[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Utopian Visionaries Who Won’t Leave People Alone

No - no - no Ain'T going To get away with iT

Pete Buttplug's Butt Plugger Trying to Turn Kids into Faggots

Mark Levin: I'm sick and tired of these attacks

Questioning the Big Bang

James Webb Data Contradicts the Big Bang

Pssst! Don't tell the creationists, but scientists don't have a clue how life began

A fine romance: how humans and chimps just couldn't let go

Early humans had sex with chimps

O’Keefe dons bulletproof vest to extract undercover journalist from NGO camp.

Biblical Contradictions (Alleged)

Catholic Church Praising Lucifer

Raising the Knife

One Of The HARDEST Videos I Had To Make..

Houthi rebels' attack severely damages a Belize-flagged ship in key strait leading to the Red Sea (British Ship)

Chinese Illegal Alien. I'm here for the moneuy

Red Tides Plague Gulf Beaches

Tucker Carlson calls out Nikki Haley, Ben Shapiro, and every other person calling for war:

{Are there 7 Deadly Sins?} I’ve heard people refer to the “7 Deadly Sins,” but I haven’t been able to find that sort of list in Scripture.

Abomination of Desolation | THEORY, BIBLE STUDY

Bible Help

Libertysflame Database Updated

Crush EVERYONE with the Alien Gambit!

Vladimir Putin tells Tucker Carlson US should stop arming Ukraine to end war

Putin hints Moscow and Washington in back-channel talks in revealing Tucker Carlson interview

Trump accuses Fulton County DA Fani Willis of lying in court response to Roman's motion

Mandatory anti-white racism at Disney.

Iceland Volcano Erupts For Third Time In 2 Months, State Of Emergency Declared

Tucker Carlson Interview with Vladamir Putin

How will Ar Mageddon / WW III End?

What on EARTH is going on in Acts 16:11? New Discovery!

2023 Hottest in over 120 Million Years

2024 and beyond in prophecy

Questions

This Speech Just Broke the Internet

This AMAZING Math Formula Will Teach You About God!

The GOSPEL of the ALIENS | Fallen Angels | Giants | Anunnaki

The IMAGE of the BEAST Revealed (REV 13) - WARNING: Not for Everyone

WEF Calls for AI to Replace Voters: ‘Why Do We Need Elections?’

The OCCULT Burger king EXPOSED

PANERA BREAD Antichrist message EXPOSED

The OCCULT Cheesecake Factory EXPOSED

Satanist And Witches Encounter The Cross

History and Beliefs of the Waldensians

Rome’s Persecution of the Bible

Evolutionists, You’ve Been Caught Lying About Fossils

Raw Streets of NYC Migrant Crisis that they don't show on Tv

Meet DarkBERT - AI Model Trained On DARK WEB

[NEW!] Jaw-dropping 666 Discovery Utterly Proves the King James Bible is God's Preserved Word

ALERT!!! THE MOST IMPORTANT INFORMATION WILL SOON BE POSTED HERE


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Talk Radio Watch
See other Talk Radio Watch Articles

Title: Rush Limbaugh, Pat Robertson take heat on remarks
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0110/31502.html
Published: Jan 14, 2010
Author: ANDY BAR
Post Date: 2010-01-14 12:44:41 by Bickus Dickus
Keywords: None
Views: 86918
Comments: 183

Rush Limbaugh, Pat Robertson take heat on remarks

Conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh and televangelist Pat Robertson are being scolded for their comments in the immediate aftermath of an earthquake in Haiti that has killed tens of thousands, according to early estimates.

Critics from both the left and right are denouncing their remarks as insensitive to the disaster and attempts to score political points off human tragedy.

Speaking on his radio show Wednesday, Limbaugh said the earthquake has played into Obama’s hands, allowing the president to look “compassionate” and “humanitarian” while at the same time bolstering his standing in both the “light-skinned and dark-skinned black community in this country.”

He added: “We've already donated to Haiti. It’s called the U.S. income tax.”

Limbaugh’s comments were, in part, a riff on Sen. Harry Reid’s (D-Nev.) much publicized remark in a new book that Obama was able to win the election because he is “light-skinned” and lacks a “Negro dialect.”

