Opinions/Editorials
See other Opinions/Editorials Articles
Title: Goldi is a................
Source:
http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=281274
URL Source: http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/ ... gi?ArtNum=281274&Disp=156#C156
Published: Jan 12, 2010
Author: Fred Mertz
Post Date: 2010-01-12 23:41:55 by Wood_Chopper
Keywords: None
Views: 13229
Comments: 55
TITLE CHANGED FROM ORIGINAL BY MODERATOR
#156. To: Goldi-Lox (#149)
He will NOT apologize, and thus, will not be back on LP.
Goldi, you're a dickhead.
Fred Mertz posted on 2010-01-12 23:12:43 ET Reply Trace
[Thread Locked] Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-6) not displayed.
.
.
.
#7. To: Wood_Chopper (#5)
Here's an idea...why don't you start your own site and run it so that it becomes The Model Site Of The Free World of Internet Chat Rooms...
No Stems No Seeds That You Don't Need...
That's actually completely within his character.
No Stems No Seeds That You Don't Need...
Did you mean this one for WhiteSands?
(sneakypete)DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Mad Dog's reply) I don't know or F ing care.
Oops...yes I did...
No Stems No Seeds That You Don't Need...
No Stems No Seeds That You Don't Need...
Here's an idea...why don't you start your own site and run it so that it becomes The Model Site Of The Free World of Internet Chat Rooms...
No Stems No Seeds That You Don't Need...
He'll get right back to you war. He's probably busy right now over at LP, posting about something going on at TOS. Either that, or telling Goldi how to run her site.
(sneakypete)DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Mad Dog's reply) I don't know or F ing care.
Okay...I'll hold...
No Stems No Seeds That You Don't Need...
You mean like LP? Stone did get a lot of you retards over here when LP was down. Fortunately, most of you have gone back to Conspiracy Central.
So, Mr./Ms. Chopper, in yer Leftist BizarroWorld, it is considered "manly" to call a woman a "dickhead"? Interesting...even more interesting that you thought this little tidbit of Leftist wisdom was worthy of its very own thread...LOL!! Carry on, you RATbots are fun to watch make fools of yerselves...MUD
"Devolve Power Outta the Federal Leviathan and Back to the States, Oh my, the Obamabots are on the March at Liberty's Flame...ROFLMAO!!
"Devolve Power Outta the Federal Leviathan and Back to the States, Been a while since I engaged kooks...kinda like flies and pulling off the wings, though.
How about showing us some of Wood_Chopper's posts that you've used to deduce he's an "Obamabot"?
I'm still waiting, Muddy.
"Been a while since I engaged kooks..." Oh, my friend, you are in fer a treat here at the Flame...we've got Mr. Dick Lickus and buckeroo and the ugliest poster on the Web, Biff Tannen. Sometimes, Mr. Hoffa even drops by...LOL!! And while the Forum owner, Mr. Stone, can be a decent chap, he's been known to show his arse on more than one occasion, too. "...kinda like flies and pulling off the wings, though." I know, ya gotta love it, don'cha?!! LOL...MUD
"Devolve Power Outta the Federal Leviathan and Back to the States, Wood_Chopper: "Goldi posted about "Men With No Manliness", and will now bounce you for showing some." Mr./Ms. Chopper believes it is manly to call women "dickhead" on a public Forum...that's prototypical Lefty RAT (aka Obamabot) thinking. Regards...MUD
"Devolve Power Outta the Federal Leviathan and Back to the States, Some of us "LP retards" have been here from the git-go, Mr. Lickus...MUD
"Devolve Power Outta the Federal Leviathan and Back to the States, I think I was registered here years ago, just couldn't remember my screen name/code.
Mud's calling me an "Obamabot" is the typical kneejerk reaction of the shills that litter the internet framing everything into the RAT vs. PUB false argument, hoping the useful idiots will follow. Mud and the rest of them have confused "manliness" with "gentlemanliness" Under Mud's definition, a "manly man" would never call a woman a "dickhead". I have to wonder where that places the crew of the Enola Gay in Mud's world, considering what they did to women and childen went a bit further than calling them "dickheads". I think they showed great manliness. Mud evidently doesn't. "Gentlemen" wear ruffled cuffs and sip their tea with their little fingers raised.
(sneakypete)DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Mad Dog's reply) I don't know or F ing care.
Well Muddy I'm still waiting for you to back up your contention that Wood_Chopper is an Obamabot. If you can't do it, why not just STFU instead of calling people names?
What a pair of fookin retards! Sneakypete, have you ever been married? Said things you later regretted?
So far above your commie loving, anti-American ass that if seen, you are barely a speck at the bottom of the outhouse hole. Sneakypete, have you ever been married? Said things you later regretted?
