[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

The minute the total solar eclipse appeared over US

Three Types Of People To Mark And Avoid In The Church Today

Are The 4 Horsemen Of The Apocalypse About To Appear?

France sends combat troops to Ukraine battlefront

Facts you may not have heard about Muslims in England.

George Washington University raises the Hamas flag. American Flag has been removed.

Alabama students chant Take A Shower to the Hamas terrorists on campus.

In Day of the Lord, 24 Church Elders with Crowns Join Jesus in His Throne

In Day of the Lord, 24 Church Elders with Crowns Join Jesus in His Throne

Deadly Saltwater and Deadly Fresh Water to Increase

Deadly Cancers to soon Become Thing of the Past?

Plague of deadly New Diseases Continues

[FULL VIDEO] Police release bodycam footage of Monroe County District Attorney Sandra Doorley traffi

Police clash with pro-Palestine protesters on Ohio State University campus

Joe Rogan Experience #2138 - Tucker Carlson

Police Dispersing Student Protesters at USC - Breaking News Coverage (College Protests)

What Passover Means For The New Testament Believer

Are We Closer Than Ever To The Next Pandemic?

War in Ukraine Turns on Russia

what happened during total solar eclipse

Israel Attacks Iran, Report Says - LIVE Breaking News Coverage

Earth is Scorched with Heat

Antiwar Activists Chant ‘Death to America’ at Event Featuring Chicago Alderman

Vibe Shift

A stream that makes the pleasant Rain sound.

Older Men - Keep One Foot In The Dark Ages

When You Really Want to Meet the Diversity Requirements

CERN to test world's most powerful particle accelerator during April's solar eclipse

Utopian Visionaries Who Won’t Leave People Alone

No - no - no Ain'T going To get away with iT

Pete Buttplug's Butt Plugger Trying to Turn Kids into Faggots

Mark Levin: I'm sick and tired of these attacks

Questioning the Big Bang

James Webb Data Contradicts the Big Bang

Pssst! Don't tell the creationists, but scientists don't have a clue how life began

A fine romance: how humans and chimps just couldn't let go

Early humans had sex with chimps

O’Keefe dons bulletproof vest to extract undercover journalist from NGO camp.

Biblical Contradictions (Alleged)

Catholic Church Praising Lucifer

Raising the Knife

One Of The HARDEST Videos I Had To Make..

Houthi rebels' attack severely damages a Belize-flagged ship in key strait leading to the Red Sea (British Ship)

Chinese Illegal Alien. I'm here for the moneuy

Red Tides Plague Gulf Beaches

Tucker Carlson calls out Nikki Haley, Ben Shapiro, and every other person calling for war:

{Are there 7 Deadly Sins?} I’ve heard people refer to the “7 Deadly Sins,” but I haven’t been able to find that sort of list in Scripture.

Abomination of Desolation | THEORY, BIBLE STUDY

Bible Help

Libertysflame Database Updated


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Corrupt Government
See other Corrupt Government Articles

Title: Either Trump Fires These People Or The Borg Will Have Won
Source: The Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity
URL Source: http://www.ronpaulinstitute.org/arc ... ple-or-the-borg-will-have-won/
Published: Jul 21, 2018
Author: Moon of Alabama
Post Date: 2018-07-21 20:29:35 by Hondo68
Keywords: None
Views: 2630
Comments: 22

undefined

President's Trump successful summit with President Putin was used by the "resistance" and the deep state to launch a coup-attempt against Trump. Their minimum aim is to put Trump into a (virtual) political cage where he can no longer pursue his foreign policy agenda.

One does not have to be a fan of Trump's policies and still see the potential danger. A situation where he can no longer act freely will likely be worse. What Trump has done so far still does not add up to the disastrous policies and crimes his predecessor committed.

The borg, financed and sworn to the agenda of globalists and the military-industrial-media complex, has its orders and is acting on them. The globalists want more free trade agreements, no tariffs and more immigration to prevent higher wages. Capital does not have a national attachment. It does not care about the "deplorables" who support Trump and his policies:

[P]olls show that Trump appears to still have the support of the bulk of Republican voters when it comes to tariffs. Nearly three-fourths, or 73 percent, of Republicans and Republican-leaning independents who responded to a Pew Research survey out this week said they felt increased tariffs would benefit the country.
His 'isolationist' economic policies make Trump an enemy of the globalists:
Donald Trump is, indeed, a kind of traitor to the Washington Consensus, a hyper-militarized capitalist utopia of corporate dominated global supply chains that doubled the international wage-slave workforce in the last two decades of the 20th century and herded these desperate billions into a race to the bottom. The leadership of both corporate parties conspired to force US workers into the global meat-grinder.
The weapon industry and the military recognize that the "war of terror" is nearing its end. To sell more they need to create an new "enemy" that looks big enough to justify large and long-term spending. Russia, the most capable opponent the US could have, is the designated target. A new Cold War will give justification for all kinds of fantastic and useless weapons.

