U.S. Constitution
See other U.S. Constitution Articles
Title: Democrat Senator Jeff Merkley to File Court Injunction to STOP Kavanaugh Vote
Source:
Gateway Pundit
URL Source: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20 ... nction-to-stop-kavanaugh-vote/
Published: Sep 26, 2018
Author: Brock Simmons
Post Date: 2018-09-26 15:55:28 by nolu chan
Keywords: None
Views: 1196
Comments: 7
Democrat Senator Jeff Merkley to File Court Injunction to STOP Kavanaugh Vote by Brock Simmons Desperate to stop any progress that Trump makes, far left senator from Oregon, Jeff Merkley, now plans on filing a lawsuit to stop the Brett Kavanaugh confirmation vote. Perhaps Merkley knows that all of the Kavanaugh accusations have no substance, so this is a last ditch effort to try to stop Trump. [snip] - - - - - - - - - - Poster comment: desperate socialist Dems are funny to watch.
Gateway Pundit
September 26, 2018
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: nolu chan (#0)
democRat dumbshittiness is a bottomless pit.
https://www.koin.com/news/politics/merkley-to-file-lawsuit-to-halt-kavanaugh-confirmation/1476736943?utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook_KOIN_6 The Oregon senator will ask the courts to intervene By: KOIN 6 News Staff Posted: Sep 26, 2018 08:08 AM PDT PORTLAND, Ore. (KOIN) -- Sen. Jeff Merkley filed a lawsuit Wednesday to stop Judge Brett Kavanaugh's confirmation process, citing what he believes to be unconstitutional presidential interference. Merkley said via Twitter that he plans to sue President Donald Trump and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell. [snip] YCMTSU.
From the COMPLAINT (draft) at 11-12: 28. Article II, Section 2 of the United States Constitution states that the President “shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint . . . Judges of the [S]upreme Court.” 29. The doctrine of separation of powers in the Advice and Consent Clause is clear: The President alone is responsible for nominating Supreme Court Justices, and the Senate alone is responsible for advice and consent. 30. The Advice and Consent Clause “is among the significant structural safeguards of the constitutional scheme.” Edmond v. United States, 117 S. Ct. 1573, 1579 (1997) (Scalia, J.). It is “designed to ensure public accountability for both the making of a bad appointment and the rejection of a good one.” Id. 31. “Through the confirmation process, the public, individuals, and interested organizations alike have an opportunity to inform the decision-making process and scrutinize the President’s nominee.” Washington Legal Foundation v. Department of Justice, 691 F. Supp. 483, 492 (D.D.C. 1988). The purpose of the Senate nomination hearing is for “the public and Congress [to] have a full opportunity to evaluate the actual nominee and to probe more deeply.” Id. at 495. 32. Charles Mathias, Jr. explained the importance of exacting Senate scrutiny of Presidential nominees when he was a Republican Senator from Maryland: Charles Mathias, Jr., Advice and Consent: The Role of the United States Senate in the Judicial Selection Process, 54 U. Chi. L. Rev. 200, 206-07 (1987).
It just keeps getting better. https://twitter.com/esaagar/status/1045024256122400768 Dr. Christine Ford's hand written statement included in her polygraph says the party where the alleged assault by Kavanaugh occurred had "4 boys and a couple of girls." In her original letter to Feinstein she said the gathering was her "and four others"
In a US court, or maybe a Russian court? I expect the results will be the same.
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. No doubt. This is only for public relations.
Tell this moron to look up "separation of powers".
#2. To: Hank Rearden (#1)
Merkley files lawsuit to halt Kavanaugh's confirmation
Updated: Sep 26, 2018 10:29 AM PDT
#3. To: Hank Rearden (#1)
Tell this moron to look up "separation of powers"
LEGAL BACKGROUND
[T]he full Senate should have the opportunity to consider each nomination on a complete record. . . . The paramount constitutional duty of the Senate in the process of advice and consent is to satisfy itself that the nominee before it is fully qualified, by virtue of education, experience, integrity, and character, to be granted a lifetime commission to sit in judgment upon the liberties and the legal rights of the American people. . . . [O]f course, in the case of nominations to the Supreme Court, which has the ultimate authority to interpret and apply the Constitution, the Senate’s scrutiny must be exacting in every respect. Only with vigorous review can the Senate carry out the role envisioned for it by the framers of the Constitution.
#4. To: All (#3)
Saagar Enjeti
@esaagar 
#5. To: nolu chan (#0)
#6. To: Pinguinite (#5)
In a US court, or maybe a Russian court?
I expect the results will be the same.
#7. To: Pinguinite, nolu chan, Hank Rearden (#5)
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]