[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Israel Attacks Iran, Report Says - LIVE Breaking News Coverage

Earth is Scorched with Heat

Antiwar Activists Chant ‘Death to America’ at Event Featuring Chicago Alderman

Vibe Shift

A stream that makes the pleasant Rain sound.

Older Men - Keep One Foot In The Dark Ages

When You Really Want to Meet the Diversity Requirements

CERN to test world's most powerful particle accelerator during April's solar eclipse

Utopian Visionaries Who Won’t Leave People Alone

No - no - no Ain'T going To get away with iT

Pete Buttplug's Butt Plugger Trying to Turn Kids into Faggots

Mark Levin: I'm sick and tired of these attacks

Questioning the Big Bang

James Webb Data Contradicts the Big Bang

Pssst! Don't tell the creationists, but scientists don't have a clue how life began

A fine romance: how humans and chimps just couldn't let go

Early humans had sex with chimps

O’Keefe dons bulletproof vest to extract undercover journalist from NGO camp.

Biblical Contradictions (Alleged)

Catholic Church Praising Lucifer

Raising the Knife

One Of The HARDEST Videos I Had To Make..

Houthi rebels' attack severely damages a Belize-flagged ship in key strait leading to the Red Sea (British Ship)

Chinese Illegal Alien. I'm here for the moneuy

Red Tides Plague Gulf Beaches

Tucker Carlson calls out Nikki Haley, Ben Shapiro, and every other person calling for war:

{Are there 7 Deadly Sins?} I’ve heard people refer to the “7 Deadly Sins,” but I haven’t been able to find that sort of list in Scripture.

Abomination of Desolation | THEORY, BIBLE STUDY

Bible Help

Libertysflame Database Updated

Crush EVERYONE with the Alien Gambit!

Vladimir Putin tells Tucker Carlson US should stop arming Ukraine to end war

Putin hints Moscow and Washington in back-channel talks in revealing Tucker Carlson interview

Trump accuses Fulton County DA Fani Willis of lying in court response to Roman's motion

Mandatory anti-white racism at Disney.

Iceland Volcano Erupts For Third Time In 2 Months, State Of Emergency Declared

Tucker Carlson Interview with Vladamir Putin

How will Ar Mageddon / WW III End?

What on EARTH is going on in Acts 16:11? New Discovery!

2023 Hottest in over 120 Million Years

2024 and beyond in prophecy

Questions

This Speech Just Broke the Internet

This AMAZING Math Formula Will Teach You About God!

The GOSPEL of the ALIENS | Fallen Angels | Giants | Anunnaki

The IMAGE of the BEAST Revealed (REV 13) - WARNING: Not for Everyone

WEF Calls for AI to Replace Voters: ‘Why Do We Need Elections?’

The OCCULT Burger king EXPOSED

PANERA BREAD Antichrist message EXPOSED

The OCCULT Cheesecake Factory EXPOSED


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Talk Radio Watch
See other Talk Radio Watch Articles

Title: Pigboy stands by his Haiti remarks, tells critical caller she’s a ‘bigot’ with ‘tampons in her ears.’
Source: Think Progress
URL Source: http://thinkprogress.org/2010/01/14/limbaugh-haiti-tampons/
Published: Jan 15, 2010
Author: Amanda Terkel
Post Date: 2010-01-15 15:00:59 by Fred Mertz
Keywords: Pigboy, Back on Drugs, Limbaugh
Views: 17451
Comments: 51

Yesterday, hate radio host Rush Limbaugh controversially said that President Obama was going to try to use the devastating Haitian earthquake to boost his credibility with the “light-skinned and dark-skinned black community” in the United States. He also argued against government aid for the nation. Today, a woman named “April” from Paducah, KY called into Limbaugh’s show and asked where he got the “cojones” to make such statements. Limbaugh insisted that he never meant to discourage private donations to Haiti, but stood by his remarks that Obama will try to exploit the disaster for political gain:

>> RUSH: No, I’m not evading it at all. If I said it I meant to say it, and I do believe that everything is political to this president. Everything this president sees is a political opportunity, including Haiti, and he will use it to burnish his credentials with minorities in this country and around the world, and to accuse Republicans of having no compassion. [...]

>> CALLER: [A]re you implying that the Huffington Post as the one and only resource that I [read]? I even watch Fox News once in a while.