But regardless of the intended context, Limbaugh’s comments have been widely panned.

“They are deeply insensitive,” said conservative commentator Pat Buchanan on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe.”

“The president speaks for the country when he says we’re going to go in there,” he said. “You want your whole nation, and it’s very positive. And I think Rush’s comments were cynical.”

Sitting next to Buchanan on set, host Joe Scarborough called Limbaugh’s comments “deplorable.”

“The insensitivity is stunning,” said the former Republican congressman.

Liberal commentators also quickly jumped on Limbaugh.

“Limbaugh did not know when to just shut up,” said liberal commentator Keith Olbermann on his MSNBC show “Countdown.” “Today he blamed communism for the poverty of Haiti, blamed President Obama for holding a news conference the day after this cataclysm when he did not hold one after the failed half-assed terror attempt in Detroit.”

John Amato from the left-leaning website Crooks and Liars added that “with thousands of people dead already and as the suffering continues in Haiti, Limbaugh and his ilk only care about one thing: destroying Obama.”

The conservative media watchdog site Newsbusters stepped up to defend Limbaugh, saying his comments were not put in proper context, but very few others are backing the conservative firebrand’s latest controversial remarks.

Click for Full Text!


Poster Comment:

Leave it to the fat, drug-addled pig Limbaugh to try to turn a natural disaster into a political act.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Bickus Dickus (#0)

Robertson's an insane egomaniac as this and so many other of his comments have demonstrated over the years.

Limbaugh's comments might be said to be 'insensitive' but the fact is he's right about how this Administration will use Haiti.

Whats laughable in this column is that lightweight blowhard Olberman's comments. Pot, kettle, black.

Badeye  posted on  2010-01-14   12:56:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: (#0)

Bickus Dickus

Little dick, Olberdink and Amato, a trio of fookin dunces!

Sneakypete, have you ever been married? Said things you later regretted?

Ibluafartsky  posted on  2010-01-14   15:10:31 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Bickus Dickus (#0)

“with thousands of people dead already and as the suffering continues in Haiti, Limbaugh and his ilk only care about one thing: destroying Obama.”

Truth.

Biff Tannen  posted on  2010-01-14   15:39:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Keith Olbermann (#0)

“Limbaugh did not know when to just shut up,” said liberal commentator Keith Olbermann on his MSNBC show “Countdown.” “Today he blamed communism for the poverty of Haiti, blamed President Obama for holding a news conference the day after this cataclysm when he did not hold one after the failed half-assed terror attempt in Detroit.”

Why should Limbaugh "shut up," Keith you sycophantic POS 0bama-moonbat?

Haiti IS a Marxist sh*t-hole, 0bama IS a Marxist sh*t-head AND feckless absentee "Leader," AND tap-dancing ass-clown.

Liberator  posted on  2010-01-14   18:20:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Biffy-Boy Tannen, Bickus Dopus (#3)

“with thousands of people dead already and as the suffering continues in Haiti, Limbaugh and his ilk only care about one thing: destroying Obama.”

Truth.

Lol, "truth"??

0bama-the-Pyromaniac is setting fire to America with his lies, grand theft, and his destruction of the economy, and YOU two flying ass-hats are crying on each others' shoulder over WHAT again? "WAAAAHHH!!! - Limbaugh torched our Kenyan Hopey/Changy messiah!!"

If you two poseurs are so damn heartbroken, instead of pounding the keyboard in between sips of Chamomile Tea, get on a frickin' plane with your checkbooks TO Haiti.

Liberator  posted on  2010-01-14   18:30:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Badeye (#1)

Whats laughable in this column is that lightweight blowhard Olberman's comments. Pot, kettle, black.

Yeah really...Olbermann??? THE paragon of virtue calling out ANYONE?

LOL

Olberdumb has the integrity of a diseased kumquat.

Liberator  posted on  2010-01-14   18:33:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Liberator, Biffy-Boy Tannen, Bickus Dopus (#5)

If you two poseurs are so damn heartbroken, instead of pounding the keyboard in between sips of Chamomile Tea, get on a frickin' plane with your checkbooks TO Haiti.

