How about showing us some of Wood_Chopper's posts that you've used to deduce he's an "Obamabot"?
Mud's calling me an "Obamabot" is the typical kneejerk reaction of the shills that litter the internet framing everything into the RAT vs. PUB false argument, hoping the useful idiots will follow.
Mud and the rest of them have confused "manliness" with "gentlemanliness"
Under Mud's definition, a "manly man" would never call a woman a "dickhead".
I have to wonder where that places the crew of the Enola Gay in Mud's world, considering what they did to women and childen went a bit further than calling them "dickheads". I think they showed great manliness. Mud evidently doesn't.
"Gentlemen" wear ruffled cuffs and sip their tea with their little fingers raised.
"Mud's calling me an "Obamabot" is the typical kneejerk reaction of the shills that litter the internet framing everything into the RAT vs. PUB false argument, hoping the useful idiots will follow."
Yer correct that my use of the word "Obamabot" was a knee-jerk reaction, and I will retract it fer the time being. However, you are wrong to deduce that this is RAT vs. Pubbie, as the RINOs have been in on this whole BigGuv'ment expansionism, too. I am very clear that this is about Right vs. Left/Wrong...it's about proponents of Constitutionally-mandated limited centralized government versus those who believe the Federal Leviathan is within its rights to regulate every aspect of American life, then demand that we give them whatever they demand to pay fer their wonderful "advice".
"...is within its rights to regulate every aspect of American life"
"Such as whom we may marry? When we may reproduce? THOSE aspects?"
Whom we can marry, eh? Can you marry yer mom, war? Can you marry yer sister? Can you marry yer cousin? No, you can't.
Marriage has always been defined as the joining of one man and one women fer better or fer worse. Why you RATS would wanna change that continues to baffle me. And regarding reproductive rights, at some point in the human gestation period, you gotta agree that we are talking about the God-given RIGHTS of two individuals, not just one...MUD
and thus have privileges afforded to others? Exactly what gets eroded? Your sense of outrage at something that is none of your g@@@ business?
This is where these filthy punks just go completely off the rails ....... it IS my business when 2 queers want to get hitched and the resultant "priveleges" cost ME money.
....because that is probably the bulk of the faggots whole agenda is to have everything from government pension survivor benefits, SS survivor to welfare to whatever other gov't theft programs these pigs can get their hands on.
Just what the ailing economy needs over the next number of years is a few million graying village people driving up SS costs by doubling on SS survivor benfits plus whatever they'd get as single people.
