[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"The Uncomfortable Truth About Trans Violence and Political Radicalization"

"AOC’s Risible Performance"

"Why the Outrage Over the Cuts at the Washington Post Is So Annoying"

"New Poll Crushes Dem, Media Narrative: Americans Demand Mass Deportations, Back ICE Overwhelmingly"

"Democratic Overreach on Immigration Beckons"

How to negotiate to buy a car

Trump warns of a 'massive Armada' headed towards Iran

End Times Prophecy: Trump Says Board of Peace Will Override Every Government & Law – 10 Kings Rising

Maine's legendary 'Lobster Lady' dies after working until she was 103 and waking up at 3am every day

Hannity Says Immigration Raids at Home Depot Are Not ‘A Good Idea’

TREASON: Their PRIVATE CHAT just got LEAKED.

"Homan Plans to Defy Spanberger After ‘Bond Villain’ Blocks ICE Cooperation in VA: ‘Not Going to Stop’"

"DemocRATZ Radical Left-Wing Vision for Virginia"

"Tim Walz Wants the Worst"

Border Patrol Agents SMASH Window and Drag Man from Car in Minnesota Chaos

"Dear White Liberals: Blacks and Hispanics Want No Part of Your Anti-ICE Protests"

"The Silliest Venezuela Take You Will Read Today"

Michael Reagan, Son of Ronald Reagan, Dies at 80

Patel: "Minnesota Fraud Probes 'Buried' Under Biden"

"There’s a Word for the West’s Appeasement of Militant Islam"

"The Bondi Beach Jihad: Sharia Supremacism and Jew Hatred, Again"

"This Is How We Win a New Cold War With China"

"How Europe Fell Behind"

"The Epstein Conspiracy in Plain Sight"

Saint Nicholas The Real St. Nick

Will Atheists in China Starve Due to No Fish to Eat?

A Thirteen State Solution for the Holy Land?

US Sends new Missle to a Pacific ally, angering China and Russia Moscow and Peoking

DeaTh noTice ... Freerepublic --- lasT Monday JR died

"‘We Are Not the Crazy Ones’: AOC Protests Too Much"

"Rep. Comer to Newsmax: No Evidence Biden Approved Autopen Use"

"Donald Trump Has Broken the Progressive Ratchet"

"America Must Slash Red Tape to Make Nuclear Power Great Again!!"

"Why the DemocRATZ Activist Class Couldn’t Celebrate the Cease-Fire They Demanded"

Antifa Calls for CIVIL WAR!

British Police Make an Arrest...of a White Child Fishing in the Thames

"Sanctuary" Horde ASSAULTS Chicago... ELITE Marines SMASH Illegals Without Mercy

Trump hosts roundtable on ANTIFA

What's happening in Britain. Is happening in Ireland. The whole of Western Europe.

"The One About the Illegal Immigrant School Superintendent"

CouldnÂ’t believe he let me pet him at the end (Rhino)

Cops Go HANDS ON For Speaking At Meeting!

POWERFUL: Charlie Kirk's final speech delivered in South Korea 9/6/25

2026 in Bible Prophecy

2.4 Billion exposed to excessive heat

🔴 LIVE CHICAGO PORTLAND ICE IMMIGRATION DETENTION CENTER 24/7 PROTEST 9/28/2025

Young Conservative Proves Leftist Protesters Wrong

England is on the Brink of Civil War!

Charlie Kirk Shocks Florida State University With The TRUTH

IRL Confronting Protesters Outside UN Trump Meeting


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

United States News
See other United States News Articles

Title: TEN MYTHS ABOUT THE BUSH TAX CUTS—AND THE FACTS
Source: Heritage.org
URL Source: http://www.heritage.org/Research/Taxes/upload/bg_2001.pdf
Published: Jan 20, 2010
Author: Heritage.org
Post Date: 2010-01-20 15:59:41 by dont eat that
Keywords: None
Views: 1516
Comments: 60

Myth #1: Tax revenues remain low.

Fact: Tax revenues are above the historical average, even after the tax cuts.

