[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Sorry, CNN, We're Not Going to Stop Talking About the Russian Collusion Hoax

"No Autopsy Can Restore the Democratic Party’s Viability"

RIP Ozzy

"Trump floats 'restriction' for Commanders if they fail to ditch nickname in favor of Redskins return"

"Virginia Governor’s Race Heats Up As Republican Winsome Sears Does a Hard Reboot of Her Campaign"

"We Hate Communism!!"

"Mamdani and the Democratic Schism"

"The 2nd Impeachment: Trump’s Popularity Still Scares Them to Death"

"President Badass"

"Jasmine Crockett's Train Wreck Interview Was a Disaster"

"How Israel Used Spies, Smuggled Drones and AI to Stun and Hobble Iran"

There hasn’T been ... a single updaTe To This siTe --- since I joined.

"This Is Not What Authoritarianism Looks Like"

America Erupts… ICE Raids Takeover The Streets

AC/DC- Riff Raff + Go Down [VH1 Uncut, July 5, 1996]

Why is Peter Schiff calling Bitcoin a ‘giant cult’ and how does this impact market sentiment?

Esso Your Butt Buddy Horseshit jacks off to that shit

"The Addled Activist Mind"

"Don’t Stop with Harvard"

"Does the Biden Cover-Up Have Two Layers?"

"Pete Rose, 'Shoeless' Joe Reinstated by MLB, Eligible for HOF"

"'Major Breakthrough': Here Are the Details on the China Trade Deal"

Freepers Still Love war

Parody ... Jump / Trump --- van Halen jump

"The Democrat Meltdown Continues"

"Yes, We Need Deportations Without Due Process"

"Trump's Tariff Play Smart, Strategic, Working"

"Leftists Make Desperate Attempt to Discredit Photo of Abrego Garcia's MS-13 Tattoos. Here Are Receipts"

"Trump Administration Freezes $2 Billion After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands"on After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands

"Doctors Committing Insurance Fraud to Conceal Trans Procedures, Texas Children’s Whistleblower Testifies"

"Left Using '8647' Symbol for Violence Against Trump, Musk"

KawasakiÂ’s new rideable robohorse is straight out of a sci-fi novel

"Trade should work for America, not rule it"

"The Stakes Couldn’t Be Higher in Wisconsin’s Supreme Court Race – What’s at Risk for the GOP"

"How Trump caught big-government fans in their own trap"

‘Are You Prepared for Violence?’

Greek Orthodox Archbishop gives President Trump a Cross, tells him "Make America Invincible"

"Trump signs executive order eliminating the Department of Education!!!"

"If AOC Is the Democratic Future, the Party Is Even Worse Off Than We Think"

"Ending EPA Overreach"

Closest Look Ever at How Pyramids Were Built

Moment the SpaceX crew Meets Stranded ISS Crew

The Exodus Pharaoh EXPLAINED!

Did the Israelites Really Cross the Red Sea? Stunning Evidence of the Location of Red Sea Crossing!

Are we experiencing a Triumph of Orthodoxy?

Judge Napolitano with Konstantin Malofeev (Moscow, Russia)

"Trump Administration Cancels Most USAID Programs, Folds Others into State Department"

Introducing Manus: The General AI Agent

"Chinese Spies in Our Military? Straight to Jail"

Any suggestion that the USA and NATO are "Helping" or have ever helped Ukraine needs to be shot down instantly


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

United States News
See other United States News Articles

Title: Attack on Gab Proves Speech Was Never Free
Source: Gold Goats ‘n Guns
URL Source: https://tomluongo.me/2018/10/29/att ... -proves-speech-was-never-free/
Published: Oct 29, 2018
Author: Thomas Luongo
Post Date: 2018-10-30 09:28:54 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 3853
Comments: 39

“Who runs Bartertown?!”
— Mad Max: Beyond Thunderdome

The First Amendment protects your right to say whatever you want free from government prosecution.  It does not protect you from saying hateful things on private properties or privately-owned forums without fear of repercussion.

That is the very definition of freedom of association.

Friday’s attack by an unhinged, vile piece of human excrement on a Synagogue in Pittsburgh wasn’t hours old before real world agendas pushed to the top of the news.

Twitter alternative Gab was immediately dropped by PayPal without specific reasons.

Then immediately, Gab’s latest hosting service unilaterally gave the company a 48-hour termination notice of its contract.

