[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

The minute the total solar eclipse appeared over US

Three Types Of People To Mark And Avoid In The Church Today

Are The 4 Horsemen Of The Apocalypse About To Appear?

France sends combat troops to Ukraine battlefront

Facts you may not have heard about Muslims in England.

George Washington University raises the Hamas flag. American Flag has been removed.

Alabama students chant Take A Shower to the Hamas terrorists on campus.

In Day of the Lord, 24 Church Elders with Crowns Join Jesus in His Throne

In Day of the Lord, 24 Church Elders with Crowns Join Jesus in His Throne

Deadly Saltwater and Deadly Fresh Water to Increase

Deadly Cancers to soon Become Thing of the Past?

Plague of deadly New Diseases Continues

[FULL VIDEO] Police release bodycam footage of Monroe County District Attorney Sandra Doorley traffi

Police clash with pro-Palestine protesters on Ohio State University campus

Joe Rogan Experience #2138 - Tucker Carlson

Police Dispersing Student Protesters at USC - Breaking News Coverage (College Protests)

What Passover Means For The New Testament Believer

Are We Closer Than Ever To The Next Pandemic?

War in Ukraine Turns on Russia

what happened during total solar eclipse

Israel Attacks Iran, Report Says - LIVE Breaking News Coverage

Earth is Scorched with Heat

Antiwar Activists Chant ‘Death to America’ at Event Featuring Chicago Alderman

Vibe Shift

A stream that makes the pleasant Rain sound.

Older Men - Keep One Foot In The Dark Ages

When You Really Want to Meet the Diversity Requirements

CERN to test world's most powerful particle accelerator during April's solar eclipse

Utopian Visionaries Who Won’t Leave People Alone

No - no - no Ain'T going To get away with iT

Pete Buttplug's Butt Plugger Trying to Turn Kids into Faggots

Mark Levin: I'm sick and tired of these attacks

Questioning the Big Bang

James Webb Data Contradicts the Big Bang

Pssst! Don't tell the creationists, but scientists don't have a clue how life began

A fine romance: how humans and chimps just couldn't let go

Early humans had sex with chimps

O’Keefe dons bulletproof vest to extract undercover journalist from NGO camp.

Biblical Contradictions (Alleged)

Catholic Church Praising Lucifer

Raising the Knife

One Of The HARDEST Videos I Had To Make..

Houthi rebels' attack severely damages a Belize-flagged ship in key strait leading to the Red Sea (British Ship)

Chinese Illegal Alien. I'm here for the moneuy

Red Tides Plague Gulf Beaches

Tucker Carlson calls out Nikki Haley, Ben Shapiro, and every other person calling for war:

{Are there 7 Deadly Sins?} I’ve heard people refer to the “7 Deadly Sins,” but I haven’t been able to find that sort of list in Scripture.

Abomination of Desolation | THEORY, BIBLE STUDY

Bible Help

Libertysflame Database Updated


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Talk Radio Watch
See other Talk Radio Watch Articles

Title: Rush Limbaugh, Pat Robertson take heat on remarks
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0110/31502.html
Published: Jan 14, 2010
Author: ANDY BAR
Post Date: 2010-01-14 12:44:41 by Bickus Dickus
Keywords: None
Views: 87334
Comments: 183

Rush Limbaugh, Pat Robertson take heat on remarks

Conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh and televangelist Pat Robertson are being scolded for their comments in the immediate aftermath of an earthquake in Haiti that has killed tens of thousands, according to early estimates.

Critics from both the left and right are denouncing their remarks as insensitive to the disaster and attempts to score political points off human tragedy.

Speaking on his radio show Wednesday, Limbaugh said the earthquake has played into Obama’s hands, allowing the president to look “compassionate” and “humanitarian” while at the same time bolstering his standing in both the “light-skinned and dark-skinned black community in this country.”

He added: “We've already donated to Haiti. It’s called the U.S. income tax.”

Limbaugh’s comments were, in part, a riff on Sen. Harry Reid’s (D-Nev.) much publicized remark in a new book that Obama was able to win the election because he is “light-skinned” and lacks a “Negro dialect.”