Myth #2: The Bush tax cuts substantially reduced 2006 revenues and expanded the budget deficit.

Fact: Nearly all of the 2006 budget deficit resulted from additional spending above the baseline.

Myth #3: Supply-side economics assumes that all tax cuts immediately pay for themselves.

Fact: It assumes replenishment of some but not necessarily all lost revenues.

Myth #4: Capital gains tax cuts do not pay for themselves.

Fact: Capital gains tax revenues doubled following the 2003 tax cut.

Myth #5: The Bush tax cuts are to blame for the projected long-term budget deficits.

Fact: Projections show that entitlement costs will dwarf the projected large revenue increases.

Myth #6: Raising tax rates is the best way to raise revenue.

Fact: Tax revenues correlate with economic growth, not tax rates.

Myth #7: Reversing the upper-income tax cuts would raise substantial revenues.

Fact: The low-income tax cuts reduced revenues the most.

Myth #8: Tax cuts help the economy by “putting money in people’s pockets.”

Fact: Pro-growth tax cuts support incentives for productive behavior.

Myth #9: The Bush tax cuts have not helped the economy.

Fact: The economy responded strongly to the 2003 tax cuts.

Myth #10: The Bush tax cuts were tilted toward the rich.

Fact: The rich are now shouldering even more of the income tax burden.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 47.

#1. To: dont eat that (#0)

Published: Jan 20, 2010

This was published in 2007 and revenue growth lagged the average...

war  posted on  2010-01-20   16:02:19 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: war (#1)

revenue growth lagged the average...

Fact: Tax revenues are above the historical average, even after the tax cuts.

Tax revenues in 2006 were 18.4 percent of gross domestic product (GDP), which is actually above the 20-year, 40-year, and 60-year historical averages. 1 The inflation-adjusted 20 percent tax revenue increase between 2004 and 2006 represents the largest two-year revenue surge since 1965–1967.2 Claims that Americans are undertaxed by historical standards are patently false.

Some critics of President George W. Bush’s tax policies concede that tax revenues exceed the historical average yet assert that revenues are historically low for economies in the fourth year of an expansion. Setting aside that some of these tax policies are partly responsible for that economic expansion, the numbers simply do not support this claim. Comparing tax revenues in the fourth fiscal year after the end of each of the past three recessions shows nearly equal tax revenues of:

• 18.4 percent of GDP in 1987,

• 18.5 percent of GDP in 1995, and

• 18.4 percent of GDP in 2006.3

While revenues as a percentage of GDP have not fully returned to pre-recession levels (20.9 percent in 2000), it is now clear that the pre-recession level was a major historical anomaly caused by a temporary stock market bubble.

dont eat that  posted on  2010-01-20   16:19:35 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: dont eat that (#3)

Revenues v GDP is a shell game...

war  posted on  2010-01-20   17:57:31 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: war (#4)

Revenues v GDP is a shell game...

What a stupid, stupid, stupid comment...even from you.

Correlation .... do yourself a favor ...... look up the definition and apply it.

e_type_jag  posted on  2010-01-20   19:21:54 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: e_type_jag (#5) (Edited)

GDP decreases...revenues remain the same...where are revenues versus GDP up or down?

It's a shell game...

Back during the Clinton days you folks used to bitch about revenues v GDP first being too low and then when revenues started rolling in them being too high...

It's a shell game...

We don't pay taxes based upon our output. We pay it against various types of income and that income doesn't even have to produce anything.

It's a shell game.

war  posted on  2010-01-20   19:53:20 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: war (#6)

GDP decreases.

Except that GDP didn't decrease in 2004, 2005 and 2006

dont eat that  posted on  2010-01-20   19:57:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: dont eat that (#7)

Chuckles...yea so?

war  posted on  2010-01-20   20:04:46 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: war (#8)

Your entire argument is bullshit and just BDS political crap.

Even if GDP decreases, that means revenue would be expected to relatively decrease. The two aren't mutually removable.

99% of economists recognize the health of budgetary policy must be made relative to GDP. What fucking sewer do the 1% of you other dumbasses live in?

dont eat that  posted on  2010-01-20   20:10:51 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: padlock (#9)

The two aren't mutually removable.

