[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"This Is How We Win a New Cold War With China"

"How Europe Fell Behind"

"The Epstein Conspiracy in Plain Sight"

Saint Nicholas The Real St. Nick

Will Atheists in China Starve Due to No Fish to Eat?

A Thirteen State Solution for the Holy Land?

US Sends new Missle to a Pacific ally, angering China and Russia Moscow and Peoking

DeaTh noTice ... Freerepublic --- lasT Monday JR died

"‘We Are Not the Crazy Ones’: AOC Protests Too Much"

"Rep. Comer to Newsmax: No Evidence Biden Approved Autopen Use"

"Donald Trump Has Broken the Progressive Ratchet"

"America Must Slash Red Tape to Make Nuclear Power Great Again!!"

"Why the DemocRATZ Activist Class Couldn’t Celebrate the Cease-Fire They Demanded"

Antifa Calls for CIVIL WAR!

British Police Make an Arrest...of a White Child Fishing in the Thames

"Sanctuary" Horde ASSAULTS Chicago... ELITE Marines SMASH Illegals Without Mercy

Trump hosts roundtable on ANTIFA

What's happening in Britain. Is happening in Ireland. The whole of Western Europe.

"The One About the Illegal Immigrant School Superintendent"

CouldnÂ’t believe he let me pet him at the end (Rhino)

Cops Go HANDS ON For Speaking At Meeting!

POWERFUL: Charlie Kirk's final speech delivered in South Korea 9/6/25

2026 in Bible Prophecy

2.4 Billion exposed to excessive heat

🔴 LIVE CHICAGO PORTLAND ICE IMMIGRATION DETENTION CENTER 24/7 PROTEST 9/28/2025

Young Conservative Proves Leftist Protesters Wrong

England is on the Brink of Civil War!

Charlie Kirk Shocks Florida State University With The TRUTH

IRL Confronting Protesters Outside UN Trump Meeting

The UK Revolution Has Started... Brit's Want Their Country Back

Inside Paris Dangerous ANTIFA Riots

Rioters STORM Chicago ICE HQ... "Deportation Unit" SCRAPES Invaders Off The Sidewalk

She Decoded A Specific Part In The Bible

Muslim College Student DUMBFOUNDED as Charlie Kirk Lists The Facts About Hamas

Charlie Kirk EVISCERATES Black Students After They OPENLY Support “Anti-White Racism” HEATED DEBATE

"Trump Rips U.N. as Useless During General Assembly Address: ‘Empty Words’"

Charlie Kirk VS the Wokies at University of Tennessee

Charlie Kirk Takes on 3 Professors & a Teacher

British leftist student tells Charlie Kirk facts are unfair

The 2 Billion View Video: Charlie Kirk's Most Viewed Clips of 2024

Antifa is now officially a terrorist organization.

The Greatness of Charlie Kirk: An Eyewitness Account of His Life and Martyrdom

Charlie Kirk Takes on Army of Libs at California's UCR

DR. ALVEDA KING: REST IN PEACE CHARLIE KIRK

Steven Bonnell wants to murder Americans he disagrees with

What the fagots LGBTQ really means

I watched Charlie Kirk get assassinated. This is my experience.

Elon Musk Delivers Stunning Remarks At Historic UK March (Tommy Robinson)

"Transcript: Mrs. Erika Kirk Delivers Public Address: ‘His Movement Will Go On’"

"Victor Davis Hanson to Newsmax: Kirk Slaying Crosses Rubicon"


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

United States News
See other United States News Articles

Title: New Rules for Men
Source: The American Thinker
URL Source: https://www.americanthinker.com/art ... 2018/10/new_rules_for_men.html
Published: Oct 3, 2018
Author: Matt Patterson
Post Date: 2018-10-04 09:37:29 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 3431
Comments: 39

And so we have arrived, in the Brett Kavanaugh affair, the inevitable and ultimate apotheosis of #MeToo – the vilification of men qua men. 

Now, one accusation alone no matter how unsubstantiated and uncorroborated  is enough to ruin a man’s reputation, nullify his accomplishments and erase his opportunities...for life

This is apparently the standard set, and accepted, by roughly half of the country as represented by the Democrat party.

We have thus entered something new and dangerous.  And in light of this new reality, new rules for men vis a vis the opposite sex are required. Here are some baseline suggestions:

  • Don’t hire women.  Where accusations against men are concerned, proof is no longer required, nor presumption of innocence granted. Under these circumstances, why on earth would a man hire any woman or interact with any woman in a professional setting?
  • If a man must interact with a woman in a professional setting, he should do so as little as possible and always with a third and fourth party present (one of whom should be a man).  Never under any circumstances should a man be alone with a female co-worker.  No written communication with a woman co-worker should take place without a boss or supervisor and at least one male co-worker copied on the correspondence. Ditto with text and telephone communications.
  • Do not mentor women or girls, large numbers of whom are clearly unstable, fragile creatures and God knows what they may mis-remember or mis-construe.  Under these circumstances, it is not even remotely worth the risk to help a woman advance her career.  Brett Kavanaugh has spent his life helping women professionally. What good will did it buy him?
  • Dating and romance are now minefields to be traversed with extreme caution, if at all (see above re: mentoring).  Forget making a move, going in for the kiss unless you get express written consent before every move, you run the risk of being labeled a sexual predator for life. 