>> RUSH: No, no, no, no, no. I’m not implying that. … What I’m illustrating here is that you’re a blockhead. What I’m illustrating here is that you’re a closed-minded bigot who is ill-informed. … And if you had listened to this program for a modicum of time you would know it. But instead you’re a blockhead. You’re mind is totally closed. You have tampons in your ears. Nothing is getting through other than the biased crap that you read.

[Snip]

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Fred Mertz (#0)

Everything this president sees is a political opportunity, including Haiti, and he will use it to burnish his credentials ...

You're one to talk, Rushbo. That's what you are like.

Biff Tannen  posted on  2010-01-15   15:03:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Fred Mertz, Sherlock (#0)

What I’m illustrating here is that you’re a closed-minded bigot who is ill-informed. …

Irony of the Day...

No Stems No Seeds That You Don't Need...

war  posted on  2010-01-15   15:05:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: war (#2)

What I’m illustrating here is that you’re a closed-minded bigot who is ill-informed. …

Limbaugh has always had the most heavily screened show on radio. These people only get through because he wants them to, and only after he's been told exactly what they're going to say.

Bickus Dickus  posted on  2010-01-15   15:25:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Bickus Dickus (#3)

You really can't stand the real world.

Badeye  posted on  2010-01-15   15:29:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Fred Mertz (#0)

You’re mind is totally closed. You have tampons in your ears.

Way to accurately characterize the ignorant cunt, Rush.

dont eat that  posted on  2010-01-15   15:39:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Bickus Dickus (#3) (Edited)

Limbaugh has always had the most heavily screened show on radio.

I never got through to Blimpy but I did get through to Walter Williams when he subbed for Blimpy once to point out that Williams did speak ebonically after claiming that his mother would beat him if he did and so he never did. I got about two sentences out before i got cut off...

I nailed both Hannity and Mark Levin a few times...I got Hannity good when when I asked him how much money he'd get from Boy Blunder's tax cuts. He cut me off real quickly and then played that game where he quickly throws out a bunch of questions and then pretends I'm still on the line and had no answer.

Levin I got when I pointed out how the premise of his book, Men In Black, i.e. The SCOTUS has no power of judiical review, stood squarely at odds with The Federalist #78. He howled like Mad Dog the first time Yukon nailed him with all 2 inches. I will never forget part of his screech in reply: "Even Satan can quote the Bible."

BTW, I met someone who was a "researcher" for Hannity...there are three of them at any point surfing the web and feeding responses to him via IM. He also said that Hannity has Matt Drudge and GOP op research guys getting a direct [not delayed] feed who IM Hannity lines and retorts.

No Stems No Seeds That You Don't Need...

war  posted on  2010-01-15   15:39:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: dont eat that (#5)

You misplaced a comma...

No Stems No Seeds That You Don't Need...

war  posted on  2010-01-15   15:40:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Fred Mertz (#0)

I believe this is the first article I've ever seen you post on the 'forums'...ever.

That really you Freddy?

Brian S  posted on  2010-01-15   19:30:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Brian S (#8)

Yes, it's me, Goldi is a hunt.

It's not my first one, as I post articles rarely. But it is one where I altered the title.

Fred Mertz  posted on  2010-01-15   21:01:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Brian S (#8)

Hey what's up man...?

No Stems No Seeds That You Don't Need...

war  posted on  2010-01-15   21:43:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: Bickus Dickus (#3)

Limbaugh has always had the most heavily screened show on radio. These people only get through because he wants them to, and only after he's been told exactly what they're going to say.

Uh ... Uh ... Uh ...

OMG, what an amazing revelation ...

Do you REALLY think this is what happens?

Wow ... thanks for letting us all know this.

Do you think letting everyone know this will hurt Rush's ratings, his ratings are climbing.

Wow, Rushh's ratings went up almost 100 percent between January and March … Rush first announced he hoped Obama failed.

Given those numbers, it's clear that the most decisive economic stimulus produced by the Obama administration so far has been at the Excellence in Broadcasting Network.

OriginalGatlin  posted on  2010-01-15   21:54:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Badeye, Bickus Dickus (#4)

You really can't stand the real world.

How can he, he's never been in it!

OriginalGatlin  posted on  2010-01-15   21:55:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: Badeye (#4)

Do you have a response to my statement or is it the name calling route for you, too?

Bickus Dickus  posted on  2010-01-15   22:01:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: Tater (#12)

How can he, he's never been in it!

