[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"International court’s attack on Israel a sign of the free world’s moral collapse" "Pete Hegseth Is Right for the DOD" "Why Our Constitution Secures Liberty, Not Democracy" Woodworking and Construction Hacks "CNN: Reporters Were Crying and Hugging in the Hallways After Learning of Matt Gaetz's AG Nomination" "NEW: Democrat Officials Move to Steal the Senate Race in Pennsylvania, Admit to Breaking the Law" "Pete Hegseth Is a Disruptive Choice for Secretary of Defense. That’s a Good Thing" Katie Britt will vote with the McConnell machine Battle for Senate leader heats up — Hit pieces coming from Thune and Cornyn. After Trump’s Victory, There Can Be No Unity Without A Reckoning Vivek Ramaswamy, Dark-horse Secretary of State Candidate Megyn Kelly has a message for Democrats. Wait for the ending. Trump to choose Tom Homan as his “Border Czar” "Trump Shows Demography Isn’t Destiny" "Democrats Get a Wake-Up Call about How Unpopular Their Agenda Really Is" Live Election Map with ticker shows every winner. Megyn Kelly Joins Trump at His Final PA Rally of 2024 and Explains Why She's Supporting Him South Carolina Lawmaker at Trump Rally Highlights Story of 3-Year-Old Maddie Hines, Killed by Illegal Alien GOP Demands Biden, Harris Launch Probe into Twice-Deported Illegal Alien Accused of Killing Grayson Davis Previously-Deported Illegal Charged With Killing Arkansas Children’s Hospital Nurse in Horror DUI Crash New Data on Migrant Crime Rates Raises Eyebrows, Alarms Thousands of 'potentially fraudulent voter registration applications' Uncovered, Stopped in Pennsylvania Michigan Will Count Ballot of Chinese National Charged with Voting Illegally "It Did Occur" - Kentucky County Clerk Confirms Voting Booth 'Glitch'' Shifted Trump Votes To Kamala Legendary Astronaut Buzz Aldrin 'wholeheartedly' Endorses Donald Trump Liberal Icon Naomi Wolf Endorses Trump: 'He's Being More Inclusive' (Washed Up Has Been) Singer Joni Mitchell Screams 'F*** Trump' at Hollywood Bowl "Analysis: The Final State of the Presidential Race" He’ll, You Pieces of Garbage The Future of Warfare -- No more martyrdom! "Kamala’s Inane Talking Points" "The Harris Campaign Is Testament to the Toxicity of Woke Politics" Easy Drywall Patch Israel Preparing NEW Iran Strike? Iran Vows “Unimaginable” Response | Watchman Newscast In Logansport, Indiana, Kids are Being Pushed Out of Schools After Migrants Swelled County’s Population by 30%: "Everybody else is falling behind" Exclusive — Bernie Moreno: We Spend $110,000 Per Illegal Migrant Per Year, More than Twice What ‘the Average American Makes’ Florida County: 41 of 45 People Arrested for Looting after Hurricanes Helene and Milton are Noncitizens Presidential race: Is a Split Ticket the only Answer? hurricanes and heat waves are Worse 'Backbone of Iran's missile industry' destroyed by IAF strikes on Islamic Republic Joe Rogan Experience #2219 - Donald Trump IDF raids Hezbollah Radwan Forces underground bases, discovers massive cache of weapons Gallant: ‘After we strike in Iran,’ the world will understand all of our training The Atlantic Hit Piece On Trump Is A Psy-Op To Justify Post-Election Violence If Harris Loses Six Al Jazeera journalists are Hamas, PIJ terrorists Judge Aileen Cannon, who tossed Trump's classified docs case, on list of proposed candidates for attorney general Iran's Assassination Program in Europe: Europe Goes Back to Sleep Susan Olsen says Brady Bunch revival was cancelled because she’s MAGA. Foreign Invaders crisis cost $150B in 2023, forcing some areas to cut police and fire services: report Israel kills head of Hezbollah Intelligence. Status: Not Logged In; Sign In United States News See other United States News Articles Title: New Kavanaugh Witnesses Source: Fox News URL Source: [None] Published: Sep 27, 2018 Author: Fox News Post Date: 2018-09-27 00:17:37 by redleghunter Keywords: None Views: 5946 Comments: 53 Ahead of pivotal Senate hearing, witnesses surface to say Christine Ford may have mistaken them for Kavanaugh Ahead of pivotal Senate hearing, witnesses surface to say Christine Ford may have mistaken them for Kavanaugh Click for Full Text! Poster Comment: Whoops. Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread   Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 11. #2. To: redleghunter (#0) https://www.theblaze.com/news/2018/09/27/senate-staff-talked-to-men-who-believe-they-not-kavanaugh-had-1982-encounter-with-ford-docs-show Senate staff talked to men who believe they, not Kavanaugh, had 1982 encounter with Ford, docs show Aaron Cohen Staff Writer The Blaze Two men have told Senate Judiciary Committee staffers that they believe they — not Judge Brett Kavanaugh — had the sexual encounter with Christine Blasey Ford which is the basis of her sexual assault allegation against the Supreme Court nominee. Documents released by majority members of the Senate Judiciary Committee on Wednesday evening threw a new wrinkle into the accusations against Kavanaugh, the night before he and Ford are scheduled to testify about the situation. Republican members of the committee released a summary timeline of staff activities related to the numerous sexual misconduct allegations against Kavanaugh. The timeline includes several bullet points that indicate two men have said Kavanaugh did not sexually assault Christine Blasey Ford at a 1982 party — because they did it. Daily Mail political editor David Martosko posted screenshots from the timeline on Twitter, highlighting these key items. https://twitter.com/dmartosko/status/1045141912863338496/photo/1 https://twitter.com/dmartosko/status/1045141912863338496 David Martosko @dmartosko Whoa. Senate Judiciary Committee Republicans say they have spoken to two men who think they, not Kavanaugh, had the 1982 encounter that formed the basis for her sexual abuse claim. (These tables are from a timeline the committee majority published 15 minutes ago.) 9:43 PM - Sep 26, 2018 What did the documents say? From Sept. 24: Committee staff have first interview with a man who believes he, not Judge Kavanaugh, had the encounter with Dr. Ford in 1982 that is the basis of his complaint. He submitted a written statement earlier in the day. From Sept. 25: Committee staff have a second interview with a man who believes he, not Judge Kavanaugh, had the encounter with Dr. Ford in the summer of 1982 that is the basis of her allegation. He described his recollection of their interaction in some detail. And from Sept. 26: Committee staff receive a more in-depth written statement from the man interviewed twice previously who believes he, not Judge Kavanaugh, had the encounter in question with Dr. Ford. Committee investigative staff spoke via phone with another man who believes he, not Judge Kavanaugh, had the encounter with Dr. Ford in 1982 that is the basis of her allegation. He explained his recollection of the details of the encounter. [...] [FUN VIDEO] https://mobile.twitter.com/ShemekaMichelle/status/1045041991321624576/video/1 Get some popcorn ready for the morning. nolu chan  posted on  2018-09-27   1:28:27 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #11. To: nolu chan (#2) Already out of popcorn; Working on the sunflowers seeds and M&Ms. So let's say the two men who had the "encounter" with Ford do step forward and give their own testimony; And correct me if I'm wrong -- the statute of limitations doesn't apply... Does this mean Ford can be prosecuted/indicted for perjury? And can media and Dem Senators be sued for defamation? MOREOVER, IF the boys (now men) testify that a drunken Ford encouraged them to make her a "pin-cushion" and grabbed THEM and their private parts...THEN WHAT? (in your opinion of course?) Wow. This could get REALLY interesting. Liberator  posted on  2018-09-28   16:36:10 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   Replies to Comment # 11. #13. To: Liberator (#11) What's interesting is Montgomery Co MD County Prosecutor came out with a statement and letter that (1) for them to investigate Ms Ford's allegations, she has to file a report and (2) even though MD law now considers attempted rape (new age language sexual assault) as a felony with no statute of limitations, such a case in 1982 under the law was a misdemeanor offense with a statute limit of one year. All very interesting. 