Trump does not buy the nonsense claims of 'Russian meddling' in the US elections and openly says so. He does not believe that Russia wants to attack anyone. To him Russia is not an enemy.

Trump grand foreign policy is following a realist assessment. He sees that previous administrations pushed Russia into the Chinese camp by aggressive anti-Russian policies in Europe and the Middle East. He wants to pull Russia out of the alliance with China, neutralize it in a political sense, to then be able to better tackle China which is the real threat to the American (economic) supremacy.

This week was a prelude to the coup against Trump:
Former CIA chief John Brennan denounced Trump as a “traitor” who had “committed high crimes” in holding a friendly summit with Putin.

It can’t get more seditious than that. Trump is being denigrated by almost the entire political and media establishment in the US as a “treasonous” enemy of the state.

Following this logic, there is only one thing for it: the US establishment is calling for a coup to depose the 45th president. One Washington Post oped out of a total of five assailing the president gave the following stark ultimatum: “If you work for Trump, quit now”.
Some high ranking people working for Trump followed that advice. His chief of staff John Kelly rallied others against him:
According to three sources familiar with the situation, Kelly called around to Republicans on Capitol Hill and gave them the go-ahead to speak out against Trump. (The White House did not respond to a request for comment.) Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and House Speaker Paul Ryan held televised press conferences to assert that Russia did meddle in the election.
Others who attacked Trump over his diplomatic efforts with Russia included the Director of National Intelligence Daniel Coats who used an widely distributed interview for that:
The White House had little visibility into what Coats might say. The intelligence director’s team had turned down at least one offer from a senior White House official to help prepare him for the long-scheduled interview, pointing out that he had known Mitchell for years and was comfortable talking with her.

Coats was extraordinarily candid in the interview, at times questioning Trump’s judgment— such as the president’s decision to meet with Putin for two hours without any aides present beyond interpreters — and revealing the rift between the president and the intelligence community.
FBI Director Wray also undermined his boss' position:
FBI Director Christopher Wray on Wednesday defended Special Counsel Robert Mueller as a “straight shooter,” and said the Russia investigation is no “witch hunt.”

Speaking at the Aspen Security Forum in Colorado, Wray said he stood by his view that Russia meddled in the 2016 presidential election in some capacity and that the threat remained active.
A day later Secretary of Defense Mattis also issued a statement that contradicted his president's policy:
Secretary of Defense James Mattis took his turn doing the implicit disavowing in a statement about new military aid to Ukraine:

"Russia should suffer consequences for its aggressive, destabilizing behavior and its illegal occupation of Ukraine. … The fundamental question we must ask ourselves is do we wish to strengthen our partners in key regions or leave them with no other options than to turn to Russia, thereby undermining a once in a generation opportunity to more closely align nations with the US vision for global security and stability."

Pat Lang thinks that Trump should fire Coats, Wray and Rosenstein, the Deputy Attorney General who is overseeing the Mueller investigation.

My advice is to spare Rosenstein, for now, as firing him would lead to a great uproar in Congress. The Mueller investigation has not brought up anything which is dangerous to Trump and is unlikely to do so in the immediate future. He and Rosenstein can be fired at a latter stage.

But Wray and Coats do deserve a pink slip and so do Kelly and Mattis. They are political appointees who work "at the pleasure of the President."

The US has the legislative and the judicial branch as a counterweight to the president who leads the executive. The "deep state" and its moles within the executive should have no role in that balance. The elected president can and must demand loyalty from those who work for him.

Those who sabotage him should be fired, not in a Saturday night massacre but publicly, with a given reason and all at the same time. They do not deserve any warning. Their rolling heads will get the attention of others who are tempted by the borg to act against the lawful policy directives of their higher up.

All this is not a defense of Trump. I for one despise his antics and most of his policies. But having a bad president of the United States implementing the policies he campaigned on, and doing so within the proper process, is way better than having unaccountable forces dictating their policies to him.

It will be impossible for Trump to get anything done if his direct subordinates, who work "at his pleasure," publicly sabotage the implementation of his policies. Either he fires these people or the borg will have won.

Reprinted with permission from Moon Over Alabama blog.