Liberty Post is recruiting posters like you. Why not give it a shot? I think you'll fit right in.

Bickus Dickus  posted on  2010-01-15   22:02:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: Tater (#11)

OMG, what an amazing revelation ...

It's not a revelation. It's the way he runs his show.

That his audience eats it up shows that he knows them well.

Bickus Dickus  posted on  2010-01-15   22:05:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: Tater (#11)

Rushh's ratings went up almost 100 percent between January and March …

He went from 14MM to 28MM listeners?

Pfft...

No Stems No Seeds That You Don't Need...

war  posted on  2010-01-15   22:16:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: Bickus Dickus (#14)

How can he, he's never been in it!

Liberty Post is recruiting posters like you. Why not give it a shot? I think you'll fit right in.

Whatsamatter ... you can't handle truth?

Are you saying that I should leave THIS forum?

Do you have a right to do that?

You will find the real world does have open minded people able to give
objective considerations ... maybe you should step out there and try it.

That was not meant to be, or a directive to be, for YOU to leave THIS forum
... it is not within my power to do that.

OriginalGatlin  posted on  2010-01-15   22:17:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: war (#16)

Rushh's ratings went up almost 100 percent between January and March … He went from 14MM to 28MM listeners?

Pfft...

Do the research ...

OriginalGatlin  posted on  2010-01-15   22:18:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: Tater (#17)

No, I'm implying if you think replying with insults is an intelligent way to debate, LP is your place.

Bickus Dickus  posted on  2010-01-15   22:20:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: Tater (#18)

Do the research ...

Suits me. Where?

Bickus Dickus  posted on  2010-01-15   22:20:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: Bickus Dickus (#19)

No, I'm implying if you think replying with insults is an intelligent way to debate, LP is your place.

That is NEVER done over here ...

Are you a MOD?

OriginalGatlin  posted on  2010-01-15   22:22:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: Bickus Dickus (#20)

Do the research ...

Suits me. Where?

Try Google ... do you know how to use it?

OriginalGatlin  posted on  2010-01-15   22:23:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: Tater (#18)

What research? Arbitron has stated that it has no way of quantifying Blimpy...

No Stems No Seeds That You Don't Need...

war  posted on  2010-01-15   22:23:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: Tater (#21)

Are you a MOD?

Of course not. You can do what you want, obviously. That's why God invented the bozo list.

Bickus Dickus  posted on  2010-01-15   22:24:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: Tater (#22)

Why don't we just pretend Rush Limbaugh has 50 million listeners? March 09, 2009 7:21 pm ET

Call it The Washington Post's 766-word non-correction correction.

It ran Saturday in the form of a Paul Farhi article about the dubious nature of trying to measure the size of Rush Limbaugh's radio audience. Farhi stressed that trying to determine the total number of weekly listeners represented an exercise "in guesswork, slippery methodology and suspect data."

The article detailed how there aren't any hard ratings numbers within the radio industry regarding Limbaugh's audience size -- a topic of increased interest since the AM talker had emerged as the public face of the Republican Party under the Obama administration.

Farhi helped put the ratings question issue in proper context, but the unspoken point of the piece seemed to be to walk back the previous day's Post article by Howard Kurtz, which boldly announced in the very first sentence that Limbaugh's ratings had "nearly doubled" since the recent controversy with Obama began in January. It was a pro-Limbaugh proclamation that went off like a firecracker, especially online, as conservatives cheered the news and mocked Democrats for padding Limbaugh's audience.

But was it true? Reading Farhi's detailed ratings piece on Saturday, it was hard to see how Kurtz's claim of Limbaugh's audience doubling could withstand serious scrutiny. (A point I made the day the Post published Kurtz's piece.) In fact, on Saturday we found out the thin sourcing that Kurtz used for his claim was little more than a hunch, and the person who made the hunch didn't think the guesstimate of Limbaugh's size growth was scientific or that it represented a true ratings estimate. (More on that below.)

Plus, even Limbaugh himself didn't think his ratings had doubled in recent weeks. The same day Kurtz's article appeared, Byron York at The Washington Examiner asked the turbo talker about his ratings. This was Limbaugh's response, in full:

The latest numbers I have are for January, well before this kerfuffle began, and they are through the roof -- six shares in NY, for example. There are d aily ratings taken now in about the top 15 markets but I have not seen them yet. All I can tell you is that as of January, we booked 80 percent of all our 2008 revenue and we'll be over 2008 by the end of this month.

