[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"There’s a Word for the West’s Appeasement of Militant Islam"

"The Bondi Beach Jihad: Sharia Supremacism and Jew Hatred, Again"

"This Is How We Win a New Cold War With China"

"How Europe Fell Behind"

"The Epstein Conspiracy in Plain Sight"

Saint Nicholas The Real St. Nick

Will Atheists in China Starve Due to No Fish to Eat?

A Thirteen State Solution for the Holy Land?

US Sends new Missle to a Pacific ally, angering China and Russia Moscow and Peoking

DeaTh noTice ... Freerepublic --- lasT Monday JR died

"‘We Are Not the Crazy Ones’: AOC Protests Too Much"

"Rep. Comer to Newsmax: No Evidence Biden Approved Autopen Use"

"Donald Trump Has Broken the Progressive Ratchet"

"America Must Slash Red Tape to Make Nuclear Power Great Again!!"

"Why the DemocRATZ Activist Class Couldn’t Celebrate the Cease-Fire They Demanded"

Antifa Calls for CIVIL WAR!

British Police Make an Arrest...of a White Child Fishing in the Thames

"Sanctuary" Horde ASSAULTS Chicago... ELITE Marines SMASH Illegals Without Mercy

Trump hosts roundtable on ANTIFA

What's happening in Britain. Is happening in Ireland. The whole of Western Europe.

"The One About the Illegal Immigrant School Superintendent"

CouldnÂ’t believe he let me pet him at the end (Rhino)

Cops Go HANDS ON For Speaking At Meeting!

POWERFUL: Charlie Kirk's final speech delivered in South Korea 9/6/25

2026 in Bible Prophecy

2.4 Billion exposed to excessive heat

🔴 LIVE CHICAGO PORTLAND ICE IMMIGRATION DETENTION CENTER 24/7 PROTEST 9/28/2025

Young Conservative Proves Leftist Protesters Wrong

England is on the Brink of Civil War!

Charlie Kirk Shocks Florida State University With The TRUTH

IRL Confronting Protesters Outside UN Trump Meeting

The UK Revolution Has Started... Brit's Want Their Country Back

Inside Paris Dangerous ANTIFA Riots

Rioters STORM Chicago ICE HQ... "Deportation Unit" SCRAPES Invaders Off The Sidewalk

She Decoded A Specific Part In The Bible

Muslim College Student DUMBFOUNDED as Charlie Kirk Lists The Facts About Hamas

Charlie Kirk EVISCERATES Black Students After They OPENLY Support “Anti-White Racism” HEATED DEBATE

"Trump Rips U.N. as Useless During General Assembly Address: ‘Empty Words’"

Charlie Kirk VS the Wokies at University of Tennessee

Charlie Kirk Takes on 3 Professors & a Teacher

British leftist student tells Charlie Kirk facts are unfair

The 2 Billion View Video: Charlie Kirk's Most Viewed Clips of 2024

Antifa is now officially a terrorist organization.

The Greatness of Charlie Kirk: An Eyewitness Account of His Life and Martyrdom

Charlie Kirk Takes on Army of Libs at California's UCR

DR. ALVEDA KING: REST IN PEACE CHARLIE KIRK

Steven Bonnell wants to murder Americans he disagrees with

What the fagots LGBTQ really means

I watched Charlie Kirk get assassinated. This is my experience.

Elon Musk Delivers Stunning Remarks At Historic UK March (Tommy Robinson)


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

United States News
See other United States News Articles

Title: Simcox won't quit Senate race if Hayworth runs
Source: Arizone Republic
URL Source: http://www.azcentral.com/news/artic ... /03/20100103nowickisimcox.html
Published: Jan 7, 2010
Author: Dan Nowicki
Post Date: 2010-01-07 06:35:30 by A K A Stone
Keywords: None
Views: 13111
Comments: 65

Don't expect Chris Simcox to quit this year's Republican Senate race to make way for J.D. Hayworth.