Yer correct that my use of the word "Obamabot" was a knee-jerk reaction, and I will retract it fer the time being. However, you are wrong to deduce that this is RAT vs. Pubbie, as the RINOs have been in on this whole BigGuv'ment expansionism, too. I am very clear that this is about Right vs. Left/Wrong...it's about proponents of Constitutionally-mandated limited centralized government versus those who believe the Federal Leviathan is within its rights to regulate every aspect of American life, then demand that we give them whatever they demand to pay fer their wonderful "advice". Regards...MUD
"Devolve Power Outta the Federal Leviathan and Back to the States, See above...I am distancing myself from said accusation...MUD
"Devolve Power Outta the Federal Leviathan and Back to the States, Such as whom we may marry? When we may reproduce? THOSE aspects?
No Stems No Seeds That You Don't Need...
Thank you.
Such as whom we may marry? When we may reproduce? THOSE aspects? How so? Here I assumed you and Freddy were already married. My invitation must have been lost (sigh.) Would you like to add Freddy's filly to the mix of "aspects"? You two/three lovebirds have my blessing to "produce" as much methane out of your male "wombs" as you want, WHENEVER you want. Just leave a d@mn barn door open out of respect for LF. Thank you - you may now kiss the bride(s).
I believe Chopper was being facetious, with a shot of sarcasm, and dusting of derision.
Do you HAVE to be an asshole? Is it inbreeding? Paint chips? What?
No Stems No Seeds That You Don't Need...
De nada...allegedly, I sometimes git carried away...
"Devolve Power Outta the Federal Leviathan and Back to the States, "Such as whom we may marry? When we may reproduce? THOSE aspects?" Whom we can marry, eh? Can you marry yer mom, war? Can you marry yer sister? Can you marry yer cousin? No, you can't. Marriage has always been defined as the joining of one man and one women fer better or fer worse. Why you RATS would wanna change that continues to baffle me. And regarding reproductive rights, at some point in the human gestation period, you gotta agree that we are talking about the God-given RIGHTS of two individuals, not just one...MUD
"Devolve Power Outta the Federal Leviathan and Back to the States, Lib....Jerx does the equestrian thing....geldings are ok in a pinch...studs...now THAT'S what he goes for.....whatever catches him next to the breeding stall come teasing season. War is probably sexless....or between operations...who wants to know really....
Death to everybody who does not get outta my way.
Are you the "badeye"? The same one that is reviled by all the floorlicking hopey changey dimTARDS from LP whose 5 candlepower "lights" were extinguished? If so, good:) Anyone that crew counts as an enemy is my friend.
Death to everybody who does not get outta my way.
Yep, the one and only....(laughing)
You're a meat eater...can you eat your dad? Thus is the absurdity of your argument. Marriage has always been defined as the joining of one man and one women... Marriage has always had the meaning of two being conjoined into one. The fact that it occurs most often between a man and a women does not make the definition of that word dependent upon that condition. Why should the state stand between two people who want to share their lives and thus have privileges afforded to others? Exactly what gets eroded? Your sense of outrage at something that is none of your goddammed business? Or is it your fear that should gays be able to marry that you will be somehow vulnerable to a man hitting his knees before you - much as you did with Boy Blunder - and asking for your hand? Is that it Nudge? Gay marriage will result in you marrying a man?
No Stems No Seeds That You Don't Need...
Above is pretty darned comical eh MUD? Conjoined.....dickhead must have gotten that stupid concept off some stupid NPR poem or something. Following the floorlicker's logic above, history has no defining marriage either.
Death to everybody who does not get outta my way.
This is where these filthy punks just go completely off the rails ....... it IS my business when 2 queers want to get hitched and the resultant "priveleges" cost ME money. ....because that is probably the bulk of the faggots whole agenda is to have everything from government pension survivor benefits, SS survivor to welfare to whatever other gov't theft programs these pigs can get their hands on. Just what the ailing economy needs over the next number of years is a few million graying village people driving up SS costs by doubling on SS survivor benfits plus whatever they'd get as single people.
Death to everybody who does not get outta my way.
I didn't deduce that this is RAT vs. Pubbie. I said that shills for the two-party-fraud do that. There's no such thing as a RINO. That is a term invented by the two-party-fraud intended to support the illusion that there is a difference between the two "parties", and that the pubbie party "can be taken back from the RINOs" if we just work hard enough. It can't. There are no RINOs. There are only Republicans. The REPUBLICANS have been in on this whole BigGuv'ment expansionism, as have the RATS.
(sneakypete)DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Mad Dog's reply) I don't know or F ing care.
Hey, howzit goin', yukon?
(sneakypete)DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Mad Dog's reply) I don't know or F ing care.
The way I will handle stuff like this for now is to change the title.
Yes...it's for WhineySands...sorry...I have him bozo'd and was reading her comments off of your responses to her. WhineySands is Badeye's wife. Nudge is their child. Some people shouldn't procreate...
No Stems No Seeds That You Don't Need...
Comments (48 - 55) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#8. To: Wood_Chopper (#6)
You came completely out of character.