Poster Comment:

Brief summary:

Chief of staff John Kelly
Director of National Intelligence Daniel Coats
FBI Director Wray
Secretary of Defense Mattis

Recommended to fire later: Mueller, Rosenstein (1 image)

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 20.

#3. To: hondo68 (#0)

Author: Moon of Alabama
No Way !!!

This is even more hilarious.

Please….PLEASE…tell me his article is satire and that you posted it under the wrong category.

Gatlin  posted on  2018-07-21   23:50:46 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Gatlin (#3) (Edited)

Author: Moon of Alabama

Moon of Alabama is a highly respected international news, politics, economics, philosophy and blog.

Problem is, you can't handle the truth. Stick with your MSM Fake News, snowflake!

Alabama Song

If you've ever listened to a group called The Doors, you might recognize this tune (Whisky Bar).

Hondo68  posted on  2018-07-22   0:44:10 ET  (2 images) Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: hondo68 (#4) (Edited)

Moon of Alabama is a highly respected international news, politics, economics, philosophy and blog.
Media Bias Check.

Moon of Alabama

Moon of 
Alabama - Left BiasedLEFT BIAS

These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Left Bias sources.

Factual Reporting: MIXED

History

Moon Of Alabama is a political blog founded in 2004 and according to its about page they are an independent and open forum for members of the another blog called the Whiskey Bar. Moon Of Alabama states it purpose as “to discuss politics, economics, philosophy and blogger Billmon’s Whiskey Bar writings.” A Daily Kos article describes Blogger Billmon (pseudonym) as one of the earliest and leading guest bloggers of Daily Kos and a self admitted financial writer working for a big Wall Street firm.

Funded by / Ownership

The editor and the person who runs the blog is anonymous and the about page states that “Bernhard started and still runs the site and you can reach the current administrator of this site by emailing Bernhard at MoonofA_at_aol.com (replacing _at_ with @).” Moon of Alabama does not have advertising, but they do have a donate button, so we assume this is the primary method of funding.

Analysis/ Bias

Moon of Alabama looks at the issues from progressive perspective, for example this article describes Trump cabinet as follows: “Soon Netanyahoo will have the cabinet in place in DC he always dreamed of. A hawkish Pompeo at State, a real torturer as head of the CIA and now Bolton are already sufficient to protect Israel’s further expansion” The majority of blog posts utilizes emotionally loaded headlines such as “Trump Asks Russia To Roll Over – It Won’t” and “John Bolton Wants No Deal With North Korea Or Iran – But Is There Any Other Choice?”

Moon of Alabama utilizes factually mixed sources such as RT News, Fox News, as well as credible sources such as Bloomberg, NY Times, Haaretz, The Jerusalem Post, Politico, cisac.fsi.stanford.edu and blogs such as johnhelmer.org. Generally, all information is sourced properly with hyperlinks to mostly known media sources.

Overall, we rate Moon of Alabama Left Biased based on story selection and word choices that consistently favor progressives and Mixed factually due to anonymity associated with who runs the site. Otherwise, Moon of Alabama is well sourced to credible/factual information.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/

Problem is, you can't handle the truth.
Problem is, you best check where your “truth” is coming from.

Moon of Alabama looks at the issues from progressive perspective, for example this article describes Trump cabinet as follows: “Soon Netanyahoo will have the cabinet in place in DC he always dreamed of. A hawkish Pompeo at State, a real torturer as head of the CIA and now Bolton are already sufficient to protect Israel’s further expansion” The majority of blog posts utilizes emotionally loaded headlines such as “Trump Asks Russia To Roll Over – It Won’t” and “John Bolton Wants No Deal With North Korea Or Iran – But Is There Any Other Choice?”

My God, man....how can you be so fucking STUPID?

You and Deckard NEVER fact check anything. All you two do is read a click-bait headline that sounds like something you agree with....then you copy and paste.

You two are almost as dumb as Stoner.

Gatlin  posted on  2018-07-22   2:49:00 ET  (1 image) Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Gatlin (#7) (Edited)

Problem is, you best check where your “truth” is coming from.

This from the poster who regularly posts anti-libertarian diatribes from leftist sites and most recently a RPG, fantasy world gaming site.

Oh, the irony!

Frikkin' hypocrite!

Deckard  posted on  2018-07-22   9:48:07 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: Deckard (#10)

Problem is, you best check where your “truth” is coming from.

This from the poster who regularly posts anti-libertarian diatribes from leftist sites.

Oh, the irony!

Frikkin' hypocrite!

You really need to pay attention. I said where the “truth is coming from.” I did not say where it is published or posted.

