United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: What is the textbook definition of a democrat
Source:
[None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Nov 11, 2018
Author: Definition
Post Date: 2018-11-11 11:27:06 by A K A Stone
Keywords: None
Views: 6580
Comments: 68
Democrat noun 1. A murderer of innocent children. 2. A person who is attracted to someone of their same sex. 3. A thief that wants to live off of someone else's labor. Feels a sense of entitlement to others labor. 4. An anti christian bigot who hates God and morals. 5. Someone who cuts off or has someone cut off their penis because they are mentally ill and do not know their own sex.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: A K A Stone (#0)
I loathe democrats just a little bit more than republicans. But there is no reason to make-up stupid, useless and offense definitions and post to a thread. Your own actions are destroying this chit-chat channel as people realize you are wasting their time.
Yeah God haTing Egomaniac criminal - weirdos Axis of devils - freaks ThaT's iT If you ... don't use exclamation points --- you should't be typeing ! Commas - semicolons - question marks are for girlie boys !
Democrat, n. A registered member of the Democratic Party of the United States. (which I am not). Here are the aspects about Democrats that are more favorable to them: (1) Favor policies that provide a safety net for the poor, working and middle classes, such as: - Social Security - Medicare - Universal Public Schooling - Medicaid - Must-treat mandates for people with life-threatening problems who present themselves at emergency rooms - Housing initiatives for the poor - Food stamp and school meal programs for the poor. - Student aid - Home heating assistance for the elderly - Disability benefits - Unemployment benefits. Republicans generally oppose the social safety net. (2) Favor workers rights and protections, such as: - Minimum Wage laws - Worker's Compensation and Workplace Safety laws - Working hours legislations, including maximum work weeks and time-and-a-half and double- time rules. - Right to form unions. - Maternity leave laws Republicans generally oppose worker protections and rights. (3) Favor anti-discrimination laws, such as - Voting Rights acts - Civil Rights acts - Legal aid for the indigent and for victims of racism Republicaxns g are generally silent on these protections. The above list of distinctively Democratic positions are why they have such broad support in the American public. The issue is not simply that the Democrats support these things, but that the Republicans actively oppose them. This drives many people who would not otherwise be Democrats to join them, because the Republican position is often so repulsive.
You are a filthy paultard liar.
I'm the infidel... Allah warned you about. كافر المسلح
Hmmm ... are you overseeing my discarded chads, now?
The ouTer axis of saniTy AlmosT Touches The axis of liberals - insaniTy ThaT's where The liberTarians hover Love If you ... don't use exclamation points --- you should't be typeing ! Commas - semicolons - question marks are for girlie boys !
To the bleeding hearts and irresponsible they probably would be.
Vegetarians eat vegetables. Beware of humanitarians!
It's sad when yukon's Log Cabin Republican canaries have to brag about being gayer than Ted Kennedy, to get Boris' vote. I don't care what F--keroo says, you're right, excepting I would add a few more to the list. The definition for Democrat can be found in the dictionary under A!
Liberals are like Slinkys. They're good for nothing, but somehow they bring a smile to your face as you shove them down the stairs.
That John Wayne blurb is priceless!
Liberals are like Slinkys. They're good for nothing, but somehow they bring a smile to your face as you shove them down the stairs.
That is a lie. They tax minimum wage earners so that they cannot live without government assistance or someone else helping them. Stealing from people trying to make a living and giving it to others is unchristian and wrong. You may think 50 or 60 percent taxes are ok. But that is because you are a communist hypocrite. Or at least close to a communist mindset.
A ponzi scheme that is like gambling.
They don't give a shit about the poor. They hate the poor. That is why they like abortion. They want the poor to kill themselves.
Not true. A real safety net. Not your version commie lite. You like the state over the individual. You are a statist hypocrite. Walk the walk. Give your stuff away and quit trying to use the force of the government to take away from people who are trying to make ends meet for your Utopian stupidity.
Stone, your reaction to what the Democrats are is the standard Republican response. Democrats are what I wrote. Republicans are what you are. There are more Independents than either Democrats or Republicans, because most people don't like various aspects of what Democrats offer (such as abortion, or anti-military postures, or race pandering, or open-borders policies), and most people find your Republican viewpoint about people, so clearly stated in your four preceding e-mails and the one before that by a different poster, to be quite ugly and wrong. You go on being a Republican. Democrats will go on being Democrats. I'll go on being Independent, because I don't agree with either side. The Democrats have too much bad in their platform, and Republicans are way too evil.
I’m an independent... and you are full of shit. Do some soul searching. You’ve allowed yourself to be indoctrinated left, more than you can see. It’s people like you, blind fuckers who don’t know what they are, that caused me to register independent.
I'm the infidel... Allah warned you about. كافر المسلح
Almost touches The axis of liberals - insanity That’s where the libertarians hover Spot on. The comical thing is, most of the Paultards don’t honestly know how similar they are to the snowflakes.
I'm the infidel... Allah warned you about. كافر المسلح
Adolph Hitler was also an "independent" with his self-proclaimed blitzkrieg; nope, you are a loser, lamer cross-walk guard destined towards no real good deed in life.
A soft, weak, self important... asshole.
I'm the infidel... Allah warned you about. كافر المسلح
Fuck off, 3rd world jungle boy. lol
I'm the infidel... Allah warned you about. كافر المسلح
——————/´ ¯/)
I think you have misspelled, it what you describe is a demorat; although I know how you could make the mistake as democrats seem individually to have similar characteristics. Allegedly a democrat is some one who believes in free speech, somewhat an oxymoron in the way they behave believing that unless you believe as they do you have no right to express an alternative opinion. There are things you cannot say such as; a baby has a right to live migrants must obey the law I can do what I like on my own property I can own a gun
You too. Go right to the heart of the Republican complaints on this board. Now imagine what life would be like if we eliminated, just wiped out, the three largest Democrat programs: Universal Public Education, Medicare and Social Security. Just those three consume the bulk of the government (local + state + federal) budgets of the United States. Poverty relief programs are a drop in the bucket compared to those three things: public education, Medicare and Social Security. If you do the soul searching and come to the conclusion: kill all three, you're a Republican - and you will also see THE issues that are THE reason why you'll always be in the minority. You'll say that it'e because the majority of the country are immoral and greedy and wrong. The majority of the country will say that you think the way you do because you're evil. This is THE battlefield on which Republican majorities always fall out of reach. It's THE reason why conservative Democrats don't change parties, and why Independents don't join the GOP. Republicans are just determined to reduce the middle class to poverty by not educating people and leaving them sick and destitute in old age, unable to retire, forced to work until they die - or to dump old parents into the houses of their children like dependents during the final decade of their lives. Republicans believe their approach to be morally right. Really it's just a love of money that exceeds the bounds of reason (the bulk of Republicans are also dependent on these programs to get their education, their retirement and their health care in retirement, but they seem to have convinced themselves that they can do without.) We lived without those things for thousands of years. Africa lives without them today. Our way, having these things, works better. The first country to adopt them was Germany, and Germany became a powerhouse that took the rest of Europe united, plus us, to bring to heel. We became a superpower and the world's dominant economy with these things. It is simply not true, objectively, that they weaken the country. But Republicans will go on believing it does until the day they die. Which is their right. But it's why they never are able to gain and keep majorities. It's why the Democrats have basically set the primary budgetary agenda since 1934. If Republicans got reasonable about necessary things, they could very easily become the dominant party - there's a whole lot wrong with Democrats. But - as we see right here on this board - Republican minds are not capable of being reasonable. There's something wrong with them. So all they can do is gain temporary advantages on emotional and hot button issues, win an election or two, dilly-dally around the edges, plunge us into debt with huge military spending and overseas adventure, but never be permitted to touch public education, Social Security and Medicare - the primary drivers of the budget - the true necessary target for them if they're going to slash taxes without blowing up the budget and, eventually, the economy, like they've done twice in my lifetime.
Allegedly a democrat is some one who believes in free speech, somewhat an oxymoron in the way they behave believing that unless you believe as they do you have no right to express an alternative opinion. There are things you cannot say such as; a baby has a right to live migrants must obey the law I can do what I like on my own property I can own a gun Yes. These and many other issues are the Democrats' Achilles' Heel. They are totalitarians on social and freedom issues. They want to control speech - unless it's theirs. They don't care about the freedom of religion or the right to keep and bear arms. They don't really care about the Constitution, except when it serves their purposes. They worship at the altar of abortion, and they have made public sexual deviancy into a civil right. They're not at all keen on law and order, or - post Vietnam - national defense. Because of all of these bad traits, Democrats are unable to get a lock on power. Independents like me find them disgusting. Because Republicans are terrible at economics and hate poor people, sick people, old people and anybody they have to spend money on, they're disgusting in their own right. And so the 28% or so who are Republican and the 32% or so who are Democrat take their positions in every election cycle, and the 40% of us who are Independents choose between two bad options, taking a "Shoot the wolf closest to the sled" approach. In general, the key Democratic social programs are so deeply entrenched that a few years of Republican rule - with substantial numbers of Democrats in the Senate and in the judiciary and administrative agencies to slow down or stop any sort of radical elimination program - cannot really touch them. So we can have relative financial irresponsibility under Republican rule but not have to endure the Democrat totalitarianism on religious, speech and personal liberty issues. Once the Republicans fuck up the economy again, as they always do with steep tax cuts uncoupled with spending cuts, we end up putting a Democrat back in their to right them ship. But the Democrats' odious school-marm tone costs them power once things have stabilied. If Democrats weren't such cunts they'd be the permanent majority. The same is true if Republicans didn't hate working people so much. But it is what it is. And that's why Independents decide all American elections, and why neither party gets a lock on power - although Democrats did largely have a lock during a half- century of building the Social Welfare state.
You consider that a true statement? You are a dirty liar. Like the democrat you are. You are not pro life. You were ready to vote for Hillary if Cruz won. Oh fuck you asshole. Liar.
You make stuff up. You know lying. Romney won the independents and lost the election. According to exit polls. You're not an independent. You are an anti christian catholic. You once said don't call you a Christian because you are not. Or something to that affect.
You are a good decent man. Honorable.
Comical.
I like to think so
They had a lock on power when people had nothing, now 64% of voters don't care enough to turn up, but listen to them howl about the result
When have the American people had nothing? This has always been a relatively rich, middle class country. Slaves had nothing, and immigrants fresh off the boat from Ireland and Italy, etc., often started with nothing, but pretty soon they had something, because they were able to easily get jobs and earn money, and farmers were able to easily buy land (something virtually impossible for the poor in crowded, cramped old Europe). People had something, but there was a gaping hole when they got hold or sick. Social Security covered that. The first universal public school system in the world, for both sexes, was Massachusetts Bay colony, and it was a fantastic success. New England may have been rustic and very much a farmer-and-tradesman society in the 1600s and 1700s, but it was also the most educated place on the planet, with a higher literacy rate than London or Paris or Rome. That New England model spread from there to the Midwest by way of the Northwest Ordnance, which partition one- thirty-sixth of the land specifically for public education purposes. Americans, more than any other people, have mostly always had something, mostly always been "middle class" by the standards of the time. They always "had something". And were relatively well-educated. It was a well-educated middle class population that voted for Social Security and Unemployment benefits and Medicare, because we decided we needed it.
I give you exhibit A: the Republican on his home turf, expressing the way he feels. This is why you are not, and never will be, the majority. You drip hatred. People don't like that. Whoever doesn't think like you is a liar and an asshole, according to you. When you Republicans do this, you drive people over to other side. It's why you're so hated.
If the KKK, NAZI's and the commie's had a child it would be a Demoncrat! They are still stuck in eugenics and this time its to murder off the white races. The religion they wish to destroy is Christianity because it gives hope to the people they are genociding. They are still using the politics of identity politics. Everything is pushed by intellectuals ie college professors. Its the same old shit, from the same old people just different day!
LIar. You are a liar because you lied and said republicans hate poor people. It is ok to call a liar a liar. Ok liar!
Libtards socialist and Paultards might false propagate this concept, to further their enabling agenda... and I’m sure I come off as a hater of poor people. The fact of the matter is, I HATE SHEEP that rely on others to survive, that don’t need to. I saw your post... good post.
I'm the infidel... Allah warned you about. كافر المسلح
But you DO hate poor people. Their poverty is THEIR fault - THEIR laziness, THEIR irresponsibility - never mind disability or disease or old age or all of the other aspects of life that cause people to be of modest means. You call Social Security, Medicare and Universal Public Education THEFT, because they are paid for by taxes. Without those three pillars, the levels of destitution and suffering and poverty in America would rise to the levels that we had before those things, and to the levels of those parts in the world that still don't have those things. You say "Trust God." Well, yes, and God sent a Savior who TOLD US that we would be judged by how we looked after the old, the infirm, the sick, the orphan and the prisoner. Note, please, the PRISONER - the people who get punished, even if they deserve it: we are not exempt from taking care of them too, according to Jesus, and he's merely the Son of God. NOPE, you say, no social welfare - that's THEFT (what a lie!) and that's contrary to God (another whopping lie!), and then you round on me for saying what God explicitly said, and call ME the liar (yet ANOTHER lie!). And how you RAGE about it! How you kick at the goad! The truth is, the reason that your party stays in the minority is because of common sense and human charity - the NEED for social welfare, and the cool, dispassionate logic as to why - versus your raging hatred against those who support it. You call us thieves, liars, people who are against God. How you roar! And your fellow hyenas pick up the chorus with you, right on this thread. They agree: KILL Social Security! KILL Medicare and Medicaid! KILL Public Education! All that expensive stuff is paid for by taxes, and it's all THEFT! HATE the weak! Damned sheep! There's a great big stinking turd of a lie laid down by you guys right in the middle of the table. Everybody sees it, and it makes people draw back from you. It's WHY you're the minority, and will stay there.
