[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Democrat Prez Hopeful Pete Buttigieg: Christianity Has Extremist Factions like Islam

The Democratic Party Is a “Freak Show

Close One: This Baby Was Almost Born Into Poverty But His Mother Killed Him In The Nick Of Time

Study: Compounds in Cannabis Found to Inhibit the Growth of Cancer Cells in the Colon

The White House Says Your Toyota Is a National Security Threat

Insurance Companies Make $1000 For Each Speed Camera Ticket

US Gov’t Now Openly Admits: Pentagon Asks for Money to Directly Fund Terrorists

Newly Released FBI Docs Shed Light on Apparent Mossad Foreknowledge of 9/11 Attacks

Should we Push our Values on the Middle East ? (US Gummint poised to re-cycle this bogus premise in potential war with Iran)

'A Song For Any Struggle': Tom Petty's 'I Won't Back Down' Is An Anthem Of Resolve

Riding Dirty Daydreams

That Time John Bolton Said ItÂ’s Good To Lie About War

Want to know what a murderer looks like.

Man in country illegally charged with 11 murders in Texas

Cash-Strapped Cities Are Turning Citizens Into Ticket Vigilantes

Police FINE pedestrian £90 for disorderly behaviour after he tries to cover his face from facial recognition camera on the streets of London (Coming soon to Police State Amerika)

Cops Break Into Innocent Man’s Home, Hold Him at Gunpoint, Force K-9 to Shred Him

NOT A JOKE: Katy Perry: "HUMAN FLESH Is The BEST MEAT!" (Yes, "Spirit Cooking" of the DC/Hollywood Illuminati is REAL)

Why Even Staunch Conservatives Should Support Marijuana Decriminalization

With the US-Iran War Ball Now Rolling, Could an “Accident” or “False Flag” Serve as Pretext?

Forensics Investigation Finds Cops Shot Each Other, Then Murdered Houston Couple

Family Sues After Video Shows Cop Mow Down Boy with Cruiser for Improper Bicycle Light

If Trump goes to war with Iran, he will lose in 2020

Annual Undie Run continues despite Colorado State University warnings

Trump Celebrates Ramadan With White House Iftar Dinner

America Will Lose The Trade War Because That Is What Globalists Want To Happen

Wikileaks releases unused footage of moon landing showing it was REALLY filmed in Nevada desert...

Biden’s Fading, Beto’s Flailing, and DeBlasio’s Just Wasting Everyone’s Time Today’s Campaign Update, Part II (Because The Campaign Never Ends)


Southwest passenger allegedly kicked off flight over joke about vodka

Homemade Air Conditioner DIY - The "5 Gallon Bucket" Air Cooler! DIY- can be solar powered!

Nebraska farmer amputates leg with pocket knife to escape auger

Tucker Carlson criticizes John Bolton and Trump for planning war with Iran

In the Land of the Free, Cops Raid a Journalist’s Home, Kidnap Him After He Refused to Name Source

Trump's Malignant Mercantilism

At Democrats’ Behest, Terrorist-Friendly Imam Gives Prayer In Congress



Tracking down the people behind a pamphlet that's fueling New York's measles outbreak

Report: All Six Men Attracted To Feminists Deeply Affected By Sex Strike

Will political correctness kill classic movies?

Hollywood Mourns one of its Greatest Stars as Wholesome Screen Icon Doris Day Dies of Pneumonia Aged 97

Drivers Beware: The Deadly Perils of Traffic Stops in the American Police State

Climate change causes Islands to disappear | 60 Minutes Australia

Bill Nye says it's time to grow up and realize the planet is on fire

Is America Ready for John Bolton’s War With Iran?

George Carlin Was Monitored By The FBI – Because He Joked About The Government

Nineteen Eighty-Four Turns 70 Years Old In A World That Looks A Lot Like The Book

Horrifying video shows the moment thugs beat, slash and stomp on a Brooklyn man in broad daylight so they could steal his credit card and use it for a $200 meal at McDonald's

Democrats Delete God

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

See other Opinions/Editorials Articles

Title: Safety vs. Saaaaaaafety
Source: Eric Peters Autos
URL Source: https://www.ericpetersautos.com/2019/03/04/safety-vs-saaaaaaafety/
Published: Mar 4, 2019
Author: Eric
Post Date: 2019-03-05 05:27:53 by Deckard
Ping List: *Cars and Automotive*     Subscribe to *Cars and Automotive*
Keywords: None
Views: 33

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Driving a car that has loose lug nuts is always unsafe.