GoDaddy is deregistering its domain name with 12 hour notice.  

This is the second time Gab has had to switch providers this year.  They have been denied an app in the iOS store.  Google will not allow their Android app to be in the Play Store.

Why is Gab targeted?

Because Gab is a true alternative to Twitter which exists outside of the control of the financial and political oligarchy. 

With the recent passing of the EU’s “Link Law” which is designed to shut down opposition voices, the merged corporate/political oligarchy are moving to ensure that all speech is criminalized.

But to do that they first have to square the circle around that pesky First Amendment in the U.S.

And that means outsourcing the censorship to the companies who own the Internet access points – the app platforms, the social media giants, the hosting firms and payment processors.

If you can’t build and maintain a business then you can’t oppose their rule.

With apologies to Trey Parker and Matt Stone, “Free Speech isn’t Free… it costs a buck o’ five.”

This is classic barrier-to-entry stuff that the government engages in to protect the market share of the favored companies over their competition.

And despite the roadblocks put up in front of Gab it has continued to grow.

The platform has improved.  I know.  I’ve been a member since 2016 when it was only a haven for the vilest of people.  That early culture drove me away along with its limitations, but then again, I’m pretty bad at this whole social media thing.

But, today that is not the case.  Gab simply doesn’t censor you.  If you want to be a jerk in public, that’s your business.

It doesn’t seem to stop Elizabeth Warren after all.

What content you consume and produce is your responsibility and CEO Andrew Torba has given you those tools to speak freely and freely be ignored.

In fact, the censorship tools are stronger than they are on Twitter.

Gab is more stringent in enforcing its policy to remove speech which is a clear incitement to violence than Twitter is.

And that’s the irony of this.  While the Synagogue shooter was a member of Gab, he also had a Facebook, Twitter and Instagram account.  They did this to Gab because they could and because they were told to.

Gab’s statement about the shooting is public for the world to see.  And they assisted the police in identifying the person responsible.

And yet, Gab will again be off the air, this time for weeks, while it migrates to a new platform, because its existence is a threat to the powerful who are rightly scared of losing their shiny new control platform.

It shouldn’t matter whether you like Gab’s platform or not. Free Speech should always be defended, yes even vile anti-Semetic crap.

Are there terrible people on Gab?  Yes.

Are there terrible people posting horrific things on Twitter?  Oh, you betcha.

Businesses which are paying their bills should be welcomed by service providers.  Hosting a platform is not an endorsement of the content of that platform.  A 48 hour shutdown notice was designed to destroy Gab’s business.

The companies terminating these contracts are doing so because of the pressure from those that want Gab shut down, case closed.  And they are hiding behind their vaguely worded Terms of Service to act unilaterally, in clear breach of all precedent in contract law.

That the hand of The Davos Crowd is behind this move to shut down alternative speech platforms is chilling.

That they are willing to deprive a peaceable man, in this case Gab’s CEO, his right to associate with all who are willing to support him is despicable.

Free Speech is cheap, defending it costs money.   It’s also messy and chaotic.  It means building new systems that prevent this from happening again.

The only people who want to see free speech curtailed are those scared by what people say about them.

Everyone else should be happy vile men like the shooter let everyone know who they are. 

They help us define the limits of our associations.

Those that spend their money supporting platforms like Gab, news outlets like InfoWars or even people like myself are the means by which we break their control.

People like Dave Rubin, Joe Rogan and even Sargon of Akkad have larger audiences now than CNN.  Their credibility gap with the public is massive.

And it will never be crossed.

Moves like this are desperation.  They still think the old rules still rule – that these power brokers still control transmission of information.

Gab will find a new home.  Within hours of their pending de-platforming, another service offered them a home, apparently looking to build a business hosting the unwanted, the maligned and the persecuted.

I’m bookmarking that for future reference.

Governments are like generals, always fighting the last war. Humans are too smart to be kept down for too long.  Someone will always find a way to offer a work-around to an existing problem.

And if the problem is censorship, then the solution is technology. 

That’s what the division of labor is all about.  Gab itself was a reaction to Silicon Valley’s hatred of free speech.  Eventually all of this will be put on a blockchain and paid for outside of the normal banking system if Soros, Zuckerberg, Merkel and the rest of these corporatists continue pushing for total control over speech.

