#21. To: Badeye, Dick Lickus, buckeroo, Biff Tannen, Jhoffa_, A K A Stone (#18)
"Been a while since I engaged kooks..."
Oh, my friend, you are in fer a treat here at the Flame...we've got Mr. Dick Lickus and buckeroo and the ugliest poster on the Web, Biff Tannen. Sometimes, Mr. Hoffa even drops by...LOL!! And while the Forum owner, Mr. Stone, can be a decent chap, he's been known to show his arse on more than one occasion, too.
"...kinda like flies and pulling off the wings, though."
I know, ya gotta love it, don'cha?!!
LOL...MUD
"Devolve Power Outta the Federal Leviathan and Back to the States, Localities, and Individuals as Prescribed in the US Constitution."
How about showing us some of Wood_Chopper's posts that you've used to deduce he's an "Obamabot"?
Mud's calling me an "Obamabot" is the typical kneejerk reaction of the shills that litter the internet framing everything into the RAT vs. PUB false argument, hoping the useful idiots will follow.
Mud and the rest of them have confused "manliness" with "gentlemanliness"
Under Mud's definition, a "manly man" would never call a woman a "dickhead".
I have to wonder where that places the crew of the Enola Gay in Mud's world, considering what they did to women and childen went a bit further than calling them "dickheads". I think they showed great manliness. Mud evidently doesn't.
"Gentlemen" wear ruffled cuffs and sip their tea with their little fingers raised.
(sneakypete)DID Palin say or write these things or not?
"Mud's calling me an "Obamabot" is the typical kneejerk reaction of the shills that litter the internet framing everything into the RAT vs. PUB false argument, hoping the useful idiots will follow."
Yer correct that my use of the word "Obamabot" was a knee-jerk reaction, and I will retract it fer the time being. However, you are wrong to deduce that this is RAT vs. Pubbie, as the RINOs have been in on this whole BigGuv'ment expansionism, too. I am very clear that this is about Right vs. Left/Wrong...it's about proponents of Constitutionally-mandated limited centralized government versus those who believe the Federal Leviathan is within its rights to regulate every aspect of American life, then demand that we give them whatever they demand to pay fer their wonderful "advice".
Regards...MUD
"Devolve Power Outta the Federal Leviathan and Back to the States, Localities, and Individuals as Prescribed in the US Constitution."
#33. To: war, Mudboy Slim, Fred Mertz (#31)(Edited)
is within its rights to regulate every aspect of American life
Such as whom we may marry? When we may reproduce? THOSE aspects?
How so?
Here I assumed you and Freddy were already married. My invitation must have been lost (sigh.)
Would you like to add Freddy's filly to the mix of "aspects"?
You two/three lovebirds have my blessing to "produce" as much methane out of your male "wombs" as you want, WHENEVER you want. Just leave a d@mn barn door open out of respect for LF.
"...is within its rights to regulate every aspect of American life"
"Such as whom we may marry? When we may reproduce? THOSE aspects?"
Whom we can marry, eh? Can you marry yer mom, war? Can you marry yer sister? Can you marry yer cousin? No, you can't.
Marriage has always been defined as the joining of one man and one women fer better or fer worse. Why you RATS would wanna change that continues to baffle me. And regarding reproductive rights, at some point in the human gestation period, you gotta agree that we are talking about the God-given RIGHTS of two individuals, not just one...MUD
"Devolve Power Outta the Federal Leviathan and Back to the States, Localities, and Individuals as Prescribed in the US Constitution."
Here I assumed you and Freddy were already married. My invitation must have been lost (sigh.)
Lib....Jerx does the equestrian thing....geldings are ok in a pinch...studs...now THAT'S what he goes for.....whatever catches him next to the breeding stall come teasing season.
War is probably sexless....or between operations...who wants to know really....
Can you marry yer mom, war? Can you marry yer sister?
You're a meat eater...can you eat your dad?
Thus is the absurdity of your argument.
Marriage has always been defined as the joining of one man and one women...