No one in their right mind would knowingly do it.

Driving a car that might not hold up as well as a tank in a crash – if you have one – is not “unsafe.”

You’ve simply accepted a heightened degree of potential risk – a greater chance of injury in the event you do crash – for the sake of a tangible (and certain) reward, such as better fuel economy or visibility.

Like a lot of people over 40, I grew up driving cars that would be libeled as “unsafe” by the government, if anyone tried to make them today. The ’74 Beetle I owned while I was in college and for several years after, for example. It would fail every “safety” standard new cars are obliged to meet. From the absence of any air bags to the car’s 1,600 pound curb weight – which was possible because when it was made, cars were not required to have roofs capable of supporting the weight of the car in the event it rolled onto its back.

If you rolled a car like the Beetle, it was possible the roof might crush.

But one could always see the world outside the passenger compartment – without relying on electronic eyes and proximity sensors – as all modern cars now have. Precisely because the ’74’s designers didn’t have to worry about the car being able to support its own weight when upside down, lying on its roof – a potential risk that actually manifests very rarely.

How many people do you know who have rolled a car onto its roof?

How often do you like to be able to see what’s coming at you?

Rather than focus on designing the ’74 Beetle to survive a possible crash – one made more likely by horrendous visibility problems caused by making it more “crashworthy” – VW designed the car to be less likely to actually crash. By designing it such that the driver had a good view of the world outside.

Particularly to either side – and behind.

The driver was thus less likely to accidentally pull out from a side street and into the path of a car he didn’t see coming – because his view to the right (or left) was not blocked by massive roof supports designed to support the weight of the car if it rolled onto its back.

My ’74 Beetle proved to be a very safe car.

I drove it for years without any harm coming my way. QED, as the expression has it.

That I might have been harmed if I had crashed is certainly true. It is equally true that I might crash the brand-new car I am test driving this week – because of the horrendous blind spots it has as a consequence of being able to support its own weight in the event it rolls onto its roof.

The real difference – ’74 vs. now – is that the cost-benefit (or risk-reward) calculation is no longer ours to make. Back in ’74 – when my old Beetle was new – one had the free to choice to buy it or buy something else. Something larger and heavier – and with air bags, even.

GM and Chrysler both offered them.

But in that better vanished time, no one was forced to buy them. People were still free to choose.

A crazy idea, obviously.

Today, the calculation is made for us – whether we like the result or not – by people we’ve never even met who have somehow obtained the power to decide for us what is “safe” and what is not “safe.”

According to their subjective standards – and with us assuming the actual risks as well as the costs – and being denied the actual rewards (such as lower cost, higher fuel economy, better visibility and a decreased likelihood of actually crashing) which we might otherwise have enjoyed.

We are encouraged not to think of them as just other people, of course. They are The Government – picture something in tights, with a cape – and we must defer to its superior wisdom.

Or else.

In fact, the government is just a warren of busybody bureaucrats – some with guns – who justify forcing us to pay their salaries by claiming they are  “keeping us safe” – which they very often fail to do, leaving aside for the moment whether this business is any of their rightful business at all.

In fact – whether consciously or not – the ululations about saaaaaaaaafety are more about the assertion of power. A pretext in the furtherance of some other object – rather than the object itself.

If this were not the case, that thing in tights and wearing a cape would – to cite a few concrete for-instances – swoop down and remove from the public roads every electric car with a lithium-ion battery, as these are at least twice as likely to catch fire than any tank of gas – and also likely to catch fire again.

He would stand athwart every single car equipped with a defective Takata air bag – and decree their immediate disabling.

There would be no question of allowing autopiloted cars that auto-pilot themselves into bridge abutments or gas trucks on public roads, where they put not only their owners’ safety in objective jeopardy but also the safety of anyone else in the vicinity.

But Superman remains placidly Clark Kent – even when he hears the cries of the imperiled – when to act would run counter to the real objective.

. . .

Got a question about cars – or anything else? Click on the “ask Eric” link and send ’em in!

(7 images)

Subscribe to *Cars and Automotive*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com