[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

America Erupts… ICE Raids Takeover The Streets

AC/DC- Riff Raff + Go Down [VH1 Uncut, July 5, 1996]

Why is Peter Schiff calling Bitcoin a ‘giant cult’ and how does this impact market sentiment?

Esso Your Butt Buddy Horseshit jacks off to that shit

"The Addled Activist Mind"

"Don’t Stop with Harvard"

"Does the Biden Cover-Up Have Two Layers?"

"Pete Rose, 'Shoeless' Joe Reinstated by MLB, Eligible for HOF"

"'Major Breakthrough': Here Are the Details on the China Trade Deal"

Freepers Still Love war

Parody ... Jump / Trump --- van Halen jump

"The Democrat Meltdown Continues"

"Yes, We Need Deportations Without Due Process"

"Trump's Tariff Play Smart, Strategic, Working"

"Leftists Make Desperate Attempt to Discredit Photo of Abrego Garcia's MS-13 Tattoos. Here Are Receipts"

"Trump Administration Freezes $2 Billion After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands"on After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands

"Doctors Committing Insurance Fraud to Conceal Trans Procedures, Texas Children’s Whistleblower Testifies"

"Left Using '8647' Symbol for Violence Against Trump, Musk"

KawasakiÂ’s new rideable robohorse is straight out of a sci-fi novel

"Trade should work for America, not rule it"

"The Stakes Couldn’t Be Higher in Wisconsin’s Supreme Court Race – What’s at Risk for the GOP"

"How Trump caught big-government fans in their own trap"

‘Are You Prepared for Violence?’

Greek Orthodox Archbishop gives President Trump a Cross, tells him "Make America Invincible"

"Trump signs executive order eliminating the Department of Education!!!"

"If AOC Is the Democratic Future, the Party Is Even Worse Off Than We Think"

"Ending EPA Overreach"

Closest Look Ever at How Pyramids Were Built

Moment the SpaceX crew Meets Stranded ISS Crew

The Exodus Pharaoh EXPLAINED!

Did the Israelites Really Cross the Red Sea? Stunning Evidence of the Location of Red Sea Crossing!

Are we experiencing a Triumph of Orthodoxy?

Judge Napolitano with Konstantin Malofeev (Moscow, Russia)

"Trump Administration Cancels Most USAID Programs, Folds Others into State Department"

Introducing Manus: The General AI Agent

"Chinese Spies in Our Military? Straight to Jail"

Any suggestion that the USA and NATO are "Helping" or have ever helped Ukraine needs to be shot down instantly

"Real problem with the Palestinians: Nobody wants them"

ACDC & The Rolling Stones - Rock Me Baby

Magnus Carlsen gives a London System lesson!

"The Democrats Are Suffering Through a Drought of Generational Talent"

7 Tactics Of The Enemy To Weaken Your Faith

Strange And Biblical Events Are Happening

Every year ... BusiesT casino gambling day -- in Las Vegas

Trump’s DOGE Plan Is Legally Untouchable—Elon Musk Holds the Scalpel

Palestinians: What do you think of the Trump plan for Gaza?

What Happens Inside Gaza’s Secret Tunnels? | Unpacked

Hamas Torture Bodycam Footage: "These Monsters Filmed it All" | IDF Warfighter Doron Keidar, Ep. 225

EXPOSED: The Dark Truth About the Hostages in Gaza

New Task Force Ready To Expose Dark Secrets


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

United States News
See other United States News Articles

Title: As VA Continues To Hook Veterans On Dangerous Opioids, Local Growers Offer Them Free Cannabis
Source: Activist Post/FTP
URL Source: https://www.activistpost.com/2018/0 ... -offer-them-free-cannabis.html
Published: Jul 29, 2018
Author: Rachel Blevins
Post Date: 2018-07-30 09:58:03 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 1331
Comments: 18

Santa Cruz, CA – While the United States federal government and the Department of Veterans Affairs continue their efforts to keep cannabis from the people who need it the most, local growers are starting a movement in a state that is known for its “big government,” in an effort to make a difference in their community.

It is no secret that the VA has a history of failing to provide proper medical care for the veterans in its care. In fact, in 2015, a leaked document showed that more than 238,000 veterans died waiting for treatment, according to the Department of Veteran Affairs’ backlog.

