[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
United States News Title: [Just in case you weren't watching] Woman Who Claimed Brett Kavanaugh Raped Her Now Admits She Never Met Him During his highly contentious confirmation hearings before the Senate Judiciary Committee, several women came forward and made 11th hour and uncorroborated claims against now-Justice Brett Kavanaugh claims he had sexually assaulted them, committed sexual misconduct or witnessed sexual assaults against other women. The most prominent of those to make claims against the then-Supreme Court nominee was California psychologist Dr. Christine Blasey Ford, who said that back in the early 1980s when both she and Kavanaugh were teens in the Washington, D.C., area, the judge committed sexual misconduct against her. In highly publicized hearings, Blasey Ford appeared before the judiciary committee and testified under oath. Throughout the process, Kavanaugh a married father of two daughters and a highly respected judge on the Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit vehemently denied all such accusations and maintained his innocence. Ultimately, evidence was lacking and people identified as witnesses said they witnessed no such actions or knew nothing about them. And 89 days after President Donald Trump nominated Kavanaugh to the nations highest court, he was confirmed by the Senate, on Oct. 6, 2018, by a vote of 50-48. Now, a woman who claimed Kavanaugh raped her admits the two never even met, as LifeNews.com and other outlets reported late on Friday afternoon. The individual, identified as Judy Munro-Leighton, has revealed her actions were part of a ploy to take down Kavanaughs nomination, that outlet noted. Late on Friday, Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa)(shown above right), chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, sent a letter to the Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation about the fabricated allegations received by the committee and referred the individual for criminal prosecution. As you know, the Senate Judiciary Committee processed the nomination of Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh to serve as an Associate Justice on the Supreme Court of the United States, leading to his eventual confirmation on October 6, 2018, the letter says early on, in part. As part of that process, the Committee has investigated various allegations made against Judge Kavanaugh. The Committees investigation has involved communicating with numerous individuals claiming to have relevant information. While many of those individuals have provided the Committee information in good faith, it unfortunately appears some have not
I am writing to refer Ms. Judy Munro-Leighton for investigation of potential violations of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1001 (materially false statements) and 1505 (obstruction), for materially false statements she made to the Committee during the course of the Committees investigation. The letter continued, On September 25, 2018, staffers for Senator [Kamala] Harris [of California], a Committee member, referred an undated handwritten letter to Committee investigators that her California office had received signed under the alias Jane Doe from Oceanside, California. The letter contained highly graphic sexual-assault accusations against Judge Kavanaugh. CONSTITUTIONAL FREEDOMS During his highly contentious confirmation hearings before the Senate Judiciary Committee, several women came forward and made 11th hour and uncorroborated claims against now-Justice Brett Kavanaugh claims he had sexually assaulted them, committed sexual misconduct or witnessed sexual assaults against other women. The most prominent of those to make claims against the then-Supreme Court nominee was California psychologist Dr. Christine Blasey Ford, who said that back in the early 1980s when both she and Kavanaugh were teens in the Washington, D.C., area, the judge committed sexual misconduct against her. In highly publicized hearings, Blasey Ford appeared before the judiciary committee and testified under oath. Throughout the process, Kavanaugh a married father of two daughters and a highly respected judge on the Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit vehemently denied all such accusations and maintained his innocence. Ultimately, evidence was lacking and people identified as witnesses said they witnessed no such actions or knew nothing about them. And 89 days after President Donald Trump nominated Kavanaugh to the nations highest court, he was confirmed by the Senate, on Oct. 6, 2018, by a vote of 50-48. Now, a woman who claimed Kavanaugh raped her admits the two never even met, as LifeNews.com and other outlets reported late on Friday afternoon. The individual, identified as Judy Munro-Leighton, has revealed her actions were part of a ploy to take down Kavanaughs nomination, that outlet noted. Late on Friday, Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa)(shown above right), chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, sent a letter to the Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation about the fabricated allegations received by the committee and referred the individual for criminal prosecution. As you know, the Senate Judiciary Committee processed the nomination of Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh to serve as an Associate Justice on the Supreme Court of the United States, leading to his eventual confirmation on October 6, 2018, the letter says early on, in part. As part of that process, the Committee has investigated various allegations made against Judge Kavanaugh. The Committees investigation has involved communicating with numerous individuals claiming to have relevant information. While many of those individuals have provided the Committee information in good faith, it unfortunately appears some have not
