[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
United States News Title: Man Arrested Because Riding a Bike Without a Bell On It Is Illegal in a Police State Seaside Heights, NJ — A fairly worrisome video has been shared with the Free Thought Project this week purporting to show a man being arrested after police stopped him for riding a bike without a bell. The video, posted to Facebook by user A Dot Norwood, shows officers from the Seaside Heights police department temporarily detaining a man who was riding his bike. In the first brief video, the officers appear to stop the man and then let him go. However, in the second video, we see them stopping him again. According to Norwood and the man being arrested, police stopped him for riding his bike without a bell on it. As the video shows, however, police quickly escalated charges as the man became agitated after he was stopped for such a ridiculous reason. Within just a few seconds, the police officers are telling the man that he will be arrested for obstruction of justice because he is upset that he is currently facing harassment for lack of a bell on his bike. “Under arrest for what?” the man asks. To which the police reply, “obstruction.” “Obstruction of what?” the man asks, “You’re telling me I need a bell on my bike.” “That’s illegal,” says the officer. Moments later, police move in and place the man in handcuffs “You see this, right?” the man asks Norwood. “They’re arresting me for not having a bell on my bike.” 2013 New Jersey Revised Statutes Universal Citation: NJ Rev Stat § 39:4-11 (2013) 39:4-11. Audible signal After police get the man in handcuffs, the onlookers attempt to keep filming before they become worried that they too will be arrested. The Free Thought Project reached out to the Seaside Heights police department who told us to contact the records department. As we had no name of the man being arrested, we were unable to seek out the exact charges he is facing. If the man riding a bike committed an actual crime in which there was an actual victim, he most definitely deserved to be arrested. However, it appears from the video that the officers indeed stopped him for not having a bell on his bike and the resultant charges, if any, likely stemmed from the original stop. As TFTP has reported on numerous occasions, riding a bike in a police state can be a dangerous act. In some instances, we’ve reported on individuals who’ve been mauled, nearly to death, by a police K9 for lacking a simple bike light. Also, last month, TFTP reported on a child who was run over by a police officer because, he too, lacked a light on his bicycle.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 18.
#18. To: Deckard (#0)
Where is the fist part? The guy could have been acting all kinda crazy(bugging everyone that pays taxes) and the office used one of those "progressive laws" to get rid of him. No actual conclusion can be made with out seeing the whole truth.
There are no replies to Comment # 18. End Trace Mode for Comment # 18.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
|
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|