LF: President Trump to UN-NWO: (NO SOUP FOR YOU!!) "The U.S. rejects “global governance, control, and domination”; "ICC has no jurisdiction, no legitimacy and no authority [over USA].”

Title: President Trump to UN-NWO: (NO SOUP FOR YOU!!) "The U.S. rejects “global governance, control, and domination”; "ICC has no jurisdiction, no legitimacy and no authority [over USA].”
Source: Brietbart News
URL Source: https://www.breitbart.com/big-gover ... e-of-patriotism-in-u-n-speech/
Published: Sep 25, 2018
Author: Joshua Caplan
Post Date: 2018-10-02 14:29:22 by Liberator
Keywords: NWO, UN, PWNED
Views: 2658
Comments: 26

President Trump Rebukes Globalism, Touts ‘Doctrine of Patriotism’ in U.N. Speech

President Donald Trump delivered a sharp rebuke to globalism, while touting the virtues of America First, during his highly-anticipated address before the United Nations General Assembly Tuesday.

https://t.co/h43dehf0WV
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 25, 2018

Speaking in triumphal terms, President Trump approached the address as an annual report to the world on his country’s progress since his inauguration. The president touted economic figures, declared that the U.S. military is “more powerful than it has ever been before,” and asserted that in “less than two years, my administration has accomplished more than almost any administration in the history of our country.”

President Trump said the U.S. rejects “global governance, control, and domination” and honors the right of every nation to pursue its own customs, beliefs, and traditions, adding that it will never tell other nations how to live, work, or worship.

In addition to the keynote speech, President Trump is to chair a meeting of the U.N. Security Council on the topic of countering nuclear proliferation on Wednesday.

At the U.N., Trump seized his opportunity to assert American independence from the international body. He was unapologetic about his decisions to engage with the erstwhile pariah North Korea, remove the U.S. from the international Iran nuclear accord, and object to U.N. programs he believes are contrary to American interests.

He referenced a long list of U.N. initiatives, from the International Criminal Court to the Human Rights Council, that his administration is working to counter.

“As far as America is concerned, the ICC has no jurisdiction, no legitimacy and no authority,” he said. The U.S. is boycotting the Human Rights Council, arguing it overlooks abuses by some and serves as a venue for anti-American and anti-Israeli action.

“The U.S. will not tell you how to live and work or worship,” President Trump said. “We only ask that you honour our sovereignty in return.”

“We reject the ideology of globalism and we embrace the doctrine of patriotism,” he added.

President Donald Trump also denounced socialism, while calling on democracy to return to Venezuela.

“Virtually everywhere socialism or communism has been tried, it has produced suffering, corruption, and decay,” President Trump said. “Socialism’s thirst for power leads to expansion, incursion, and oppression.”

“We ask the nations gathered here to join us in calling for the restoration of democracy in Venezuela,” the president added.

The speech, critically acclaimed by leading conservatives, including radio host Mark Levin, came after President Trump and South Korean president Moon Jae-in signed a new version of the U.S.-South Korean trade agreement on Monday, marking one ofthe Commander-in-Chief’s first successes in his effort to renegotiate economic deals on more favorable terms for the U.S.

PRESIDENT TRUMP’S UN SPEECH IS SPECTACULAR
— Mark R. Levin (@marklevinshow) September 25, 2018

President Trump hailed the agreement a “very big deal” and said the new deal makes significant improvements to reduce the trade deficit between the countries and create opportunities to export American products to South Korea.

In both venues, U.S. officials say, President Trump is expected on Wednesday to offer a contrast between the path of negotiation chosen by North Korea and that of Iran. The president earlier this year fulfilled a core campaign promise by removing the U.S. from the 2015 Iran nuclear deal, citing the Islamic regime’s malign influence in the region and support for terror groups like Hezbollah. The next round of tough sanctions on Iran is set to go into effect in November.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

We have been waiting for (never ever expecting to hear in our lifetime) what needed to be said to the UN General Assembly and their NWO gangstas. And our President said it! The America-Hating Fakester-MSM as usual downplayed or failed to report what was YUGE GOOD NEWS!:

President Trump B-Slapped the UN and its corrupt, America-hating mobster-gangstas. Said our President:

"NO!" to the authoritah of the criminal-gangsta ICC, a fake International Court of Kangaroo "Justice" if ever seen. It HATES the USA.