When veterans do receive treatment, it comes in the form prescription drugs, many of which are opioid painkillers and antidepressants that are highly addictive, have alarming and dangerous side effects, and have been shown to worsen the symptoms they are supposed to treat.

All the while, the VA continues to deny access to the natural medicine that has saved countless veterans from ending their lives—cannabis.

Instead of waiting around for the federal government to reclassify cannabis, the Santa Cruz Veterans Alliance took matters into their own hands and they started a program to help veterans in need by giving them free access to cannabis.

The alliance hosts a program where each month, veterans can come retrieve tickets that they can redeem at local dispensaries, in exchange for a gift bag of cannabis products that includes lotions, pills, candies, hemp oils and varieties of the plant that they can smoke.

The program is made possible by founders of the alliance, veterans Aaron Newsom and Jason Sweatt, who started growing cannabis, selling the product to local dispensaries, and then using the funds to pay for the program for veterans in need. As the Santa Cruz Sentinel reported, “they view medical marijuana as a better alternative than addictive opioids that are typically are prescribed for pain.”

Even though countless veterans have shared testimonies of how cannabis has treated their PTSD, pain, depression, and anxiety, the VA still continues to claim that the plant is a dangerous drug, and has no medicinal value.

Congress now has the option to decide whether it will allow the VA to perform studies looking at the effectiveness of cannabis to treat chronic pain and PTSD in veterans. A bill was introduced this spring by Democratic Rep. Tim Walz and Republican Rep. Phil Roe, which would allow the research.

Walz told The New York Times that he believes the passage of the bill could be the first start towards VA doctors eventually having the freedom to write cannabis prescriptions for their patients.

“You may be a big advocate of medical marijuana, you may feel it has no value,” Walz said. “Either way, you should want the evidence to prove it, and there is no better system to do that research than the VA.”

California became the first state to legalize cannabis for medicinal use in 1996. But it was not legal for recreational use until earlier this year, and it came packed with a host of taxes and regulations.

In September 2017, California passed a joint resolution calling for the federal government to reclassify cannabis to allow for more research, which received overwhelming support from the state’s legislature.

As the resolution noted, cannabis has been “studied worldwide outside the United States for years” and has shown “efficacy for various conditions, such as wasting syndrome, as an antinauseant in those taking chemotherapy, Glaucoma (reduces intraocular pressure), Epilepsy (anti-seizure properties), migraine headaches and other types of pain, and anxiety.”

The work of the Santa Cruz Veterans Alliance should serve as a reminder that it does not take the federal government to make a difference in local communities. This movement was started by two cannabis growers who simply wanted to help veterans who were being ignored or harmed by the VA, and their work now helps dozens of veterans in the area, and it could be used as a blueprint for veterans’ groups across the country.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Deckard (#0)

As VA Continues To Hook Veterans On Dangerous Opioids.....

SAY WHAT???????

The fool that wrote this has obviously never been a patient at a VA hospital.

In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

sneakypete  posted on  2018-07-30   10:11:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Deckard (#0)

All the while, the VA continues to deny access to the natural medicine that has saved countless veterans from ending their lives—cannabis.

The VA is a Federal agency. Federal law denies access to dangerous drugs which have not been medically accepted for any medical use. Marijuana possession, use, or sale is illegal.

nolu chan  posted on  2018-07-30   10:45:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Deckard (#0)

As the Santa Cruz Sentinel reported, “they view medical marijuana as a better alternative than addictive opioids that are typically are prescribed for pain.”

"Pain" is relative.

Can't just make that type of blanket statement about treatment. It's deceiving and irresponsible. MJ *may* be helpful for certain pain, true.

I smell an agenda being advanced by the Santa Cruz Sentinel.

Smoking weed promotes lung problems and disease; De-motivates; damages DNA; and is also psychologically and physically addictive.

BUT...It CAN become a Cottage Industry since anyone CAN grow it then sell it. (Kinda hard to create an opioid lab in the house.)

Liberator  posted on  2018-07-30   11:33:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: nolu chan (#2)

Federal law denies access to dangerous drugs which have not been medically accepted for any medical use.

Unfortunately the FDA is frankly...a sham.

That feral agency has been approving "dangerous drugs" for decades based on political/financial considerations. This WHILE *denying* effective drugs (and treatments) based on the SAME reason. INCLUDING those for Cancer.