Limbaugh hadn't seen ratings more recent than January. Yet the Post on Friday claimed Limbaugh's ratings had nearly doubled since January. During his Monday broadcast, Limbaugh reiterated that he had no idea if his ratings had recently increased twofold.

Have Limbaugh's numbers spiked in recent weeks? I'd be shocked if they hadn't given the extraordinary publicity he's received. But doubled? There's simply no proof, regardless of what the Post claimed on Friday.

Kurtz's sloppy reporting highlighted the media's perpetual soft spot for Limbaugh's ratings. As Farhi noted, nobody has specific numbers about what the talker's audience is and "Limbaugh himself has muddied the water with the claim that he reaches 20 million people a week, although there's no independent support for that figure."

Yet, for years, news consumers have been told 20 million people listen each week. It's a statistic that has become absolutely synonymous with Limbaugh.

But where did that ginormous number come from? From Limbaugh, of course. The first reported reference I could find came from the July 31, 1993, issue of the radio bible, Billboard magazine, which reported "Li mbaugh's show is now heard on 610 stations and reaches approximately 20 million listeners, according to [Kit] Carson," Limbaugh's "chief of staff."

According to Limbaugh's right-hand person, the talker had 20 million listeners. Was there any way to confirm that? Not really, but no matter: The media loved the nice round number, and soon it began to appear everywhere -- but often without the acknowledgement that the stat came from Limbaugh's camp. The following month, in August 1993, U.S. News & World Report announced: "Welcome, one and all, to Rush World, the one-man media theme park of the '90s. Over here, the Radio Show, reaching 20 million listeners a week on 616 stations."

And the month after that, conservative columnist Cal Thomas wrote that Limbaugh "is heard on more than 600 mostly AM radio stations with an audience estimated at 20 million listeners per week, is a phenomenon unseen in modern times."

A check of Nexis today finds more than 800 news references to that mythical Limbaugh number throughout the years. Despite the fact nobody knows if it's accurate, the figure has been codified: Limbaugh attracts 20 million listeners each week. Wow.

But what other type of media reporting do journalists gladly repeat ratings numbers based on nothing more than a feel-good estimate provided by broadcasters? (Why stop at 20? Why not claim Limbaugh has 50 million listeners each week?)

And how amazing is this: Limbaugh in 1993 claimed he had 20 million listeners, and in 2009 the press is still mouthing the same statistic. Meaning that, until recently, Limbaugh's audience hadn't budged -- not up, not down -- in 16 years.. Obviously that doesn't pass any kind of smell test.

Why is it so difficult to pinpoint the number? First, much of radio's ratings methodology remains stuck in the 1960s, and it takes months to generate nationwide audience figures -- unlike TV ratings, which can often be measured within 24 hours. And second, because Limbaugh appears on a patchwork of stations all over the country, it's tough to add up all the numbers for an accurate reading. As Farhi noted, Arbitron, the overseer of U.S. radio ratings, has never tried to measure Limbaugh's audience. And it has no plans to since, as its spokesman told the newspaper, "There is no economic motivation for any objective third party to do that kind of analysis."

Obviously radio syndicators have ratings numbers off of which they sell advertising, but those figures are closely held -- unlike Arbitron data, which is more widely avail able. So, basically, it's up to the syndicator to dole out the ratings numbers to the press; like last year, when Limbaugh's syndicator, Premiere Radio Networks, claimed 20 million listeners tuned into Limbaugh's show each week.

Also keep in mind that eight-digit number is what's known in radio as the "cume" (short for cumulative). It in no way reflects the actual audience size like the way television shows are measured minute by minute or half-hour by half-hour. Instead, the cume number represents a very large -- and generous -- umbrella covering the number of people who, in theory, tune into a program at any time during the week, even if it's for just two minutes.

No Stems No Seeds That You Don't Need...

war  posted on  2010-01-15   22:26:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: Tater (#22)

Google? At best, that's nothing but someone's wild-ass guess. Radio audience ratings are proprietary.

The best you'll find, unless you subscribe to a ratings service, is quarterly ratings info by location by station. If you are a subscriber, you're prohibited from releasing the data.

That's why newspapers may list TV show ratings every week, but radio show ratings never.

