[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Kamala Harris, reparations, and guaranteed income

Did Mudboy Slim finally kill this place?

"Why Young Americans Are Not Taught about Evil"

"New Rules For Radicals — How To Reinvent Kamala Harris"

"Harris’ problem: She’s a complete phony"

Hurricane Beryl strikes Bay City (TX)

Who Is ‘Destroying Democracy In Darkness?’

‘Kamalanomics’ is just ‘Bidenomics’ but dumber

Even The Washington Post Says Kamala's 'Price Control' Plan is 'Communist'

Arthur Ray Hines, "Sneakypete", has passed away.

No righT ... for me To hear --- whaT you say !

"Walz’s Fellow Guardsmen Set the Record Straight on Veep Candidate’s Military Career: ‘He Bailed Out’ "

"Kamala Harris Selects Progressive Minnesota Governor Tim Walz as Running Mate"

"The Teleprompter Campaign"

Good Riddance to Ismail Haniyeh

"Pagans in Paris"

"Liberal groupthink makes American life creepy and could cost Democrats the election".

"Enter Harris, Stage Lef"t

Official describes the moment a Butler officer confronted the Trump shooter

Jesse Watters: Don’t buy this excuse from the Secret Service

Video shows Trump shooter crawling into position while folks point him out to law enforcement

Eyewitness believes there was a 'noticeable' difference in security at Trump's rally

Trump Assassination Attempt

We screamed for 3 minutes at police and Secret Service. They couldn’t see him, so they did nothing. EYEWITNESS SPEAKS OUT — I SAW THE ASSASSIN CRAWLING ACROSS THE ROOF.

Video showing the Trump Rally shooter dead on the rooftop

Court Just Nailed Hillary in $6 Million FEC Violation Case, 45x Bigger Than Trump's $130k So-Called Violation

2024 Republican Platform Drops Gun-Rights Promises

Why will Kamala Harris resign from her occupancy of the Office of Vice President of the USA? Scroll down for records/details

Secret Negotiations! Jill Biden’s Demands for $2B Library, Legal Immunity, and $100M Book Deal to Protect Biden Family Before Joe’s Exit

AI is exhausting the power grid. Tech firms are seeking a miracle solution.

If you need a Good Opening for black, use this.

"Arrogant Hunter Biden has never been held accountable — until now"

How Republicans in Key Senate Races Are Flip-Flopping on Abortion

Idaho bar sparks fury for declaring June 'Heterosexual Awesomeness Month' and giving free beers and 15% discounts to straight men

Son of Buc-ee’s co-owner indicted for filming guests in the shower and having sex. He says the law makes it OK.

South Africa warns US could be liable for ICC prosecution for supporting Israel

Today I turned 50!

San Diego Police officer resigns after getting locked in the backseat with female detainee

Gazan Refugee Warns the World about Hamas

Iranian stabbed for sharing his faith, miraculously made it across the border without a passport!

Protest and Clashes outside Trump's Bronx Rally in Crotona Park

Netanyahu Issues Warning To US Leaders Over ICC Arrest Warrants: 'You're Next'

Will it ever end?

Did Pope Francis Just Call Jesus a Liar?

Climate: The Movie (The Cold Truth) Updated 4K version

There can never be peace on Earth for as long as Islamic Sharia exists

The Victims of Benny Hinn: 30 Years of Spiritual Deception.

Trump Is Planning to Send Kill Teams to Mexico to Take Out Cartel Leaders

The Great Falling Away in the Church is Here | Tim Dilena

How Ridiculous? Blade-Less Swiss Army Knife Debuts As Weapon Laws Tighten


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Opinions/Editorials
See other Opinions/Editorials Articles

Title: Americas Decade Of Decline
Source: American Conservative
URL Source: http://www.amconmag.com/blog/2009/12/28/americas-decade-of-decline/
Published: Dec 31, 2009
Author: Patrick James Buchanan
Post Date: 2009-12-31 12:41:06 by A K A Stone
Keywords: None
Views: 11178
Comments: 52

About the first decade of what was to be the Second American Century, the pessimists have been proven right.

According to the International Monetary Fund, the United States began the century producing 32 percent of the world’s gross domestic product. We ended the decade producing 24 percent. No nation in modern history, save for the late Soviet Union, has seen so precipitous a decline in relative power in a single decade.

The United States began the century with a budget surplus. We ended with a deficit of 10 percent of gross domestic product, which will be repeated in 2010. Where the economy was at full employment in 2000, 10 percent of the labor force is out of work today and another 7 percent is underemployed or has given up looking for a job.

Between one-fourth and one-third of all U.S. manufacturing jobs have disappeared in 10 years, the fruits of a free-trade ideology that has proven anything but free for this country. Our future is being outsourced — to China.

While the median income of American families was stagnant, the national debt doubled.

The dollar lost half its value against the euro. Once the most self-sufficient republic in history, which produced 96 percent of all it consumed, the U.S.A. is almost as dependent on foreign nations today for manufactured goods, and the loans to pay for them, as we were in the early years of the republic.

What the British were to us then, China is today.

Beijing holds the mortgage and grows impatient as we endlessly borrow on equity and refuse to begin paying it down. The possibility exists of an eventual run on the dollar or even a U.S. debt default.

Who did this to us? We did it to ourselves.

We sold ourselves a lot of snake oil about the Global Economy, interdependence, free trade and “it doesn’t make any difference where goods are produced.” The George W. Bush Republicans ran up the deficit with tax cuts, two wars and a splurge in social spending to rival the guns-and-butter of the Great Society.

Abandoning its role as the fellow who comes and takes away the punch bowl when the party’s getting good, the Fed kept the money flowing fast and free, creating the tech bubble that burst in Y2K and the stock and housing bubble that burst at decade’s end.

To pull us back from the cliff’s edge, over which we were headed a year ago, the Fed doubled the money supply, while the administration ran up deficit spending to the highest level since World War II.

Unlike World War II, however, there is no end in sight to these deficits.

The stock market, which flat-lined over the decade, had to surge 50 percent in 2009 to retrieve the worst losses since the Depression.

Everyone, it seems, except for Washington bureaucrats and Wall Street, for whom the bonuses never seem to stop, has been hammered by the sinking home values and shrinking portfolios.

After Sept. 11, the nation was united behind a president as it had not been since Pearl Harbor. But instead of focusing on the enemies who did this to us, we took Osama bin Laden’s bait and plunged into a war in Iraq that bled and divided us, alienated Europe and the Arab world, and destroyed the Republican Party’s reputation as the reliable custodian of national security and foreign policy.

The party paid — with the loss of both houses in 2006 and the presidency in 2008 — but the nation has not stopped paying.

With nearly 200,000 troops in Iraq and Afghanistan and another 30,000 more on the way, al-Qaida is now in Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia and North Africa, while the huge U.S. military presence in Afghanistan and Iraq serves as its recruiting poster.

Again, it is not a malevolent fate that has done this to us. We did it to ourselves. We believed all that hubristic blather about our being the “greatest empire since Rome,” the “indispensable nation” and “unipolar power” advancing to “benevolent global hegemony” in a series of “cakewalk” wars to “end tyranny in our world.”

After a decade of self-delusion and self-indulgence, we must stop deceiving ourselves. As Hurricane Katrina demonstrated, the “can-do” nation that won World War II in Europe and the Pacific in less than four years, that put a man on the moon in the same decade JFK said we would, is history.

We have a government that cannot balance its books, defend its borders or win its wars. And what is it now doing? Drafting another entitlement program as we are informed that the Social Security and Medicare trust funds have unfunded liabilities in the trillions.

At the end of the first decade of the 21st century, the question is not whether we will preside over the creation of a New World Order, but whether America’s decline is irreversible.

Click for Full Text!

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 32.

#4. To: A K A Stone (#0)

More like "America's 5th decade of decline",that was only interrupted by 8 years of Reagan in office.

sneakypete  posted on  2010-01-01   13:50:30 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: sneakypete (#4)

Oh Reagan.

It was such a different country then.

I know Nixon wasn't perfect. But was he an interruption too?

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-01-01   14:14:03 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: A K A Stone (#5)

I know Nixon wasn't perfect. But was he an interruption too?

Yes. I voted for him in 72 because he had the guts to fight the war in VN the way it should have been fought all along by attacking the communist sanctuaries in Cambodia and Laos,and this drove the communists in Congress absolutely nuts.

THIS is what caused him to be forced to resign from office to avoid impeachment and removal,not that bullshit burglary that he had nothing to do with and didn't even know about. The communists joined with the Country Club Republicans and stuck a knife in his back for daring to end the war by winning it. The communists because they didn't want to see a communist defeat,and the Country Club Republicans/RINO's because they didn't want to see the war end because it would end some of their profits from the defense industry.

Still,it was Nixon that started the EPA,and he was the one who came up with wage and price controls. I was so ignorant back then that I thought wage and price controls were a good thing,but now I know better. Nixon,as a educated man who had spent his life in government should have already known better.

He wasn't the evil ogre history has made him out to be,though.

sneakypete  posted on  2010-01-01   18:24:02 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: sneakypete (#6)

THIS is what caused him to be forced to resign from office to avoid impeachment and removal,not that bullshit burglary that he had nothing to do with and didn't even know about.

A) Not only did he know about it he set John Mitchell and Maurice Stans off to raise the money to keep the burglars quiet. The tapes with his voice on it don't lie.

B) Nixon campaigned on a secret plan to end the war which noone assumed meant that he was going to draw troops down while also escalating the war.

Sneak you are a true hero but you were put into a meat grinder so that any number of American corporations could simply stay in business not only courtesy of your blood but of taxpayer dollars. There was never anything to "win" in Viet Nam.

war  posted on  2010-01-01   21:46:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: war (#9)

any number of American corporations could simply stay in business not only courtesy of your blood but of taxpayer dollars.

BTW,that part is 100% true,and most of the people getting rich were Dims.

sneakypete  posted on  2010-01-01   23:36:52 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: sneakypete (#17)

The head of Bell Helicopter was not a dem...ditto McDonnell Douglas, North American Rockwell, and Fairchild-Republic. Brown Root was a different story...

war  posted on  2010-01-02   11:18:49 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: war (#22)

The head of Bell Helicopter was not a dem...ditto McDonnell Douglas, North American Rockwell, and Fairchild-Republic. Brown Root was a different story...

No,they were Dims in Republican clothing,known as "Country Club Republicans" at the time,and the daddy's of today's RINOs.

They also paid off a lot of Dims to keep the war going before the Dim hard left took over control of the Party. We could have ended the war in 1965 if we had been serious about it by invading Hanoi and going after the leadership. We didn't,because as you said,"there is money to be made from war." It was true then,and it is still true now. Look at Boy Jorge and Bubba Barry for proof of this.

sneakypete  posted on  2010-01-02   12:01:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: sneakypete (#25)

The protests STOPPED dead in the water the instant Nixon ended the draft

The draft ended the same year that the war did....1973...doh.

That said, the war was unpopular across every demographic save one...men aged which was white men aged 40-60. IN 1967, Gallup reported that 56% of the American people believed that the war was lost or at an impasse. To blame Cronkite is a misstatement of history.

war  posted on  2010-01-02   16:33:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: war (#26)

The draft ended the same year that the war did....1973...doh.

The war didn't end until 1975,and it was still going when the draft ended in 73.

To blame Cronkite is a misstatement of history.

To give him all the blame would be,but you have to be as partisan and blind as a bat to say he had no influence on the pressure put on Congress to sign a peace treaty,ANY peace treaty.

sneakypete  posted on  2010-01-02   17:32:50 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: sneakypete (#27)

To give him all the blame would be,but you have to be as partisan and blind as a bat to say he had no influence on the pressure put on Congress to sign a peace treaty,ANY peace treaty.

Again, huh? Congress doesn't sign a peace treaty. And the terms that NV offered Nixon in 1969 were the terms that we accepted in 1973.

The only thing that was ever going to be accomplished in VietNam was a body count.

war  posted on  2010-01-02   18:11:07 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: war (#29)

Congress doesn't sign a peace treaty.

Are you trying to claim Congress has no influence on treaties,or that their ability to shut down funding has no effect if they don't get their way?

And the terms that NV offered Nixon in 1969 were the terms that we accepted in 1973.

Yes,and prior to Cronkites report after Tet of 68 the NVN thought they had lost the war because of the ass-beating they got,and they were ready to sue for peace. Then Cronkite and the Communists in the Dim Party got involved in it,and they said they changed their minds because they knew they had won the war politically that they could never win militarily.

The only thing that was ever going to be accomplished in VietNam was a body count.

And the body count only soared after we pulled out.

The only thing that was ever going to be accomplished in VietNam was a body count.

sneakypete  posted on  2010-01-02   18:48:15 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 32.

#35. To: sneakypete (#32)

es,and prior to Cronkites report after Tet of 68 the NVN thought they had lost the war because of the ass-beating they got

They knew that they were going to get an ass beating. They didn't care. What they did know what that the cumulative lies being told by the US government to the US citizenry were going to be exposed. Never in hell did the US governmenrt prepare us for the fact that the NVA and VC were capable of attacking every major city and port in the South. The outcome of the battles were always going to be moot.

Did you hear about what happened in Afghanistan over the last couple of days? Think RVN and 1962...

war  posted on  2010-01-03 09:47:01 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 32.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com