Leftist sites and rightist sites both carry truth....and both carry lies. It is beholden to ones intelligence to determine which is truth and which is falsehood.

When you check where truth is coming from, you will find in epistemology, criteria of truth (or tests of truth) are standards and rules used to judge the accuracy of statements and claims. Not to simply categorize the location where it is published posted as evil.

To see where truth is coming from, it is important to understand the philosophy's criteria of truth is fundamental to a clear evaluation. Do not se the rules of logic to try and distinguish truth as those rules have no abilit to distinguish truth on their own. You as an individual must determine what standards are acceptable to distinguish truth from a malicious falsehood.

Jonathan Dolhenty states there seem to be only three functional, effective tests of truth. He lists these as the correspondence, coherence and pragmatic theories of truth.

Dolhenty, Jonathan. Truth and Certainty. The Problem of Knowledge:
A brief introduction to epistemology. Retrieved 2007-10-31.

I find the following listed criteria represent those most commonly used to determine where truth is coming from.

1 Authority
2 Coherence
3 Consensus gentium
4 Consistency (mere)
5 Consistency (strict)
6 Correspondence
7 Custom
8 Emotions
9 Instinct
10 Intuition
11 Majority rule
12 Naïve realism
13 Pragmatic
14 Revelation
15 Time
16 Tradition
It matters not where the anti-libertarian polemic attacks I make come from, which I post for open consideration. What matters is that the anti-libertarian articles I post are most definitely truthful. It is readily apparent to everyone, however, that you can never dispute the information in the articles to prove it wrong. Sll you can do [as hondo. Stoner, Liberator, and buckeroo also do] is to use ad hominem to direct a barrage of personal attacks against me while NEVER addressing the positions taken in the articles.

Sad.

Am I getting “too academically deep” for you? If so, then let me know and I will try to “dumb it down” to your lower intelligence level. Shall we say, that of a 10-year old child? That is NO ad hominem attack....I am merely trying to be constructively helpful to you.

Gatlin  posted on  2018-07-22   11:17:20 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Gatlin, Stoner, Buckeroo, Hondo68 (#11)

I find the following listed criteria represent those most commonly used to determine where truth is coming from.
1 Authority
2 Coherence
3 Consensus gentium
4 Consistency (mere)
5 Consistency (strict)
6 Correspondence
7 Custom
8 Emotions
9 Instinct
10 Intuition
11 Majority rule
12 Naïve realism
13 Pragmatic
14 Revelation
15 Time
16 Tradition

YOU?? Nice try, Gilligan.

You -- a serial plagiarist -- lifted the above STRAIGHT FROM WIKIPEDIA, under "Criteria of truth". You did NOT attribute it to Jonathan Dolhenty.

Oh -- and it seems you forgot to include #17 -- "See Also", and #18, "FOOTNOTES" to "your" so-called "list":

Contents

Liberator  posted on  2018-07-22   11:34:41 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: Liberator (#12) (Edited)

You -- a serial plagiarist -- lifted the above STRAIGHT FROM WIKIPEDIA, under "Criteria of truth". You did NOT attribute it to Jonathan Dolhenty.
Woah, now Hoss!

You – ignoramus asshole – made an egregious ERROR when you stated that “[I] did NOT attribute [the “criteria listed”] to Jonathan Dolhenty”.

What am I talking about?

After reading the following instructions, you need to go here and arrive at Criteria of truth on WikipediA. Upon arriving there, scroll down the page to arrive at “The criteria listed represent those most commonly used by scholars and the general public. [2]”. Now, don’t click on it, but lay your cursor over [2] at the end of that sentence.

Viola!!! What do you see there? You see: “Sahakian & Sahakian, Ideas, pg. 3”. So, MISTER KNOW IT ALL, Sahakian & Sahakian authored the “criteria listed” and Jonathan Dolhenty the individual you said I should have attributed the list to....had absolutely NOTHING to do with the list.

You were so intensely devoted to finding a “gotcha” on the “Great Gatlin” that you never paid any attention at all to what you were reading. You MUST learn to read for content and not for structure.

And furthermore, the next time you ATTEMPT to chastise me for a mistake, you better damn well clean up your own shit first....because I am coming after you ass is I find you making a misake.

Oh, BTW - here is the actual book:
Ideas of the Great Philosophers Hardcover – 1993 – William S Sahakian.

Karma is a Bitch….I am still LMAO at your gross stupidity.

Gatlin  posted on  2018-07-23   0:58:26 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 20.

        There are no replies to Comment # 20.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 20.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com