#9. To: war, WhiteSands (#7)
Here's an idea...why don't you start your own site and run it so that it becomes The Model Site Of The Free World of Internet Chat Rooms...
#10. To: Wood_Chopper (#9)
#11. To: Wood_Chopper (#5)
(Edited)
#12. To: WhiteSands (#3)
#13. To: war, WhiteSands (#12)
(war to whitesands) Here's an idea...why don't you start your own site and run it so that it becomes The Model Site Of The Free World of Internet Chat Rooms...
#14. To: Wood_Chopper (#13)
He'll get right back to you war.
#15. To: WhiteSands (#3)
Unless your intent is to create a Clown Posse site , posters such as Wood Chopper are not they way to build a great site.
#16. To: Wood_Chopper, Fred Mertz (#1)
"Uh-oh Fred. Goldi posted about "Men With No Manliness", and will now bounce you for showing some."
Localities, and Individuals as Prescribed in the US Constitution."
#17. To: Wood_Chopper (#6)
"Get used to it."
Localities, and Individuals as Prescribed in the US Constitution."
#18. To: Mudboy Slim (#17)
#19. To: Mudboy Slim (#17)
Oh my, the Obamabots are on the March at Liberty's Flame...ROFLMAO!!
#20. To: Mudboy Slim (#19)
How about showing us some of Wood_Chopper's posts that you've used to deduce he's an "Obamabot"?
#21. To: Badeye, Dick Lickus, buckeroo, Biff Tannen, Jhoffa_, A K A Stone (#18)
Localities, and Individuals as Prescribed in the US Constitution."
#22. To: Bickus Dickus, Wood_Chopper (#20)
Prima facie evidence of W_C's Obamabotism...
Localities, and Individuals as Prescribed in the US Constitution."
#23. To: Bickus Dickus (#15)
"Stone did get a lot of you retards over here when LP was down."
Localities, and Individuals as Prescribed in the US Constitution."
#24. To: Mudboy Slim (#23)
#25. To: Bickus Dickus, Mudboy Slim (#19)
How about showing us some of Wood_Chopper's posts that you've used to deduce he's an "Obamabot"?
#26. To: Mudboy Slim (#23)
Some of us "LP retards" have been here from the git-go, Mr. Lickus...MUD
#27. To: war, Wood_Chopper (#10)
Oops...yes I did...
#28. To: Wood_Chopper, Bickus Dickus, Mudboy Slim (#25)
I have to wonder where that places the crew of the Enola Gay in Mud's world,
#29. To: Wood_Chopper (#25)
"Mud's calling me an "Obamabot" is the typical kneejerk reaction of the shills that litter the internet framing everything into the RAT vs. PUB false argument, hoping the useful idiots will follow."
Localities, and Individuals as Prescribed in the US Constitution."
#30. To: Bickus Dickus (#26)
"I'm still waiting..."
Localities, and Individuals as Prescribed in the US Constitution."
#31. To: Mudboy Slim (#29)
(Edited)
is within its rights to regulate every aspect of American life
#32. To: Mudboy Slim (#30)
See above...I am distancing myself from said accusation...MUD
#33. To: war, Mudboy Slim, Fred Mertz (#31)
(Edited)
is within its rights to regulate every aspect of American life
#34. To: Wood_Chopper, WhiteSands (#4)
WhiteSands, you might want to read Goldi's post about Manliness.
#35. To: Liberator (#33)
#36. To: Bickus Dickus (#32)
Localities, and Individuals as Prescribed in the US Constitution."
#37. To: war (#31)
"...is within its rights to regulate every aspect of American life"
Localities, and Individuals as Prescribed in the US Constitution."
#38. To: Liberator (#33)
Here I assumed you and Freddy were already married. My invitation must have been lost (sigh.)
#39. To: Badeye (#24)
I think I was registered here years ago, just couldn't remember my screen name/code.
#40. To: e_type_jag (#39)
#41. To: Mudboy Slim (#37)
Can you marry yer mom, war? Can you marry yer sister?
#42. To: Mudboy Slim (#37)
Marriage has always had the meaning of two being conjoined into one. The fact that it occurs most often between a man and a women does not make the definition of that word dependent upon that condition.
#43. To: Mudboy Slim (#37)
and thus have privileges afforded to others? Exactly what gets eroded? Your sense of outrage at something that is none of your g@@@ business?
#44. To: Mudboy Slim (#29)
However, you are wrong to deduce that this is RAT vs. Pubbie,
as the RINOs have been in on this whole BigGuv'ment expansionism, too.
#45. To: Ibluafartsky (#28)
So far above your commie loving, anti-American ass that if seen, you are barely a speck at the bottom of the outhouse hole.
#46. To: WhiteSands (#3)
Unless your intent is to create a Clown Posse site , posters such as Wood Chopper are not they way to build a great site.
#47. To: Wood_Chopper (#9)
.
.
.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]