Simcox, the founder of the border-watch group Minuteman Civil Defense Corps, announced his intention in April to challenge four-term incumbent Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., in the state's GOP primary. But most of the attention over the past couple of months has centered on Hayworth, a former congressman and current KFYI-AM (550) radio host who is considering his own run. Hayworth, a firebrand on the illegal-immigration issue, and Simcox likely would compete for some of the same voters and campaign contributors.

"No way in hell," Simcox told The Arizona Republic when asked about speculation that a Hayworth candidacy might drive him from the race. "After what I know I've built, there's no way I'm dropping out of this race. I will not let down the people who have supported me to this point." Simcox said he is somewhat annoyed by the continued chatter about a possible insurgent run by Hayworth, whom Simcox said "has always been a GOP establishment guy." Simcox characterized himself as a true outsider candidate.

"Not only have I been out there working for the last eight or nine months, but so has (fellow Republican Senate candidate) Jim Deakin," Simcox said. "We've been out there working the state and not getting recognition from anybody, and J.D. opens his mouth because he has his bully pulpit and he's the frontrunner in the polls."

Most election watchers started taking the possibility of a Hayworth challenge seriously after a November Rasmussen Reports poll found McCain and Hayworth in a statistical dead heat. McCain had 45 percent to Hayworth's 43 percent, with the survey's margin of error plus or minus 4 percentage points. Simcox garnered 4 percent support.

In other developments:

• Citing Capitol Hill's heavy workload, Sen. Jon Kyl, R-Ariz., expressed reluctance to wade into the messy Maricopa County brawl that has pitted Sheriff Joe Arpaio and County Attorney Andrew Thomas against sitting Superior Court judges and county supervisors. Kyl, a lawyer who sits on the influential Senate Judiciary Committee, called the Arizona Supreme Court's intervention appropriate.

Last month, Chief Justice Rebecca White Berch appointed a "special master" to oversee and help settle the infighting.

"Obviously, Senator McCain and I are back in Washington. We've been a little busy," Kyl said Tuesdayduring a news conference with McCain in Phoenix. "I think it would be very difficult for us to get the kind of information that we would need in order to weigh in in a persuasive way with the court system here, or in some other way."

• Rep. Harry Mitchell, D-Ariz., is teaming up again with Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas, to put the kibosh on Congress' next pay raise for fiscal 2011, which starts Oct. 1. Mitchell and Paul were instrumental last year in stopping the pay raise for fiscal 2010, resulting in a $2.5 million saving. Under a 20-year-old procedure, Congress gets an automatic raise every year unless lawmakers vote otherwise.

"With unemployment high and so many families struggling to make ends meet, it is unconscionable to think that Congress is considering giving itself a pay raise," Mitchell said in a written statement.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 52.

#11. To: A K A Stone (#0)

Simcox doesn't stand a chance - he brings with him the same ideals that McCain has. If the voters have to decide between the two - they'll go with the more expierenced candidate. Besides that, Simcox doesn't have the backing he needs to win - he has no support. Deakin has a better chance and Hayworth has the best chance.

mel  posted on  2010-01-07   14:48:22 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: mel (#11)

he brings with him the same ideals that McCain has.

Well I think he should go for it.

But what are these ideals that he shares with McCain you are talking about. He doesn's support amnesty does he? Please tell me he doesn't.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-01-07   14:56:45 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: A K A Stone (#12)

December 2007
The Hard Work of Compromise: America Needs a Comprehensive Immigration Policy
Yet Simcox agreed with others that society cannot afford the kind of social friction that immigration debates create. "We're all victims of government failure -- in Arizona and in Washington, D.C.," he said. "We need a compromise. And I'm willing to lead that compromise."

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Issue Clash: Immigration
Simcox Answers Questions:

Q: What stance should the U.S. government take regarding the estimated 11 million undocumented immigrants living in the U.S?

A: It is against the law to enter the U.S. without authorization. Anyone discovered to be in the U.S. illegally, who has committed a crime, has stolen someone's identity, or has obtained false documents should be deported and never allowed to reenter the U.S. for any reason. The major problem we have is what to do with the children who were brought into the U.S. illegally. If they have been here since they were a child, they should be allowed to be put on a fast track to gain citizenship. Immediately declaring that the 14th Amendment does not grant automatic birthright citizenship will cut off the magnet that attracts people to take advantage of our charity.

Q: President Obama says longtime undocumented immigrants should have a path to citizenship in the U.S. Do you agree?

A: On a case-by-case basis I would agree that if someone is found to be living in the U.S. illegally, has been gainfully employed, has paid their taxes and has not committed a crime, I feel that we certainly can make an exception. But this will be the last time, and I would only accept that after our borders are secured and illegal immigration is no longer an out of control problem.

Q: Should undocumented immigrants with children born in the U.S. be allowed to stay here?

A: First we must immediately end automatic birthright citizenship, and then proceed on a case-by-case basis. If the child is under the age of 18, then their parents should be allowed to stay in the U.S. to seek citizenship unless they commit a crime. However, if citizenship is not processed before the child turns 18, then the parents must then self-deport.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

“They need to be brought out of the shadows. They need to be documented and swear an oath to become a citizen,” he said. “If they do that, then by all means they deserve the opportunity that anyone else has.” ~ Chris Simcox, the American DREAM Act, SB170

mel  posted on  2010-01-07   15:02:36 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: mel (#14)

First we must immediately end automatic birthright citizenship

That would take an amendment to the USCON...the entire Eastern Seaboard would never let that happen and the aggregate of them is enough to keep it that way...

war  posted on  2010-01-07   15:29:02 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: war (#16)

That would take an amendment to the USCON..

I don't think it would.

Especially since they never follow it anyway. But for other reasons too.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-01-07   16:10:30 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: A K A Stone (#22) (Edited)

ALL PERSONS BORN...

--14A USCON...

~~~~

"ALL" does not allow for an exception...and the one exception listed is children of diplomats...

war  posted on  2010-01-07   20:46:39 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: war (#24)

ALL PERSONS BORN...

--14A USCON...

Do you support amendments that weren't properly ratified under our constitution?

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-01-08   7:42:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: A K A Stone (#27)

That amendment most certainly was properly ratified.

war  posted on  2010-01-08   8:20:54 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: war (#28)

That amendment most certainly was properly ratified.

lol. You had senators who wouldn't vote for the 14th. They had already passed the 13th. So they were legitimate. Then you had a military govt remove the elected senators and replace them with puppets. You had states withdraw their support (revote against it im my memory serves me correctly).

States were deprived of their equal sufferage in the senate. You should research this. Others have and it was done unlawfully.

Why would anyone support the 14th? It turned the constitution on its ass.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-01-08   8:31:14 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: A K A Stone (#30)

Why would anyone support the 14th?

Becuase it personfies what freedom is: The right to birthright citizenship no matter who we are or what State we live in and NO state can deny or disparage that fact.

war  posted on  2010-01-08   9:37:19 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: war (#32)

It was unlawfully ratified.

So when we are at war or being invaded. All the enemy has to do is come over and have babies. That's pretty stupid. It isn't freedom at all. It is rule by foreigners and slavery to pay their medical costs, food, crime and the list goes on and on.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-01-08   9:49:55 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#52. To: A K A Stone, war, all (#34)

So when we are at war or being invaded. All the enemy has to do is come over and have babies. That's pretty stupid. It isn't freedom at all. It is rule by foreigners and slavery to pay their medical costs, food, crime and the list goes on and on.

Well stated....This amendment might have made sense had actual border security been taking place. The President and the Federal Gubmint have been especially derelict in their respective duty since 9/11... According to the U.S. Constitution Article 4 Section 4:

"The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion"

Invasion: In*va"sion, n. [L. invasio: cf. F. invasion. See Invade.] [1913 Webster]

1. The act of invading; the act of encroaching upon the rights or possessions of another; encroachment; trespass.

Liberator  posted on  2010-01-08   22:38:58 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 52.

        There are no replies to Comment # 52.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 52.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com