restored to shoot, automatically more than one shot, without manual reloading, by a single function of the trigger." A rifle with a bump stock does not fire automatically, since the shooter has to push the rifle forward while keeping his finger in position, and it does not fire more than one round by a single function of the trigger, since the trigger has to be reset before another round can be fired. That is why the ATF concluded, over and over again, that bump stocks are not machine guns. That is why, even after the Las Vegas massacre, both supporters and opponents of a bump stock ban agreed that it could be accomplished only by a new act of Congress.

Trump, who has a habit of ignoring inconvenient laws, was undeterred. He instructed the Justice Department, which includes the ATF, to come up with a legal rationale for the ban he had already decided to impose. The DOJ complied by defining "a single function of the trigger" as "a single pull of the trigger," defining pull to exclude what happens during bump fire, and treating the shooter as part of the rifle mechanism, ignoring his active participation in the process so that the gun could be said to fire "automatically."

Last month, responding to lawsuits by bump stock owners and gun rights groups, U.S. District Judge Dabney Friedrich concluded that the ATF had acted within its authority by reinterpreting "single function of the trigger" and "automatically," terms that he deemed "ambiguous." The plaintiffs, urging the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit to overturn that ruling, vigorously and persuasively contest Friedrich's characterization of those terms.

"A 'single function of the trigger' involves the mechanical movement of the mechanism that constitutes the trigger," they note. "It is complete when the trigger traverses its range of motion and initiates the firing sequence. A separate function occurs when the trigger is released and returns to its starting point to reset....Regardless whether the shooter 'pulls' their finger against the trigger or pushes the firearm and trigger forward against a stationary finger, neither the operation of the trigger's component parts nor the operation of the firearm vary. Each round discharged is the result of a single function of the trigger initiated by the manual act of putting pressure on the reset trigger."

The plaintiffs also point out that the word automatically "means by mechanical process without further human intervention," so shooting automatically "means to continue to fire without further human action beyond a single function of the trigger." Bump fire, by contrast, is "mediated by the human intervention of repeatedly forcing the gun body and trigger forward to reengage the trigger after it has been returned to its starting position and has reset."

Accepting the ATF's counterintuitive definition of these terms "yields absurd results," the appeal brief notes, since the statutory definition of machine gun also includes "parts designed and intended" to convert a weapon into a machine gun and "any combination of parts from which a machinegun can be assembled if such parts are in the possession or under the control of a person." The ATF concedes that "individuals wishing to replicate the effects of bump-stock-type devices could also use rubber bands, belt loops, or otherwise train their trigger finger to fire more rapidly." The implication is that any semi-automatic rifle, if owned by someone who also has rubber bands, belt loops, or fingers, could be considered a machine gun. Although the ATF has said it does not intend to follow through on that logic, such reassurances only underline the arbitrariness of its legal interpretation.

Even if the contested terms were ambiguous, the plaintiffs say, the ATF's new interpretation would violate the "rule of lenity," which requires that ambiguous criminal statutes be read narrowly. They also argue that the rule is "arbitrary and capricious," in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act.

A brief filed by the Cato Institute elaborates on that last point by highlighting the result-oriented process that led to the rule, which "was a fait accompli" before the ATF even began to reconsider the issue. "Expressly declining to pursue a legislative solution, [Trump] directed his administration to redefine bump-stock devices...as automatic weapons," the Cato brief says. In response, the ATF "broke from decades of precedent and discovered a new power to prohibit that widely held type of firearm accessory. This expansion of regulatory authority, motivated by political expediency, is arbitrary and capricious."

The ATF's arbitrary and capricious rule unjustly criminalizes peaceful behavior that not only does not violate anyone's rights but does not violate the law by any reasonable interpretation. The DOJ estimates that Americans own as many as 520,000 bump stocks. Since the Supreme Court has declined to intervene by issuing an emergency stay that would have prevented the ATF from enforcing its rule while the case is pending, potentially hundreds of thousands of law-abiding Americans are now exposed to prosecution for possessing products that everyone thought were legal until Donald Trump decided otherwise.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Deckard (#0)

I did not have one of these. Never wanted one. However, I do not agree with Trump doing this.

It worries me, along with his " take the guns first, due process later. "

It worries me that if he wants to " make a deal " on some other legislation, that he will agree to some other egregious 2nd Amendment infraction.

It was claimed prior to the election that he was a NY liberal at heart

I hope not, but that is my concern !

Si vis pacem, para bellum

Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God.

Never Pick A Fight With An Old Man He Will Just Shoot You He Can't Afford To Get Hurt

"If there are no dogs in Heaven, then when I die I want to go where they went." (Will Rogers)

"No one ever rescues an old dog. They lay in a cage until they die. PLEASE save one. None of us wants to die cold and alone... --Dennis Olson "

AMERICA! Designed by geniuses. Now run by idiots.

Stoner  posted on  2019-03-29   8:58:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Deckard, Red Flag Donnell, Take The Guns (#0)

If Trump is reelected, America as we've known it will be past history.

Neither the Bump Stock Ban, nor Red Flag Gun Confiscations were mentioned by Donnell at his Grand Rapids MI rally yesterday.

What a coincidence! /s


Hondo68  posted on  2019-03-29   9:39:53 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Stoner, youre in NYC now (#1)


Ted Cruz
Published on Jan 16, 2016

New York Values are the law of the land, by Presidential Fiat edict.

Elections have consequences.

Ted Cruz tried to warn us, but the Cult of Trump wouldn't listen.


Hondo68  posted on  2019-03-29   9:57:06 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Stoner, hondo68 (#1)

The ATF concedes that "individuals wishing to replicate the effects of bump-stock-type devices could also use rubber bands, belt loops, or otherwise train their trigger finger to fire more rapidly." The implication is that any semi-automatic rifle, if owned by someone who also has rubber bands, belt loops, or fingers, could be considered a machine gun. Although the ATF has said it does not intend to follow through on that logic, such reassurances only underline the arbitrariness of its legal interpretation.

Will we see gun owners arrested for possessing rubber bands or belt buckles while also in possession of a semi-automatic rifle?

It wouldn't surprise me.

Kind of like being arrested as a drug dealer for having baggies or a scale in your house.

Government is in the last resort the employment of armed men, of policemen, gendarmes, soldiers, prison guards, and hangmen.
The essential feature of government is the enforcement of its decrees by beating, killing, and imprisoning.
Those who are asking for more government interference are asking ultimately for more compulsion and less freedom.

Deckard  posted on  2019-03-29   10:22:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Deckard, all, waste of time change the law!!!! (#0)

We all new this was going to happen. Change the law and you can buy full auto's like you do semiauto's.

You pull the trigger once and the gun will not stop firing until you remove finger from the trigger, run out of ammo or it jams. Yes that makes it a full auto!

"Socialism corrupts and Democratic Socialism corrupts Absolutely"!

Justified  posted on  2019-03-29   16:15:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Justified, Tyrant Trump, Imperial Decree, no bumpin', slack jawed progressives (#5) (Edited)

change the law!!!!

President Trump IS the law, particularly in this instance.

Change the president, impeach, try, execute.

Treason, He's given aid and comfort to the enemy, The Hogg Bros!

Hogg Bros, Take the Guns First


Hondo68  posted on  2019-03-29   16:34:23 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: hondo68 (#6)

The only person in this government fighting for you and me is Trump. If you are too stupid or bias that's a problem I can not help you with.

If you want a fullauto then either go throw the bs and get one or change the law. Trying to skirt the law is still breaking the law. That's what the bumpstock was all about.

"Socialism corrupts and Democratic Socialism corrupts Absolutely"!

Justified  posted on  2019-03-29   17:11:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Justified (#5)

You pull the trigger once and the gun will not stop firing until you remove finger from the trigger, run out of ammo or it jams. Yes that makes it a full auto!

So does using your belt loop. Now what?

They should have either required registration of bump stocks or offered a cash trade-in. This is an ex post fact law. The Constitution of the United States, Article I, Section 9, paragraph 3 provides that: "No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto* Law will be passed."

*An ex post facto law retroactively makes criminal conduct that was not criminal when performed.

misterwhite  posted on  2019-03-29   18:19:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: misterwhite (#8)

Not sure what you are talking about with the belt loop?

I knew this was coming the moment I saw the bumpstock. One pull of the trigger and it becomes a fullauto. I was tempted to buy one but new they would be found "illegal". People arguing about this subject to me seem nutty and im a gun nut!

This isn't our fathers country anymore and unless you are willing to go to war you just have to deal with it in the most efficient manner possible. In other words pick your fights. This is not a winnable fight.

"Socialism corrupts and Democratic Socialism corrupts Absolutely"!

Justified  posted on  2019-03-31   17:50:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Justified (#9)

Not sure what you are talking about with the belt loop?

misterwhite  posted on  2019-04-01   9:08:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: misterwhite, All (#10)

I can also bump shoot an ak47 to mimic a full auto. I have never tried my AR15.

"Socialism corrupts and Democratic Socialism corrupts Absolutely"!

Justified  posted on  2019-04-01   16:04:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com