Obama Wars
See other Obama Wars Articles
Title: 5 Things Obama Can't Blame On Bush
Source:
Fox News
URL Source: http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2010 ... eek-george-w-bush-obama-blame/
Published: Jan 22, 2010
Author: Liz Peek
Post Date: 2010-01-22 10:51:42 by Badeye
Keywords: None
Views: 1934
Comments: 34
5 Things Obama Can't Blame On Bush By Liz Peek - FOXNews.com President Obama and his team spent most of last year blaming President G.W. Bush for just about everything that went wrong. So what can we expect from the Bush-bashing White House in 2010? AP As we survey the wreckage of President Obama’s first year in office, one thing is clear: it’s all George Bush’s fault. The Obama administration has not confronted an obstacle yet that they have not blamed on the 43rd president – including the loss Tuesday of Ted Kennedy’s Senate seat. While political analysts from coast to coast credited Massachusetts voters with effectively repudiating Obamacare (and polling showed this to be the number one issue with Bay State voters), the White House was taking a hard look at the shocking upset and placing the Democrats’ loss – squarely at the feet of G.W. Bush! Republican Scott Brown’s remarkable victory in the bluest of our blue states is, of course, not the only thing the White House has blamed on Obama’s predecessor. The financial crisis, losing the Olympics to Brazil, inadequate airport screening, the mess in Afghanistan, the Florida orange freeze (no--scrap that one), the problems surrounding the closing of Guantanamo, sky-high unemployment, the embarrassment of an unearned Nobel Peace Prize, our poor relations with Russia, North Korea, Iran et al – all have been laid at the feet of Mr. Bush. To some degree, this blame game is reasonable, and understandable. The Obama team inherited a mess, for sure. Also, given 43rd’s low popularity ratings when he left office, bashing the former president (like bashing banks) is an endlessly popular activity for this now not-so-popular president. Still, some of the items added to Bush’s tabs -- including the Brown bruising -- are absurd. For instance, the president’s casual -- and tone-deaf -- initial response to the near-terrorist attack on Christmas Day has been explained as deliberate. Obama’s handlers insist they were trying to avoid the “scare tactics” that they say were the hallmark of the Bush-Cheney squad, and that led to heinous human rights violations. In other words, President Obama’s dismissive and inadequate comments issued in between putts in Hawaii were… George Bush’s fault! Puhleeze...give the people some credit. In year two of their administration, the Obama team may have to find another whipping boy if things continue to go wrong. Americans will likely tire of Obama’s buck-passing, and indeed there will be some events that the most ardent Bush-o-phobes cannot credibly link to G.W. Here, for instance, are five likely developments that I don’t believe can reasonably be laid at the feet of the 43rd president: 1) George Bush did not create the earthquake that destroyed Port-au-Prince. (I think we are on solid ground here, so to speak.) Obama can, however, pin what will undoubtedly be a messy clean-up effort on G.W. who, along with Bill Clinton, has volunteered to help raise relief money for the stricken country. As lawlessness and disease become the heartbreaking second and third wave of misery in Haiti, a desperate Obama administration will make Bush and Clinton the fall-guys for our inability to magically fix Haiti’s problems. It will be noted, and ignored by many, that Haiti is just about the most corrupt country in the world, in thrall to Chavez and Castro, and that its poverty was already the worst in the hemisphere—having nothing to do with G.W. Bush. 2) George Bush did not create the health care bill. The disliked legislation has become an enormous millstone around the neck of Democrats, and it is entirely Obama’s handiwork. It has become a grab-bag of possibly unconstitutional favors to one group after another and a financial pit that will never be filled. Despite continued haranguing by the President, the ever-sensible American people – and most obviously the voters in Massachusetts -- know this is a disaster. Assuming that the Democrats are successful in passing some sort of watered-down bill, we will witness ongoing wrangling over attempts to cut Medicare spending, efforts to penalize those who do not sign up for insurance, small businesses struggling to pay for workers’ coverage, and increasing delays in accessing doctors and health facilities as millions of Americans jump to take advantage of free medical care. 3) George Bush is not to blame for Obama’s anti-business bias. Industry, under attack by this administration, may well continue uncertain and distracted, leading decision-makers to defer hiring. Though the decennial Census will temporarily boost hiring this spring by more than one million workers, and though the stimulus bill will kick in more forcefully in coming months, job growth may disappoint. Neither the government nor the consumer can provide the spending surge we need to put people back to work; a robust private sector is essential. Unhappily, this president, weaned on community organizing, views business as the enemy. His emboldened associates at the Justice Department, EPA, Interior Department and elsewhere are socking businesses with increased regulations, investigations and fees, undermining business leaders just when their confidence needs boosting. 4) It will not be George Bush’ s fault that the trial of Khalid Sheik Mohammed and his associates turns into a circus. Despite the best efforts of NYC Police Commissioner Kelly and his ranks, and despite an estimated cost of $215 million in the first year alone, there is no doubt that the absurd decision to try these terrorists in our most targeted urban center will prove a nightmare. Let us hope that the only attacks emanating from the trial are only verbal. 5) It is not because of George Bush that the despots running Iran, North Korea and Venezuela continue to resist President Obama’s overtures. Though our new leader has unclenched his fist, and delivered any number of stirring speeches, our relations with these nations will not improve. These countries face ruined economies and restless populations; they need a foil – a predicament all too familiar to President Obama. I know David Letterman, who popularized such lists, always comes up with a nice round Top Ten—not a measly five. Since many might argue that it was the Bush administration’s poor handling of Iraq, the economy and a host of other challenges that swept in the most liberal administration in a generation, finding ten things that we can’t blame on Bush might have taken us into the next election cycle. Liz Peek is a financial columnist and frequent Fox Forum contributor. For more visit LizPeek.com.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Badeye (#0)
LOL...gotta love it!! 2010's gonna be a very fun year politically, imho. The only way the RATS can fend off a major implosion come November is to convince the electorate that they ain't the Marxists they have been demonstrating themselves to be over the last year...and if they do that, they might even lose their base...LOL!! Defeat the ObamaNation...MUD
"Devolve Power Outta the Federal Leviathan and Back to the States, Bottom line is unemployment over 7% means a one term President.
So what - they'd only hire in China anyway.
Could there be a MORE desperate list than this one?
gopqueefingroom.com
Yep, but thats what happens when the American workforce, and the tax laws for corporations here make manufacturing financially unviable.
What he really means is this: ...and the Right now in the US, manufacturing is the largest tax abated commercial affair in the corporate tax structure.
gopqueefingroom.com
That darned American workforce and their expectations. An average Chinese wage of $0.57 per hour -- or $104 per month -- is about 3 percent of the average U.S. manufacturing worker's wage, according to data collected by Banister. http://www.manufacturingnews.com/news/06/0502/art1.html Just imagine how many jobs would be created in the US if the average wage was $.57 an hour. As for taxes: Moreover, taxes are rarely paid, in part because of the legacy of the Maoist period from 1949 to 1978, during which time taxes were not collected. "Today, during the post Mao economic reform era, employers appear to have developed a culture of tax avoidance," writes Banister. "For example, when foreign and multinational companies come to China and attempt to acquire or set up a joint venture or merger with a (usually state-owned) Chinese company, the foreign company insists on engaging in a due diligence process to determine whether the joint venture, merger or acquisition is in the interest of its owners and shareholders. The auditors and accounting companies frequently discover that the target company has two sets of books...The 'tax ledger' is a set of employee and financial data reported to the tax and other authorities and the 'administrative ledger' records a more accurate picture of the number of employees, their actual earnings, the true costs and income of the company, its actual profit, and more. The tax ledger is designed to minimize tax exposure, particularly corporate income taxes, value-added taxes, personal income taxes for employer and employees and required social benefit payments. It is believed that non-public-sector domestic Chinese enterprises avoid taxation and social benefit payments to an even greater extent than the state-owned and collective-owned enterprises."