I am writing to refer Ms. Judy Munro-Leighton for investigation of potential violations of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1001 (materially false statements) and 1505 (obstruction), for materially false statements she made to the Committee during the course of the Committees investigation. The letter continued, On September 25, 2018, staffers for Senator [Kamala] Harris [of California], a Committee member, referred an undated handwritten letter to Committee investigators that her California office had received signed under the alias Jane Doe from Oceanside, California. The letter contained highly graphic sexual-assault accusations against Judge Kavanaugh. MORE FROM LIFEZETTE The anonymous accuser alleged that Justice Kavanaugh and a friend, the letter continued, had raped her several times each in the backseat of a car. In addition to being from an anonymous accuser, the letter listed no return address, failed to provide any time frame, and failed to provide any location beyond an automobile in which these alleged incidents took place. Regardless, Committee staff quickly began investigating the claims as part of the broader investigation, hindered by the limited information provided. On September 26, 2018, Committee staff questioned Judge Kavanaugh about these allegations in a transcribed interview conducted under penalty of felony, the letter continued. Kavanaugh unequivocally denied all such claims and called them ridiculous. He said that nothing of the kind ever happened. Under questioning by Committee investigators, the letter continued, Ms. Munro-Leighton admitted, contrary to her prior claims, that she had not been sexually assaulted by Judge Kavanaugh and was not the author of the original Jane Doe letter. When directly asked by Committee investigators if she was, as she had claimed, the Jane Doe from Oceanside, California, who had sent the letter to Senator Harris, she admitted: No, no, no. I did that as a way to grab attention. I am not Jane Doe
but I did read Jane Does letter. I read the transcript of the call to your Committee
I saw it online. It was news. She further said, as the Grassley letter indicated, that (1) she just wanted to get attention; (2) it was a tactic; and (3) that was just a ploy.' His letter also noted, In short, during the Committees time-sensitive investigation of allegations against Judge Kavanaugh, Ms. Munro-Leighton submitted a fabricated allegation, which diverted Committee resources. Grassley also referred Julie Swetnik, Michael Avenatti and an unnamed man for criminal prosecution after they made false claims to congressional investigators, as Townhall and other outlets also noted. There is a lot more. GOTO: https://www.lifezette.com/2018/11/woman-who-claimed-brett-kavanaugh-raped-her-now-admits-she-never-met-him/ Incredible story. The waste that Diane Feinstein created within and about our nation is why I don't live here anymore. FUCK THE POLITICAL PARTIES.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 22.
#2. To: buckeroo (#0)
What? Who? When? WTF kind of gobbledygook is that?
https://heavy.com/news/2018/11/judy-munro-leighton-5-fast-facts-you-need-to-know/ At the link are images of the handwritten Jane Doe letter, the typewritten Judy Munro-Leighton typewritten letter claiming to be the author of the Jane Doe letter, and Grassley's letter of referral for criminal prosecution. Now she tells investigators she was not Jane Doe.
So when she said, "No, no, no. I did that as a way to grab attention. I am not Jane Doe", she meant her claim that she was Jane Doe was false. Meaning the original Jane Doe and the original accusations are still out there.
And her typewritten letter suffices to establish her criminal misconduct.
And what criminal misconduct was that? She said she was Jane Doe ... then retracted that statement. How many people walked into the San Francisco police station in the late 60's claiming to be the Zodiac killer? Happens all the time in high profile cases.
How many people walked into the San Francisco police station in the late 60's claiming to be the Zodiac killer? Happens all the time in high profile cases. She now alleges she sent a letter falsely claiming to be Jane Doe. Walking into a San Fran police station and making a false statement to officer Clancy is not a crime. Making a false statement to Federal officials, to include senators, is a felony. It is what Martha Stewart went to prison for. https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2018-11-02%20Kavanaugh%20Report.pdf 414 pp. Senate Report at page 28: 84 18 U.S.C. § 1001 and § 1505. At page 26: On September 25, 2018, Senator Harriss staff referred a handwritten letter to the Committee signed by Jane Doe. Senator Harriss San Diego office received the letter; however the envelope listed no return address. According to the letter, Justice Kavanaugh, with the help of a friend, sexually assaulted Doe while driving her home from a party. Doe claimed that Justice Kavanaugh slapped her, forced her to perform oral sex, and groped her. Doe also claimed that both men raped her several times each and that Justice Kavanaugh warned her that no one would believe her if she reported the incident. The author did not provide the year or any location (city, state, or country) in which this incident allegedly took place. Because the authors identity was unknown, the Committee was only able to interview Justice Kavanaugh regarding the allegations. He denied ever engaging in the misconduct described. After the Committee released the transcript of the interview with Justice Kavanaugh, a woman named Judy Munro-Leighton sent an email to the Senate Judiciary Committee claiming to be Jane Doe. She included a version of the letters text and said she felt compelled to contact the Committee because she refuse[d] to allow Donald J. Trump to use me or my story as an ugly chant at one of his Republican rallies. The Committee quickly concluded that Munro-Leighton was unlikely to be the author. The text of the letter in Munro-Leightons email to the Committee differed from the original handwritten letter in several respects, including punctuation and the omission of a duplicate instance of the word and. Committee investigators determined that the text from Munro-Leightons email was, however, identical in all respects to the previously publicly released transcript from the telephonic interview, suggesting she copied it from the press. Investigators also examined Munro-Leightons background and determined she was a liberal activist who resided in Kentucky, far from the location of the letters San Diego postmark. Committee investigators tried to contact her on multiple occasions. On November 1, 2018, Munro- Leighton called back and admitted that she was not Jane Doe and that her email to the committee was just a ploy and that she used it as a way to get attention. Investigators asked her if she had ever met Justice Kavanaugh, to which she replied, Oh Lord, no.
#23. To: nolu chan (#22)
Yes. She claimed to be Jane Doe
then later retracted that claim. She wasn't the one who sent the original Jane Doe letter containing the false allegations.
Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest |
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|