Weird Stuff/Unexplained
See other Weird Stuff/Unexplained Articles
Title: The Wisdom and silliness of Mudboy Slim..! Stupidity too!
Source:
war
URL Source: [None]
Published: Jan 13, 2010
Author: war
Post Date: 2010-01-13 07:47:43 by war
Keywords: None
Views: 1287148
Comments: 3286
Bet this gets more bumps than his vanity threads. (Editors Note) This thread was formerly called Mudbutt sucks the big one thread. I changed the title. Now you can debate if it is wisdom or unwisdom.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 2062.
#2. To: war (#0)
"Packed in Back" Packed in back! Right in the crack This one's soo long It's not really too bad Yes, I'm pullin train For the man.. who runs every thing. I'm a pubbie, I'm a sheeple.. can't make me think on my own Not gonna listen to the proof that I'm shown. Cause I'm with the Prez, till the end. And I whine. Big-time! Re- writin' this song, cause it's an easy rhyme. Cause I'm packed! Yes, I'm Packed! George I'm Packed! Yes, I'm Packed! Well, I'm Paaaaacked! Paaaaacked! Well, I'm Packed in Back! Yes, I'm Packed on Back! Ow! Back with no brain I down a six-pack Save one just for Gannon Rest my lower back. Hand in hand, with a gang If they catch me, I'm a gonna' hang! Cause I'm backin' the Prez and I'm spinning the truth, And I'll blame everybody who's a Democrat. So look at me now, I'm just, uh, makin' my bread, I'm a paid poster, shill, so just get out of my way! Cause I'm packed! Yes, I'm Packed! George I'm Packed! Yes, I'm Packed! Well, I'm Paaaaacked! Paaaaacked! Well, I'm Packed in Back! Yes, I'm Packed on Back! Ow! Well, I'm Paaaaacked! Paaaaacked! Paaaaacked! Paaaaacked! Paaaaacked! Paaaaacked! I'm Mudboy Slim, and I'm Packed in Back!"
BRAVO!!! ENCORE!!!
Thank YOU, war...thankyouverymuch...MUD
Hmmm...purrrFECT...MUD
#2063. To: bayourod, MurryMom, dwbh, Libloather, Catholicguy, Common Tator, George W. Bush (#2062)
From another thread, a discussion about whether or not America should hold Bill Clinton accountable for the multiple felonies he and his Administration have committed... bayourod in bold "...focus only on the question of whether Bill Clinton should be brought to trial. This was the great question when Nixon resigned and Ford pardoned him because he didn't think the nation should be put through the ordeal of a trial of Mr. Nixon." First off, Nixon was never accused of committing a criminal offense vis a vis Watergate. Ford pardoned him, but there was never an actual law broken...I would argue that Clinton has committed multiple felonies that, if prosecuted, would have him in jail until the day he passed on to his Final Judgement. "Some of the considerations should be: While I seriously believe Clinton has most likely conspired to have folks murdered, I've yet to see the concrete evidence; still, just because he's an ex- POTUS, should he be allowed to get away with rampant Abuse of Power, blatant Obstruction of Justice and Perjury, and making a mockery of our existing Campaign Finance Laws? I say no. "2. What was the impact of the crime on the nation? Was the impact negligible like pardoning someone for going AWOL during World War II; or does the crime threaten the very existence of the country, such as selling China the secrets enabling them to destroy every major city in the nation?" As the highest-ranking member of the Executive Branch, IMHO Clinton's crimes have done major damage to the legitimacy of our government, and thereby the "very existence of the country." How can a Blatant Abuser of Our Laws be allowed to go Living--Absolutely Unpunished and ARROGANTLY UNASHAMED--in a Land that claims that NO MAN IS ABOVE THE LAW?! Explain that to the teenager imprisoned for smoking a weed in his basement. "3. How strong is the evidence? Is it circumstantial, relying on the testimony of dubious witnesses; or is there incontrovertable physical evidence such as video recordings and records written in Bill's hand?" The arrogance Clinton has displayed in committing multiple felonies has resulted in a carelessness that will bear fruit in any SERIOUS investigation of his crimes. There are many, many people within his sphere of influence who know where the skeletons are buried, and they have likewise committed crimes in his service. As these underlings are brought to Justice