LF: State Department provided ‘clearly false’ statements to derail requests for Clinton docs, ‘shocked’ federal judge says

Title: State Department provided ‘clearly false’ statements to derail requests for Clinton docs, ‘shocked’ federal judge says
Source: FromThe Trenches/FOX News
URL Source: http://fromthetrenchesworldreport.c ... cked-federal-judge-says/234958
Published: Oct 18, 2018
Author: FOX News
Post Date: 2018-10-19 06:58:57 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 11773
Comments: 67

In a combative exchange at a hearing Friday in Washington, D.C., a federal judge unabashedly accused career State Department officials of lying and signing “clearly false” affidavits to derail a series of lawsuits seeking information about former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s private email server and her handling of the 2012 terrorist attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya.

U.S. District Court Judge Royce Lamberth said he was “shocked” and “dumbfounded” when he learned that FBI had granted immunity to former Clinton chief of staff Cheryl Mills during its investigation into the use of Clinton’s server, according to a court transcript of his remarks.

“I had myself found that Cheryl Mills had committed perjury and lied under oath in a published opinion I had issued in a Judicial Watch case where I found her unworthy of belief, and I was quite shocked to find out she had been given immunity in — by the Justice Department in the Hillary Clinton email case,” Lamberth said during Friday’s hearing.

The Department of Justice’s Inspector General (IG), Michael Horowitz, noted in a bombshell report in June that it was “inconsistent with typical investigative strategy” for the FBI to allow Mills to sit in during the agency’s interview of Clinton during the email probe, given that classified information traveled through Mills’ personal email account. “[T]here are serious potential ramifications when one witness attends another witness’ interview,” the IG wrote.

On Friday, Lamberth, who was appointed to the bench by President Ronald Reagan, said he did not know Mills had been granted immunity until he “read the IG report and learned that and that she had accompanied [Clinton] to her interview.”

The transparency group Judicial Watch initially sued the State Department in 2014, seeking information about the response to the Benghazi attack after the government didn’t respond to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request. Other parallel lawsuits by Judicial Watch are probing issues like Clinton’s server, whose existence was revealed during the course of the litigation.

The State Department had immediately moved to dismiss Judicial Watch’s first lawsuit on a motion for summary judgment, saying in an affidavit that it had conducted a search of all potentially relevant emails in its possession and provided them. The affidavit noted that some more documents and emails could be forthcoming.

But Lamberth denied the request to dismiss the lawsuit at the time — and on Friday, he said he was happy he did, charging that State Department officials had intentionally misled him because other key documents, including those on Clinton’s email server, had not in fact been produced.

“It was clear to me that at the time that I ruled initially, that false statements were made to me by career State Department officials, and it became more clear through discovery that the information that I was provided was clearly false regarding the adequacy of the search and this – what we now know turned out to be the Secretary’s email system,” Lamberth said Friday.

He continued: “I don’t know the details of what kind of IG inquiry there was into why these career officials at the State Department would have filed false affidavits with me. I don’t know the details of why the Justice Department lawyers did not know false affidavits were being filed with me, but I was very relieved that I did not accept them and that I allowed limited discovery into what had happened.”

During a tense exchange with Justice Department lawyer Robert Prince, Lamberth pressed the issue, accusing Prince of using “doublespeak” and “playing the same word games [Clinton] played.”

That “was not true,” the judge said, referring to the State Department’s assurances in a sworn declaration that it had searched all relevant documents. “It was a lie.”

But Prince pushed back sharply, saying he took the judge’s accusations “extremely seriously.”

“It might be that our search could be found to be inadequate, but that declaration was absolutely true,” he said.

“Now, it’s been made clear in rulings by various courts that, basically, the courts are going to expect us to search items that come in afterward in this instance, and that’s understandable, but at the time, that was not at all clear, you know?” Prince continued. “I understand if Your Honor thinks that the searches that were done up to the motion for summary judgment were inadequate, but being wrong about the search being adequate does not make it a false affidavit.”

Lamberth ultimately conceded that he had “misremembered” some details on the issue.

JW v State Benghazi Talking Points Transcript 01242 1 by Fox News on Scribd

In a statement, Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton, who was present at the hearing, pushed the White House for answers.

“President Trump should ask why his State Department is still refusing to answer basic questions about the Clinton email scandal,” Fitton said. “Hillary Clinton’s and the State Department’s email cover up abused the FOIA, the courts, and the American people’s right to know.”

The hearing was held because Judicial Watch is seeking to compel Clinton and other officials to testify and provide more information as part of its lawsuit.

Clinton has since blamed Republicans and groups like Judicial Watch for derailing her presidential bid in 2016.

“Take the Benghazi tragedy—you know, I have one of the top Republicans, Kevin McCarthy, admitting we’re going to take that tragedy—because, you know, we’ve lost people, unfortunately, going back to the Reagan administration, if you talk about recent times, in diplomatic attacks,” Clinton said on NBC’s “Today” in an interview last year. “But boy, it was turned into a political football. And it was aimed at undermining my credibility, my record, my accomplishments.”

BENGHAZI MASTERMIND SENTENCED TO 22 YEARS IN PRISON ON FEDERAL TERRORISM CHARGES

Four Americans were killed in the attack on the Benghazi embassy, and the Clinton State Department was faulted for ignoring security concerns in the run-up to the attack, contributing to the poor defense posture at the post.

The independent government Accountability Review Board that examined the tragedy concluded there were “systemic failures and leadership and management deficiencies at senior levels” at the department that “resulted in a Special Mission security posture that was inadequate for Benghazi and grossly inadequate to deal with the attack that took place.”

Then-national security adviser Susan Rice claimed on several talk shows that the attack was caused by a YouTube video, even as e-mails uncovered after the fact revealed that administration officials knew the incident was the result of terrorism. Officials at the State Department were stunned by Rice’s appearances, according to the emails, with one State Department employee suggesting Rice had gone “off the reservation.”

Rice has since openly suggested she is considering running against Maine moderate Republican Sen. Susan Collins because of her vote to support Supreme Court Associate Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation. Rice called Collins’ speech announcing her vote a “paean to disingenuousness and incoherence.”

But Collins has downplayed any potential challenge from Rice.

“As far as Susan Rice is concerned, her family has a home in Maine, but she doesn’t live in the state of Maine,” Collins said earlier this month. “Everybody knows that.”

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/state-department-provided-clearly-false-statements-to-derail-hillary-clinton-doc-requests-federal-judge-says

In the Whitewater probe, “In the space of three hours, she claimed, by our count, over a hundred times that she ‘did not recall’ or ‘did not remember,’” Starr wrote.

That will be followed swiftly by an end to the Mueller probe, and the opening of strategically targeted probes to weed out more and more Democrats.

Victory in November is the key to being able to purge the civil service, because it will mean both the defeat of the Democrats AND the defeat of the Republican Never-Trumpers.

What are moral first principles and why can't (D)rumpf and his Chabadnik cult leaders demonstratively articulate them?

I have never wished harder for anything to be true,and to happen. You can't begin to clean up an entrenched corrupt government without bringing serious criminal charges against the corrupt,getting convictions,and then stripping them of all their illegal gain and sending them to federal prisons. THAT will send a message! Not that most will ever see a day in prison because most have multiple citizenships thanks to their corruption that allowed them to have multiple citizenships just in case they were needed. These people will just get on their private jets or private yachts and flee to places like France,where they can't be extradited.

In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

Your wife doesn't know moral first principals. If she had a shred of decency she would have you committed to a mental institution. Kook.

You can make one more comment tomorrow and another one the next day. Have a good day Fred.

I will too, Stone. You are fucking up your own channel with your continual nonsense.

This ain’t no anarchist hump fest site. The site has rules. Unlike LP, I’ve not seen Stone punish any poster who didn’t deserve it.

You may have had a mini-stroke,and not even realize it. You should see a doc for a checkup to be safe.

In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

Then again,you think everybody deserves to be punished,and you probably pay extra for it.

In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

Hillary & Obongo aren't in jail yet, lock her up. IMO, they ain't going to jail ever, the D&R party team protects their own.

If you were consistent, you'd chastise the foul-mouthed cretin and former cop for his abusive scatological posts.

Are you REALLY so stupid you think Trump can just order "Lock her up!",and away she goes?

Neither she nor Bubba will ever be arrested,never mind sent to prison. If some president were to try,the DNC would order their vote for pay voters to riot and kill people in the streets.

In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

I love how you Paultards (who coincidentally were the trash that drove away any and all posters that weren’t Paultards from LP) normalize, trivialize and condone a poster that intentionally, deliberately and knowingly insults and slanders the OWNER of this site.

Do you feel if Fred didn’t like or agree with you, he should be allowed to stand in your living room and tell you to go fuck yourself?

I don’t insult the site owner, regardless if I like him, hate him, agree or disagree with him. It’s his site. If I disagree with him or dislike him enough to say anything like Fred has said, I’d just simply stop fucking posting here.

And just to point out, you Paultards (namely BUCKY) has a history of being banned and finding creative ways to come back and shit all over the site again. So DID YOU, infobuger. What is it with you fucking paultard anarchist assholes, that when you aren’t wanted you can’t grasp that reality?

He’s also stupid enough to not realize that when his choice for president campaigns on what 6% of the American voting populace wants, and this candidate is NOT VIABLE, then all the good things they could do... IS FOR NOT.

The site has become a Trump echo chamber, and you are whining because there are still a few of us here who express viewpoints that frighten you and your cult of personality?

Willie Green, Hondopedo, Dicktard, Jamesfag, vxnazi, and others don't support Trump.

Get your head out of libertarian doo. Wash your face. Quit lying. Quit being a dick. Get out of the buffet of libertarian shit you eat.

So basically your dysfunctional "solution" is to send anybody who dares contradict the opinions and modes of (group)thinking of the emperor and his imperial underwear weavers to the Gulags for reeducation.

Is that how Comrade First Father in law climbed so high on the Soviet manure pile?

You're wrong sir. I should decide who goes to the gulag. Call it individual thought.

I've read that quote at the Jefferson Memorial. Inspiring words. Those words don't support you at any of your causes you push here.

Oh, which "causes" are those, according to the glob of coagulated sand lodging atop your shoulders?

Although that panel does contain clues that lead to the Virginia Act - a mental reprobate like you would more likely take the needle off the compass and use it for a toothpick... rather than use it for any fruitful navigational purpose.

When you stop being an asshole I will put you back to full posting. Have a good day.

I'm not lying. I went to DC last year and made the long walk in the hot sun to Jefferson's Memorial. It was my favorite site as I consider Jefferson the best president or one of the best.

I don't get the impression that (D)onaldo The Magnificent has managed to wobble over there and digest what's written on the walls.

"I HAVE SWORN UPON THE ALTAR OF GOD ETERNAL HOSTILITY TO EVERY FORM OF TYRANNY OVER THE MIND OF MAN"

“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul

“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul