International News
See other International News Articles
Title: Pompeo Arranges Mass Starvation of Iranian People
Source:
Another Day in The Empire
URL Source: https://kurtnimmo.blog/2018/10/04/p ... -starvation-of-iranian-people/
Published: Oct 5, 2018
Author: Kurt Nimmo
Post Date: 2018-10-05 09:06:51 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 1934
Comments: 9
Prior to George W. Bush illegally rolling into Iraq based on a passel of lies, Bill Clinton oversaw Papa Bush’s medieval sanctions on the country. The sanctions were not intended to stop Saddam Hussein from building WMDs as we were told by The New York Times and The Washington Post. They were put in place to starve the Iraqi people, deny basic medical supplies, and turn the country into a failed state. The process resulted in the death of half a million Iraqi children. Madeline Albright, Clinton’s Secretary of State, went on national television and said the murder of 500,000 Iraqi children was a price worth paying. Now we have Mike Pompeo, Trump’s secretary of state, demanding similar sanctions imposed on Iran. On Wednesday, Pompeo said the US will terminate a treaty with Iran put into place in 1955, two years after the CIA engineered a coup ousting the democratically elected leader Mohammad Mosaddegh. The long forgotten Treaty of Amity was brought up by the International Court of Justice when it ruled the US must lift sanctions that affect the import of humanitarian goods and products. The Hague said in a preliminary decision the US must “remove, by means of its choosing, any impediments arising from” sanctions that affect exports to Iran of medicine, medical devices, food, agricultural commodities and equipment necessary to ensure the safety of civil aviation, according to a report at Fox News. The ICJ’s attempt to prevent the Trump administration from engaging in massive crimes against humanity, according to Pompeo, is “meritless” and accused the international court of “attempting to interfere with the sovereign rights of the United States to take lawful actions necessary to protect our national security and abusing the ICJ for political and propaganda purposes.” Trump and his top neocon adviser John Bolton insist the International Criminal Court has no authority. “As far as America is concerned, the ICC has no jurisdiction, no legitimacy, and no authority,” Trump told the General Assembly at the United Nations. “The ICC claims near-universal jurisdiction over the citizens of every country, violating all principles of justice, fairness, and due process. We will never surrender America’s sovereignty to an unelected, unaccountable, global bureaucracy.” The US is not a party to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. Bill Clinton signed the Rome Statue in 2000, but it wasn’t sent to the Senate to be ratified. The Bush administration sent a note informing the Secretary-General that it would not ratify the Rome Statute and did not recognize any obligation toward it. Like the Trump administration, the Bush administration openly demonstrated hostility toward the idea of holding nations accountable for war crimes. The US backed up this defiance by passing the American Service Members Protection Act in 2002 ahead of the Iraq invasion. The law includes a provision to “use all means necessary and appropriate to bring about the release of any U.S. or allied personnel being detained by, on behalf of, or at the request of the International Criminal Court.” Additionally, the act permits the president to order military action against the Court, which resulted in critics calling it the “Hague Invasion Act.” However, the Bush administration and its neocons decided the ICC would be of use on a selective basis—against its official roster of enemies. The former Bush UN ambassador (by recess appointment) and current top Trump administration neocon John Bolton declared war on the ICC after it announced it would investigate war crimes in Afghanistan. Bolton said the US will level sanctions against the international organization if it proceeds. Trump and Bolton are clearing the decks in preparation of military action against Iran. They would like to see a return of brutal sanctions used for over a decade in Iraq. Iran understands what this means: rapid deterioration of health, targeting water purification (a primary objective in Iraq), communications, agriculture, and medical infrastructure. The US stated sanctions would remain in place even if Saddam Hussein decided to cooperate with the United Nations, thus demonstrating the sanctions and subsequent second invasion were not about WMDs and unfounded threats to America. The objective was to destroy Iraq, kill its people, and reduce the country to failed state status. Neocon “creative destruction” is focused on making certain Iran does not pose a challenge to the hegemonic rule of the United States and Israel. Both Israel and the fossilized Sunni-Wahhabi emirates in the Persian Gulf avidly support destroying Iran and killing millions of its people.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 6.
#2. To: Deckard (#0)
Iran has no right to trade with the United States. And being a declared, sworn enemy of the United States, Iran has no right to expect anything but treatment as the enemy they have declared themselves to be. Iran is a democracy: the people there determine who they vote for. They vote for the government they have. It represents the will of those people, just as Hitler represented the will of the German people, and Mussolini represented the will of the Italians. There's no reason for us to pretend that there is some sort of disconnect between the Iranian people and their elected government. Iran is not a dictatorship, it's an elected mullahcracy. No reason to not cut them off.
people there determine who they vote for. They vote for the government they have. It represents the will of those people, just as Hitler represented the will of the German people, and Mussolini represented the will of the Italians. Duly elected wahhabi terrorist.
You're never going to be happy with American government. I'd suggest you find a new hobby, because tracking politics is not going to fulfill you. You're just always going to be frustrated and bitter. The country is very rapidly lining up almost exactly in accordance with my own political desiderata. It's not doing that for you. And it won't.
just always going to be frustrated and bitter. The country is very rapidly lining up almost exactly Your totalitarian global police nanny state government is becoming less popular every day. Cry for yourself, you're losing. Hoooray! #winning
#8. To: hondo68 (#6)
Losing? Moi? I’m seeing a Supreme Court installed that will overturn Roe v Wade. I’m seeing tariffs imposed on China. I’m seeing treaties cancelled with Iran, and treaties established with North Korea. I’m seeing the politics line up for a wall. I don’t see myself losing on anything I care about. Seems like winning to the horizon to me. Oh, and we’re making friends with Russia and making NAFTA work for us. And rectifying the situation in Israel. I’m pretty happy.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#4. To: Vicomte13, Boy Muhammad, Donald of Arabia (#2)
#5. To: hondo68 (#4)
#6. To: Vicomte13, getting happier every minute (#5)
You're never going to be happy with American government
Replies to Comment # 6.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 6.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]