Opinions/Editorials
See other Opinions/Editorials Articles
Title: Kurt Russell Drops Massive Truth Bomb About Gun Control
Source:
The Federalist
URL Source: http://thefederalist.com/2015/12/11 ... -truth-bomb-about-gun-control/
Published: Dec 22, 2018
Author: Staff
Post Date: 2018-12-22 10:29:21 by IbJensen
Keywords: None
Views: 3139
Comments: 29
'If you think gun control is going to change the terrorists’ point of view, I think you’re, like, out of your mind.' In a recent interview for Hollywood Elsewhere, Kurt Russell shut down a reporter’s argument in favor of gun control. The conversation started out civil enough, focusing on Russell’s performance in the upcoming Quentin Tarantino film “The Hateful Eight,” but things took a turn when reporter Jeffery Wells described guns as a “metaphor that disenfranchised white guys need… [to] feel good about themselves.” “If you think gun control is going to change the terrorists’ point of view, I think you’re, like, out of your mind,” Russell said. “I think anybody [who says that] is. I think it’s absolutely insane.” Allowing people to carry guns for protection would curb violence more effectively than gun control because it forces violent individuals to think twice before physically harming someone else, he explained. “If I’m a hockey team and I’ve got some guy bearing down on me as a goal- tender, I’m not concerned about what he’s gonna do — I’m gonna make him concerned about what I’m gonna do,” Russell said. The tension between the two is clearly palpable in this transcript: Russell: They can also make a bomb pretty easily. So what? They can also get knives and stab you. Whaddaya gonna do about that? They can also get cars and run you over. Whaddaya gonna do about that? Wells: They didn’t kill the people in San Bernardino with cars. Russell: But they’ve killed others that way, haven’t they? Yeah, yeah. Whaddaya gonna do? Outlaw everything? That isn’t the answer. Wells: Just put some controls… Russell: Put some controls? What, so the people, so the people who want to defend themselves can’t? Wells: No, not so you can’t, just so the idiots can’t get hold of them [so easily], that’s all. Russell: You really believe they’re not going to? Are you serious about that? What good will that…? Oh my God. You and I just disagree.
Poster Comment: Good for Kurt! History has a way of repeating itself and the 2nd Amendment was drafted to protect against a tyrannical government, nothing is easier than gathering up a whole neighborhood unopposed then shipping them off to be gassed in a chamber, I'd rather fight then submit myself and my family to that horror, victims have the most horrific look at their time of death, and fingernails ripped clawing over people to get fresh remaining air, do you think about them when you drafted your questions..the pro's and con's? A lot of early Americans died, sacrificed their lives so we can have the Bill of Rights Democrat-Communists wipe their asses with.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 29.
#5. To: IbJensen (#0)
No, but it should make it more difficult for some pubescent, Jr-HS numbnut to get a hold of an AR-style semi-auto assault weapon with a 30+ round magazine and blow away half his class just because the teacher gave him a D in algebra or Peggy-Sue slapped him silly when he tried to cop a feel and all the other kids laughed at him... Get rid of the semi-auto rifles & hi-capacity magazines... or Tax the shit out of them just like fully auto machine guns... That won't affect the true sportsmen who put Bambi's venison on the dinner table...
You know I wonder why some folks always go for the take/get rid of guns scenario instead of the take care/get rid of the whack jobs who use them scenario? (I know the answer to that question but are you willing to say it/admit it?)
(I know the answer to that question but are you willing to say it/admit it?) It's because you can't do anything to the whack jobs until AFTER they kill innocent victims... See? That was a lot easier than you thought it would be..
See? That was a lot easier than you thought it would be.. No it's because it would seriously cut into the Democrat voter base hence the reason behind gun control, if you put a substantial part of their base in jail they can't get elected. That was easy wasn't it...
There are no replies to Comment # 29. End Trace Mode for Comment # 29.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest“If you think gun control is going to change the terrorists’ point of view...
#23. To: Willie Green (#5)
Get rid of the semi-auto rifles & hi-capacity magazines... or Tax the shit out of them just like fully auto machine guns...
#24. To: CZ82 (#23)
instead of the take care/get rid of the whack jobs who use them scenario?
#29. To: Willie Green (#24)
(Edited)
It's because you can't do anything to the whack jobs until AFTER they kill innocent victims...
Replies to Comment # 29.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]