Meanwhile, Gab just had its best couple of days in terms of new accounts ever.

Just like Alex Jones saw interest in InfoWars spike after his un-personing in August.   So, I have no doubt that Gab will survive because as Ron Paul so brilliantly said during his runs for the Presidency, “Freedom is Popular.”

And that freedom is what Twitter and Facebook have forgotten.  They were popular because of their lack of filter.

Their anarchy.

And if there is one thing the government hates is competition.

What is the antithesis to government?  Lack of it.

Everything great in the world was created through voluntary exchange.  Through functional anarchy.

Even if you disagree with this article, you are doing so freely, without any coercion.  All I can do is offer up my best ideas and see if you like them.  I can’t make you read this.

And I don’t do it for free.  I do it because I can’t not do it and feel what I have to say is worth not only your time but your direct support.  And so far more than 210 of you have chosen freely to do just that. For that I am incredibly grateful.

Just like I supported Gab at the outset, sending in donations because I saw this coming.  And I knew that money spent today was a down payment on a world without speech controls tomorrow.

And that’s something we should all shout about at the tops of our lungs.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 15.

#1. To: Deckard (#0)

And yet, Gab will again be off the air

Since the government didn't shut it down, what's the problem? Even the author admits that "(The first amendment) does not protect you from saying hateful things on private properties or privately-owned forums".

misterwhite  posted on  2018-10-30   9:56:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: misterwhite (#1)

Since the government didn't shut it down, what's the problem? Even the author admits that "(The first amendment) does not protect you from saying hateful things on private properties or privately-owned forums".

Walmart is also private.

But that doesn't give them the right to ban blacks or asians. Or whites for that matter.

Business operations that cater to the public do NOT have undisputed legal right to discriminate against people based on their politics.

Pinguinite  posted on  2018-10-30   11:59:06 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Pinguinite (#4)

Business operations that cater to the public do NOT have undisputed legal right to discriminate against people based on their politics.

That is an argument for another thread. I say they DO have that right.

But back to matter at hand. The first amendment is clear -- "Congress shall make no law … abridging the freedom of speech". The 14th amendment extended that to state legislatures, not private businesses.

The Federal Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination by privately owned places of public accommodation on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, sex/sexual orientation, age or disability.

misterwhite  posted on  2018-10-30   15:08:08 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: misterwhite (#5)

That is an argument for another thread. I say they DO have that right.

You are spouting libertarian gobblygook.

I did say they did not have *undisputed* right. It doesn't mean that certain businesses do not have that right.

Some utility companies are private, but that doesn't mean they have a right to cut off water or electric service to people because they don't like the campaign signs in the yard.

It comes down to the issue of balancing one's right to freedom of speech with a business owner's right to restrict business sales to people based on how much he approves of them. On the spectrum of wedding cakes to corporate retailers, the rule changes wildly.

Pinguinite  posted on  2018-10-30   18:05:11 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: Pinguinite (#14)

It comes down to the issue of balancing one's right to freedom of speech with a business owner's right to restrict business sales to people based on how much he approves of them. On the spectrum of wedding cakes to corporate retailers, the rule changes wildly.

How does Pay Pal get away with cutting people off? It should be illegal. They are open to the public or they aren't. That would be consistent with other similar situations.

A K A Stone  posted on  2018-10-30   19:25:20 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 15.

#16. To: A K A Stone (#15)

How does Pay Pal get away with cutting people off? It should be illegal. They are open to the public or they aren't.

They are a PRIVATE business. They can cater to whom ever they choose. You should endorse this.

You are looking at it skewed. Just because the PUBLIC walks into your PRIVATELY owned business, doesn’t mean government can force you to cater. Now, if the PUBLIC walked into a GOVERNMENT funded business, then because the PUBLIC owns it, they must cater to all.

GrandIsland  posted on  2018-10-30 21:57:55 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: A K A Stone (#15)

How does Pay Pal get away with cutting people off? It should be illegal. They are open to the public or they aren't. That would be consistent with other similar situations.

First National Bank, Delta, United Airlines and FedEx dropped the discounts and special offers they awarded NRA members in the wake of the February school shooting in Parkland, Florida.

Should that be legal? Can they do the same to black and Hispanic gang members? Planned Parenthood? The DNC?

misterwhite  posted on  2018-10-31 10:21:14 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 15.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com