That would mean leaving momma's basement and their blow-up dolls!

Sneakypete, have you ever been married? Said things you later regretted?

Ibluafartsky  posted on  2010-01-14   18:34:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Ibluafartsky (#7)

That would mean leaving momma's basement and their blow-up dolls!

THAT ain't happenin' - who'd wanna leave THAT Shan-gri-la?

No, I believe the stud-muffins will be content to play it safe at home with Latex Honey I and II.

Plus fake sympathy and whimpering comes cheaply.

Liberator  posted on  2010-01-14   18:46:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Liberator (#5)

You might have noticed that I only posted the article. Why not post your brilliant rebuttal to the author over at Politico?

Since you like to redo people's names, why not call him something really clever by your standards like Candy Barr?

Don't bother to thank me, Lubricator. I'm always happy to help.

Bickus Dickus  posted on  2010-01-14   18:51:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: yukon (#8)

That would mean leaving momma's basement and their blow-up dolls!

Hi, yucktard.

I see you and Mad Dog got back from testifying against Prop 8 in DC all right.

Bickus Dickus  posted on  2010-01-14   18:53:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: Bickus Dickus (#10)

Hi, yucktard.

I see you

Still meth delusional, eh little dick?

Sneakypete, have you ever been married? Said things you later regretted?

Ibluafartsky  posted on  2010-01-14   18:57:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Bickus Dickus (#0)

Leave it to the fat, drug-addled pig Limbaugh to try to turn a natural disaster into a political act.

As it always is, and will continue to be, Rush was only partially quoted and some folks are swallowing the media set up. Rush never advocated NO aid be sent to Haiti, he did advocate that it NOT be sent through governmental agencies. We all know that ONLY pennies on the dollar would actually get through the sticky hands of the bureaucrats. Rush smartly suggested helping those in need in Haiti through private charities … where the donations would be used better, faster and for less money loss to get aid to Haiti. You dudes continually for his scheisse all the time … he loves it and laughs at you.

OriginalGatlin  posted on  2010-01-14   19:06:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: Bickus Dickus (#9)

You might have noticed that I only posted the article.

Excuse me. I thought you were channeling Keith Olbermann with your whiny post about Robertson and Limbaugh....Hmmm, yes you were.

You and I both know I'm right, Bogus Dickus.

Liberator  posted on  2010-01-14   19:12:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: Tater, Bickus Dickus (#12)

he loves it and laughs at you.

You have to excuse little dick, the meth has totally decimated what little sense he had.

Sneakypete, have you ever been married? Said things you later regretted?

Ibluafartsky  posted on  2010-01-14   19:12:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: Liberator (#13)

xcuse me. I thought you were channeling Keith Olbermann with your whiny post about Robertson and Limbaugh

You really are quite deranged. Ever try visiting reality?

Bickus Dickus  posted on  2010-01-14   19:13:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: Tater (#12)

You dudes continually for his scheisse all the time

English translation, please.

Bickus Dickus  posted on  2010-01-14   19:14:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: Tater, Bickus Dickus (#12)

As it always is, and will continue to be, Rush was only partially quoted and some folks are swallowing the media set up. Rush never advocated NO aid be sent to Haiti, he did advocate that it NOT be sent through governmental agencies. We all know that ONLY pennies on the dollar would actually get through the sticky hands of the bureaucrats. Rush smartly suggested helping those in need in Haiti through private charities … where the donations would be used better, faster and for less money loss to get aid to Haiti. You dudes continually for his scheisse all the time … he loves it and laughs at you.

WELL stated.

Deconstructing the lies of the Olbermann-Left, then reconstructing the truth is always a challenge when tutoring room-temperature simian posters.

Liberator  posted on  2010-01-14   19:14:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: Bickus Dickus, Tater (#16)

English translation, please.

HA!

See what I mean?

Liberator  posted on  2010-01-14   19:15:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: Biff Tannen (#3)

“with ... in Haiti, Limbaugh and his ilk only care about one thing: destroying Obama.” >p>Truth.