Even if you do get consent at every stage of the encounter, that still may not be enough. As Cathy Young wrote for the Washington Post, the definition of “consent” is itself disputed and subject to change given the whims of the mob:

“Consent advocates already fret that even an explicit ‘yes’ may not be given freely enough. A series of educational campus posters includes the warning that ‘if they don’t feel free to say ‘No,’ it’s not consent’; a Canadian college campaign cautions that consent is invalid if it’s ‘muted’ or ‘uncertain’ rather than ‘loud and clear.’

This advocacy creates a world where virtually any regretted sexual encounter can be reconstructed as assault...”

In other words, we live in a world where a woman can consent to intimacy, then retroactively withdraw that consent (the exact nightmare that comedian Aziz Ansari recently found himself in). 

This is a world in which men and women are not free to find each other, a world in which genuine romance is not possible.

Romance, after all, requires maturity and acceptance of a certain ambiguity from both parties. It requires that both men and women accept responsibility for their feelings and actions, responsibility that modern women often seem incapable of exhibiting and, frighteningly, are not expected to exhibit.

Nevertheless, men are burdened with strong sexually appetites, appetites honed by millions of years of evolution.  So what of your natural instincts to pursue, court, woo women?  To find one with whom to wed and mate in order to procreate and advance the species? 

All I can say is, good luck my friend. Proceed at your own risk.

Take heart, though. The sex robots are already here, and are daily growing cheaper, better and more widely available.

It won’t be long before men won’t need women at all.

Because this ultimately is what men are realizing in our current anti-male hysteria:  That interactions with women are often more trouble than they are worth. 

Congratulations, #MeToo. (1 image)

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 35.

#2. To: Deckard (#0)

roughly half of the country as represented by the Democrat party.

They're only 35% of the country. The rest of us can come together THIS ONE TIME, to crush them in November, so that they pay so badly they change their beliefs.

We saw this happen with Ronald Reagan. He rode into Washington an arch- conservative, and one of the things he targeted was Social Security. He was going to privatize it.

The backlash was so huge and so ferocious, that he realized that it was the end of his political career his before his first two years in office were through if he persisted. So he completely reversed himself. Thereafter, he became THE staunchest support of Social Security in Washington, insisted that it never be touched, etc.

Reagan was capable of doing a permanent 180 degree reversal, an absolute abandonment of his public position and adopting the view of the other side, because he saw that the alternative was the immediate political grave - the end of him politically, defeat, disgrace and humiliation. The Gipper was not a stupid man. Facing political death, he joined the other side.

Democrats are stupider than Reagan. For one thing, they believe themselves to be absolutely right and morally justified, and also they believe themselves to be nearly the majority of the country. Reagan did a 180. The Democrats will not.

Therefore, unless the rest of us WANT the Kavanaugh Standard to be applied to us for the rest of our lives, it is IMPERATIVE that - no matter what your political beliefs and causes are - Kavanaugh be put on the court, and the Republicans trounce the Democrats in November.

There is much more at stake here than taxes and spending. What is happening to Kavanaugh will become the new norm. It MUST be stopped, or it will become a tyranny that you will never be able to fight. Kill it now. Kill it in its cradle.

The only way to do that is by giving the Republicans massive gains in November. That can be taken back in two short years. The Democrats MUST be shown that they are only a third of the population, not half, and that their passionately held ideas will not rule this land. Otherwise they WILL rule the land. and that will be really bad.

Vicomte13  posted on  2018-10-04   10:29:24 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Vicomte13, Deckard (#2)

[Deckard] roughly half of the country as represented by the Democrat party.

[Vicomte13] They're only 35% of the country.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_party_strength_in_U.S._states

As of October 2017, Gallup polling found that 31% of Americans identified as Democrat, 24% identified as Republican, and 42% as Independent. Additionally, polling showed that 46% are either "Democrats or Democratic leaners" and 39% are either "Republicans or Republican leaners" when Independents are asked "do you lean more to the Democratic Party or the Republican Party?"[

nolu chan  posted on  2018-10-04   15:19:21 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: nolu chan (#8)

As of October 2017, Gallup polling found that 31% of Americans identified as Democrat, 24% identified as Republican, and 42% as Independent.

Updated % FWIW

2018 Sep 4-12 Republicans 26% Independents 44% Democrats 27%

https://news.gallup.com/poll/15370/party-affiliation.aspx

Jameson  posted on  2018-10-04   15:47:49 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Jameson (#11)

Thanks for the update. I can't stand this One Party, Two Factions System.

Fred Mertz  posted on  2018-10-04   15:50:20 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: Fred Mertz (#12)

I can't stand this One Party, Two Factions System.

There are two parties that are very different. You must be drunk.

A K A Stone  posted on  2018-10-04   22:29:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: A K A Stone (#27)

There are two parties that are very different.

Yep. The differences between the two parties on most major issues is obvious.

"We wanna live!" and "We wanna win!" are universal platform planks shared by Dems and Republicans and Nazis and Communists. Past that, things diverge.

Vicomte13  posted on  2018-10-05   8:34:14 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 35.

        There are no replies to Comment # 35.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 35.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com