[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

One 2020 Democrat Debate Will Be Solely Focus ed on LGBT Issues (Queers and Baby Killers)

Suspect who mailed pipe bombs to Trump critics pleads guilty

Mueller submits long-awaited Russia probe report to Justice Department; next move up to AG Barr

The Left sees Christianity as an obstacle to the state ... so anything that represents it in a positive light --- must be destroyed

Many Antichrists; One Beastly System - Message by Dr. Chuck Baldwin on Jan. 13, 2019

Ichiro retires after emotional finale in Tokyo (There *is* Crying in Baseball)

Man arrested for keeping TV sent to him by mistake

It's An Emergency You Dumb Communist Bastards!

Bernie Sanders Calls for New Zealand-Style Gun Ban in U.S.

The manipulation of the American mind: Edward Bernays and the birth of public relations

Trump, Graham, Rubio, et. al are about to enact a gun confiscation bill that rivals anything in Nazi Germany or Stalin’s Russia

On The Anniversary Of The Iraq Invasion, Bush Press Secretary Claims Bush Didn’t Lie

Harvard researchers say certain ADHD medications may increase risk of psychosis

NJ Governor Signs “Rain Tax” Bill; Residents Can Now BE TAXED When It Rains On Their Property

The Zoning Code Banned His Tall Fence, but Not the Naked Mannequin Party Behind It

The Texas State House has passed a bill legalizing lemonade stands run by children

New Zealand Prime Minister announces immediate ban on all assault weapons

Fond Memories of Hitching

Are we a soul, or do we hava a soul?

Can the President Legally Break the Law?

Facebook just suspended Natural News for 7 days for posting this rather ho-hum fluoride infographic

Missouri Senate Bans All Federal Gun Control Laws in Proposed Bill

WOW! Just Rewatched Enemy of the State & Guess what I found

The Ex-Model Who Claimed Silvio Berlusconi Hosted Satanic Rituals in His House Died From “Apparent Poisoning”

MLB Going Full-Blown TSA: Teams Prepare To Scan Millions Of Fans’ Faces

Why Does The Mainstream Media Purposely Ignore Mass Killings Of Christians Across The Globe?

U.S. Supreme Court Refuses to Require Police to Render Emergency Aid After Ohio Police Shoot Military Veteran Multiple Times, Let Him Bleed to Death

Don’t Shoot the Dogs: The Growing Epidemic of Cops Shooting Family Dogs

Ron Paul Support Legalizing Heroin

Reputed Gambino crime boss' suspected killer flashes 'MAGA,' other slogans on hand

lMalia, Michelle, Barack and the College Admissions Scandal

Sen. Warren: ‘I Would Support Removing Confederate’ Statues and Monuments

HOW U.S. MEDIA IS HELPING THE NEW ZEALAND TERRORIST ACHIEVE HIS ULTIMATE GOAL There's a reason the media is selectively choosing which facts to report about this killer's purpose

Is Trump Really About to Attack Venezuela?

The Grim Reaper – Frequently A Personified Insignificant Force

Dick Dale, a Great American Original, RIP

Government to Pizzeria: You Can Paint a Mural, Just Not One That Features Pizza

Donna Bazile Hired as FOX News Contributor

Source Claims Fox News Host Secretly Worked to Get Jeanine Pirro Suspended to Curry Favor With Democrats

AP Pushes New Leftwing Conspiracy Theory: "Puzzling" Number of Activists Connected to Ferguson are Dying (Usually by Suicide or Drug Overdose), And That Suggests They're Being Secretly Murdered by an Unidentified But Obviously White Cabal

Man cleaning garage finds burglar crushed by fallen 900-pound floor safe, cops say

US Supreme Court denies hearing Ron Paul 2012 aides' appeal

'Beto' Was A Member Of A Prominent Hacking Group, a Punk-Rock Band And His Name Was 'Psychedelic Warlord,' Report Says

Conservative? Hardly. New Zealand mass shooter is a far-Left “eco-fascist” who praised communist China

Tucker Carlson and Thoughtcrime

New Zealand: The Most Hysterical Reaction to an Event I’ve Seen Since 9/11

CONGRESSWOMAN ILHAN OMAR: TERRORIST

Trump threatens 'Saturday Night Live' with federal investigation and charges comedy show as an 'an advertisement without consequences' for mocking him

Illegal Alien Who Used Fake Fed Doc to Get License Committed No Crime, Obama Judge Rules

Hillsborough sues to declare Flintstone House a ‘public nuisance’


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

United States News
See other United States News Articles

Title: Wanted: Some intellectual consistency on abortion
Source: Washington Examiner
URL Source: https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/ ... ectual-consistency-on-abortion
Published: Mar 10, 2019
Author: Kylee Zempe
Post Date: 2019-03-10 21:11:46 by Gatlin
Keywords: None
Views: 59
Comments: 3

Libertarians and the Left have long advocated for keeping morals out of politics. But when it comes to abortion, that position just doesn’t hold up.

The abortion debate is very different now from what it once was. It has been advanced recently by the appointment of Justice Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court, New York’s unrestricted full-term abortion law, infanticidal remarks by Virginia's governor and attempts in Richmond to enshrine abortion as a right up to the very moment of birth.

What's more, politicians and doctors are no longer unsure about the science, as they were in the day of Roe v. Wade. Nor are the Left and the Right squabbling over a woman’s access to contraceptives; they are instead fighting about full- term, third-trimester abortion bills and even whether or not already born babies’ lives can be terminated, or simply neglected, after they are born alive.

This isn’t an exaggeration. On Feb. 25, Senate Democrats, including all six high-profile 2020 presidential hopefuls, blocked the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, a bill intended to ensure that babies born after surviving botched abortions receive medical care. Note that this isn't even an abortion question, properly speaking.

Most Republicans oppose legal abortion in most cases, and most Democrats support it. Sixty percent of Independents think abortion should be legal in all or most instances, according to a 2018 Pew Research survey. But this isn’t the only concerning plight. While vociferous pro-abortion activists who “stand with Planned Parenthood” present their own problems, at least we know where they stand. Their priorities begin and end with “women’s reproductive rights.” Of deeper concern are the passive pro-choicers who call themselves “moderates.”

These tend to be conscience-pricked Democrats, libertarians and non-religious Republicans. They’re middle-of-the-road on abortion, and they are quiet on the issue. Though I’ve engaged in many versions of this “hands-off” conversation, the predictable rationale for the half-hearted argument they offer: "I would never personally have an abortion, but I would never dictate another woman’s choice." This argument was recently articulated by writer Annie Reneau in an Upworthy article entitled, “It is possible to be morally pro-life and politically pro-choice at the same time.”

This sounds like music to a libertarian's ears: non-aggression and small government. It’s appealing for blue dog Democrats: self-righteousness without ostracization from an increasingly progressive party. It’s easy for weak conservatives, especially on college campuses: No need to defend a controversial position. It makes everybody happy, no?

Defenders of this belief can appeal to a number of rationalizations for what amounts to a morally and politically convenient position. Some babies, if born, will suffer neglect; there are too many gray areas; criminalization of abortion doesn’t make it go away; I don’t want the government telling people what to do.

Some of these lines hardly merit engagement. But that last reason, the “hands- off” argument, creates a unique paradox. Libertarian ideals are based on the premise that government should leave individuals alone so long as those individuals are not infringing on the rights of another. This rationale holds up for many issues, such as the typical drug legalization debate, for instance. The substances you put into your own body are your choice, you weigh the risks and benefits, consciously or not, and live with the consequences, good or bad.

In true libertarian fashion, one's actions become the concern of the government or another person only when they begin to interfere with his or her rights. Smoke weed to your heart’s content, but when you drive under the influence and hit a pedestrian in your impaired mental state, your actions are no longer lawful. You reserve no right to deprive an innocent person of his or her rights.

But, this paradigm does not apply when it comes to infanticide or even just abortion. Abortion necessarily deprives the rights of an innocent third party in every single case. Of the more than 50 million abortions since Roe, not one has never been performed in which only the mother’s rights were in question.

If you are in this fickle “morally pro-life and politically pro-choice” demographic, you have embraced the intellectual equivalent of standing on the sidelines. You still have a choice to make. Your decision not to seek an abortion for yourself does not make you pro-life. or pro-choice; it just makes you pro-abortion for other people.

If you still think that a fetus is just a clump of cells, your head is in the sand as regards modern science, going back to the discovery of DNA. On the other hand, if you understand that a fetus is a living human organism, and you still willfully choose not to protect it, you are not “morally pro-life and politically pro-choice.” You are simply a moral coward.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Gatlin (#0)

Libertarians and the Left ...

blah, blah blah.

buckeroo  posted on  2019-03-10   21:17:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Gatlin (#0)

aborTion is

a million Times worse

Than slavery

mosT slaves

we're wined - dined

compared To chopped up - murdered

you would Think

afTer 50 million

people would wake up

love
boris

If you ... don't use exclamation points --- you should't be typeing ! Commas - semicolons - question marks are for girlie boys !

BorisY  posted on  2019-03-10   23:12:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: BorisY (#2) (Edited)

Spot on, Boris.

During the last forty years, there have been any number of prominent pro-life activists, judges, and politicians who have repeatedly invoked the history and legacy of slavery in America to illuminate the main aspects of contemporary abortion politics.

Thank you for joining with them to once again bring this analogy to the forefront and it is my fervent hope that we can at some near future date look back with the same passionate intensity to view abortion as we view slavery today.

Gatlin  posted on  2019-03-11   2:36:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com