and plead out, they will provide valuable testimony linking Clinton to any number of crimes that you and I may never even been aware of. And Clinton has been extremely sloppy in leaving documented proof of his guilt to be readily discovered by hungry RELENTLESS investigators. "4. Was the offense committed as an official act, such as selling seats on trade missions, or was it entirely separate from official duties, such as rape?" SHEEESH, my FRiend, I cannot believe you actually believe this is a consideration. We are a Nation of Laws, and if those laws are legitimate enough to prosecute you or me for, why not some hayseed from Arkansas? "5. Would prosecution cause bitter division among Americans because the offense is one that people hold strongly held opposite opinions on, such as lying about having sex because that's what gentlemen are taught to do; or one that everyone is in agreement on, such as using FBI files to blackmail elected officials?" Once again, if folks are going to argue that the Laws are invalid, how come we don't see an uprising calling for said laws to be revoked, so that you and I cannot be held accountable for them, just like the ex-Most Powerful Man in the FReeWorld?! "6. How would prosecution effect future policy. Would it create a public outcry for campaign finance reform that would result in destruction of our First Amendment rights and turn the government over to liberal Democrats? Would it appear to Democrat voters as petty vindictiveness on the part of Republicans that would result in such a backlash that Democrat Senators would be forced to reject confirmation of pro-life judges?" Here, my FRiend, you are arguing political strategy. Fair enough, as that seems to be most FReepers' argument against holding the ex-First Felon accountable for his many crimes against this Nation. My response is that this is a very important time in our Country's history, as we are deciding whether or not We the Sheeple will sit idly by and allow Rampant Corruption to go on at the highest echelons of the Federal Guv'ment, and do absolutely NOTHING!! SHEEESH... Clinton's not a frickin' KING...he's no different than you or I!! (emphasis MUDZ) Are LeftWing DemonRATS going to actually argue that a corrupt ex-POTUS should be allowed to get away with committing multiple felonies? If so, are the Sheeple going to go along meekly and support those same hopelessly-corrupt individuals in the next election? If so, we've already lost this Country, and we should readily expect to go the way of the once-great Roman Empire. "Now to answer your question. I believe we elected a President who is of extremely high moral character who loves this country and is trying as hard as he can to do what he sincerely believes is best for our nation. I believe that he chose an honest, conscientious, competent Attorney General. I have complete confidence in their judgment and will support whatever decisions that they make." Here, my FRiend, we are in complete agreement...however, I believe Dubyuh and Ashcroft need to hear from folks who "sincerely believe [what] is best for our nation" is that the Guilty--no matter how Powerful or allegedly popular-- are brought to Justice!! Are we a Nation of Laws? Or are certain folks in this Country ABOVE the Laws that govern and restrict the rest of us?! Seriously, my fellow FReepers, am I just a Right-Wing Whacko for expecting the Laws of this Nation to apply to ALL Americans...even those who once held office at the highest echelons of our Federal Guv'ment?! FReegards...MUD 1 Posted on 07/14/2001 23:39:12 PDT by Mudboy Slim BWAHAHAHAHA...Argh'yoo'n to the Contrary is FUTILE!!! But MUD welcomes yer attempts...)8^D!! 14 posted on Wednesday, September 11, 2002 12:17:02 PM by Mudboy Slim
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
(Sung to AC/DC's "Back in Black")
#4. To: Fred Mertz (#2)
#2032. To: war (#4)
Comments: 2031
#2062. To: All (#2032)
Comments: 2031
Comments: 2061
Replies to Comment # 2062.
1. How serious was the offense? Was it a technical violation such as comingling union contributions in hard money accounts; or was it a universally recognized crime such as murder of a potential witness?"
(Justice 4 All!!!)
End Trace Mode for Comment # 2062.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]