MJ is as effective (or more than) many approved drugs.

Liberator  posted on  2018-07-30   11:52:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Liberator (#4)

MJ is as effective (or more than) many approved drugs.

And how do you know inhaled marijuana is any safer than inhaled tobacco?

The fact is that it is illegal under Federal law and the VA is prohibited by law from possession or distribution.

The DHHS determines the medical status of marijuana.

nolu chan  posted on  2018-07-30   14:40:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Deckard (#0)

The spice guild will not be pleased.

Must. Feed. MOLOCH!

VxH  posted on  2018-07-31   9:34:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: nolu chan (#5)

The DHHS determines the medical status of marijuana

The DHHS coundln't determine it's own arse with both hands.

VxH  posted on  2018-07-31   9:36:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: nolu chan (#5)

And how do you know inhaled marijuana is any safer than inhaled tobacco?

I don't. It's likely worse. At Post #3 I noted the potential for lung problems with weed.

The fact is that it is illegal under Federal law and the VA is prohibited by law from possession or distribution.

Several states have already determined MJ to be legal and legit for medical purposes. Sure -- a lotta things are technically "illegal" under feral law, but if authoritahs don't enforce the law in individual States -- like "recreational" MJ -- IS it really "illegal"? Or just a suggested observation? (And why are States' ignoring Feral Law with respect to MJ? Or for that matter, even ICE, Sanctuary Cities and Border Enforcement? But I digress.)

The DHHS determines the medical status of marijuana.

As a matter of medical research, efficacy, safety and usage, the FDA would have that oversight and responsibility and approval. Yes, technically it must then be shoved upstairs to DHHS to sign off on its politics-based determination for legal status. That said, the weight of the FDA makes it ostensibly THE Decider.

Speaking of which... as a Feral Agenda, the FDA remains a sham-agency, corrupt gangstas in their own right for approving dangerous drugs but denying effective, safe drugs, supplements and procedures. Feral and respective State Depts of Health and Human Services remain corrupt politics-based shams.

Liberator  posted on  2018-07-31   11:08:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Liberator (#8)

Several states have already determined MJ to be legal and legit for medical purposes. Sure -- a lotta things are technically "illegal" under feral law, but if authoritahs don't enforce the law in individual States -- like "recreational" MJ -- IS it really "illegal"?

The Veteran's Administration is a FEDERAL agency. No state law has any jurisdiction whatever. The VA is REQUIRED to comply with FEDERAL law. A VA doctor prescribing marijuana would be fired and prosecuted.

If you are caught using or possessing on FEDERAL property, you have committed a FEDERAL crime. State law is irrelevant. You may be prosecuted in FEDERAL court pursuant to FEDERAL LAW.

As a matter of medical research, efficacy, safety and usage, the FDA would have that oversight and responsibility and approval.

Put down the pipe. The Attorney General is the head honcho, with the government units involved being the DEA and DHHS.

http://law.justia.com/codes/us/2014/title-21/chapter-13/subchapter-i/part-b/sec.-811/

Chapter 13 - Drug Abuse Prevention and Control (Sections 801 - 971)

Subchapter I - Control and Enforcement (Sections 801 - 904)

Part B - Authority to Control; Standards and Schedules (Sections 811 - 814) Sec. 811 - Authority and criteria for classification of substances

21 U.S.C. § 811 (2014)

§811. Authority and criteria for classification of substances

(a) Rules and regulations of Attorney General; hearing

The Attorney General shall apply the provisions of this subchapter to the controlled substances listed in the schedules established by section 812 of this title and to any other drug or other substance added to such schedules under this subchapter.

[...]

(b) Evaluation of drugs and other substances

The Attorney General shall, before initiating proceedings under subsection (a) of this section to control a drug or other substance or to remove a drug or other substance entirely from the schedules, and after gathering the necessary data, request from the Secretary a scientific and medical evaluation, and his recommendations, as to whether such drug or other substance should be so controlled or removed as a controlled substance. In making such evaluation and recommendations, the Secretary shall consider the factors listed in paragraphs (2), (3), (6), (7), and (8) of subsection (c) of this section and any scientific or medical considerations involved in paragraphs (1), (4), and (5) of such subsection. The recommendations of the Secretary shall include recommendations with respect to the appropriate schedule, if any, under which such drug or other substance should be listed. The evaluation and the recommendations of the Secretary shall be made in writing and submitted to the Attorney General within a reasonable time. The recommendations of the Secretary to the Attorney General shall be binding on the Attorney General as to such scientific and medical matters, and if the Secretary recommends that a drug or other substance not be controlled, the Attorney General shall not control the drug or other substance. If the Attorney General determines that these facts and all other relevant data constitute substantial evidence of potential for abuse such as to warrant control or substantial evidence that the drug or other substance should be removed entirely from the schedules, he shall initiate proceedings for control or removal, as the case may be, under subsection (a) of this section.

81 Fed Reg No 156 (12 Aug 2016) 53767-53845, Proposed Rules Denial, Docket DEA-427

You requested that DEA remove marijuana from schedule I based on your assertion that:

1. Marijuana has accepted medical use in the United States;

2. Studies have shown that smoked marijuana has proven safety and efficacy;

3. Marijuana is safe for use under medical supervision; and

4. Marijuana does not have the abuse potential for placement in schedule I

In accordance with the CSA scheduling provisions, after gathering the necessary data, DEA requested a scientific and medical evaluation and scheduling recommendation from the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). HHS concluded that marijuana has a high potential for abuse, has no accepted medical use in the United States, and lacks an acceptable level of safety for use even under medical supervision. Therefore, HHS recommended that marijuana remain in schedule I. The scientific and medical evaluation and scheduling recommendation that HHS submitted to DEA is attached hereto.

Based on the HHS evaluation and all other relevant data, DEA has concluded that there is no substantial evidence that marijuana should be removed from schedule I. A document prepared by DEA addressing these materials in detail also is attached hereto. In short, marijuana continues to meet the criteria for schedule I control under the CSA because:

[...]

nolu chan  posted on  2018-07-31   22:29:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: VxH (#7)

The DHHS coundln't determine it's own arse with both hands.

And you have proven you cannot calculate the sides and angles of a right triangle with your half a brain.

nolu chan  posted on  2018-07-31   22:58:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: nolu chan (#10)

LIAR.

VxH  posted on  2018-08-01   10:46:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: nolu chan (#9)

Sorry Nolu -- you might just be toking from one of those octopus opium pipes...

I always appreciate your citation of THE Law, but TECHNICAL Law is different from APPLIED Law.

The AG's office is negligent. On several issues of supposed enforcement and oversight.

Now yes, if Feral Jurisdiction like VA and its patients, doctors, and properties are involved, enforcement will occur; Otherwise Pot Shops are popping up all over while indy docs are dispensing medicinal scripts. FACT.

Liberator  posted on  2018-08-01   11:55:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: VxH (#11)

LIAR.

Yes, you also demonstrated that you are a congenital liar, and that your skill at lying is no better than your skill at math and triangles.

nolu chan  posted on  2018-08-01   14:00:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: nolu chan (#13)

your skill at math and triangles.

A^2 + B^2 = C^2

Poor, legendary, psychotic, Nolu Donkey.

VxH  posted on  2018-08-01   14:05:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: Liberator (#12)

TECHNICAL Law is different from APPLIED Law.

REAL Law is different from MAKE BELIEVE law.

Whenever Federal jurisdiction applies, FEDERAL LAW preempts any conflicting State law.

Federal agencies are governed by Federal law. A VA doctor who gets caught prescribing marijuana has committed a felony, will be terminated from employment, will lose any pension, will lose any opportunity for other Federal employment, and will be criminally prosecuted, and probably lose his medical license, and be subject to criminal forfeiture of his property.

No state marijuana law would be admissible in any Federal court in his defense.

If you sincerely believe state law matters in a Federal jurisdiction, go toke up at a Federal courthouse.

https://law.justia.com/codes/us/2016/title-21/chapter-13/subchapter-i/part-d/sec.-844/

21 U.S.C. § 844 (2016)

§844. Penalties for simple possession

(a) Unlawful acts; penalties

[excerpt]

Any person who violates this subsection may be sentenced to a term of imprisonment of not more than 1 year, and shall be fined a minimum of $1,000, or both, except that if he commits such offense after a prior conviction under this subchapter or subchapter II, or a prior conviction for any drug, narcotic, or chemical offense chargeable under the law of any State, has become final, he shall be sentenced to a term of imprisonment for not less than 15 days but not more than 2 years, and shall be fined a minimum of $2,500, except, further, that if he commits such offense after two or more prior convictions under this subchapter or subchapter II, or two or more prior convictions for any drug, narcotic, or chemical offense chargeable under the law of any State, or a combination of two or more such offenses have become final, he shall be sentenced to a term of imprisonment for not less than 90 days but not more than 3 years, and shall be fined a minimum of $5,000.

[...]

(c) "Drug, narcotic, or chemical offense" defined

As used in this section, the term "drug, narcotic, or chemical offense" means any offense which proscribes the possession, distribution, manufacture, cultivation, sale, transfer, or the attempt or conspiracy to possess, distribute, manufacture, cultivate, sell or transfer any substance the possession of which is prohibited under this subchapter.

https://law.justia.com/codes/us/2016/title-21/chapter-13/subchapter-i/part-d/sec.-853/

21 U.S.C. § 853 (2016)

§853. Criminal forfeitures

(a) Property subject to criminal forfeiture

Any person convicted of a violation of this subchapter or subchapter II punishable by imprisonment for more than one year shall forfeit to the United States, irrespective of any provision of State law—

(1) any property constituting, or derived from, any proceeds the person obtained, directly or indirectly, as the result of such violation;

(2) any of the person's property used, or intended to be used, in any manner or part, to commit, or to facilitate the commission of, such violation; and

(3) in the case of a person convicted of engaging in a continuing criminal enterprise in violation of section 848 of this title, the person shall forfeit, in addition to any property described in paragraph (1) or (2), any of his interest in, claims against, and property or contractual rights affording a source of control over, the continuing criminal enterprise.

The court, in imposing sentence on such person, shall order, in addition to any other sentence imposed pursuant to this subchapter or subchapter II, that the person forfeit to the United States all property described in this subsection. In lieu of a fine otherwise authorized by this part, a defendant who derives profits or other proceeds from an offense may be fined not more than twice the gross profits or other proceeds.

(b) Meaning of term "property"

Property subject to criminal forfeiture under this section includes—

(1) real property, including things growing on, affixed to, and found in land; and

(2) tangible and intangible personal property, including rights, privileges, interests, claims, and securities.

If you like Federal prison, you will love the Federal parole system.

The AG's office is negligent. On several issues of supposed enforcement and oversight.

You maintained that the FDA had responsibility, whereas they have none. Drug policy enforcement is assigned to the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA), not the FDA. There is no manpower for a nationwide enforcement of Federal drug policy in uncooperative state jurisdictions.

The article stated:

All the while, the VA continues to deny access to the natural medicine that has saved countless veterans from ending their lives—cannabis.

On Federal property, Federal authorities can and do arrest stoners who choose to ignore that State law is preempted in a Federal jurisdiction.

Now yes, if Feral Jurisdiction like VA and its patients, doctors, and properties are involved, enforcement will occur

For a VA doctor to prescribe marijuana would terminate his career, pension, and freedom, and subject him to criminal forfeiture. Expecting VA doctors or officials to ignore that is ridiculous.

Otherwise Pot Shops are popping up all over while indy docs are dispensing medicinal scripts. FACT.

Indy docs are not doing it on Federal property while working for a Federal agency.

nolu chan  posted on  2018-08-01   14:31:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: VxH (#14)

A^2 + B^2 = C^2

Poor congenital liar and math dipshit takes angle A of 14.70 degrees and side a of 338 feet and derives a triangle in which an angle of 14.70 degrees is impossible.

Poor congenital liar and math dipshit throws darts at Google maps and gets a side that is four feet too long, but makes believe he computed it to 9 decimal places.

Way to go, lying math whiz.

nolu chan  posted on  2018-08-01   14:35:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: nolu chan (#16)

Angle A of 14.70 degrees

LOL. @ The TRIGerred Psycho Donkey.

Got 14.675980979113387 ?

VxH  posted on  2018-08-01   15:53:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: VxH (#17)

Got 14.675980979113387

Not in a problem where you specified an angle of elevation of 14.7 degrees.

I do not have a round being shot from the middle of North wing, about 150 feet from Paddock's room, either.

nolu chan  posted on  2018-08-06   16:07:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com