Title: "Right Wing" Quinnipiac Poll -- White Voters Disapprove of the HNIC 54% -- 36% Source:
quinnipiac URL Source:http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x1295.xml?ReleaseID=1411 Published:Jan 13, 2010 Author:quinnipiac Post Date:2010-01-13 15:45:31 by dont eat that Keywords:None Views:956 Comments:75
Overall approval only 45%. Even lower than Rasmussen. Now even the left wing pollsters are realizing that only the dregs of society really like this guy any more.
Double digit unemployment, vacationing in Hawaii while its happening, taking months to make a decision on Afghanistan, stimulus bill that was one gigantic payoff to political supporters, tripling the deficit, allowing SEALS to be put on trial in Iraq...Obama will be lucky if he isn't in the 20 - 30% approval range by August.
only the dregs of society really like this guy any more.
45% of the nation is the dregs of society?
That said, Boy Blunder had the benefit of first patriotism and then a semi- decent economy that kept his numbers artifically high...Obama is at the mercy of the economy...always been that way with POTUS'...
and then a semi- decent economy that kept his numbers artifically high
I guess you missed the Dims talking points and the MSM's echoing of them for 2 years leading up to the 2004 election. Bush was hardly given credit for a good economy, even though it was good.
The HNIC bankrupting the country, and that's what he is being given credit for.
As usual, you don't make any sense. In post #5 you say the economy under Bush was good, yet in post 7 you link to articles from 2002 that say just the opposite.
The economy WAS good in late 2003 and 2004 when the the Dims and MSM were trying to blame Boy Blunder for a bad economy.
The MSM never said a bad word about the Boy Blunder and in any number of ways enabled his theft of both the 2000 and 2004 elections and were co-conspirators in the lead up to the Iraq debacle. Hell, they didn't even turn on him in 2008 when his numbers were so far in the Crapper that they sunk the Ty-de-bowl Man...
The one guy who did by telling what most believe to be the absolute truth about Boy Blunder's service record - who scored in the 25%'ile but still managed a spot in the TANG - lost his job over it.
So your Iraq argument is bullshit, like most of what you spew.
Hold on there Tonto...YOU claimed that they preferred Kerry on the economy over Boy Blunder which was wrong. All I claimed was that if the economy hadn;t turned with Iraq in the crapper he'd have lost. So what if they believed the decision was correct? We know what 2004 turned on in key states...a) stealing Ohio and b) moral values in a couple of smaller swing states...
Your talking to a manchild thats insane, you do know that right? 12 years, he's never had anything postive to say about anyone that wasn't an uber Liberal, and a democrat. 12 YEARS. Yet he claims to be a libertarian...course he also claims he's married with kids, and employed.
Don't worry; I know exactly what he is, at least as far as his political leanings and musings. I've seen him around for almost that long myself.
But just so war knows what you wrote:
Your talking to a manchild thats insane, you do know that right? 12 years, he's never had anything postive to say about anyone that wasn't an uber Liberal, and a democrat. 12 YEARS. Yet he claims to be a libertarian...course he also claims he's married with kids, and employed.
He knows. His infatuation with me is well documented at kook central. Christ, he even got himself and 'Imstillright' banned at FR two years ago for spamming my fr email account....(eyes rolling)
The polling firm that USA Today used claims to have given CNN their data as well.
That said, you've done zipola to counter what I said which was...had the economy not turned in 03/04 Boy Blunder would have lost. In other words, padlock, had the economy been WORSE than it was, the economy would have played a BIGGER role in the election than it did.
How can you accept those 2 exit polling facts and the notion that Bush won because of there was the perception of a good economy?
It wasn't a significant enought plurality to swing the election, padlock.
The point is, what if, instead of 20% of the voters believing that the economy was an issue, 40% did, accepting your [unestablshed] distribution of what voters found "important"?
he even got himself and 'Imstillright' banned at FR two years ago for spamming my fr email account....(eyes rolling)
But weren't you repeatedly posting his real life name, like the fucking asshole you are. How do you justify that bullshit behavior? Don't bother with your dipshit explanation.
Child, please...I asked Sally for 18 months to put an end to this turds constantly posting my name, and photo. Finally told her via the website forum and a dozen emails I would begin 'returning fire in kind' if she didn't stop it. She didn't, I did as I said. Several months later Sally decided to act, banning me and then lying repeatedly about what took place behind the scenes.
I was asked a question and responded by telling the truth...something you have no ability to even comprehend doing online, as we both know. No whing at all. I'm glad I was out of LP before it became Stormfront lite.
I'm glad I was out of LP before it became Stormfront lite.
You could have left at any time. But your life was wrapped up in being the LP poster with the biggest post count. Almost like your post count size was a substitute for something in your life that is lacking.