"NO!" to the fake "Human Rights Commission", a homofascist mob which denies and deprives supports of human rights for Jews, Christians, Whites, Males, Heterosexual/normal people, and European or capitalist nations. IT HATES THE USA.

"NO!" to the Human Rights Commission for targeting personal and national sovereignty, for criminalizing Christianity and Judaism, and "HELL NO!" for demanding the United States of America and World that the Bible must be censored as "Hate Speech".

"NO!" To the coercion and blackmail of the pro-Jihad, pro-Illegal Invasion, thieves of the various UN Cartels.

"HELL NO!" to the the satanic United Nations thugs wielding an iota of authoritah over We The People of the United States of America. (1 image)

Trump's was the anti-0bama speech. New Sheriff in town. He will NOT receive a Fake Nobel Peace Prize (like war-monger 0bama).

Compare Trump's tone to that of Poppy Bush. This was considered his "New World Order" speech (2 minutes), the one he cultivated and justified with his fake Iraq World War.

Poppy spoke of "justice", characterizing his phony war as "working toward a victory over tyranny and savage aggression".

Aren't today's Democrats, Academia, Hollywood and Mainstream Media attempting to deprive us of "justice"? Aren't today's Democrats, Academia, Hollywood and Mainstream Media "working toward a victory via their own tyranny and savage aggression"? Aren't today's Democrats exactly what Poppy Bush was warning the world against?

President Reagan: Maintaining peace for his entire two terms. The 1980s were the last decade of peace, prosperity, AND freedom.

As we know, no sooner had Poppy Bush and his neocon/Globalists-gangstas taken over power and he had the USA invading Iraq for bogus/manufactured reasons, creating what was almost WW3. The USA has never been the same since, have we?

Just a decade later, no sooner had Dubya Bush and the same neocon-globalists taken power... and HE had the USA invading Iraq once again for hyped-up/bogus WMD reasons. Remember how much fun it was watching us demolishing its cities and infrastructure on Tee-Bee and CNN as entertainment? (only to hand the bill to the American taxpayer to rebuild IT as the US's own infrastructure was decrepit.)

It has become America's longest war. Recall how some people were ridiculed and decried as "unpatriotic" for audaciously predicting a "quagmire"? And for questioning the wisdom of the invasion?

And we STILL have good men serving, bleeding, and dying over in that Muzzie hell-hole.

On the other hand, he's telling Europe and Iran and everyone else what THEY are allowed to do.

Trump is not wrong in taking the US away from the failed ideal of the UN. The UN is a toothless tiger that has become too powerful, using treaty obligations to enforce laws that are contrary to national interests.

observation. The UN attempts to override the sovereign rights of nations through its agencies dictating the rights of refugees, distribution of aid and use of military assets yet it has a security council that cannot make decisions because of veto

Do you hate our VETO? Would you prefer the UN was the world legislative body and every one obeyed THEM?

Because if that was the case I would support overthrowing and destroying everyone involved with that satanic organization.

I'm talkiing about the foreigners and the people here who think it should rule us.

Sure -- on one hand Trump did absolutely tell the UN (NOT Europe) to $#@!# off. But also backed them off of everyone else.

So first and foremost he rejects the UN's authoritah to control the USA, but also Trump spoke on behalf on all other sovereign nations rights to maintain their own individual autocracy.

The UN is a toothless tiger that has become too powerful, using treaty obligations to enforce laws that are contrary to national interests.

Absolutely true. It's been a sham. "Peace" and "aiding nations" has never been its objective; RAW UNCHALLENGED POWER is; A One World Government.

Most egregious has been the UN refusal to stop the slaughter of millions of Christians BY Muzzies in Africa and elsewhere.

But it's not. It instead takes the form of bullying these soverign European countries into their not trading with Iran.

With some 86 million people, Iran has a population fully 20% of the size of the USA's, and I think over half the size of Russia. It's no wonder it's a country to be reckoned with. And as I point out from time to time to people who would like to see Iran destroyed (and no, that's not you), half of Iran's current population wasn't yet even born at the time of the 79 hostage crisis, which itself was rooted in US CIA meddling in their government in the 50's in the name of big oil.

Except, of course, for these various European countries and Iran which much not do business with each other.... or else.

And India, which I think is also getting flak for being interested in Russian weapons.

While Trump has been good domestically, AND while I agree it's good he's cutting the binds to the UN and such, extracting the US from foreign affairs we have no legit business being in would be a vast improvement.

Look -- the EU is now controlled by unelected NWO bureaucrats. I assume you realize this. They (like Dems) OPPOSE US (and even European autocracy). They want a One World Government. They WANT chaos and WW3. They WANT Middle East War.

One reason they are a nation "to be reckoned with" is BECAUSE 0bama and his buddies handed Iran $1.5 BILLION for nothing. AND not-so-secretly enabled their nuke program (with which a hostile Iran threatened Israel).

FWIW, I agree; The CIA meddled in their internal affairs in 1979, but also did during 0bama's regime. To the detriment of Iran and world peace. Did you forget the Iranian people revolted against their oppressive gubmint? AS 0bama DID NOTHING TO HELP?

As to the US not supporting exclusive EU-Russian gas deal, a hostile Turkey, or India possibly shunned for their interest in Russian weaponry, what about it?

What's good for Trump's America is actually good for the USA and the World; The alternative is an oppressive, freedom-stomping UN-EU and an insane hostile Iran and Turkey creating WW3.

Btw, the USA can lean on countries but can't dictate exactly what they do. (LIKE THE EU.)

I do disagree. I've seen no compelling argument that Iran is any worse or better than any other country in the region. If anything Saudi Arabia may be a bigger threat to peace than Iran.

We do hear lots of terrible things in Iran in the MSM. But we also see terrible things from such sources about Trump and now Kavanaugh. While at least Fox is pro-Trump, all MSM including Fox is uniformally demonizing Iran, Assad and Putin, and I think they are doing it in a very slanted, unjust way.

As I understand it, those funds rightly belonged to Iran and the transfer was returning their money to them. It was money that has been seized for quite sometime, perhaps related to the 79 hostage crisis. I don't know for certain that's the case, but that's my understanding. It was not a gift.

As for their nuke program, how long do we think we can actually prevent Iran from obtaining nukes? 2 years, 10 years, 50 years? Eventually they will get nukes if that is what they want. To me it's futile and even counterproductive to sanction them in this area as it will just increase the chance that **when** they do get them, which they will, we will have a higher chance of a nuke exchange occurring. Hell, if we improve relations with Iran, they may see that they have no need to build nukes. On the other hand, they may decide that the best way to end sanctions is to obtain nuke weapons, as once they get an arsenal going, they can use that as leverage to end sanctions.

That is the reality. Get nuke weapons and only then are you are respected as a sovereign state.

Iran has plenty to live for without getting into a nuke war exchange over purely political disputes with a country that has 10% of Iran's population and perhaps a couple hundred nuke weapons.

As bad as things got between the USSR & USA, mutual deterrence worked between the USSR and the USA. It will work between Iran and Israel, neither of whom are as dangerous as the USSR once was.

Should Obama have helped? Bush II helped in Iraq and look how that turned out. We helped in Ukraine too, which didn't exactly end with "and they lived happily ever after". As a direct result, Crimea is now Russian and tens of thousands have died, including the airline shootdown.

As I said.... Trump great in promoting US sovereignty, but is still peddling the Deep State's wishes for world empire status.

And why did they do that? Perhaps Putin was a bit PO'd at being blamed for the Skripal chem attack and having hundreds of his diplomats thrown out of Europe and the USA? Perhaps he was miffed at the west bombing Syria for chem attacks that didn't happen? Perhaps he's PO'd at seeing Ukraine, a major ally of Russia being taken over by western interests, and then being accused of helping eastern Russian ethnicities fight for their right of self determination?

Perhaps he's disturbed by NATO expanding, against western promises, to the border of Russia itself?

Personally, I don't understand why more Americans are unable to look at the world from Russia's perspective. If we continue to regard Russia as the communist, atheistic, rights suppressing entity which the USSR once was, then things will be bad. On the other hand, we could recognize that Russia has an economy on par with Italy, is no longer communist, and has long lost any prospects for being a world empire, and work WITH them instead of against them, and make the world a better place.