8 hours of testimony over what back then was a misdemeanor offense and would be treated as such even with a newer more strict law in effect. County Prosecutor, Police Chief Won’t Investigate Kavanaugh Without Complaint redleghunter  posted on  2018-09-28 16:44:30 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #23. To: Liberator (#11) So let's say the two men who had the "encounter" with Ford do step forward and give their own testimony; And correct me if I'm wrong -- the statute of limitations doesn't apply... The statute of limitations does not apply to felonies. If the alleged misdeeds are classified as misdemeanors, it ran decades ago. I believe the statute of limitations does apply. Attempted rape was a misdemeanor in Maryland in 1982. https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/amid-the-ford-kavanaugh-exchanges-have-the-local-police-been-asked-to-investigate/2018/09/27/7787d8c0-c297-11e8-a1f0-a4051b6ad114_story.html The most serious allegation that authorities could pursue, given the sworn testimony provided by Ford, would be attempted rape. But that was considered a misdemeanor in Maryland in 1982, and that would be the relevant legal standard. As a misdemeanor, the offense carried a one-year statute of limitations, meaning charges would have had to be filed within a year of an incident, according to John McCarthy, Montgomery County’s longtime chief prosecutor. Lisae C. Jordan, the executive director and counsel for the Maryland Coalition Against Sexual Assault, and other longtime Maryland lawyers interviewed in recent days concurred. The Maryland legislature changed the law in 1996, making attempted rape a felony and removing the statute of limitations, according to McCarthy and Jordan. “But we’d have to apply the law as it existed at the time of the allegations,” McCarthy said. Other possible charges, such as second-degree assault, remain misdemeanor offenses in Maryland and subject to a one-year statute of limitations, McCarthy said. “Based on all the allegations I’ve seen so far, there are a number of legal barriers to criminal prosecutions,” Jordan said. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Does this mean Ford can be prosecuted/indicted for perjury? I don't think she was competent to commit perjury and I don't recall such prosecutions for congressional testimony, even if the law provides for it. And can media and Dem Senators be sued for defamation? Senators, definitively no. They have immunity. Media may be held liable, but not for reporting he said this and she said that. It is a statement of fact that Kavanaugh was accused of attempted rape, weenie wagging, and involvement in gang banging. nolu chan  posted on  2018-09-28 22:13:49 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #24. To: Liberator (#11) https://www.scribd.com/document/389710351/Department-of-Police-Montgomery-County-Maryland-Ltr-of-28-Sep-2018-Kavanaugh-and-Statute-of-Limitations nolu chan  posted on  2018-09-28 23:50:26 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #29. To: Liberator (#11) So let's say the two men who had the "encounter" with Ford do step forward and give their own testimony; And correct me if I'm wrong -- the statute of limitations doesn't apply... Does this mean Ford can be prosecuted/indicted for perjury? And can media and Dem Senators be sued for defamation? In THEORY,yes,it does. In reality,we are as likely to see the Clinton's arrested and convicted of murder as well as treason. Because we are only a free nation where everyone is treated equally IN THEORY. Some people are "too big to bust". In FACT,some groups,such as blacks,homosexuals,and women are "too big to bust OR EVEN TO QUESTION in 21st Century America. Short of a revolution,I don't see this ever getting any better,and getting worse as time passes. "The White Man" will be universally accepted as being at fault for everything that has ever gone wrong in all of recorded history,and be kept from any positions of power in the future. Not that the future will last all that long. Name ONE nation or group of people in ALL OF HISTORY that has accomplished more positive things than nations controlled and ran by white men. Or even ANY nation that has accomplished 10 percent as much. Eventually there WILL be a revolution and the slaves (white men) will revolt and start taking revenge as they take back the reigns of power. sneakypete  posted on  2018-09-30 10:07:48 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   End Trace Mode for Comment # 11. Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register]  Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com