Liberalism is looked upon as a mental disorder and this sick comment sounds like a fart from some Liberal. You have to twist good intent around to fit your personal agenda. A liberal sounding rubbish remark is boring talk. If you don't like Rush, then pay no attention to him. He has enough followers who like really like him. Don’t flatter yourself into feeling that he needs you.

OriginalGatlin  posted on  2010-01-14   19:17:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: Bickus Dickus (#16)

Scheisse

German word meaning: Shit.

OriginalGatlin  posted on  2010-01-14   19:18:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: Liberator (#18)

HA!

See what I mean?

No, I don't.

Do you want to tell me what this is supposed to mean?

You dudes continually for his scheisse all the time

Bickus Dickus  posted on  2010-01-14   19:19:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: All (#21)

So we dudes continually for his shit.

Right. That makes perfect sense.

Bickus Dickus  posted on  2010-01-14   19:20:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: Liberator (#6)

I've seen nothing from you that ensconces you in a base of moral superiority over anyone. That fact that you would make a personal attack rather than attack Olberman's argument underscores that.

No Stems No Seeds That You Don't Need...

war  posted on  2010-01-14   19:24:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: Liberator (#13)

... You and I both know I'm right ...

Spot right on the bullseye, you are ... make that three.

OriginalGatlin  posted on  2010-01-14   19:24:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: Tater (#12)

Rush was only partially quoted

I can't seem to find the entire quote anywhere...can you provide it?

That asked, how many private charities have at their disposal the hundreds of millions of dollars as well as the vast mechanism requiring thousands of pieces of machinery and thousands of personnel to deliver this aid?

I can't think of one. Can you?

No Stems No Seeds That You Don't Need...

war  posted on  2010-01-14   19:27:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: Bickus Dickus (#22)

So we dudes continually for his shit.

Right. That makes perfect sense.

Calling out re-inforcements, are you?

Stand your ground alone, if you can.

If you buy into the press account then
enjoy your meal!

OriginalGatlin  posted on  2010-01-14   19:28:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: war (#25)

I can't seem to find the entire quote anywhere...can you provide it?

No, I heard him make it ... paraphrased it the best I could ... accurately, I would say.

OriginalGatlin  posted on  2010-01-14   19:29:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: Tater (#26)

Calling out re-inforcements, are you?

No, I'm not. Again, what are you talking about?

Bickus Dickus  posted on  2010-01-14   19:31:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: Tater (#27)

No, I heard him make it ...

That's not good enough. Rush and his apologists have too often claimed that he was misquoted only to be confronted with the stark reality that...wait for it... he wasn't.

On a side note...if you respond to you own post, as Bickus did above, the "To" defaults to "All"///

No Stems No Seeds That You Don't Need...

war  posted on  2010-01-14   19:34:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: war, Tater (#29)

On a side note...if you respond to you own post, as Bickus did above, the "To" defaults to "All"///

Oh, so that's what he meant.

No, Tater, "ALL" isn't my ping list for reinforcements.

Bickus Dickus  posted on  2010-01-14   19:36:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: Bickus Dickus (#30)

No, Tater, "ALL" isn't my ping list for reinforcements.

I understand ... sometimes words relayed do not mean what they are intended to mean ... point made.

OriginalGatlin  posted on  2010-01-14   19:40:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: war (#29)

That's not good enough. Rush and his apologists have too often claimed that he was misquoted only to be confronted with the stark reality that...

Reality ...

Rush has a point on which he is right. The US Government already gives millions upon millions every year to Haiti and it gets stolen by a corrupt government. Haiti could be a tourist hot spot just like the Bahamas, but it isn't because it is so corrupt.

Sure US Dollars will be used to rebuild Haiti, and that is the way it should be … through CONTROLLED and ACCOUNTABLE methods … what will the effect for the effort be. Where will Haiti be one year from now? Corruption needs to be controlled … the money needs to go to the needy … not to rebuild the palatial estates of the corrupt politicians.

Let the money flow THROUGH private charities.

OriginalGatlin  posted on  2010-01-14   19:42:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: Tater (#32)

Let the money flow THROUGH private charities.

You didn't answer the question....WHAT CHARITY is set up for this undertaking?

Also, what makes you believe that a private charity would be MORE effective at avoiding Haitian corruption than the US government?