Bickus Dickus  posted on  2010-01-15   22:30:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: Bickus Dickus, war (#22)

Do the research ... Suits me. Where?

Here, Bickus, I'll do the some research for you ... this was just the first to pop up ... there are more:

Feud with Obama has nearly doubled the size of Limbaugh's audience

To war:
I have no way of verifying the numbers ... I just post what others said and provide links ... I find that is a safe way to do things.

OriginalGatlin  posted on  2010-01-15   22:30:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: Bickus Dickus (#26)

Google? At best, that's nothing but someone's wild-ass guess. Radio audience ratings are proprietary.

The best you'll find, unless you subscribe to a ratings service, is quarterly ratings info by location by station. If you are a subscriber, you're prohibited from releasing the data.

That's why newspapers may list TV show ratings every week, but radio show ratings never.

Then, Hells Bells Man, you just believe what you want to ... you probably will whatever is presented to you ... Yea?

OriginalGatlin  posted on  2010-01-15   22:32:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: war (#25)

Two of my tavern pals heard about Pill's comments...from TV.

Bofe of dem thought he was a complete asshole.

Fred Mertz  posted on  2010-01-15   22:33:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: Fred Mertz (#29)

Two of my tavern pals heard about Pill's comments...from TV.

Bofe of dem thought he was a complete asshole.

People Sometimes Seek the Truth, but Most Prefer Like-Minded Views ~ Anonymous

OriginalGatlin  posted on  2010-01-15   22:38:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: Tater (#28)

25 no comment?

No Stems No Seeds That You Don't Need...

war  posted on  2010-01-15   22:40:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: war (#25)

And how amazing is this: Limbaugh in 1993 claimed he had 20 million listeners, and in 2009 the press is still mouthing the same statistic.

You'll still come across people saying Limbaugh has 20 million daily listeners. If that were true, his weekly total would be nearly 100 million, or around half of the adult population of the US.

Ratings are more accurate for large markets where the money is, and not much more than a seat of the pants guess everywhere else.

Bickus Dickus  posted on  2010-01-15   22:42:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: war, Bigus Dickus, Fred Mertz (#25)

I have already seen that ... you can find one that says no and then you can find one that says yes ...

In all cases, Rush's ratings are going through the roof:

Rush Limbaugh's August Ratings Soar; Media Ignore the Feat

OriginalGatlin  posted on  2010-01-15   22:44:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: Tater (#27)

http://blog.beliefnet.com/reformedchicksblabbing/2009/03/feud-with-obama-has-nearly-dou.html

See wars post above. Anyway, doubled from what. What was the baseline number?

The only realistic "guesstimate" numbers I've ever seen are from Talkers magazine, but apparently they have stopped printing them.

Bickus Dickus  posted on  2010-01-15   22:48:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: All (#33)

war, Bigus Dickus, Fred Mertz

Now: One for you ... Two for me:

Rush Limbaugh’s Ratings Doubled, Thanks To Obama Team’s Attacks

OriginalGatlin  posted on  2010-01-15   22:48:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: Tater (#35)

You just keep linking back to the same Kurtz article.

Bickus Dickus  posted on  2010-01-15   22:50:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: Tater (#33)

In all cases, Rush's ratings are going through the roof:

Does that mean Americans should do nothing to help Haiti?

What are you trying to say? Controversy sells?

He's a pig in my book...that is all.

Fred Mertz  posted on  2010-01-15   22:51:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: Bickus Dickus, war (#36)

Sorry, went to different sites ... did not notice that.

You are correct, there aren't any hard ratings numbers within the radio industry regarding Limbaugh's audience size.

Have Limbaugh's numbers spiked since last January, I'd be shocked if they hadn't given the extraordinary publicity he's received.

But doubled? You are right, there's no proof of that. Some source say so, while the Post corrected their numbers.

Since no one can prove he even has the 20 million some say he has ... then maybe he only has one: Me.

OriginalGatlin  posted on  2010-01-15   22:58:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: Fred Mertz (#37)

He's a pig in my book...that is all.

Fred, there are a lot of people who are pigs in your book.

Why doesn't this surprise me?

But I won't hold that agains you.

My son thinks the same thing as you do.

OriginalGatlin  posted on  2010-01-15   23:00:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: Tater (#39)

Do you have tampons in your ears?

Fred Mertz  posted on  2010-01-15   23:08:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  



      .
      .
      .

Comments (41 - 51) not displayed.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com