But regardless of the intended context, Limbaugh’s comments have been widely panned.

“They are deeply insensitive,” said conservative commentator Pat Buchanan on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe.”

“The president speaks for the country when he says we’re going to go in there,” he said. “You want your whole nation, and it’s very positive. And I think Rush’s comments were cynical.”

Sitting next to Buchanan on set, host Joe Scarborough called Limbaugh’s comments “deplorable.”

“The insensitivity is stunning,” said the former Republican congressman.

Liberal commentators also quickly jumped on Limbaugh.

“Limbaugh did not know when to just shut up,” said liberal commentator Keith Olbermann on his MSNBC show “Countdown.” “Today he blamed communism for the poverty of Haiti, blamed President Obama for holding a news conference the day after this cataclysm when he did not hold one after the failed half-assed terror attempt in Detroit.”

John Amato from the left-leaning website Crooks and Liars added that “with thousands of people dead already and as the suffering continues in Haiti, Limbaugh and his ilk only care about one thing: destroying Obama.”

The conservative media watchdog site Newsbusters stepped up to defend Limbaugh, saying his comments were not put in proper context, but very few others are backing the conservative firebrand’s latest controversial remarks.

Click for Full Text!


Poster Comment:

Leave it to the fat, drug-addled pig Limbaugh to try to turn a natural disaster into a political act.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Comments (1-109) not displayed.
      .
      .
      .

#110. To: Tater (#105)

maybe he will learned

huh?


Click if you want the truth. Click here for an important video message

mel  posted on  2010-01-14   23:10:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#111. To: mel (#110)

maybe he will learned

huh?

lol ... I was typing to quickly ... had other things to get to.

Was gonna say it either two ways, present or past ... screwed both together.

OriginalGatlin  posted on  2010-01-15   5:40:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#112. To: Liberator (#5)

Asshole. It was the truth. And you point at Obama ("setting fire to America"?? lol, retard) and somehow that makes it not the truth?

Biff Tannen  posted on  2010-01-15   8:43:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#113. To: Liberator (#8)

Hilarious how quickly you and your chum turn to homoerotica, Luberator.

Biff Tannen  posted on  2010-01-15   8:44:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#114. To: Tater (#106)

May there be a day when Americans go back to being Americans, then we will see the undo of Obama.

I have no idea what that means.

But as long as they are parasites voters who claim to be Americans and want something for nothing … then Obama will always have voters.

Why does big business, who, combined do NOT employ the most Americans, get the greatest benefits from the tax code? Better yet...why do they DEMAND it?

No Stems No Seeds That You Don't Need...

war  posted on  2010-01-15   8:57:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#115. To: Tater (#106)

Good night, war, wherever you are ... Thank you for a great exchange ...

You too man...saw how late you were going at it...bet yer still abed...

No Stems No Seeds That You Don't Need...

war  posted on  2010-01-15   9:03:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#116. To: Liberator (#6)

Exactly.

Badeye  posted on  2010-01-15   9:06:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#117. To: Tater (#87)

You see nothing wrong with a couple of guys in black uniforms (giving the appearance of LEOs) waving nightsticks in front of a predominately white voting area?

I'd have an issue with that...but that isn't what happened there...first off, IIRC, no connection was ever made between those men and the BPP...noone has come forward and claimed that they were denied the right to vote and when those men were told to leave, they did.

they were found guilty

By whom? Fox News?

What was the kid doing that had his arms blown off ...

It's his fault?

No Stems No Seeds That You Don't Need...

war  posted on  2010-01-15   9:09:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#118. To: Tater (#88)

"He didn't say it ... but I knew what he MEANT to say ... and he COULD have said it ...

I've asked you before...where has anyone claimed that he said DO NOT HELP HAITI?

No Stems No Seeds That You Don't Need...

war  posted on  2010-01-15   9:10:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#119. To: mel (#89)

Wha...huh?

What the hell kind of question is that?

One of proportion...

No Stems No Seeds That You Don't Need...

war  posted on  2010-01-15   9:11:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#120. To: Tater (#100)

That was pretty good back and forth it was...

No Stems No Seeds That You Don't Need...

war  posted on  2010-01-15   9:12:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#121. To: Tater (#105)

With all of his condemnation of Bush, let us now watch Obama's response … maybe he will learned it is not so easy being the President and handling a disaster far worse than Katrina.

As in all things, Boy Blunder set the bar so low...

No Stems No Seeds That You Don't Need...

war  posted on  2010-01-15   9:13:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#122. To: Tater (#27)

You quoted him accurately, and the transcript is available on his website.

Badeye  posted on  2010-01-15   9:17:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#123. To: war (#85)

On MSNBC for the past 24 hours, dumbshit.

Badeye  posted on  2010-01-15   9:18:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#124. To: Tater (#99)

What in the Constitution makes it possible for Obama to take tax money and give it away, even in the event of a disaster?

Congressional appropriation coupled to his Constitutional station of chief foreign policy officer of the US.

No Stems No Seeds That You Don't Need...

war  posted on  2010-01-15   9:49:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#125. To: war (#115)

...bet yer still abed...

lol ... I was up at 4:00AM MST ... doing the chores ...

OriginalGatlin  posted on  2010-01-15   9:50:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#126. To: Tater (#99)

But I’m all for private donations, not government money … No way … it will just be stolen by the corrupt politicians there.

Private charities do not have the resources...any where NEAR...

No Stems No Seeds That You Don't Need...

war  posted on  2010-01-15   9:51:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#127. To: war (#117)

no connection was ever made between those men and the BPP...

Justice Department political appointees overruled career lawyers and ended a civil complaint accusing three
members of the New Black Panther Party for Self-Defense of wielding a nightstick and intimidating voters at a
Philadelphia polling place last Election Day, according to documents and interviews.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/may/29/career-lawyers-overruled-on- voting-case/

OriginalGatlin  posted on  2010-01-15   9:56:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#128. To: war (#126)

Private charities do not have the resources...any where NEAR...

International Red Cross?

OriginalGatlin  posted on  2010-01-15   9:57:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#129. To: Tater (#127)

I know what's being reported in the media. I also know what law enforcement has been saying since the incident.

No Stems No Seeds That You Don't Need...

war  posted on  2010-01-15   10:02:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#130. To: war (#129)

Then they WERE BPP ... Right?

OriginalGatlin  posted on  2010-01-15   10:07:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#131. To: war (#124)

Constitutional station of chief foreign policy officer of the US

That is designated in the Constitution ... where?

OriginalGatlin  posted on  2010-01-15   10:10:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#132. To: Badeye, war (#122)

You quoted him accurately, and the transcript is available on his website.

Thank you ... war just wanted me to send me running for something ... his method of debate.

OriginalGatlin  posted on  2010-01-15   10:12:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#133. To: war (#121)

As in all things, Boy Blunder set the bar so low...

For which Obama continues to blame him over and over ... over and over ... over and over ... everything is "Boosch's fault."

OriginalGatlin  posted on  2010-01-15   10:14:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#134. To: Tater (#128)

The relationship between the American Red Cross and the federal government is unique. The American Red Cross is an independent entity that is organized and exists as a nonprofit, tax-exempt, charitable institution pursuant to a charter granted to it by the United States Congress.

Unlike other congressionally chartered organizations, the Red Cross maintains a special relationship with the federal government. It has the legal status of "a federal instrumentality," due to its charter requirements to carry out responsibilities delegated to it by the federal government.

Among these responsibilities are:

to fulfill the provisions of the Geneva Conventions, to which the United States is a signatory, assigned to national societies for the protection of victims of conflict,

to provide family communications and other forms of support to the U.S. military,

and to maintain a system of domestic and international disaster relief, including mandated responsibilities under the National Response Plan coordinated by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

Despite this close relationship with the federal government, the American Red Cross is not a federal agency, nor does it receive federal funding on a regular basis to carry out its services and programs. It receives its financial support from voluntary public contributions and from cost-recovery charges for some of its services, such as the provision of blood and blood products and health and safety training courses. Under limited circumstances, however, it sometimes becomes necessary for the American Red Cross to seek appropriations for certain programs when the funding requirements are beyond that supported by the charitable public. At times, federal and state government agencies also contract with the Red Cross and provide material aid and assistance to support the Red Cross in fulfillment of specific instances of its charter obligations.

No Stems No Seeds That You Don't Need...

war  posted on  2010-01-15   10:15:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#135. To: war (#120)

That was pretty good back and forth it was...

Ya, I thought it was a good one ... haven't done one of those for a long time ... you are great good ...

Gotta run now ... chores ...

Later ...

OriginalGatlin  posted on  2010-01-15   10:16:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#136. To: Tater (#133)

"BUT CLINTON...!!!" is STILL heard from some quarters...

No Stems No Seeds That You Don't Need...

war  posted on  2010-01-15   10:17:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#137. To: Tater (#132)

I know, then when you produce the facts, he 'baits and switches'. Its a waste of time, he's quite insane you know.

Badeye  posted on  2010-01-15   10:22:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#138. To: Tater (#132) (Edited)

...his method of debate.

Hold on there...the claim has been made by your "side" that Limbaugh was telling everyone to NOT donate to Haiti. NOWHERE has anyone claimed that he said that and you have been asked to provide any evidence that it was so claimed. WHAT has been claimed is that he has used Haiti to attack Obama.

Can you refute that?

No Stems No Seeds That You Don't Need...

war  posted on  2010-01-15   10:26:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#139. To: Tater (#135)

... you are great good ...

I'll try harder next time coach!!!

No Stems No Seeds That You Don't Need...

war  posted on  2010-01-15   10:27:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#140. To: Tater (#131)

That is designated in the Constitution ... where?

Article II Section 2 USCON...

Here's is Madison's commmentary when Washington was criticized for declaring the US a neutral party when a dispute arose between france and England:

“Were it once established that the powers of war and treaty are in their nature executive; that so far as they are not by strict construction transferred to the legislature, they actually belong to the executive; that of course all powers not less executive in their nature than those powers, if not granted to the legislature, may be claimed by the executive; if granted, are to be taken strictly, with a residuary right in the executive; or . . . perhaps claimed as a concurrent right by the executive; and no citizen could any longer guess at the character of the government under which he lives; the most penetrating jurist would be unable to scan the extent of constructive prerogative.”

No Stems No Seeds That You Don't Need...

war  posted on  2010-01-15   10:36:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#141. To: war (#138)

There you go again!

Bartcoprules  posted on  2010-01-15   10:43:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#142. To: Bartcoprules (#141)

Fuck...and I promised myself that I wouldn't do that here...

Hey...Pens/Sabes seem to play each other a lot coming up...

No Stems No Seeds That You Don't Need...

war  posted on  2010-01-15   10:52:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#143. To: Badeye (#137)

I know, then when you produce the facts, he 'baits and switches'. Its a waste of time, he's quite insane you know.

Thanks ... I know his tactics well ... he is good

Thanks again ... I only post when I have time to spare ...

Nice talking with you ...

OriginalGatlin  posted on  2010-01-15   13:47:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#144. To: Tater (#19)

Liberalism is looked upon as a mental disorder and this sick comment sounds like a fart from some Liberal. You have to twist good intent around to fit your personal agenda. A liberal sounding rubbish remark is boring talk. If you don't like Rush, then pay no attention to him. He has enough followers who like really like him. Don’t flatter yourself into feeling that he needs you.

Whatever. Anyone who listens to Rushbo for any amount of time and can't see he's a useless blowhard ain't that bright (you).

Biff Tannen  posted on  2010-01-15   13:50:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#145. To: war (#138)

Hold on there...the claim has been made by your "side" that Limbaugh was
telling everyone to NOT donate to Haiti. NOWHERE has anyone claimed that he
said that and you have been asked to provide any evidence that it was so
claimed. WHAT has been claimed is that he has used Haiti to attack Obama.

It has been a day and many exchanges since … let me get this straight.