No Stems No Seeds That You Don't Need...

war  posted on  2010-01-14   19:53:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: Tater, war (#32)

Rush has a point on which he is right.

[1] The US Government [aka the American Taxpayer] already gives millions upon millions every year to Haiti and...

[2] ....it gets stolen by a corrupt government.

[3] Haiti could be a tourist hot spot just like the Bahamas, but it isn't because it is so corrupt.

Point "1": TRUE

Point "2": TRUE

Point "3": TRUE

Sure US Dollars will be used to rebuild Haiti, and that is the way it should be … through CONTROLLED and ACCOUNTABLE methods …

Emergency Relief is one thing...

But I must respectfully disagree with and oppose the notion that there is ANY financial obligation on the part the United States Government to rebuild Haiti at all - from it's capital/mansion, to its Marxist government buildings, to it's giant shanty-town/city.

Let the UN cough monies up from ITS coffers.

Liberator  posted on  2010-01-14   19:57:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: war (#33)

WHAT CHARITY is set up for this undertaking?

Dont' know right off hand ... would need to research ... maybe the Red Cross to start with, and then there some other large ones.

Rush was questioned by a caller as to why he should go through the Obama administration to make a donation to the Red Cross and Rush expounded on that thought. I got the idea that the caller should go directly to the Red Cross.

Also, the caller said his mother was headed to Haiti to help out. Rush did not discourage that nor did he in any way discourage people making donations to non- Obama administration controlled charities.

OriginalGatlin  posted on  2010-01-14   19:58:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: war, Tater (#33)

WHAT CHARITY is set up for this undertaking?

International Red Cross, the UN - whatever.

The US Government is NOT a chartered "Charitable Organization"; It's a Republic.

Also, what makes you believe that a private charity would be MORE effective at avoiding Haitian corruption than the US government?

NOT the problem of the US Mercenary Force.

Liberator  posted on  2010-01-14   20:00:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: Liberator, war (#34)

Rush has a point ...

I saw Rush as warning his listeners not to be taken in by the Obama administration by going to WhiteHouse.gov, as Obama instructed, to make donations to Haiti earthquake relief.

Why does Obama want this channeled through the White House … to increase the names on their mailing list for donations and ….

I too would feel concern for any accountability of the donations made there … where would those donations wind up in the Obama administration?

I feel it was that concern that that was addressed ... while it prompted his remark that has been taken out of context and used to smear Rush.

OriginalGatlin  posted on  2010-01-14   20:02:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: Tater'war (#35)

Rush was questioned by a caller as to why he should go through the Obama administration to make a donation to the Red Cross and Rush expounded on that thought. I got the idea that the caller should go directly to the Red Cross.

The 0bama Administration is about NOTHING BUT Power & Control; Control & Power.

If the caller prefers that his/her check get cashed by Red Cross, then WTF is 0bama's hand doing out??

Liberator  posted on  2010-01-14   20:03:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: Tater (#37)

I saw Rush as warning his listeners not to be taken in by the Obama administration by going to WhiteHouse.gov, as Obama instructed, to make donations to Haiti earthquake relief.

Good for him...

Why does Obama want this channeled through the White House … to increase the names on their mailing list for donations and ….

That's all these people ever do - harvest names and money for whatever Leftist ulterior motive Leftists have.

I too would feel concern for any accountability of the donations made there … where would those donations wind up in the Obama administration?

There ya go. ACORN's Favorite Son resides at the WH. Everyone knows it. We know how they operate.

...taken out of context and used to smear Rush.

It's gone on for ages.

This is why I believe Rush Limbaugh is still effective and a major asset to conservatism - BECAUSE the Left is still obsessed with attacking him every which way.

Liberator  posted on  2010-01-14   20:09:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: Liberator, war (#38)

Rush did make the point that throwing money at the problems in Haiti has not worked because of thievery by dictators who've run Haiti and a failure to focus on self-reliance with the charitable work.

Rush did not tell people not to help the Haitians.

OriginalGatlin  posted on  2010-01-14   20:12:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  



      .
      .
      .

Comments (41 - 183) not displayed.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com