BULLSHIT. GDP = output. Income can be made from sales of PRIOR output e.g. inventories...from sales of stock, i.e., capital gains.

You are out of your FUCKING mind padlock. You believe that you can throw this crap up here - opinion in the guise of fact - and have it accepted like fucking Moses coming down the fucking mountain with stone tablets. None of this crap stands up to even minimal scrutiny. None of it.

war  posted on  2010-01-20   20:28:14 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: war (#10)

GDP = output. Income can be made from sales of PRIOR output e.g. inventories...from sales of stock, i.e., capital gains.

Uhh, this is a discussion of government revenues. Not a discussion of business profit statements.

dont eat that  posted on  2010-01-20   20:37:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: padlock (#11)

Uhh, this is a discussion of government revenues.

Chuckles....from where do those revenues derive their source, puddin' head?

war  posted on  2010-01-20   21:13:18 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: war (#12)

from where do those revenues derive their source

Largely from personal income taxes and pay roll taxes, and it has been shown that after the Bush tax cuts, revenue was incoming at or larger than historical rates despite the personal income tax cuts and the economy was growing at a faster than historical rate.

The tax cuts worked. Let's hope the nigger doesn't let them expire.

dont eat that  posted on  2010-01-21   9:12:43 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: padlock, e_type_jag (#14)

Let's hope the nigger doesn't let them expire.

Can't we all just get along?

war  posted on  2010-01-21   9:24:52 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#41. To: war (#16)

#16. To: padlock, e_type_jag (#14)

Let's hope the nigger doesn't let them expire. Can't we all just get along?

No Stems No Seeds That You Don't Need...

war posted on 2010-01-21 9:24:52 ET Reply Trace Private Reply

Odd fixation you have on padlock war......chuckles.....LOL!!!!

I have zero posts to the cracker on this site.

Total LP posts in 3 years to padlock = 15......none since 10-09 when he sunk to his outed level.

You have zillions of posts to him.

At least get that part right today ok?

Of course you can go ahead and make some typical white plantation fraudulent leftist offhanded comment like you've done before and tell me to go back to my EEOC job.

You fool nobody war.

Be honest and go tip a few with sheets/padlock and step away from your stupid assertion that he and I are buds in any way.

e_type_jag  posted on  2010-01-21   13:46:31 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#43. To: e_type_jag (#41)

I have zero posts to the cracker on this site.

Why would you...you are so politically in tune there's no reason for you to...your MO is to respond to those with whom you disagree and invoke the Truck Stop response at every turn...

and tell me to go back to my EEOC job.

C'mon e_type...seriously...tell me that you did NOT take that to heart...

That said...amazing that if you do that I offend you but puddin' pop does not...

war  posted on  2010-01-21   13:52:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#46. To: war (#43)

That said...amazing that if you do that I offend you but puddin' pop does not...

Hello??

Hellooooooooo?

Did you miss the LP post where I called the dude a cracker?

Most people know that term is a derogatory one and might kind of indicate I find padlock and his ilk offensive.

As for the EEOC thing.....minor in Psych war.....that post was your Freudian and you made the comment to someone else probably not thinking I'd catch it.

It's what you really think...blacks get jobs via some sort of preferences regardless of their capability.......who ya kidding here war?....you'd be number 567 in the list of people who have either said or insinuated that that I'm aware of.

e_type_jag  posted on  2010-01-21   14:08:28 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#47. To: e_type_jag (#46)

As for the EEOC thing.....minor in Psych war.....that post was your Freudian and you made the comment to someone else probably not thinking I'd catch it.

I've made it to you as well...mon frer noir...

war  posted on  2010-01-21   14:22:00 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 47.

#48. To: war (#47)

I've made it to you as well...mon frer noir...

Really?

Where was that again war?

I really actually don't recall....I'd probably have had a comment back to you on it.

Whatever....it's not a backhand I'd have expected from you as I'm no EEOC recipient that I'm aware of.

e_type_jag  posted on  2010-01-21 15:59:16 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 47.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com