Marriage has always had the meaning of two being conjoined into one. The fact that it occurs most often between a man and a women does not make the definition of that word dependent upon that condition.
Why should the state stand between two people who want to share their lives and thus have privileges afforded to others? Exactly what gets eroded? Your sense of outrage at something that is none of your goddammed business?
Or is it your fear that should gays be able to marry that you will be somehow vulnerable to a man hitting his knees before you - much as you did with Boy Blunder - and asking for your hand? Is that it Nudge? Gay marriage will result in you marrying a man?
Marriage has always had the meaning of two being conjoined into one. The fact that it occurs most often between a man and a women does not make the definition of that word dependent upon that condition.
Above is pretty darned comical eh MUD?
Conjoined.....dickhead must have gotten that stupid concept off some stupid NPR poem or something.
Following the floorlicker's logic above, history has no defining marriage either.
and thus have privileges afforded to others? Exactly what gets eroded? Your sense of outrage at something that is none of your g@@@ business?
This is where these filthy punks just go completely off the rails ....... it IS my business when 2 queers want to get hitched and the resultant "priveleges" cost ME money.
....because that is probably the bulk of the faggots whole agenda is to have everything from government pension survivor benefits, SS survivor to welfare to whatever other gov't theft programs these pigs can get their hands on.
Just what the ailing economy needs over the next number of years is a few million graying village people driving up SS costs by doubling on SS survivor benfits plus whatever they'd get as single people.
However, you are wrong to deduce that this is RAT vs. Pubbie,
I didn't deduce that this is RAT vs. Pubbie. I said that shills for the two-party-fraud do that.
as the RINOs have been in on this whole BigGuv'ment expansionism, too.
There's no such thing as a RINO. That is a term invented by the two-party-fraud intended to support the illusion that there is a difference between the two "parties", and that the pubbie party "can be taken back from the RINOs" if we just work hard enough.
It can't. There are no RINOs. There are only Republicans.
The REPUBLICANS have been in on this whole BigGuv'ment expansionism, as have the RATS.
(sneakypete)DID Palin say or write these things or not?
Yes...it's for WhineySands...sorry...I have him bozo'd and was reading her comments off of your responses to her. WhineySands is Badeye's wife. Nudge is their child. Some people shouldn't procreate...
The way I will handle stuff like this for now is to change the title.
The problem with that is that you have now made it look like I posted a thread titled, "Fred Mertz Banned from LP for Calling Goldi a Dickhead" when I did not.
AFAIK, Fred Mertz HAS NOT been banned from LP, and I never posted that he was banned from LP.
Changing the name of the thread, without indicating that you did so, makes it look like I'm posting bogus info.
Not good.
(sneakypete)DID Palin say or write these things or not?
#50. To: A K A Stone, Whitesands, Wood_Chopper (#46)
The way I will handle stuff like this for now is to change the title.
So why do you feel it's so imperative to impress Whitesands at the expense of Wood Chopper. Afraid he's going to turn you into the ADL or call you a Stormfronter?
Changing the name of the thread, without indicating that you did so, makes it look like I'm posting bogus info.
Not good.
I skimmed the comments. I thought that was accurate.
Do you have a better title? I mean a 1 line comment by Mertz. That says goldi is a dickhead. That is kind of stupid. If I don't do anything about it then others will come and turn this place into an insult machine and not a serious discussion place. But you do have a good point about it making you look like you chose that title. So come up with a better title please.
Here is something to note for the future. I at least try to keep the title bar somewhat clean. Insults cursing and such in the thread are pretty much ok. I think that is reasonable.
I at least try to keep the title bar somewhat clean.
OK, understood. I thought I put the original title in quote marks, showing it was a quote.
Maybe something like: Fred Mertz to Goldi: "Goldi, you're a ....." for the title.
Lets the reader know that the thread is about a post from Fred to Goldi, keeps bad language out of the title, and makes the reader want to read the thread to find out what Fred called Goldi.
Something like "Title edited by moderator" like you've done solves the other problem.
(sneakypete)DID Palin say or write these things or not?