Don'T forgeT AgainsT free speech Too ATTacking the news Puke Ps You're a personificaTion Of the euro model Top heavy sTaTisT FeeT of Toes of clay
If you ... don't use exclamation points --- you should't be typeing ! Commas - semicolons - question marks are for girlie boys !
I’m don’t buy the whole European social model. Feet of clay? Not hardly.
Comments (41 - 68) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#2. To: A K A Stone, recycled bushbot, mittens fanboi, *The Two Parties ARE the Same* (#0)
> 
#3. To: A K A Stone (#0)
(Edited)
boris
#4. To: A K A Stone (#0)
#5. To: buckeroo (#1)
I loathe democrats just a little bit more than republicans.
#6. To: GrandIsland (#5)
You are a filthy paultard liar.
#7. To: GrandIsland (#5)
(Edited)
boris
#8. To: Vicomte13 (#4)
the Republican position is often so repulsive.
#9. To: BorisY, Fire Island NYC Republicans (#7)
#10. To: A K A Stone (#0)
#11. To: hondo68 (#9)
#12. To: Vicomte13 (#4)
1) Favor policies that provide a safety net for the poor
#13. To: Vicomte13 (#4)
Social Security - Medicare
#14. To: Vicomte13 (#4)
Housing initiatives for the poor - Food stamp and school meal programs for the poor. -
#15. To: Vicomte13 (#4)
Republicans generally oppose the social safety net.
#16. To: A K A Stone (#15)
#17. To: Vicomte13 (#16)
You go on being a Republican. Democrats will go on being Democrats. I'll go on being Independent
#18. To: BorisY (#7)
The outer axis of sanity
#19. To: GrandIsland (#17)
I’m an independent.
#20. To: A K A Stone (#0)
What is the textbook definition of a democrat
#21. To: buckeroo (#19)
#22. To: GrandIsland (#21)
—————--/—-/
—————-/—-/
———--/´¯/'--'/´¯`•_
———-/'/--/—-/—--/¨¯
——--('(———- ¯~/ '--' )
———————-'—--/
———-''————_-•´
———————--(
#23. To: GrandIsland, Bingo Bango Bongo Independents, Fred Mertz, buckeroo (#21)
#24. To: A K A Stone (#0)
#25. To: GrandIsland (#17)
Do some soul searching.
#26. To: paraclete (#24)
(Edited)
I know how you could make the mistake as democrats seem individually to have similar characteristics.
#27. To: Vicomte13 (#26)
Because Republicans are terrible at economics and hate poor people, sick people, old people and anybody they have to spend money on, they're disgusting in their own right.
#28. To: Vicomte13 (#26)
But it is what it is. And that's why Independents decide all American elections
#29. To: paraclete (#24)
#30. To: Vicomte13 (#26)
nd the 40% of us who are Independents
#31. To: A K A Stone (#29)
#32. To: Vicomte13 (#26)
#33. To: paraclete (#32)
They had a lock on power when people had nothing, now 64% of voters don't care enough to turn up, but listen to them howl about the result
#34. To: A K A Stone (#27)
You are a dirty liar. Like the democrat you are. You are not pro life. You were ready to vote for Hillary if Cruz won. Oh fuck you asshole. Liar.
#35. To: A K A Stone, All (#0)
#36. To: Vicomte13 (#34)
Whoever doesn't think like you is a liar
#37. To: A K A Stone (#36)
(Edited)
You are a liar because you lied and said republicans hate poor people.
#38. To: A K A Stone (#36)
(Edited)
You are a liar because you lied and said republicans hate poor people.
#39. To: Vicomte13 (#38)
(Edited)
boris
#40. To: BorisY (#39)
.
.
.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]