But...that would mean you don't take their threats seriously. Like "DEATH TO AMERICA!" and "DEATH TO ISRAEL!"

The latter must be taken seriously. If Israel is attacked or seriously threatened by an imminent nuke (or ANY exchange of nukes), that entire part of the world is smoked. And that means the entire WORLD is in disarray.

Q: Are the expressed "rights" of Iran (whose primary reason for their nuclear program is threatening their neighbors and world?? Do you really trust their leadership judgement? I believe it's a risk the world cannot afford.

I agree -- we must always discern and be cynical over the MSM slant, disinfo and propaganda. The PTB use them to sway opinion as we well know.

Iran is run by Muzzie sociopaths. They are willing to sacrifice hundreds of millions of people. Irrational people/nuts can NOT be reasoned with.

It's Iran's insane unhinged gubmint that legitimately poses major concerns. Saudis seemed to have knocked off their trouble-making quite a bit. Yes, I agree with the MSM demonization of Russia and Assad. I also believe the "Russia!!" threat is fake; It's been hyped up because they reject the Globalists agenda. AND because Putin openly rejects the homofascist agenda.

I can easily find similar "Death to Iran" protesters in the US. Maybe they are not in the streets, but I've certainly seen plenty of comments in the Fox News comments on Iran articles that express similar sentiment. Things about teaching Iran a lesson, and nuking them and such. I seem to remember one presidential candidate, after being asked about how to deal with Iran, singing "Bomb, bomb, bomb.... bomb, bomb Iran". Perhaps you recall.

You can take it seriously sure, but to do that, you have to appreciate that street protestors do NOT speak for an entire country, and neither do Iranian "military commanders" that I've often seen quoted with such rhetoric, which is all it is. Rhetoric. The west always likes to treat such words and statements as official Iranian policy. But it's not. Of course there is animosity between Iran and the USA. When the US puts sanctions on Iran, that is what you get. Animosity from Iran. Protests, flag burnings the whole works. That's normal.

And the solution is.... Sanction their people into economic disaster like we did Iraq. Declare war on Iran like we did Iraq (only we didn't actually even declare war before invading them) and destroy yet another country in the grand cause of avoiding "disarray"?

Certainly your beliefs differ, but I do not see Israel as anything special. They are one more country in the area, and if they want to live there, they should find a way to get along with the people in the region. If they really were forced to make peace I think they would and could but I don't think they want that if it means acknowledging a state of equality between Israelis and non-Israelis.

Do you trust Israel to not use nukes in their "Sampson option"? I.e. in the event they are faced with complete military defeat, they would nuke their traditional adversaries in surrounding countries just out of spite?

I sure don't. It's what happens when you get a people who consider themselves religiously superior to members not in their group.

I think your perception of Iran is faulty. Yes there are "Muzzie Sociopaths" but I don't know that any are running Iran. The last Iranian president was secular. The current one is not. But this idea that everyone in Iran wears a suicide vest to work is really overly melodramatic.

Nonsense. Suadi's are just now allowing women to drive, and seems to still require they be completely covered, which Assad does NOT do in Syria. They are still chopping peoples heads off in the streets in feigned justice on a mere accusations, quite often when husbands accuse their wives of some deed. Saw a video on that.

Yes, Putin will not be waving any LGBT flags any time soon. I remember him being interviewed about a church he was outside of. He spoke fondly of it because he was baptized there. I guess he's an orthodox Catholic.

what is the point of having a decision making body if it's decisions can be negated by a recalicant nation? Russia frequently negates US proposals, China frequently negates US proposals. What is the point?

There is no such thing as an orthodox catholic, either you are catholic or you are orthodox which is just a case of which version of the creed you use

There’s also ways of combating a leftist government... without running away to some taco hut, in the jungle.

The point is the nations with veto power are more powerful and dominate the other nations.

There should never be any world government. When that happens it is the Antichrists govt.

President Trump Rebukes Globalism, Touts ‘Doctrine of Patriotism’ in U.N. Speech

President Donald Trump delivered a sharp rebuke to globalism, while touting the virtues of America First, during his highly-anticipated address before the United Nations General Assembly Tuesday.

“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul