Historical
See other Historical Articles
Title: Remember The Pentagon Plane Attack Impossibilities
Source:
Dark Politricks
URL Source: http://www.darkpolitricks.com/2018/ ... -plane-attack-impossibilities/
Published: Aug 18, 2018
Author: Dark Politricks
Post Date: 2018-09-10 09:27:30 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 1274
Comments: 3
I have been into 9.11 almost as soon as I saw it on the TV screens of secretaries at my work in 2001. I always thought the “Pentagon Plane was really a missile” story was a fake or government spinned lie to discredit the 9.11 Truth movement. If the witnesses at the WTC, thousands who saw a plane or two hit the Twin Towers then why shouldn’t the witnesses at the Pentagon be believed just as much. However after examining it more extensively and with Pilots for 911Truth getting FOI data showing that the plane actually flew over the building and listening to talks from people who saw no plane debris at the “official” impact site, I changed my mind. From the video given out to the public only after numerous FOI requests, we are expected to believe that a Boeing 757 managed to fly only a few feet off the ground horizontally, for some time, without down-force crashing it into the ground or it’s engines, and for it’s huge body to disappear into a small hole on the first floor of the Pentagon before punching it’s way through 3 re-enforced walls of concrete and coming out of a small exit hole 3 rings later. Witnesses, TV crew and employees spoke about the lack of debris, bodies, bags and engine parts when they walked through this 3 ring puncture to escape. I have a detailed talk from Barbara Honegger, an ex Reagan official who appears in this short video on my “Pentagon Attack Finally Solved?” page, and I think she puts the pieces together well. She talks about 2 attacks at the site which get around the problems of the first pictures of pristine grass outside the impact zone and no debris and if you watch her speech in the article she explains it as 2 attacks. One by a drone, coloured to look like a plane and then the main attack at a different section of the building which was a bomb. This was why there was no debris outside or plane engines buried 10 feet in the ground as they would have been if flying that low to the ground to hit the first floor. Problems with the official story include: So from all the CCTV that the FBI confiscated which could have caught the plane, drone, missile, or flock of concrete beaked seagulls hit the Pentagon we got a short clip from a CCTV camera that showed a few frames that showed no plane and an explosion. The FBI must know what happened from other CCTV and their threats to staff who went public but they themselves are as corrupt as every part of the US Oligarchy. The plane did not nose dive down into the first floor it apparently flew parallel to the ground for a good few hundred yards. This is something when I asked my father who worked for one of the UK’s top Air Research Facilities as a chief engineer who designed plane engines how difficult it would be. He said “very”, and “almost impossible”. He said the same as many other pilots who said that just the huge turn in the air and path the plane took was impossible for this type of plane. Many ex military men and pilots have come out to say this. John Lear tried to sue the Government and in his affidavit he explains how planes flying at 550 mph (roughly) could not be controlled in the manner they were as they are designed as cruise ships in the sky at 40,000 feet not Jet fighters performing exotic turns at low altitude. Conspiracies like the official 9.11 Report show that. 1. The Commissioners lied to the public about outside funding from Pakistan and Saudi Arabia when asked numerous times due to the release of the 28/29 pages which admits Saudi Involvement in the attack. 2. Why did the extensive news coverage on the day about white vans being stopped on the Washington Bridge with Israeli Mossad agents inside along with box cutters and bombs not heard about after the event on the day? 3. How did the “Dancing Israelis” know to park their van across the Jersey river to get pictures and footage of the first plane hitting the WTC. They are on record saying they were “Sent to document the event“, so how did they know the event would even happen. 4. Whatever turned the WTC into dust, metal beams just frazzling up as they fell, the lack of seismic data from the buildings hitting the floor, toasted cars a block away with perfectly fine paper from the WTC offices floating about. Nano thermate particles (or rust) found in the huge dust cloud that covered NYC for days and is now giving first responders cancers, from asbestos and other concrete particles or maybe radiation from a mini nuke under the towers as Russian agent and material witness Dimitri Khalezov believes is unimportant. We know from the extensive library of firemen, police, WTC workers and people like William Rodriguez, a janitor who helped many people escape and described multiple explosions below and above him that there was probably a number of fail safe techniques used to ensure the towers fell that day. Watch on YouTube.com. Here is a death bed confession from a “deep state CIA” demolition expert who celebrated the WTC7 falling then worried that it looked too real. This should be on the US news along with the 28/29 pages that prove Bush and Cheney lied to get the US to commit war crimes by attacking Iraq and protected it’s Jihadist machine maker Saudi Arabia from any MSM attacks. These recent articles are all updates for the upcoming 9.11 anniversary. You can find many more on the site. By Dark Politricks
The Plane simply does not fit and cannot fly at 550 mph that low to the ground
1. The incompetence of the pilot supposedly at the wings of the 757 to make such a complex maneuver. Something experienced pilots would need many attempts on simulators to get anywhere near right.
2. The official path of the plane does not fit with the witness evidence or the broken light poles on the road.
3. A plane cannot fly at 550 mph at only a few feet off the ground which is required to hit the 1st floor “official impact zone”.
4. If you watch this video of a test to see what a plane would do a re-enforced concrete wall like the Pentagon had you will see that the possibility of an aluminium plane using kinetic energy would not punch through 3 walls but be destroyed into tiny bits on the first impact. Notice in the video the plane is on train tracks due to the fact you cannot fly a plane that low to the ground at that speed.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Deckard (#0)
Other than the 757 landing gear. And the black boxes. Did they find missile debris at the "official" crash site? Funny. No missile debris does not exclude a missile strike, but no 747 debris proves it wasn't a plane.
Don't believe that. It's not true. Who said that? The reports I've read say that the 747 actually skidded on the ground prior to impact.
Seriously? Introducing the amazing new Penta-Lawn 2000! The most resilient lawn ever!
If a wall is massive enough and well guarded enough to keep them out, it is also massive enough and well guarded enough to keep you in.
who saw no plane debris at the “official” impact site,
#2. To: Deckard (#0)
we are expected to believe that a Boeing 757 managed to fly only a few feet off the ground horizontally, for some time
#3. To: misterwhite (#2)
(Edited)
The reports I've read say that the 747 actually skidded on the ground prior to impact.
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
In a Cop Culture, the Bill of Rights Doesn’t Amount to Much
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]