Actually, its that darn union supporting Democratic Party, and its love of socialism. The American Workforce is not unionized heavily (Thank God). Except in heavy manufacturing...see Detriot, see the former Steel producing states and cities and towns. How'd that work out? Second, I'm talking about the US Tax Code, not China's...but suspect you knew that.
Pretty good for a long time. Everybody made money, paid taxes and bought stuff.
What are you trying to do, give Rush Limbaugh his second orgasm of the year?
The present lack of jobs also means "Amnesty fer ILLEGALS" is a very unpopular stand fer the RATS/RINOs to be taking...MUD
"Devolve Power Outta the Federal Leviathan and Back to the States, (laughing) you want to think that way, knock yourself out. Its not 1950.
Yep, but thats a good talking point, Mud. The real issue is always the economy, and employment. Thats where the Democrats are doomed for this election cycle. There is simply nothing they can do at this late point that will significantly change those two basic components before November. Had they acted correctly LAST YEAR, then maybe. But now? Its too late.
I've lived long enough to have noticed that the less people pay in taxes, the more they whine.
Its true the welfare class is given to whining. We agree.
Oh you noticed too how they whined when their bonuses were threatened.
No, I notice how they whine when their told 'get a job'. If you think I have sympathy for bank CEO's your sadly mistaken. Its my view the biggest mistake of the past four years (Bush and Obama) was bailing out failed business models of GM, AIG, etc etc etc. I don't run my companies that way. If I did, well...nobody is bailing out a small business owner, as we both know.
That has more meaning when there are jobs to get. I don't run my companies that way. If I did, well...nobody is bailing out a small business owner, as we both know. If you were successful, you'd be too big to fail and get a bailout too.
(laughing) I'll pass that along to the staff, my biz partners, the banks, and the accounting firm, corporate legal eagles, and of course Ohio's tax office & the IRS.....
What a glorious display of ignorance! Who was bigger than GM? Sneakypete, have you ever been married? Said things you later regretted?
So, I'm successful if I fail and get bailed out by the government? That's your definition of successful? Failing is success?
(sneakypete)DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Mad Dog's reply) I don't know or F ing care.
Your boss, big government.
(sneakypete)DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Mad Dog's reply) I don't know or F ing care.
"Tongue in cheek Meaning In an ironic manner, not meant to be taken seriously."
That line just caused me to realize lucysmom isn't all that bright.
Betcha can't do THAT again, dude...MUD BTW...the Vikes gave it away last night. Should be an entertaining Super Bowl, though.
"Devolve Power Outta the Federal Leviathan and Back to the States, I think Colts v Saints will be a great game. I was thinking Vikes v Colts would be a blowout for the Vikes, given the Colts problems on occasion with a strong running game, backed up by a top flight quarterback. To me, the Vikes were the best team on paper...but as we saw last night, thats why the play the games. Enjoyed both. Wife is pumped up, she wears her Manning jersey and has a Colts 'teddybear' whenever they are on. Have no clue who's going to win this one.
It all came down to a coin toss. I hate the way they do overtime. They should play a full quarter. Whoever wins the toss has a tremendous advantage.
Hmmmm, bottom line is Favre lost the game.
But you'll still sniff his ass anyway, Nudge...
gopqueefingroom.com
Favre plays D does he? That asked...if Peterson, Berrian and Marvin all hold onto the ball, it's a blowout...Favre didn't cost them the game...but from your infantile understanding of a game that you were incapable of playing yourself I can understand your confusion...
gopqueefingroom.com
Not when yer workhorse RB puts the ball on the ground three times...I honestly don't understand Adrien Peterson's inability to hold onto the ball. That guy needs to get control of that and he could go down as a great one...but if the coach can't count on you not to fumble in the second half of the NFC Championship, yer not gonna go down as a Great One...MUD
"Devolve Power Outta the Federal Leviathan and Back to the States, Yep...ultimately you are correct. Still, the Vikes totally controlled that game except fer the turnovers...MUD
"Devolve Power Outta the Federal Leviathan and Back to the States, I'm not a huge football fan, but . . . Isn't that statement similar to saying something like "I was a great student, except for my grades"?
The science is settled, peer-reviews are complete, and the debate is over: Al Gore IS a fraud and an idiot.
Mud - 'on paper'. I was stunned at how many times he lost the ball as well.
"While political analysts from coast to coast credited Massachusetts voters with effectively repudiating Obamacare (and polling showed this to be the number one issue with Bay State voters), the White House was taking a hard look at the shocking upset and placing the Democrats’ loss – squarely at the feet of G.W. Bush!"
Localities, and Individuals as Prescribed in the US Constitution."
#2. To: Mudboy Slim (#1)
#3. To: Badeye (#0)
George Bush is not to blame for Obama’s anti-business bias. Industry, under attack by this administration, may well continue uncertain and distracted, leading decision-makers to defer hiring.
#4. To: Badeye (#0)
#5. To: lucysmom (#3)
#6. To: Badeye, lucysmom (#5)
tax laws for corporations union workers here make manufacturing financially unviable.
#7. To: Badeye (#5)
Yep, but thats what happens when the American workforce, and the tax laws for corporations here make manufacturing financially unviable.
#8. To: lucysmom (#7)
#9. To: Badeye (#8)
How'd that work out?
#10. To: lucysmom (#7)
Just imagine how many jobs would be created in the US if the average wage was $.57 an hour.
#11. To: Badeye (#2)
"Bottom line is unemployment over 7% means a one term President."
Localities, and Individuals as Prescribed in the US Constitution."
#12. To: lucysmom (#9)
#13. To: Mudboy Slim (#11)
#14. To: Badeye (#8)
Second, I'm talking about the US Tax Code, not China's...but suspect you knew that.
#15. To: lucysmom (#14)
#16. To: Badeye (#15)
Its true the welfare class is given to whining. We agree.
#17. To: lucysmom (#16)
#18. To: Badeye (#17)
No, I notice how they whine when their told 'get a job'.
#19. To: lucysmom (#18)
If you were successful, you'd be too big to fail and get a bailout too.
#20. To: lucysmom, Badeye (#18)
If you were successful, you'd be too big to fail and get a bailout too.
#21. To: lucysmom, Badeye (#18)
If you were successful, you'd be too big to fail and get a bailout too.
#22. To: Ibluafartsky (#20)
Who was bigger than GM?
#23. To: Wood_Chopper (#21)
That's your definition of successful? Failing is success?
#24. To: Wood_Chopper (#21)
#25. To: Badeye (#24)
"Badeye posted on...15:55:55"
Localities, and Individuals as Prescribed in the US Constitution."
#26. To: Mudboy Slim (#25)
#27. To: Mudboy Slim (#25)
BTW...the Vikes gave it away last night. Should be an entertaining Super Bowl, though.
#28. To: A K A Stone (#27)
#29. To: Mudboy Slim (#25)
Betcha can't do THAT again, dude...MUD
#30. To: Badeye (#28)
(Edited)
#31. To: Badeye (#26)
"To me, the Vikes were the best team on paper..."
Localities, and Individuals as Prescribed in the US Constitution."
#32. To: A K A Stone (#27)
"It all came down to a coin toss."
Localities, and Individuals as Prescribed in the US Constitution."
#33. To: Mudboy Slim (#32)
Still, the Vikes totally controlled that game except fer the turnovers...MUD
#34. To: Mudboy Slim (#31)
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]