You say: NOWHERE (Emphasis Yours) has anyone claimed that he (Rush) said that (not to send donate to Haiti, send money, etc) and you (Tater) have been asked to provide any evidence that it was so claimed.

And I need to show you ANYWHERE or SOMEWHERE that SOMEONE said that Mr.Limbaugh ask that donations not be sent to Haiti.

We went back and forth … I really need to know what you are asking and what I need to prove.

OriginalGatlin  posted on  2010-01-15   15:21:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#146. To: Tater (#145)

And I need to show you ANYWHERE or SOMEWHERE that SOMEONE said that Mr.Limbaugh ask that donations not be sent to Haiti.

You need to show how from the article that started this thread and the responses that you can justify this statement:

As it always is, and will continue to be, Rush was only partially quoted and some folks are swallowing the media set up. Rush never advocated NO aid be sent to Haiti...

Tater posted on 2010-01-14 19:06:46 ET Reply Trace Private Reply

No Stems No Seeds That You Don't Need...

war  posted on  2010-01-15   15:31:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#147. To: war (#146)

He added: “We've already donated to Haiti. It’s called the U.S. income tax.”

This implicitly discourages donations IMO.

Fred Mertz  posted on  2010-01-15   15:34:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#148. To: war (#146)

You need to show how from the article that started this thread and the responses that you can justify this statement:

As it always is, and will continue to be, Rush was only partially quoted and some folks are swallowing the media set up. Rush never advocated NO aid be sent to Haiti...

Here is where my confusion lies ...

You are talking about the article here ...

And I am talking about what I heard Rush say ...

Please, I am NOT be evasive ... I am just a little confused.

I can show you where many said that Rush said not to send aid to Haiti.

I can also show you were many said that Rush did not say not to send aid to Haiti.

I heard Rush and he did not say NOT to send aid to Haiti.

Now, bear with me, again ... I may be able to get the transcript from Rush's program ... or links to the other two ...

Which do you want?

OriginalGatlin  posted on  2010-01-15   15:43:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#149. To: war (#146)

Here's what I found.

http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AI...

A Letter to Rush Limbaugh / / / January 14, 2010

To: Rush Limbaugh From: Roger Ebert

You should be horse-whipped for the insult you have paid to the highest office of our nation.

Having followed President Obama's suggestion and donated money to the Red Cross for relief in Haiti, I was offended to hear you suggest the President might be a thief capable of stealing money intended for the earthquake victims.

Here is a transcript from your program on Thursday:

Justin of Raleigh, North Carolina: "Why does Obama say if you want to donate some money, you could go to whitehouse.gov to direct you how to do so? If I wanted to donate to the Red Cross, why do I have to go to the White House page to donate?"

Limbaugh: "Exactly. Would you trust the money's gonna go to Haiti?"

Justin: "No."

Rush: "But would you trust that your name's gonna end up on a mailing list for the Obama people to start asking you for campaign donations for him and other causes?"

Justin: "Absolutely!"

Limbaugh: "Absolutely!"

That's what was said.

Unlike you and Justin of Raleigh, I went to Obama's web site, and discovered the link there leads directly to the Red Cross. I can think of a reason why anyone might want to go via the White House. That way they can be absolutely sure they're clicking on the Red Cross and not a fake site set up to exploit the tragedy.

But let me be sure I have this right. You and Justin agree that Obama might steal money intended for the Red Cross to help the wretched of Haiti.

This conversation came 48 hours after many of us had seen pitiful sights from Port au Prince. Tens of thousands are believed still alive beneath the rubble. You twisted their suffering into an opportunity to demean the character of the President of the United States.

You have a sizable listening audience. You apparently know how to please them. Anybody given a $400 million contract must know what he is doing.

That's what offends me. You know exactly what you're doing.

Bickus Dickus  posted on  2010-01-15   15:44:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#150. To: Tater (#148)

I can show you where many said that Rush said not to send aid to Haiti.

That one...

No Stems No Seeds That You Don't Need...

war  posted on  2010-01-15   15:45:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  



      .
      .
      .

Comments (151 - 183) not displayed.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com